The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2405.09783 · v1 · pith:2EMAI2OT · submitted 2024-05-16 · cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CE

LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discovery

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:2EMAI2OTrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CE
keywords scientificdiscoveryobservationalphysicalanalysisbilevelexperimentsextensive
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Large Language Models have recently gained significant attention in scientific discovery for their extensive knowledge and advanced reasoning capabilities. However, they encounter challenges in effectively simulating observational feedback and grounding it with language to propel advancements in physical scientific discovery. Conversely, human scientists undertake scientific discovery by formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and revising theories through observational analysis. Inspired by this, we propose to enhance the knowledge-driven, abstract reasoning abilities of LLMs with the computational strength of simulations. We introduce Scientific Generative Agent (SGA), a bilevel optimization framework: LLMs act as knowledgeable and versatile thinkers, proposing scientific hypotheses and reason about discrete components, such as physics equations or molecule structures; meanwhile, simulations function as experimental platforms, providing observational feedback and optimizing via differentiability for continuous parts, such as physical parameters. We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate our framework's efficacy in constitutive law discovery and molecular design, unveiling novel solutions that differ from conventional human expectations yet remain coherent upon analysis.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FunctionEvolve: Structure-Guided Symbolic Regression with LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FunctionEvolve recovers 107 exact symbolic forms out of 129 synthetic tasks (82.9% SA@50) by using expression-tree structure for evolutionary search, parent selection, mutation, and coefficient scoring with LLMs.

  2. EngiBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Engineering Problem Solving

    cs.AI 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    EngiBench shows LLMs accuracy drops with task complexity, degrades under perturbations, and stays below human performance on open-ended engineering problems.

  3. GenoMAS: A Multi-Agent Framework for Scientific Discovery via Code-Driven Gene Expression Analysis

    cs.AI 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GenoMAS deploys six specialized LLM agents with guided planning to preprocess transcriptomic data and identify genes, reaching 89.13% composite similarity and 60.48% F1 on the GenoTEX benchmark while outperforming pri...

  4. Experiment-as-Code Labs: A Declarative Stack for AI-Driven Scientific Discovery

    eess.SY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Experiment-as-Code Labs encodes experiments as declarative configurations that AI agents generate, systems software analyzes and orchestrates, and device APIs execute on physical lab hardware.

  5. Experiment-as-Code Labs: A Declarative Stack for AI-Driven Scientific Discovery

    eess.SY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper introduces Experiment-as-Code Labs as a declarative stack synthesizing AI agents, systems orchestration, and physical lab control for AI-driven discovery.

  6. Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The paper surveys reinforced reasoning techniques for LLMs, covering automated data construction, learning-to-reason methods, and test-time scaling as steps toward Large Reasoning Models.