pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.06963 · v3 · pith:UR2GHQGHnew · submitted 2024-03-11 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.LG

The pitfalls of next-token prediction

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords next-tokenfailpredictionpredictorteacher-forcingaccurateautoregressiveinference
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Can a mere next-token predictor faithfully model human intelligence? We crystallize this emerging concern and correct popular misconceptions surrounding it, and advocate a simple multi-token objective. As a starting point, we argue that the two often-conflated phases of next-token prediction -- autoregressive inference and teacher-forced training -- must be treated distinctly. The popular criticism that errors can compound during autoregressive inference, crucially assumes that teacher-forcing has learned an accurate next-token predictor. This assumption sidesteps a more deep-rooted problem we expose: in certain classes of tasks, teacher-forcing can simply fail to learn an accurate next-token predictor in the first place. We describe a general mechanism of how teacher-forcing can fail, and design a minimal planning task where both the Transformer and the Mamba architecture empirically fail in that manner -- remarkably, despite the task being straightforward to learn. Finally, we provide preliminary evidence that this failure can be resolved using _teacherless_ training, a simple modification using dummy tokens that predicts multiple tokens in advance. We hope this finding can ground future debates and inspire explorations beyond the next-token prediction paradigm. We make our code available under https://github.com/gregorbachmann/Next-Token-Failures

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Continuous Latent Diffusion Language Model

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Cola DLM proposes a hierarchical latent diffusion model that learns a text-to-latent mapping, fits a global semantic prior in continuous space with a block-causal DiT, and performs conditional decoding, establishing l...

  2. Semantic Trimming and Auxiliary Multi-step Prediction for Generative Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    STAMP mitigates semantic dilution in SID-based generative recommendation via adaptive input pruning and densified output supervision, delivering 1.23-1.38x speedup and 17-55% VRAM savings with maintained or improved accuracy.

  3. Multi-Token Prediction via Self-Distillation

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Self-distillation turns pretrained autoregressive LMs into multi-token predictors that decode over 3x faster with under 5% accuracy drop on GSM8K.

  4. Representation Without Reward: A JEPA Audit for LLM Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    An empirical audit of 22 JEPA-style training auxiliaries on Llama-3.2-1B fine-tuning for regex generation finds no statistically significant task improvement after multiple-testing correction, even when auxiliaries vi...

  5. Pen-Strategist: A Reasoning Framework for Penetration Testing Strategy Formation and Analysis

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Pen-Strategist fine-tunes Qwen-3-14B with RL on a pentesting reasoning dataset and pairs it with a CNN step classifier, reporting 87% better strategy derivation, 47.5% more subtask completions than baselines, and gain...

  6. Direct Reasoning Optimization: Token-Level Reasoning Reflectivity Meets Rubric Gates for Unverifiable Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Direct Reasoning Optimization applies token-level Reasoning Reflection Reward (R3) focused on high-variance tokens and rubric-gating constraints to improve sample-efficient RL training of LLMs on unverifiable tasks.

  7. Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graphs (GraphRAG)

    cs.IR 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A survey proposing a holistic GraphRAG framework with components including query processor, retriever, organizer, generator, and data source, plus domain-tailored reviews, challenges, and future directions.