Computational quantum transport: a scattering approach perspective

Anton Akhmerov; Branislav K. Nikolic; Christoph Groth; Daniel Varjas; Mathieu Istas; Michael Wimmer; T\'omas \"Orn Rosdahl; Xavier Waintal

arxiv: 2407.16257 · v2 · submitted 2024-07-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · physics.comp-ph

Computational quantum transport: a scattering approach perspective

Xavier Waintal , Michael Wimmer , Anton Akhmerov , Christoph Groth , Branislav K. Nikolic , Mathieu Istas , T\'omas \"Orn Rosdahl , Daniel Varjas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall physics.comp-ph

keywords quantum transportscattering approachnonequilibrium Green's functionsGaussian eliminationphase-coherent transportnanoelectronicsmesoscopic systemscomputational algorithms

0 comments

The pith

Scattering and nonequilibrium Green's function formalisms for quantum transport are equivalent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review shows that the scattering approach and the nonequilibrium Green's function approach to phase-coherent transport in nanoelectronic systems are mathematically equivalent. It formulates the scattering problem as a system of linear equations and demonstrates that existing algorithms amount to different sequences of Gaussian elimination. A sympathetic reader would care because the equivalence explains why seemingly different methods produce the same results and clarifies how to assess their numerical stability and complexity. The paper reviews algorithms from the literature, proves the equivalence explicitly, and ends with examples of applications where the calculations shaped physical understanding.

Core claim

The scattering problem in quantum nanoelectronics can be written as a system of linear equations. Different existing algorithms for solving it correspond to different sequences of Gaussian elimination. The nonequilibrium Green's function formalism is explicitly shown to be equivalent to this scattering formulation for phase-coherent systems connected to electrodes.

What carries the argument

Formulation of the scattering problem as a linear system, with algorithms differing by the order of Gaussian elimination steps.

If this is right

All reviewed algorithms share the same underlying linear-algebra structure and can be compared by their elimination ordering.
Stability and computational cost of any given method follow directly from properties of Gaussian elimination on the linear system.
Results obtained with scattering codes can be cross-checked against NEGF codes on the same geometry without additional theory.
Choice of algorithm for a given system size can be guided by the known complexity of different elimination sequences.
The equivalence supplies a common language for discussing limitations of both formalisms in the phase-coherent regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The linear-equation perspective may suggest new preconditioners or iterative solvers not yet tried in transport codes.
Similar reformulations could be attempted for time-dependent or weakly interacting cases if the underlying equations remain linear.
Numerical agreement on benchmark devices would provide a practical test of code correctness across communities.
The review's emphasis on electrode coupling suggests that extensions to more complex lead geometries would still rest on the same linear-system foundation.

Load-bearing premise

The systems under study are phase-coherent and connected to electrodes so that both the scattering and NEGF formalisms apply directly.

What would settle it

A concrete mesoscopic device geometry where a scattering-algorithm implementation and an NEGF implementation produce numerically discrepant transport quantities beyond floating-point precision.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2407.16257 by Anton Akhmerov, Branislav K. Nikolic, Christoph Groth, Daniel Varjas, Mathieu Istas, Michael Wimmer, T\'omas \"Orn Rosdahl, Xavier Waintal.

read the original abstract

This review is devoted to the different techniques that have been developed to compute the phase-coherent transport properties of quantum nanoelectronic systems connected to electrodes. Beside a review of the different algorithms proposed in the literature, we provide a comprehensive and pedagogical derivation of the two formalisms on which these techniques are based: the scattering approach and the (nonequilibrium) Green's function approach. We show that the scattering problem can be formulated as a system of linear equations and that different existing algorithms for solving this scattering problem amount to different sequences of Gaussian elimination. We explicitly prove the equivalence of the two formalisms. We discuss the stability and numerical complexity of the existing methods. The review ends with a selection of a few applications where numerical calculations were instrumental in shaping our understanding of the physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This review walks through the linear-algebra equivalence of scattering and NEGF methods with explicit derivations, but it is a re-presentation of established techniques rather than new work.

read the letter

The core contribution is the explicit framing of the scattering problem as a linear system whose solution algorithms are just different orders of Gaussian elimination, plus a direct proof that this matches the NEGF formalism for phase-coherent transport. That equivalence is standard, but spelling it out step by step in one place is the useful part here. The paper also reviews existing algorithms, discusses their numerical stability and complexity, and closes with a few examples where computation clarified physics. Those sections are straightforward and well-organized for someone who already works in mesoscopic transport. The derivations appear to rest on ordinary linear algebra without hidden assumptions or circular steps, which matches the abstract's description. Because the paper is a review, it does not claim or deliver new algorithms, new predictions, or new physical results; the cited literature already contains the methods being re-derived. The scope is limited to phase-coherent systems attached to electrodes, as stated, so readers working outside that regime will not find coverage. The writing is pedagogical rather than terse, which helps newcomers but adds length for experts. Overall the manuscript is internally consistent and cites the relevant prior work. It is the kind of reference a student or postdoc entering the field would appreciate, and a group that runs transport codes might keep it on hand. A serious editor should send it to peer review as a review article; the derivations are careful enough to be worth archiving even if the novelty is modest.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This review derives the scattering and nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF) formalisms for phase-coherent quantum transport in nanoelectronic systems attached to electrodes, formulates the scattering problem as a linear system, shows that existing algorithms correspond to different sequences of Gaussian elimination on that system, explicitly proves the equivalence of the two formalisms, discusses numerical stability and complexity, and closes with selected applications.

Significance. The explicit pedagogical derivations and the demonstration that algorithm variants are different elimination orders on the same linear system provide a clear unification of the two approaches. This strengthens the manuscript's value as a reference for implementing and comparing methods, particularly if the proofs are fully detailed and self-contained as claimed in the abstract.

minor comments (3)

The abstract states that the scattering problem is formulated as a linear system and that algorithms amount to Gaussian elimination sequences; ensure that the corresponding matrix construction and elimination steps are shown with explicit matrix blocks in the main text (e.g., around the derivation of the scattering equations).
Notation for the electrode self-energies and the lead-device partitioning should be introduced once and used consistently when proving equivalence between the scattering and NEGF expressions.
The discussion of numerical complexity would benefit from a brief table comparing operation counts or memory scaling for the main algorithms reviewed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive assessment of our manuscript, including the recognition of its pedagogical value and the unification of scattering and NEGF approaches. We note the recommendation for minor revision and will prepare a revised version accordingly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via standard linear algebra

full rationale

The paper is a review that derives the scattering formalism as a linear system and proves its equivalence to NEGF via explicit Gaussian-elimination sequences and standard algebraic manipulations. The central claim (equivalence for phase-coherent systems) is established directly in the manuscript rather than by reduction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or prior ansatzes from the same authors. No load-bearing step reduces to a definition of its own output or to an unverified self-citation chain. The derivation relies on external mathematical facts (linear algebra) and prior literature only for context, not for the equivalence proof itself. This matches the default case of a self-contained pedagogical derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review the paper rests on standard linear algebra (Gaussian elimination) and established physical assumptions of phase-coherent transport already present in the cited literature; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the review itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5685 in / 1098 out tokens · 24640 ms · 2026-05-23T23:07:08.575803+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean (J-uniqueness, Aczél classification) washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We show that the scattering problem can be formulated as a system of linear equations and that different existing algorithms for solving this scattering problem amount to different sequences of Gaussian elimination. We explicitly prove the equivalence of the two formalisms.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The scattering matrix S(E) parametrizes the single particle eigenstates... Landauer formula

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

FermiLink: A Unified Agent Framework for Multidomain Autonomous Scientific Simulations
physics.chem-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 8.0

FermiLink is a unified AI agent framework that automates multidomain scientific simulations via separated package knowledge bases and a four-layer progressive disclosure mechanism, reproducing 56% of target figures in...
Electrostatics in semiconducting devices II: Solving the Helmholtz equation
cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Maps the quantum-electrostatic self-consistency problem to a non-linear Helmholtz equation, enabling construction of a convex functional for provable convergence that lifts to the exact solution in typically one or tw...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 4 internal anchors

[1]

Scaling theory of localization: Ab- sence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions,

Abrahams, E, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan (1979), “Scaling theory of localization: Ab- sence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673–676. Agapito, Luis A, Marco Fornari, Davide Ceresoli, Andrea Fer- retti, Stefano Curtarolo, and Marco Buongiorno Nardelli (2016a), “Accurate tight-binding Hamiltonians ...

work page doi:10.1137/s0895479894278952 1979
[2]

Reconciling edge states with compressible stripes in a ballistic meso- scopic conductor,

Armagnat, Pacome, and Xavier Waintal (2020), “Reconciling edge states with compressible stripes in a ballistic meso- scopic conductor,” Journal of Physics: Materials3 (2), 02LT01. Asano, Yasuhiro, Yukio Tanaka, Takehito Yokoyama, and Satoshi Kashiwaya (2006), “Josephson current through superconductor/diffusive-normal-metal/superconductor junctions: Interf...

work page 2020
[3]

Quantum Spin Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transition in HgTe Quantum Wells

Bautze, Tobias, Christoph Süssmeier, Shintaro Takada, Christoph Groth, Tristan Meunier, Michihisa Yamamoto, Seigo Tarucha, Xavier Waintal, and Christopher Bäuerle (2014), “Theoretical, numerical, and experimental study of a flying qubit electronic interferometer,” Phys. Rev. B89, 125432. Beenakker, C W J, J. A. Melsen, and P. W. Brouwer (1995), “Giant bac...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[4]

Tran- sition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion,

49 Blonder, G E, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk (1982), “Tran- sition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion,” Phys. Rev. B25, 4515–4532. Borlenghi, Simone, Valentin Rychkov, Cyril Petitjean, and Xavier Waintal (2011), “Multiscale approach to spin trans- port ...

work page doi:10.1021/nl2002268 1982
[5]

Multiband transmission calculations for nanowires using an optimized renormalization method,

Boykin, Timothy B, Mathieu Luisier, and Gerhard Klimeck (2008), “Multiband transmission calculations for nanowires using an optimized renormalization method,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 165318. Boykin, Timothy B, Mathieu Luisier, Gerhard Klimeck, Xueping Jiang, Neerav Kharche, Yu Zhou, and Saroj K. Nayak (2011), “Accurate six-band nearest-neighbor tight- binding mo...

work page 2008
[6]

Spin-dependent tunneling conductance of Fe|MgO|Fesandwiches,

Butler, W H, X.-G. Zhang, T. C. Schulthess, and J. M. Ma- cLaren (2001), “Spin-dependent tunneling conductance of Fe|MgO|Fesandwiches,” Phys. Rev. B63, 054416. Buttiker, M (1993), “Capacitance, admittance, and rectifica- tion properties of small conductors,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 5 (50), 9361–9378. Bäuerle, Christopher, D. Christian Glattli...

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaa98a 2001
[7]

Generalized many-channel conductance formula with appli- cation to small rings,

Büttiker, M, Y. Imry, R. Landauer, and S. Pinhas (1985), “Generalized many-channel conductance formula with appli- cation to small rings,” Phys. Rev. B31, 6207–6215. Calogero, Gaetano, Nick Papior, MohammadKoleini, Matthew Helmi Leth Larsen, and Mads Brandbyge (2019), “Multi- scale approach to first-principles electron transport beyond 100 nm,” Nanoscale1...

work page doi:10.1021/nl500755m 1985
[8]

Hamiltonian approach to the transport properties of su- perconducting quantum point contacts,

Cuevas, J C, A. Martín-Rodero, and A. Levy Yeyati (1996), “Hamiltonian approach to the transport properties of su- perconducting quantum point contacts,” Phys. Rev. B54, 7366–7379. Danneau, R, F. Wu, M. F. Craciun, S. Russo, M. Y. Tomi, J. Salmilehto, A. F. Morpurgo, and P. J. Hakonen (2008), “Shot noise in ballistic graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 196802...

work page 1996
[9]

Multiscale modeling of current-induced switching in magnetic tunnel junctions using ab initio spin-transfer torques,

Ellis, Matthew O A, Maria Stamenova, and Stefano Sanvito (2017), “Multiscale modeling of current-induced switching in magnetic tunnel junctions using ab initio spin-transfer torques,” Phys. Rev. B96, 224410. Esseni, David, Marco Pala, Pierpaolo Palestri, Cem Alper, and Tommaso Rollo (2017), “A review of selected topics in physics based modeling for tunnel...

work page 2017
[10]

Ab initio tight-binding LMTO method for nonequilibrium electron transport in nanosystems,

Faleev, Sergey V, François Léonard, Derek A. Stewart, and Mark van Schilfgaarde (2005), “Ab initio tight-binding LMTO method for nonequilibrium electron transport in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. B71 (19), 195422. Fan, Zheyong, José H. Garcia, Aron W. Cummings, Jose Ed- uardo Barrios-Vargas, Michel Panhans, Ari Harju, Frank Ortmann, and Stephan Roche (2021), “...

work page 2005
[11]

Elimination of spurious solutions from eight-band k·p theory,

Foreman, Bradley A (1997), “Elimination of spurious solutions from eight-band k·p theory,” Phys. Rev. B56, R12748– R12751. Franklin, Aaron D, Mathieu Luisier, Shu-Jen Han, George Tulevski, Chris M. Breslin, Lynne Gignac, Mark S. Lund- strom, and Wilfried Haensch (2012), “Sub-10 nm carbon nanotube transistor,” Nano Lett.12,

work page 1997
[12]

Ap- plicability of thek·p method to the electronic structure of quantum dots,

Fu, Huaxiang, Lin-Wang Wang, and Alex Zunger (1998), “Ap- plicability of thek·p method to the electronic structure of quantum dots,” Phys. Rev. B57, 9971–9987. Fuchs, Jacob, Michael Barth, Cosimo Gorini, İnanç Adagideli, and Klaus Richter (2021), “Crossed Andreev reflection in topological insulator nanowire T-junctions,” Phys. Rev. B 104, 085415. Fujimoto...

work page doi:10.1063/1.4870288 1998
[13]

Charge Hall effect driven by spin-dependent chemical potential gradients and Onsager relations in mesoscopic systems

Gaury, Benoit, and Xavier Waintal (2016), “A computational approach to quantum noise in time-dependent nanoelec- tronic devices,” Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 75, 72–76. Gaury, Benoit, Joseph Weston, Matthieu Santin, Manuel Houzet, Christoph Groth, and Xavier Waintal (2014), “Nu- merical simulations of time-resolved quantum electr...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1137/0710032 2016
[14]

Complexity bounds for regular finite difference and finite element grids,

Hoffman, Alan J, Michael S. Martin, and Donald J. Rose (1973), “Complexity bounds for regular finite difference and finite element grids,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 10 (2), 364–369, https://doi.org/10.1137/0710033. Hofstadter, Douglas R (1976), “Energy levels and wave func- tions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields,” Phy...

work page doi:10.1137/0710033 1973
[15]

A general algorithm for computing bound states in infinite tight-binding systems,

Istas, M, C. Groth, A. R. Akhmerov, M. Wimmer, and X. Waintal (2018), “A general algorithm for computing bound states in infinite tight-binding systems,” SciPost Phys. 4,

work page 2018
[16]

Pushing the limit of quantum transport simulations,

Istas, Mathieu, Christoph Groth, and Xavier Waintal (2019), “Pushing the limit of quantum transport simulations,” Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033188. Iwase, Shigeru, Yasunori Futamura, Akira Imakura, Tetsuya Sakurai, and Tomoya Ono (2017), “Efficient and scalable calculation of complex band structure using Sakurai-Sugiura method,” inProceedings of the Internat...

work page 2019
[17]

Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene

Junquera, Javier, Óscar Paz, Daniel Sánchez-Portal, and EmilioArtacho(2001),“Numericalatomicorbitalsforlinear- scaling calculations,” Phys. Rev. B64, 235111. Kane, C L, and E. J. Mele (2005a), “Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene,” Physical Review Letters95 (22), 226801, cond-mat/0411737. Kane, C L, and E. J. Mele (2005b), “z2 topological order and the q...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1137/s1064827595287997 2001
[18]

Non-Equilibrium Green Functions in Electronic Device Modeling

Proceedings, edited by Felix Wolf, Bernd Mohr, and Dieter an Mey (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg) pp. 533–544. Kłos, J W, and I. V. Zozoulenko (2010), “Effect of short- and long-range scattering on the conductivity of graphene: Boltzmann approach vs tight-binding calculations,” Phys. Rev. B 82, 081414. Laeven, Tom, Bas Nijholt, Michael Wim...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.365394 2010
[19]

Computing entries of the inverse of a sparse matrix using the {FIND} algorithm,

Li, S,S.Ahmed, G.Klimeck, andE.Darve(2008),“Computing entries of the inverse of a sparse matrix using the {FIND} algorithm,” Journal of Computational Physics227 (22), 9408 –

work page 2008
[20]

An overview of SuperLU: Algorithms, implementation, and user interface,

Li, Xiaoye S (2005), “An overview of SuperLU: Algorithms, implementation, and user interface,” ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 31 (3), 302–325. Lima, Leandro R F, Amintor Dusko, and Caio Lewenkopf (2018), “Efficient method for computing the electronic trans- port properties of a multiterminal system,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 165405. Lin, Ho-Chun, Zeyu Wang, and Chia Wei...

work page 2005
[21]

Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductorheterostructures,

Lutchyn, Roman M, Jay D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma (2010), “Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductorheterostructures,”Phys.Rev. Lett. 105, 077001. Luttinger, J M, and W. Kohn (1955), “Motion of electrons and holes in perturbed periodic fields,” Phys. Rev.97, 869–883. Léonard, F, and Derek A Stewart (2006), “Properti...

work page 2010
[22]

The calculation of transport properties and density of states of disordered solids,

MacKinnon, A (1985), “The calculation of transport properties and density of states of disordered solids,” Zeit. f. Phys. B 59 (4), 385–390. MacKinnon, A, and B. Kramer (1981), “One-parameter scal- ing of localization length and conductance in disordered systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 1546–1549. Mamaluy, D, M. Sabathil, and P. Vogl (2003), “Efficient metho...

work page doi:10.1063/1.1560567 1985
[23]

Three signatures of phase-coherent Andreev re- flection,

Marmolejo-Tejada, J M, J H García, M D Petrović, P-H Chang, X-L Sheng, A Cresti, P Plecháš, S Roche, and B K Nikolić (2018), “Deciphering the origin of nonlocal resistance in multiterminal graphene on hexagonal-boron-nitride with ab initioquantum transport: Fermi surface edge currents rather than Fermi sea topological valley currents,” Journal of Physics:...

work page 2018
[24]

An easy and efficient way to treat Green’s function for nano-devices with arbitrary shapes and multi-terminal configurations,

Mou, Yang, Ran Xian-Jin, Cui Yan, and Wang Rui-Qiang (2011), “An easy and efficient way to treat Green’s function for nano-devices with arbitrary shapes and multi-terminal configurations,” Chinese Physics B20 (9), 097201. Nayak, Chetan, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freed- man, and Sankar Das Sarma (2008), “Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum...

work page doi:10.1063/1.4864376 2011
[25]

Equilibrium and time-dependent Josephson current in one- dimensional superconducting junctions,

Perfetto, Enrico, Gianluca Stefanucci, and Michele Cini (2009), “Equilibrium and time-dependent Josephson current in one- dimensional superconducting junctions,” Phys. Rev. B80, 205408. Pichard, J L, and G Sarma (1981a), “Finite size scaling ap- proach to Anderson localisation,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics14 (6), L127–L132. Pichard, J L, and...

work page 2009
[26]

Towards a realistic transport modeling in a superconducting nanowire with Majorana fermions,

Rainis, Diego, Luka Trifunovic, Jelena Klinovaja, and Daniel Loss (2013), “Towards a realistic transport modeling in a superconducting nanowire with Majorana fermions,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 024515. Ralph, DC, and M.D. Stiles (2008), “Spin transfer torques,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 320 (7), 1190–1216. Rammer, J, and H. Smith (1986), “Quantu...

work page 2013
[27]

Quantum-interference- controlled three-terminal molecular transistors based on a single ring-shaped molecule connected to graphene nanorib- 55 bon electrodes,

Saha, Kamal K, Branislav K. Nikolić, Vincent Meunier, Wen- chang Lu, and J. Bernholc (2010), “Quantum-interference- controlled three-terminal molecular transistors based on a single ring-shaped molecule connected to graphene nanorib- 55 bon electrodes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (23), 236803. Sahasrabudhe, H, B. Novakovic, J. Nakamura, S. Fallahi, M. Povolotsky...

work page arXiv 2010
[28]

Tunable ther- mopower in a graphene-based topological insulator,

Shevtsov, Oleksii, Pierre Carmier, Christoph Groth, Xavier Waintal, and David Carpentier (2012a), “Tunable ther- mopower in a graphene-based topological insulator,” Phys. Rev. B 85, 245441. Shevtsov, Oleksii, Pierre Carmier, Cyril Petitjean, Christoph Groth, David Carpentier, and Xavier Waintal (2012b), “Graphene-based heterojunction between two topologic...

work page doi:10.1063/1.3208067 2009
[29]

Whatismeasured when you measure a resistance?—the Landauer formula re- visited,

Stone, ADouglas, andAaronSzafer(1988),“Whatismeasured when you measure a resistance?—the Landauer formula re- visited,” IBM Journal of Research and Development32 (3), 384–413. Strange, M, I. S. Kristensen, K. S. Thygesen, and K. W. Jacobsen (2008), “Benchmark density functional theory calculations for nanoscale conductance,” The Journal of Chemical Physic...

work page 1988
[30]

Re- cursive Green’s function method for multi-terminal nanos- tructures,

Thorgilsson, G, G. Viktorsson, and S.I. Erlingsson (2014), “Re- cursive Green’s function method for multi-terminal nanos- tructures,” Journal of Computational Physics261, 256 –

work page 2014
[31]

Conductivity of the disordered linear chain,

Thouless, D J, and S Kirkpatrick (1981), “Conductivity of the disordered linear chain,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 14 (3), 235–245. Thygesen, KS, and K.W. Jacobsen (2005), “Molecular trans- portcalculationswithWannierfunctions,”ChemicalPhysics 319 (1), 111 –

work page 1981
[32]

Real-space finite-difference calculation method of gener- alized Bloch wave functions and complex band structures with reduced computational cost,

Tsukamoto, Shigeru, Kikuji Hirose, and Stefan Blügel (2014), “Real-space finite-difference calculation method of gener- alized Bloch wave functions and complex band structures with reduced computational cost,” Phys. Rev. E90, 013306. Tsukamoto, Shigeru, Tomoya Ono, Kikuji Hirose, and Stefan Blügel (2017), “Self-energy matrices for electron transport calcu...

work page 2014
[33]

Effects of the electrostatic environment on the Majorana nanowire devices,

Voon, L C Lew Yan, and M. Willatzen (2009),The k·p Method: Electronic Properties of Semiconductors(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin). Vuik, A, D Eeltink, A R Akhmerov, and M Wimmer (2016), “Effects of the electrostatic environment on the Majorana nanowire devices,” New Journal of Physics18 (3), 033013. Vuik, Adriaan, Bas Nijholt, Anton R. Akhmerov, and ...

work page 2009
[34]

Magnetic exchange interaction induced by a Josephson current,

Waintal, Xavier, and Piet W. Brouwer (2002), “Magnetic exchange interaction induced by a Josephson current,” Phys. Rev. B 65, 054407. Waintal, Xavier, Edward B. Myers, Piet W. Brouwer, and D. C. Ralph(2000),“Roleofspin-dependentinterfacescatteringin generating current-induced torques in magnetic multilayers,” Phys. Rev. B62, 12317–12327. Waldron, Derek, L...

work page 2002
[35]

First-principles study of spin-transfer torques in layered systems with non- collinear magnetization,

Wang, Shuai, Yuan Xu, and Ke Xia (2008b), “First-principles study of spin-transfer torques in layered systems with non- collinear magnetization,” Phys. Rev. B77, 184430. Webb, R A, S. Washburn, C. P. Umbach, and R. B. Laibowitz (1985), “Observation ofh/e Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in normal-metal rings,” Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 2696–2699. Weeks, Conan, Jun Hu...

work page 1985
[36]

The kernel polynomial method,

Weiße, Alexander, Gerhard Wellein, Andreas Alvermann, and Holger Fehske (2006), “The kernel polynomial method,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 275–306. Weston, Joseph, and Xavier Waintal (2016), “Linear-scaling source-sink algorithm for simulating time-resolved quantum transport and superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. B93, 134506. Wimmer, Michael (2010), Quantum transpor...

work page 2006
[37]

Unified numerical approach to topological semiconductor-superconductor het- erostructures,

Winkler, Georg W, Andrey E. Antipov, Bernard van Heck, Alexey A. Soluyanov, Leonid I. Glazman, Michael Wim- mer, and Roman M. Lutchyn (2019), “Unified numerical approach to topological semiconductor-superconductor het- erostructures,” Phys. Rev. B99, 245408. Winkler, R (2003), Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems(Sprin...

work page 2019
[38]

Gen- eral Green’s function formalism for layered systems: Wave function approach,

Zhang, Shu-Hui, Wen Yang, and Kai Chang (2017), “Gen- eral Green’s function formalism for layered systems: Wave function approach,” Phys. Rev. B95, 075421. Zhu, Jian-Xin (2016), Bogoliubov-de Gennes Method and Its Applications (Lecture Notes in Physics Volume

work page 2017

[1] [1]

Scaling theory of localization: Ab- sence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions,

Abrahams, E, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan (1979), “Scaling theory of localization: Ab- sence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673–676. Agapito, Luis A, Marco Fornari, Davide Ceresoli, Andrea Fer- retti, Stefano Curtarolo, and Marco Buongiorno Nardelli (2016a), “Accurate tight-binding Hamiltonians ...

work page doi:10.1137/s0895479894278952 1979

[2] [2]

Reconciling edge states with compressible stripes in a ballistic meso- scopic conductor,

Armagnat, Pacome, and Xavier Waintal (2020), “Reconciling edge states with compressible stripes in a ballistic meso- scopic conductor,” Journal of Physics: Materials3 (2), 02LT01. Asano, Yasuhiro, Yukio Tanaka, Takehito Yokoyama, and Satoshi Kashiwaya (2006), “Josephson current through superconductor/diffusive-normal-metal/superconductor junctions: Interf...

work page 2020

[3] [3]

Quantum Spin Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transition in HgTe Quantum Wells

Bautze, Tobias, Christoph Süssmeier, Shintaro Takada, Christoph Groth, Tristan Meunier, Michihisa Yamamoto, Seigo Tarucha, Xavier Waintal, and Christopher Bäuerle (2014), “Theoretical, numerical, and experimental study of a flying qubit electronic interferometer,” Phys. Rev. B89, 125432. Beenakker, C W J, J. A. Melsen, and P. W. Brouwer (1995), “Giant bac...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[4] [4]

Tran- sition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion,

49 Blonder, G E, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk (1982), “Tran- sition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion,” Phys. Rev. B25, 4515–4532. Borlenghi, Simone, Valentin Rychkov, Cyril Petitjean, and Xavier Waintal (2011), “Multiscale approach to spin trans- port ...

work page doi:10.1021/nl2002268 1982

[5] [5]

Multiband transmission calculations for nanowires using an optimized renormalization method,

Boykin, Timothy B, Mathieu Luisier, and Gerhard Klimeck (2008), “Multiband transmission calculations for nanowires using an optimized renormalization method,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 165318. Boykin, Timothy B, Mathieu Luisier, Gerhard Klimeck, Xueping Jiang, Neerav Kharche, Yu Zhou, and Saroj K. Nayak (2011), “Accurate six-band nearest-neighbor tight- binding mo...

work page 2008

[6] [6]

Spin-dependent tunneling conductance of Fe|MgO|Fesandwiches,

Butler, W H, X.-G. Zhang, T. C. Schulthess, and J. M. Ma- cLaren (2001), “Spin-dependent tunneling conductance of Fe|MgO|Fesandwiches,” Phys. Rev. B63, 054416. Buttiker, M (1993), “Capacitance, admittance, and rectifica- tion properties of small conductors,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 5 (50), 9361–9378. Bäuerle, Christopher, D. Christian Glattli...

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaa98a 2001

[7] [7]

Generalized many-channel conductance formula with appli- cation to small rings,

Büttiker, M, Y. Imry, R. Landauer, and S. Pinhas (1985), “Generalized many-channel conductance formula with appli- cation to small rings,” Phys. Rev. B31, 6207–6215. Calogero, Gaetano, Nick Papior, MohammadKoleini, Matthew Helmi Leth Larsen, and Mads Brandbyge (2019), “Multi- scale approach to first-principles electron transport beyond 100 nm,” Nanoscale1...

work page doi:10.1021/nl500755m 1985

[8] [8]

Hamiltonian approach to the transport properties of su- perconducting quantum point contacts,

Cuevas, J C, A. Martín-Rodero, and A. Levy Yeyati (1996), “Hamiltonian approach to the transport properties of su- perconducting quantum point contacts,” Phys. Rev. B54, 7366–7379. Danneau, R, F. Wu, M. F. Craciun, S. Russo, M. Y. Tomi, J. Salmilehto, A. F. Morpurgo, and P. J. Hakonen (2008), “Shot noise in ballistic graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 196802...

work page 1996

[9] [9]

Multiscale modeling of current-induced switching in magnetic tunnel junctions using ab initio spin-transfer torques,

Ellis, Matthew O A, Maria Stamenova, and Stefano Sanvito (2017), “Multiscale modeling of current-induced switching in magnetic tunnel junctions using ab initio spin-transfer torques,” Phys. Rev. B96, 224410. Esseni, David, Marco Pala, Pierpaolo Palestri, Cem Alper, and Tommaso Rollo (2017), “A review of selected topics in physics based modeling for tunnel...

work page 2017

[10] [10]

Ab initio tight-binding LMTO method for nonequilibrium electron transport in nanosystems,

Faleev, Sergey V, François Léonard, Derek A. Stewart, and Mark van Schilfgaarde (2005), “Ab initio tight-binding LMTO method for nonequilibrium electron transport in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. B71 (19), 195422. Fan, Zheyong, José H. Garcia, Aron W. Cummings, Jose Ed- uardo Barrios-Vargas, Michel Panhans, Ari Harju, Frank Ortmann, and Stephan Roche (2021), “...

work page 2005

[11] [11]

Elimination of spurious solutions from eight-band k·p theory,

Foreman, Bradley A (1997), “Elimination of spurious solutions from eight-band k·p theory,” Phys. Rev. B56, R12748– R12751. Franklin, Aaron D, Mathieu Luisier, Shu-Jen Han, George Tulevski, Chris M. Breslin, Lynne Gignac, Mark S. Lund- strom, and Wilfried Haensch (2012), “Sub-10 nm carbon nanotube transistor,” Nano Lett.12,

work page 1997

[12] [12]

Ap- plicability of thek·p method to the electronic structure of quantum dots,

Fu, Huaxiang, Lin-Wang Wang, and Alex Zunger (1998), “Ap- plicability of thek·p method to the electronic structure of quantum dots,” Phys. Rev. B57, 9971–9987. Fuchs, Jacob, Michael Barth, Cosimo Gorini, İnanç Adagideli, and Klaus Richter (2021), “Crossed Andreev reflection in topological insulator nanowire T-junctions,” Phys. Rev. B 104, 085415. Fujimoto...

work page doi:10.1063/1.4870288 1998

[13] [13]

Charge Hall effect driven by spin-dependent chemical potential gradients and Onsager relations in mesoscopic systems

Gaury, Benoit, and Xavier Waintal (2016), “A computational approach to quantum noise in time-dependent nanoelec- tronic devices,” Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 75, 72–76. Gaury, Benoit, Joseph Weston, Matthieu Santin, Manuel Houzet, Christoph Groth, and Xavier Waintal (2014), “Nu- merical simulations of time-resolved quantum electr...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1137/0710032 2016

[14] [14]

Complexity bounds for regular finite difference and finite element grids,

Hoffman, Alan J, Michael S. Martin, and Donald J. Rose (1973), “Complexity bounds for regular finite difference and finite element grids,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 10 (2), 364–369, https://doi.org/10.1137/0710033. Hofstadter, Douglas R (1976), “Energy levels and wave func- tions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields,” Phy...

work page doi:10.1137/0710033 1973

[15] [15]

A general algorithm for computing bound states in infinite tight-binding systems,

Istas, M, C. Groth, A. R. Akhmerov, M. Wimmer, and X. Waintal (2018), “A general algorithm for computing bound states in infinite tight-binding systems,” SciPost Phys. 4,

work page 2018

[16] [16]

Pushing the limit of quantum transport simulations,

Istas, Mathieu, Christoph Groth, and Xavier Waintal (2019), “Pushing the limit of quantum transport simulations,” Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033188. Iwase, Shigeru, Yasunori Futamura, Akira Imakura, Tetsuya Sakurai, and Tomoya Ono (2017), “Efficient and scalable calculation of complex band structure using Sakurai-Sugiura method,” inProceedings of the Internat...

work page 2019

[17] [17]

Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene

Junquera, Javier, Óscar Paz, Daniel Sánchez-Portal, and EmilioArtacho(2001),“Numericalatomicorbitalsforlinear- scaling calculations,” Phys. Rev. B64, 235111. Kane, C L, and E. J. Mele (2005a), “Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene,” Physical Review Letters95 (22), 226801, cond-mat/0411737. Kane, C L, and E. J. Mele (2005b), “z2 topological order and the q...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1137/s1064827595287997 2001

[18] [18]

Non-Equilibrium Green Functions in Electronic Device Modeling

Proceedings, edited by Felix Wolf, Bernd Mohr, and Dieter an Mey (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg) pp. 533–544. Kłos, J W, and I. V. Zozoulenko (2010), “Effect of short- and long-range scattering on the conductivity of graphene: Boltzmann approach vs tight-binding calculations,” Phys. Rev. B 82, 081414. Laeven, Tom, Bas Nijholt, Michael Wim...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.365394 2010

[19] [19]

Computing entries of the inverse of a sparse matrix using the {FIND} algorithm,

Li, S,S.Ahmed, G.Klimeck, andE.Darve(2008),“Computing entries of the inverse of a sparse matrix using the {FIND} algorithm,” Journal of Computational Physics227 (22), 9408 –

work page 2008

[20] [20]

An overview of SuperLU: Algorithms, implementation, and user interface,

Li, Xiaoye S (2005), “An overview of SuperLU: Algorithms, implementation, and user interface,” ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 31 (3), 302–325. Lima, Leandro R F, Amintor Dusko, and Caio Lewenkopf (2018), “Efficient method for computing the electronic trans- port properties of a multiterminal system,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 165405. Lin, Ho-Chun, Zeyu Wang, and Chia Wei...

work page 2005

[21] [21]

Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductorheterostructures,

Lutchyn, Roman M, Jay D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma (2010), “Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductorheterostructures,”Phys.Rev. Lett. 105, 077001. Luttinger, J M, and W. Kohn (1955), “Motion of electrons and holes in perturbed periodic fields,” Phys. Rev.97, 869–883. Léonard, F, and Derek A Stewart (2006), “Properti...

work page 2010

[22] [22]

The calculation of transport properties and density of states of disordered solids,

MacKinnon, A (1985), “The calculation of transport properties and density of states of disordered solids,” Zeit. f. Phys. B 59 (4), 385–390. MacKinnon, A, and B. Kramer (1981), “One-parameter scal- ing of localization length and conductance in disordered systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 1546–1549. Mamaluy, D, M. Sabathil, and P. Vogl (2003), “Efficient metho...

work page doi:10.1063/1.1560567 1985

[23] [23]

Three signatures of phase-coherent Andreev re- flection,

Marmolejo-Tejada, J M, J H García, M D Petrović, P-H Chang, X-L Sheng, A Cresti, P Plecháš, S Roche, and B K Nikolić (2018), “Deciphering the origin of nonlocal resistance in multiterminal graphene on hexagonal-boron-nitride with ab initioquantum transport: Fermi surface edge currents rather than Fermi sea topological valley currents,” Journal of Physics:...

work page 2018

[24] [24]

An easy and efficient way to treat Green’s function for nano-devices with arbitrary shapes and multi-terminal configurations,

Mou, Yang, Ran Xian-Jin, Cui Yan, and Wang Rui-Qiang (2011), “An easy and efficient way to treat Green’s function for nano-devices with arbitrary shapes and multi-terminal configurations,” Chinese Physics B20 (9), 097201. Nayak, Chetan, Steven H. Simon, Ady Stern, Michael Freed- man, and Sankar Das Sarma (2008), “Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum...

work page doi:10.1063/1.4864376 2011

[25] [25]

Equilibrium and time-dependent Josephson current in one- dimensional superconducting junctions,

Perfetto, Enrico, Gianluca Stefanucci, and Michele Cini (2009), “Equilibrium and time-dependent Josephson current in one- dimensional superconducting junctions,” Phys. Rev. B80, 205408. Pichard, J L, and G Sarma (1981a), “Finite size scaling ap- proach to Anderson localisation,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics14 (6), L127–L132. Pichard, J L, and...

work page 2009

[26] [26]

Towards a realistic transport modeling in a superconducting nanowire with Majorana fermions,

Rainis, Diego, Luka Trifunovic, Jelena Klinovaja, and Daniel Loss (2013), “Towards a realistic transport modeling in a superconducting nanowire with Majorana fermions,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 024515. Ralph, DC, and M.D. Stiles (2008), “Spin transfer torques,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 320 (7), 1190–1216. Rammer, J, and H. Smith (1986), “Quantu...

work page 2013

[27] [27]

Quantum-interference- controlled three-terminal molecular transistors based on a single ring-shaped molecule connected to graphene nanorib- 55 bon electrodes,

Saha, Kamal K, Branislav K. Nikolić, Vincent Meunier, Wen- chang Lu, and J. Bernholc (2010), “Quantum-interference- controlled three-terminal molecular transistors based on a single ring-shaped molecule connected to graphene nanorib- 55 bon electrodes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105 (23), 236803. Sahasrabudhe, H, B. Novakovic, J. Nakamura, S. Fallahi, M. Povolotsky...

work page arXiv 2010

[28] [28]

Tunable ther- mopower in a graphene-based topological insulator,

Shevtsov, Oleksii, Pierre Carmier, Christoph Groth, Xavier Waintal, and David Carpentier (2012a), “Tunable ther- mopower in a graphene-based topological insulator,” Phys. Rev. B 85, 245441. Shevtsov, Oleksii, Pierre Carmier, Cyril Petitjean, Christoph Groth, David Carpentier, and Xavier Waintal (2012b), “Graphene-based heterojunction between two topologic...

work page doi:10.1063/1.3208067 2009

[29] [29]

Whatismeasured when you measure a resistance?—the Landauer formula re- visited,

Stone, ADouglas, andAaronSzafer(1988),“Whatismeasured when you measure a resistance?—the Landauer formula re- visited,” IBM Journal of Research and Development32 (3), 384–413. Strange, M, I. S. Kristensen, K. S. Thygesen, and K. W. Jacobsen (2008), “Benchmark density functional theory calculations for nanoscale conductance,” The Journal of Chemical Physic...

work page 1988

[30] [30]

Re- cursive Green’s function method for multi-terminal nanos- tructures,

Thorgilsson, G, G. Viktorsson, and S.I. Erlingsson (2014), “Re- cursive Green’s function method for multi-terminal nanos- tructures,” Journal of Computational Physics261, 256 –

work page 2014

[31] [31]

Conductivity of the disordered linear chain,

Thouless, D J, and S Kirkpatrick (1981), “Conductivity of the disordered linear chain,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 14 (3), 235–245. Thygesen, KS, and K.W. Jacobsen (2005), “Molecular trans- portcalculationswithWannierfunctions,”ChemicalPhysics 319 (1), 111 –

work page 1981

[32] [32]

Real-space finite-difference calculation method of gener- alized Bloch wave functions and complex band structures with reduced computational cost,

Tsukamoto, Shigeru, Kikuji Hirose, and Stefan Blügel (2014), “Real-space finite-difference calculation method of gener- alized Bloch wave functions and complex band structures with reduced computational cost,” Phys. Rev. E90, 013306. Tsukamoto, Shigeru, Tomoya Ono, Kikuji Hirose, and Stefan Blügel (2017), “Self-energy matrices for electron transport calcu...

work page 2014

[33] [33]

Effects of the electrostatic environment on the Majorana nanowire devices,

Voon, L C Lew Yan, and M. Willatzen (2009),The k·p Method: Electronic Properties of Semiconductors(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin). Vuik, A, D Eeltink, A R Akhmerov, and M Wimmer (2016), “Effects of the electrostatic environment on the Majorana nanowire devices,” New Journal of Physics18 (3), 033013. Vuik, Adriaan, Bas Nijholt, Anton R. Akhmerov, and ...

work page 2009

[34] [34]

Magnetic exchange interaction induced by a Josephson current,

Waintal, Xavier, and Piet W. Brouwer (2002), “Magnetic exchange interaction induced by a Josephson current,” Phys. Rev. B 65, 054407. Waintal, Xavier, Edward B. Myers, Piet W. Brouwer, and D. C. Ralph(2000),“Roleofspin-dependentinterfacescatteringin generating current-induced torques in magnetic multilayers,” Phys. Rev. B62, 12317–12327. Waldron, Derek, L...

work page 2002

[35] [35]

First-principles study of spin-transfer torques in layered systems with non- collinear magnetization,

Wang, Shuai, Yuan Xu, and Ke Xia (2008b), “First-principles study of spin-transfer torques in layered systems with non- collinear magnetization,” Phys. Rev. B77, 184430. Webb, R A, S. Washburn, C. P. Umbach, and R. B. Laibowitz (1985), “Observation ofh/e Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in normal-metal rings,” Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 2696–2699. Weeks, Conan, Jun Hu...

work page 1985

[36] [36]

The kernel polynomial method,

Weiße, Alexander, Gerhard Wellein, Andreas Alvermann, and Holger Fehske (2006), “The kernel polynomial method,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 275–306. Weston, Joseph, and Xavier Waintal (2016), “Linear-scaling source-sink algorithm for simulating time-resolved quantum transport and superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. B93, 134506. Wimmer, Michael (2010), Quantum transpor...

work page 2006

[37] [37]

Unified numerical approach to topological semiconductor-superconductor het- erostructures,

Winkler, Georg W, Andrey E. Antipov, Bernard van Heck, Alexey A. Soluyanov, Leonid I. Glazman, Michael Wim- mer, and Roman M. Lutchyn (2019), “Unified numerical approach to topological semiconductor-superconductor het- erostructures,” Phys. Rev. B99, 245408. Winkler, R (2003), Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems(Sprin...

work page 2019

[38] [38]

Gen- eral Green’s function formalism for layered systems: Wave function approach,

Zhang, Shu-Hui, Wen Yang, and Kai Chang (2017), “Gen- eral Green’s function formalism for layered systems: Wave function approach,” Phys. Rev. B95, 075421. Zhu, Jian-Xin (2016), Bogoliubov-de Gennes Method and Its Applications (Lecture Notes in Physics Volume

work page 2017