pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.15689 · v5 · submitted 2024-11-24 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Prospects for observing the missing 2D and 1F charmonium states around 4 GeV

Cheng-Xi Liu , Zi-Long Man , Tian-Le Gao , Xiang Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 17:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords charmonium2D states1F statesstrong decaysradiative decaysOZI rulemass spectrumunquenched effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mass and decay predictions for the missing 2D and 1F charmonium states place them near 4 GeV with observable production and decay channels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs a mass spectrum calculation for high-lying charmonium states that includes unquenched effects and then computes the allowed two-body strong decays under the OZI rule together with the main radiative transitions. It also examines production of these states through radiative processes in electron-positron annihilation. The results are intended to supply concrete targets for experiments searching for these states at existing and planned facilities. A sympathetic reader would care because filling these gaps would complete the low-lying spectrum of the charmonium family and test the reliability of unquenched quark models at higher masses.

Core claim

A mass spectrum analysis that incorporates unquenched effects locates the 2D and 1F charmonium states around 4 GeV; the same framework yields partial widths for OZI-allowed two-body strong decays and identifies the dominant radiative decay channels, while radiative transitions via e+e- annihilation provide additional production mechanisms.

What carries the argument

Unquenched mass spectrum analysis combined with OZI-rule decay width calculations for two-body strong decays and radiative transitions.

If this is right

  • The 2D states should appear in specific two-body strong decay modes whose widths are now quantified.
  • Radiative transitions from the 2D and 1F states offer measurable channels in e+e- annihilation.
  • Absence of these states in the predicted mass window would require revision of the unquenched model parameters.
  • Detection at the listed facilities would confirm the extension of the charmonium spectrum to these quantum numbers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mass predictions hold, the same approach could be applied to still higher states such as 3D or 2F to generate a fuller spectrum map.
  • The calculated decay widths could be used to estimate production cross sections at hadron colliders like LHCb for comparison with electron-positron machines.
  • Discrepancies between predicted and observed widths would point to additional mixing or coupled-channel effects not included here.

Load-bearing premise

The unquenched effects fitted to lower states remain accurate and transferable to the 2D and 1F states without extra state-dependent corrections.

What would settle it

Experimental searches at BESIII or Belle II that find no resonance near the predicted masses with the calculated partial widths for OZI-allowed decays would falsify the placement and decay pattern.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.15689 by Cheng-Xi Liu, Tian-Le Gao, Xiang Liu, Zi-Long Man.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Table of Charmonium States. The yellow and green background colors represent well-established low-lying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Mass spectrum of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Strong decay widths of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Strong decay widths of the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Our understanding of high-lying states within the charmonium family remains incomplete, particularly in light of recent observations of charmonium states at energies around 4 GeV. In this study, we investigate the spectroscopic properties of several high-lying charmonia, focusing on the $2D$ and $1F$ states. A mass spectrum analysis is conducted, incorporating the unquenched effects. We then present a detailed study of the strong decay properties, including partial decay widths for two-body strong decays permitted by the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka (OZI) rule. Additionally, we explore the primary radiative decay channels associated with these states. Finally, we discuss the radiative transitions of the $2D$ and $1F$ states via $e^+e^-$ annihilation. Theoretical predictions provided here aim to guide future experimental searches for high-lying charmonium states at facilities such as BESIII, Belle II, LHCb, and the future STCF.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the spectroscopic properties of the missing 2D and 1F charmonium states near 4 GeV. It performs a mass spectrum analysis that incorporates unquenched effects, computes partial widths for OZI-allowed two-body strong decays, examines primary radiative decay channels, and discusses radiative transitions via e+e- annihilation, with the stated aim of guiding experimental searches at BESIII, Belle II, LHCb, and the future STCF.

Significance. If the unquenched mass model and subsequent decay calculations prove reliable upon extrapolation, the numerical predictions for masses, widths, and branching fractions could provide concrete targets for experimental searches of these high-lying states. The work follows a standard workflow for quark-model studies of charmonium but does not demonstrate new methodological advances such as parameter-free derivations or machine-checked results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, mass spectrum analysis paragraph] Abstract and mass spectrum analysis paragraph: the central predictions for masses, widths, and radiative rates of the 2D and 1F states are obtained by fitting unquenched parameters to lower-lying states and then extrapolating; no explicit validation (e.g., comparison of model predictions for known states above the fit range or state-specific open-channel couplings) is supplied to quantify the systematic uncertainty of this transferability.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the workflow is described but the abstract supplies no numerical results, error estimates, or comparisons against established charmonium states, so the load-bearing claim that these predictions can usefully guide experiments lacks demonstrated support within the provided text.
minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from explicit tables listing all predicted masses, partial widths, and branching fractions with uncertainties for the 2D and 1F multiplets.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's detailed review and suggestions for improving the manuscript. We have addressed the major comments by revising the abstract and adding validation discussions in the mass spectrum analysis section. Below we respond point by point to each major comment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, mass spectrum analysis paragraph] Abstract and mass spectrum analysis paragraph: the central predictions for masses, widths, and radiative rates of the 2D and 1F states are obtained by fitting unquenched parameters to lower-lying states and then extrapolating; no explicit validation (e.g., comparison of model predictions for known states above the fit range or state-specific open-channel couplings) is supplied to quantify the systematic uncertainty of this transferability.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation of the extrapolation is important for assessing systematic uncertainties. In the revised version, we have included comparisons of the model's predictions with known charmonium states in the 3.8-4.2 GeV range, such as the ψ(4040) and χc2(3930), to demonstrate the model's reliability when extrapolated. We have also added a discussion on the estimated uncertainties from parameter variations and open-channel effects. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the workflow is described but the abstract supplies no numerical results, error estimates, or comparisons against established charmonium states, so the load-bearing claim that these predictions can usefully guide experiments lacks demonstrated support within the provided text.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original abstract lacked specific numerical predictions. We have revised the abstract to include key predicted masses, total widths, and prominent decay channels for the 2D and 1F states, along with brief comparisons to known states where applicable. This provides concrete support for the claim that these results can guide experimental searches. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model extrapolations are independent of target states

full rationale

The provided abstract and description indicate a standard quark-model approach: parameters for unquenched effects are determined from lower-lying states, then applied to compute masses, widths, and radiative rates for the unobserved 2D and 1F states near 4 GeV. No quoted equations or text demonstrate self-definition (Y defined via X where X uses Y), fitted inputs directly renamed as predictions for the same quantities, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the central claims. The derivation chain remains self-contained; the output quantities for the target multiplets are not forced by construction to equal the input data. This is the normal, non-circular case for phenomenological spectrum calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract; the unquenched mass formula and OZI rule are treated as standard inputs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5707 in / 1089 out tokens · 33566 ms · 2026-05-23T17:20:39.403442+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Proposed mixing between $2P$ and $1F$ wave charmonia

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Unquenched calculation finds sizable 2P-1F mixing in charmonium with angles 7.5° and 15.4°, yielding predictions for two-photon and two-gluon decay widths.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Compared with previous result of Ref

    We set The mass axis spans ±150 MeV about the central value. Compared with previous result of Ref. [58–60] from other unquenched model, the discrepancy between our results and other values does not exceed than 30 MeV . We therefore adopt the range of ±30 MeV around the calculated value as estimate for the masses of the investigated states. In our calculat...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Compared to the 2 3D1 state, the DD∗ and D∗D∗ channels remain dominant, but the new DD′ 1 channel contributes a branching ratio of 18.76%

    = 1.9 : 1 .7 : 1 .0. Compared to the 2 3D1 state, the DD∗ and D∗D∗ channels remain dominant, but the new DD′ 1 channel contributes a branching ratio of 18.76%. For the 33D2 state, the DD∗ channel dominates, with a branching ratio higher than that of theD∗D∗ channel, which contrasts with the 23D2 state, where D∗D∗ dominates. This state primarily de- 9 cays...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Finally, for the 33D3 state, the most significant decay channel is DD∗, with a branching ratio of 51.2%

    = 9.2 : 4.9 : 1.1 : 1.2 : 1.0. Finally, for the 33D3 state, the most significant decay channel is DD∗, with a branching ratio of 51.2%. Compared to the 2 3D3 state, the partial decay width of the 3 3D3 state into the D∗D∗ channel decreases significantly, primarily due to the node effect in the corresponding spatial wave function. The strong decay width of...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The decay width of the 3 3F2 state is governed by the DD, DD∗, D∗D∗, and DD1 channels, with the branching frac- tion Br[χc2(33F2) → DD, DD∗, D∗D∗, DD1] reaching up to 92%

    = 2.8 : 1 .6 : 1 .0. The decay width of the 3 3F2 state is governed by the DD, DD∗, D∗D∗, and DD1 channels, with the branching frac- tion Br[χc2(33F2) → DD, DD∗, D∗D∗, DD1] reaching up to 92%. The 3 3F3 state has three dominant decay modes: DD∗, D∗D∗, and DD∗ 2, with the ratio of partial widths predicted to be Γ(DD∗) : Γ(D∗D∗) : Γ(DD∗

    work page

  5. [5]

    Finally, the 3 3F4 state predominantly decays into DD∗ and D∗D∗, with the ratio between partial widths being approxi- mately Γ(DD∗) : Γ(D∗D∗) = 1.0 : 4 .1

    = 2.7 : 1 .3 : 1 .0. Finally, the 3 3F4 state predominantly decays into DD∗ and D∗D∗, with the ratio between partial widths being approxi- mately Γ(DD∗) : Γ(D∗D∗) = 1.0 : 4 .1. The decay pattern for the 3F states closely follows that of the 1F and 2F states, with the DD∗ channel remaining dominant. In Table II, we present the strong decay widths for the 1...

    work page

  6. [6]

    = 5 : 1. 10 IV . RADIA TIVE DECA Y In this section, we briefly outline the model used to calcu- late radiative decay. The quark-photon electromagnetic cou- pling is described by He = − X j e j ¯ψ jγ j µAµ(k, r)ψ j, (16) where ψ j is the j-th quark field with a charge e j in a hadron, and k denotes the 3-momentum of the photon. The spatial wave functions a...

    work page

  7. [7]

    J. J. Aubert et al. (E598), Experimental observation of a heavy particle J, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1404 (1974)

    work page 1974

  8. [8]

    J. E. Augustin et al. (SLAC-SP-017), Discovery of a narrow res- onance in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1406 (1974)

    work page 1974

  9. [9]

    G. S. Abrams et al. , The discovery of a second narrow reso- nance in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1453 (1974)

    work page 1974

  10. [10]

    Himel et al., Observation of the ηc(2980) produced in the ra- diative decay of the ψ′(3684), Phys

    T. Himel et al., Observation of the ηc(2980) produced in the ra- diative decay of the ψ′(3684), Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 1146 (1980)

    work page 1980

  11. [11]

    Edwards et al

    C. Edwards et al. , Observation an an η′ c Candidate State with Mass 3592 ± 5 MeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 70 (1982)

    work page 1982

  12. [12]

    Goldhaber et al., D and D∗ Meson Production Near 4-GeV in e+e− Annihilation, Phys

    G. Goldhaber et al., D and D∗ Meson Production Near 4-GeV in e+e− Annihilation, Phys. Lett. B 69, 503 (1977)

    work page 1977

  13. [13]

    Siegrist et al

    J. Siegrist et al. , Observation of a resonance at 4.4-GeV and additional structure near 4.1-GeV in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 700 (1976)

    work page 1976

  14. [14]

    T. A. Armstrong et al., Observation of the P-wave singlet state of charmonium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2337 (1992)

    work page 1992

  15. [15]

    C. J. Biddick et al., Inclusive gamma-Ray Spectra fromψ(3095) and ψ′ (3684), Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1324 (1977)

    work page 1977

  16. [16]

    W. M. Tanenbaum et al., Observation of an intermediate state in ψ′ (3684) radiative cascade decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1323 (1975)

    work page 1975

  17. [17]

    J. S. Whitaker et al., Radiative decays ofψ(3095) and ψ′ (3684), Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1596 (1976)

    work page 1976

  18. [18]

    P. A. Rapidis et al. , Observation of a resonance in e+e− anni- hilation just above charm threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 526 (1977), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 39, 974 (1977)]

    work page 1977

  19. [19]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, J. B. Kogut, K. D. Lane, 12 21D2 23D1 23D2 23D3 11F3 13F2 Our Ref. [46] Our Ref. [46] Our Ref. [46] Our Ref. [46] Our Ref. [46] Our Ref. [46] Mass 4137 4158 4125 4159 4137 4158 4144 4167 4074 4026 4070 4029 Mode Γthy Br Γthy Br Γthy Br Γthy Br Γthy Br Γthy Br Γthy Br Γthy Br Γthy Br Γthy Br Γthy Br Γthy Br DD ✗ ✗ 19...

    work page 1975

  20. [20]

    Eichten, K

    E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, and T.-M. Yan, Charmonium: the model, Phys. Rev. D 17, 3090 (1978), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 21, 313 (1980)]

    work page 1978

  21. [21]

    Barbieri, R

    R. Barbieri, R. Kogerler, Z. Kunszt, and R. Gatto, Meson masses and widths in a Gauge theory with linear binding po- tential, Nucl. Phys. B 105, 125 (1976)

    work page 1976

  22. [22]

    D. P. Stanley and D. Robson, Nonperturbative potential model for light and heavy quark anti-quark systems, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3180 (1980)

    work page 1980

  23. [23]

    Carlson, J

    J. Carlson, J. B. Kogut, and V . R. Pandharipande, Hadron spec- troscopy in a flux tube quark model, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2807 (1983)

    work page 1983

  24. [24]

    J. L. Richardson, The heavy quark potential and theΥ, J/ψ Sys- tems, Phys. Lett. B 82, 272 (1979)

    work page 1979

  25. [25]

    Buchmuller, G

    W. Buchmuller, G. Grunberg, and S. H. H. Tye, The Regge slope and the Lambda parameter in QCD: An empirical ap- proach via quarkonia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 103 (1980), [Erra- tum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 45, 587 (1980)]

    work page 1980

  26. [26]

    Buchmuller and S

    W. Buchmuller and S. H. H. Tye, Quarkonia and quantum chro- modynamics, Phys. Rev. D 24, 132 (1981)

    work page 1981

  27. [27]

    Martin, A simultaneous fit of b¯b, c¯c, s¯s, (bcs pairs) and c¯s Spectra, Phys

    A. Martin, A simultaneous fit of b¯b, c¯c, s¯s, (bcs pairs) and c¯s Spectra, Phys. Lett. B 100, 511 (1981)

    work page 1981

  28. [28]

    Bhanot and S

    G. Bhanot and S. Rudaz, A New Potential for Quarkonium, Phys. Lett. B 78, 119 (1978)

    work page 1978

  29. [29]

    Quigg and J

    C. Quigg and J. L. Rosner, Quarkonium Level Spacings, Phys. Lett. B 71, 153 (1977)

    work page 1977

  30. [30]

    Godfrey and N

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985)

    work page 1985

  31. [31]

    L. P. Fulcher, Perturbative QCD, a universal QCD scale, long range spin orbit potential, and the properties of heavy quarko- nia, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2079 (1991)

    work page 2079

  32. [32]

    S. N. Gupta, J. M. Johnson, W. W. Repko, and C. J. Suchyta, III, Heavy quarkonium potential model and the P-wave singlet state of charmonium, Phys. Rev. D 49, 1551 (1994). 15

    work page 1994

  33. [33]

    J. Zeng, J. W. Van Orden, and W. Roberts, Heavy mesons in a relativistic model, Phys. Rev. D 52, 5229 (1995)

    work page 1995

  34. [34]

    Ebert, R

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, and V . O. Galkin, Properties of heavy quarkonia and Bc mesons in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 67, 014027 (2003)

    work page 2003

  35. [35]

    Liu, Z.-G

    X. Liu, Z.-G. Luo, Y .-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, X(3872) and other possible heavy molecular states, Eur. Phys. J. C61, 411 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Liu, An overview of XYZ new particles, Chin

    X. Liu, An overview of XYZ new particles, Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 3815 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, The XYZ states: experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rept. 873, 1 (2020), arXiv:1907.07583 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y .-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Deng, R.-H

    Q. Deng, R.-H. Ni, Q. Li, and X.-H. Zhong, Charmonia in an unquenched quark model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 056034 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    S. K. Choi et al. (Belle), Observation of a narrow charmonium- like state in exclusive B± → K±π+π− J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  43. [43]

    Wong, Molecular states of heavy quark mesons, Phys

    C.-Y . Wong, Molecular states of heavy quark mesons, Phys. Rev. C 69, 055202 (2004)

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    E. S. Swanson, Short range structure in the X(3872), Phys. Lett. B 588, 189 (2004)

    work page 2004

  45. [45]

    Maiani, F

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V . Riquer, Diquark- antidiquarks with hidden or open charm and the nature of X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 71, 014028 (2005)

    work page 2005

  46. [46]

    Chen and S.-L

    W. Chen and S.-L. Zhu, The vector and axial-Vector charmonium-like states, Phys. Rev. D 83, 034010 (2011)

    work page 2011

  47. [47]

    van Beveren and G

    E. van Beveren and G. Rupp, Observed Ds(2317) and tentative D(2100–2300) as the charmed cousins of the light scalar nonet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 012003 (2003)

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    Dai, C.-S

    Y .-B. Dai, C.-S. Huang, C. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Understanding the D+ sJ(2317) and D+ sJ(2460) with sum rules in HQET, Phys. Rev. D 68, 114011 (2003)

    work page 2003

  49. [49]

    van Beveren and G

    E. van Beveren and G. Rupp, Continuum bound states KL, D1(2420), Dsl(2536) and their partners KS , D1(2400), D∗ sJ(2463), Eur. Phys. J. C 32, 493 (2004)

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    Y . S. Kalashnikova, Coupled-channel model for charmonium levels and an option for X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 72, 034010 (2005)

    work page 2005

  51. [51]

    Zhang, C

    O. Zhang, C. Meng, and H. Q. Zheng, Ambiversion of X(3872), Phys. Lett. B 680, 453 (2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    Barnes, S

    T. Barnes, S. Godfrey, and E. S. Swanson, Higher charmonia, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054026 (2005)

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Duan, S.-Q

    M.-X. Duan, S.-Q. Luo, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Possibility of charmoniumlike state X(3915) as χc0(2P) state, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054029 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Man, C.-R

    Z.-L. Man, C.-R. Shu, Y .-R. Liu, and H. Chen, Charmonium states in a coupled-channel model, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 810 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Near-threshold D ¯D spectroscopy and ob- servation of a new charmonium state, JHEP 07, 035

    work page

  56. [56]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Observation of new charmonium or char- moniumlike states in B+ → D∗±D∓K+ Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 131902 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Observation of Structures in the Processes e+e− → ωχc1 and ωχc2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 161901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Observation of a vector charmo- niumlike state at 4 .7 GeV /c2 and Search for Zcs in e+e− → K+K− J/ψ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 211902 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Precise Measurement of the e+e− → D∗+ s D∗− s Cross Sections at Center-of-Mass Energies from Threshold to 4 .95 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151903 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y .-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, A re- view of the open charm and open bottom systems, Rept. Prog. Phys. 80, 076201 (2017), arXiv:1609.08928 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Wang, D.-Y

    J.-Z. Wang, D.-Y . Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Construct- ing J/ψ family with updated data of charmoniumlike Y states, Phys. Rev. D 99, 114003 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    Duan and X

    M.-X. Duan and X. Liu, Where are 3P and higher P-wave states in the charmonium family?, Phys. Rev. D 104, 074010 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    C. A. Bokade and Bhaghyesh, Charmonium: conventional and XYZ states in a relativistic screened potential model, arXiv:2408.06759 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    W.-J. Deng, H. Liu, L.-C. Gui, and X.-H. Zhong, Charmonium spectrum and their electromagnetic transitions with higher mul- tipole contributions, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034026 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    Li and K.-T

    B.-Q. Li and K.-T. Chao, Higher charmonia and X,Y ,Z states with screened potential, Phys. Rev. D 79, 094004 (2009)

    work page 2009

  67. [67]

    Chaturvedi and A

    R. Chaturvedi and A. K. Rai, Charmonium spectroscopy moti- vated by general features of pNRQCD, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59, 3508 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    M. A. Sultan, N. Akbar, B. Masud, and F. Akram, Higher hybrid charmonia in an extended potential model, Phys. Rev. D 90, 054001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    R. N. Faustov, D. Ebert, and V . O. Galkin, Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy quarkonia and Bc mesons, PoS Baldin-ISHEPP-XXI, 058 (2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    Cao, Y .-C

    L. Cao, Y .-C. Yang, and H. Chen, Charmonium states in QCD-inspired quark potential model using Gaussian expansion method, Few Body Syst. 53, 327 (2012)

    work page 2012

  71. [71]

    Song, D.-Y

    Q.-T. Song, D.-Y . Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Charmed- strange mesons revisited: mass spectra and strong decays, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054031 (2015)

    work page 2015

  72. [72]

    Song, D.-Y

    Q.-T. Song, D.-Y . Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Higher radial and orbital excitations in the charmed meson family, Phys. Rev. D 92, 074011 (2015)

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    Pang, J.-Z

    C.-Q. Pang, J.-Z. Wang, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, A systematic study of mass spectra and strong decay of strange mesons, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 861 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    Wang, Z.-F

    J.-Z. Wang, Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Higher bottomo- nium zoo, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 915 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Wang, R.-Q

    J.-Z. Wang, R.-Q. Qian, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Are the Y states around 4.6 GeV from e+e− annihilation higher charmo- nia?, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    Wang, S.-Q

    L.-M. Wang, S.-Q. Luo, and X. Liu, Light unflavored vec- tor meson spectroscopy around the mass range of 2.4 ∼3 GeV and possible experimental evidence, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034011 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Micu, Decay rates of meson resonances in a quark model, Nucl

    L. Micu, Decay rates of meson resonances in a quark model, Nucl. Phys. B 10, 521 (1969)

    work page 1969

  78. [78]

    Le Yaouanc, L

    A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Naive quark pair creation model and baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1415 (1974)

    work page 1974

  79. [79]

    Le Yaouanc, L

    A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Why is ψ′′(4.414) so narrow?, Phys. Lett. B 72, 57 (1977). 16

    work page 1977

  80. [80]

    Le Yaouanc, L

    A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, and J. C. Raynal, Strong decays of ψ′′(4.028) as a radial excitation of charmonium, Phys. Lett. B 71, 397 (1977)

    work page 1977

Showing first 80 references.