Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MMWorld: Towards Multi-discipline Multi-faceted World Model Evaluation in Videos

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.08407 v3 pith:NN6SBON2 submitted 2024-06-12 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

MMWorld: Towards Multi-discipline Multi-faceted World Model Evaluation in Videos

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL
keywords mmworldvideosmllmsevaluationmodelsmulti-disciplinemulti-facetedunderstanding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal Language Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate the emerging abilities of "world models" -- interpreting and reasoning about complex real-world dynamics. To assess these abilities, we posit videos are the ideal medium, as they encapsulate rich representations of real-world dynamics and causalities. To this end, we introduce MMWorld, a new benchmark for multi-discipline, multi-faceted multimodal video understanding. MMWorld distinguishes itself from previous video understanding benchmarks with two unique advantages: (1) multi-discipline, covering various disciplines that often require domain expertise for comprehensive understanding; (2) multi-faceted reasoning, including explanation, counterfactual thinking, future prediction, etc. MMWorld consists of a human-annotated dataset to evaluate MLLMs with questions about the whole videos and a synthetic dataset to analyze MLLMs within a single modality of perception. Together, MMWorld encompasses 1,910 videos across seven broad disciplines and 69 subdisciplines, complete with 6,627 question-answer pairs and associated captions. The evaluation includes 2 proprietary and 10 open-source MLLMs, which struggle on MMWorld (e.g., GPT-4V performs the best with only 52.3\% accuracy), showing large room for improvement. Further ablation studies reveal other interesting findings such as models' different skill sets from humans. We hope MMWorld can serve as an essential step towards world model evaluation in videos.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Video-Holmes: Can MLLM Think Like Holmes for Complex Video Reasoning?

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Video-Holmes benchmark shows top MLLMs achieve at most 45% accuracy on tasks needing integration of multiple clues from suspense films, unlike existing perception-focused tests.

  2. WorldSense: Evaluating Real-world Omnimodal Understanding for Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CV 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    WorldSense provides the first benchmark requiring synergistic audio-video-text understanding on 1,662 real-world videos and 3,172 QA pairs, where the best current multimodal LLM reaches only 65.1% accuracy.

  3. SoccerRef-Agents: Multi-Agent System for Automated Soccer Refereeing

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SoccerRef-Agents is a multi-agent framework using MLLMs, cross-modal RAG, and a custom knowledge base that outperforms general MLLMs on soccer foul decisions and explanations.

  4. Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Position paper claims multimodal LLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning and proposes a four-stage roadmap plus challenges and suggestions.