REVIEW 2 cited by
Distinguishing Ignorance from Error in LLM Hallucinations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Distinguishing Ignorance from Error in LLM Hallucinations
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to hallucinations -- factually incorrect outputs -- leading to a large body of work on detecting and mitigating such cases. We argue that it is important to distinguish between two types of hallucinations: ones where the model does not hold the correct answer in its parameters, which we term HK-, and ones where the model answers incorrectly despite having the required knowledge, termed HK+. We first find that HK+ hallucinations are prevalent and occur across models and datasets. Then, we demonstrate that distinguishing between these two cases is beneficial for mitigating hallucinations. Importantly, we show that different models hallucinate on different examples, which motivates constructing model-specific hallucination datasets for training detectors. Overall, our findings draw attention to classifying types of hallucinations and provide means to handle them more effectively. The code is available at https://github.com/technion-cs-nlp/hallucination-mitigation .
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LA-RL: Label-Aware Self-Reflection for Reinforcement Learning in Information Extraction
Label-aware diagnostic reflection plus two-stage outcome GRPO improves same-backbone IE F1 over SFT, with larger gains under relation-extraction domain shift.
-
LC-ICL: Label-Guided Contrastive In-Context Learning for Robust Information Extraction
LC-ICL improves few-shot NER and RE by using label-guided contrastive demonstrations that pair positive samples with error-annotated negative samples.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.