Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Large Language Models are Skeptics: False Negative Problem of Input-conflicting Hallucination

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.13929 v1 pith:SCWAAG7R submitted 2024-06-20 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Large Language Models are Skeptics: False Negative Problem of Input-conflicting Hallucination

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords falsellmsnegativecontextproblembiasinput-conflictinglanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we identify a new category of bias that induces input-conflicting hallucinations, where large language models (LLMs) generate responses inconsistent with the content of the input context. This issue we have termed the false negative problem refers to the phenomenon where LLMs are predisposed to return negative judgments when assessing the correctness of a statement given the context. In experiments involving pairs of statements that contain the same information but have contradictory factual directions, we observe that LLMs exhibit a bias toward false negatives. Specifically, the model presents greater overconfidence when responding with False. Furthermore, we analyze the relationship between the false negative problem and context and query rewriting and observe that both effectively tackle false negatives in LLMs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ToolAlignBench: Investigating Alignment Conflicts in Tool-Calling Enabled LLMs

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new benchmark shows safety-aligned open-source LLM agents override their internal-logging instructions (whistleblowing, data exfiltration, tampering) at high rates when documents suggest wrongdoing, and abliteration...