pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.04705 · v2 · submitted 2024-12-06 · 🪐 quant-ph

QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python

Neill Lambert , Eric Gigu\`ere , Paul Menczel , Boxi Li , Patrick Hopf , Gerardo Su\'arez , Marc Gali , Jake Lishman
show 10 more authors
Rushiraj Gadhvi Rochisha Agarwal Asier Galicia Nathan Shammah Paul Nation J. R. Johansson Shahnawaz Ahmed Simon Cross Alexander Pitchford Franco Nori
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 08:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords QuTiPquantum toolboxPythonquantum simulationopen sourcequantum circuitsquantum controldata layer
0
0 comments X

The pith

QuTiP 5 introduces a flexible data layer and new modules that allow the toolbox to integrate modern computing packages and remain a central open-source resource for quantum research and teaching.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes the updates in QuTiP version 5 after thirteen years of use. It details code design changes, a revised data layer for quantum objects, efficiency gains, new solvers, and added modules for quantum circuits and control. These features enable direct use of packages such as JAX and CuPy. The authors present the changes through examples and argue that the updates position the software for continued development and widespread adoption. A sympathetic reader would see the work as extending the life of an established tool by adapting it to current hardware and software ecosystems.

Core claim

The central claim is that the code design changes and fundamental data layer updates in QuTiP 5, together with new solvers and the QuTiP-QIP and QuTiP-QOC modules, will enable the toolbox to harness state-of-the-art data formats and packages and thereby remain a modern, continuously developed, and popular tool for another decade or more.

What carries the argument

The revised data layer that underlies all quantum objects, which provides flexibility to connect with external packages such as JAX and CuPy while supporting new application modules.

If this is right

  • Users gain the ability to run simulations with GPU acceleration and automatic differentiation through integration with CuPy and JAX.
  • New dedicated modules allow direct modeling of quantum circuits and optimal control problems within the same framework.
  • Efficiency improvements in core solvers reduce computation time for established tasks.
  • The modular structure supports future extensions without requiring a full rewrite of the codebase.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The data layer changes could allow QuTiP to serve as a backend for hybrid quantum-classical machine learning workflows that rely on differentiable programming.
  • Wider use of the new modules might reduce the need for separate specialized packages in quantum device design and control optimization.
  • If community maintenance holds, the updated architecture could serve as a template for other long-lived scientific Python libraries facing similar hardware shifts.

Load-bearing premise

The new code design and data layer changes have been implemented correctly and will be adopted and maintained by the user community over the long term.

What would settle it

A sustained decline in downloads, citations, or community contributions to the QuTiP repository after the version 5 release would indicate that the updates did not achieve the claimed long-term impact.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04705 by Alexander Pitchford, Asier Galicia, Boxi Li, Eric Gigu\`ere, Franco Nori, Gerardo Su\'arez, Jake Lishman, J. R. Johansson, Marc Gali, Nathan Shammah, Neill Lambert, Patrick Hopf, Paul Menczel, Paul Nation, Rochisha Agarwal, Rushiraj Gadhvi, Shahnawaz Ahmed, Simon Cross.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic overview of the QuTiP project, describing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: For the example problem of two interacting qubits, we compare the output of two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In panel (a), we show the dynamics of a resonantly driven qubit simulated with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Benchmark of the time required to solve the dynamics of an Ising spin chain as a function of the number of spins [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Here we show the same example as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Damped Jaynes-Cummings Model. The figure shows results from the simulations described in Sec. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Two-level system driven periodically (Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Numerical study of the performance of Floquet basis and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: An example of solving the stochastic master equation for a dissipative cavity, with decay rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: For the example of a standard spin-boson problem, we compare the output of the different master equation solvers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: An overview of the environment class, which is now supported by the HEOM and Bloch-Redfield solvers. Details [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Approximation of the spectral density of an Ohmic Bath via fitting with three underdamped Brownian motion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: This figure shows the spin-boson localization-delocalization phase transition. For the simulation, we used [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The left figure shows the Bloch sphere representation of the dynamics of a qubit undergoing unitary evolution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Left figure shows the Wigner function, a pseudo-probability distribution, of a cavity prepared in a Schrödinger cat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The dynamics of a two-level system, or qubit, interacting with a waveguide truncated at one end by a mirror. Here, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Occupation of the waveguide modes B † nBn, where we we have increased the number of modes to 80. The time steps only extend to γt = 2, so that in the left figure, for ϕ = 0, we can see the overall loss of population in the waveguide modes after around γt = 1, the round-trip time, while in the right figure, for ϕ = π, we see the saturation of the occupation. ed = 1 # Quantum dot energy GammaL = 1 # Transpo… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Optimized pulse amplitudes implementing the Hadamard operator for a single qubit system with the control [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The figure illustrates the visual output of three different quantum circuit renderers available in QuTiP-QIP: TeXRen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Circuit model of a single Trotterization step of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Results for the simulation of the closed system dynamics of the system described with the Hamiltonian ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Pulse-level decomposition of the circuit in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p059_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Circuit model of a single Trotterization step of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Pulse-level decomposition of the circuit in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Results for the quantum simulation of open-system dynamics defined by the Hamiltonian ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_25.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

QuTiP, the Quantum Toolbox in Python, has been at the forefront of open-source quantum software for the past 13 years. It is used as a research, teaching, and industrial tool, and has been downloaded millions of times by users around the world. Here we introduce the latest developments in QuTiP v5, which are set to have a large impact on the future of QuTiP and enable it to be a modern, continuously developed and popular tool for another decade and more. We summarize the code design and fundamental data layer changes as well as efficiency improvements, new solvers, applications to quantum circuits with QuTiP-QIP, and new quantum control tools with QuTiP-QOC. Additional flexibility in the data layer underlying all ``quantum objects'' in QuTiP allows us to harness the power of state-of-the-art data formats and packages like JAX, CuPy, and more. We explain these new features with a series of both well-known and new examples. The code for these examples is available in a static form on GitHub and as continuously updated and documented notebooks in the qutip-tutorials package.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces QuTiP v5, summarizing code design and data-layer changes that enable support for JAX, CuPy and similar backends, efficiency improvements, new solvers, the QuTiP-QIP module for quantum circuits, and the QuTiP-QOC module for quantum control. It illustrates these features through well-known and new examples whose code is provided both statically on GitHub and as continuously updated notebooks in the qutip-tutorials package.

Significance. If the described data-layer abstractions and new modules are realized as stated, the release supplies a concrete path for QuTiP to integrate modern GPU and autodiff tooling while preserving its existing API, thereby extending its utility for research, teaching, and industrial quantum simulations. The explicit provision of runnable examples directly supports reproducibility and lowers the barrier to adoption.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that the examples are 'available in a static form on GitHub'; the manuscript should include the precise repository URL and commit hash (or tag) used for the version described.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review of the manuscript and their recommendation to accept. The report contains no major comments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is a software release note describing QuTiP v5 updates, data-layer changes (JAX/CuPy support), new solvers, QuTiP-QIP and QuTiP-QOC modules, and example notebooks. It contains no mathematical derivations, predictions, fitted parameters, or uniqueness theorems. All content is factual description of implemented features with runnable examples; the forward-looking impact statement rests on adoption of the released code rather than any internal derivation chain. No self-citation load-bearing steps, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of results occur. The paper is self-contained as a factual announcement and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a software release paper, there are no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities associated with any scientific derivation or claim.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5799 in / 1174 out tokens · 36186 ms · 2026-05-23T08:03:32.254140+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AtomTwin.jl: a physics-native digital twin framework for neutral-atom quantum processors

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AtomTwin.jl is a physics-native Julia framework for simulating neutral-atom quantum processors, with a demonstration of logical Bell state preparation using four ytterbium-171 atoms in movable tweezers.

  2. Excited-State Quantum Chemistry on Qumode-Based Processors via Variational Quantum Deflation

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    QumVQD enables excited-state quantum chemistry calculations on bosonic qumode hardware by enforcing particle-number symmetry and using Hamiltonian fragmentation, achieving chemical accuracy on H2 and spectroscopic acc...

  3. Multivariate quantum reservoir computing with discrete and continuous variable systems

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Quantum reservoirs handle multivariate time series best with task-specific encodings that leverage non-classical effects.

  4. Fluctuation-guided adaptive random compiler for Hamiltonian simulation

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0

    A fluctuation-guided adaptive random compiler for Hamiltonian simulation dynamically adjusts term sampling probabilities according to state sensitivity to improve fidelity over fixed randomized methods.

  5. Universal Jaynes-Cummings Control of an Oscillator

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Experimental demonstration of universal qudit control on a cavity oscillator via compiled Jaynes-Cummings gates with a transmon ancilla, reaching 96% mean post-selected process fidelity for qutrit gates.

  6. Training continuously-coupled reconfigurable photonic chips with quantum machine learning

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A black-box machine learning technique trains continuously-coupled photonic waveguide arrays to implement target unitaries using limited single- and two-photon measurements without requiring detailed internal models.

  7. Error-Tolerant Quantum State Discrimination: Optimization and Quantum Circuit Synthesis

    quant-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Error-tolerant quantum state discrimination methods using CrossQSD, FitQSD, and a hybrid convex optimization framework are proposed, with a modified Naimark dilation for hardware-efficient quantum circuits.

  8. Addressing intramolecular vibrational redistribution in a single molecule through pump and probe surface-enhanced vibrational spectroscopy

    physics.optics 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    A molecular-optomechanics framework predicts clear anti-Stokes SERS signatures of population transfer between coupled vibrational modes under two realistic pump-probe schemes.

  9. Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing for simultaneous gate operations on multiple qubits via a shared control line

    quant-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Orthogonal FDM with rectangular pulses suppresses interference to enable high-fidelity simultaneous gates on multiple qubits via a single microwave line.

  10. Single-shot conditional displacement gate between a trapped atom and traveling light

    quant-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Proposes and models a single-shot conditional displacement gate between a trapped atom and traveling light pulse via cavity mediation, including loss effects for hybrid quantum information processing.

  11. Quantum Error Correction with Superpositions of Squeezed Fock States

    quant-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A bosonic code from superpositions of squeezed Fock states maintains orthogonality at all squeezing levels and achieves error correction scaling as exp(-7r) for single-photon loss and dephasing.

  12. Fate of entanglement in open quantum spin liquid: Time evolution of its genuine multipartite negativity upon sudden coupling to a dissipative bosonic environment

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Time evolution of genuine multipartite negativity in the open Kitaev quantum spin liquid shows persistence in loopy subregions in Markovian regime and at higher temperatures in non-Markovian regime.

  13. Quantum-inspired dynamical models on quantum and classical annealers

    quant-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A parallel-in-time encoding turns quantum dynamical propagators into QUBO instances for direct benchmarking of quantum annealers against classical solvers on models from single-qubit rotations to PT-symmetric systems.

  14. Ultracold Mechanical Quantum Sensor for Tests of New Physics

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Experimental measurement of ultralow excited-state populations in an HBAR enables new constraints on high-frequency gravitational waves, dark matter, and wavefunction collapse models.

  15. Long-range quantum emitter interactions mediated by a non-local metasurface: Application to qubit-qubit entanglement

    quant-ph 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Non-local metasurfaces supporting BICs achieve β-factors exceeding 80% for quantum emitter coupling, enabling faster and amplified entanglement between remote qubits over multiple wavelengths.

  16. Perfect displacement of a superconducting resonator via fast-forward scaling and its application to high-speed $R_{ZZ}$ gates in Kerr-cat qubits

    quant-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Perfect displacement of superconducting resonators is achieved via fast-forward scaling of drive amplitude or detuning, enabling high-speed R_ZZ gates in Kerr-cat qubits.

  17. Integrable Floquet Time Crystals in One Dimension

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Integrable Floquet time crystals realized in 1D quadratic lattice models from spin chains, with rigid DTC phase, phase diagram showing transitions to Floquet paramagnet, and exponentially diverging lifetime via finite...

  18. Quantum reservoir computing in Jaynes-Cummings models: Nonlinear memory and time-series prediction

    quant-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Jaynes-Cummings qubit-boson systems show superior nonlinear memory capacity and comparable Mackey-Glass forecasting performance when used as quantum reservoirs.

  19. A trace distance-based geometric analysis of the stabilizer polytope for few-qubit systems

    quant-ph 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Geometric study of non-stabilizerness in few-qubit systems via trace distance to the stabilizer polytope, with state sampling, measure comparisons, an analytical expression, facet classification, and a concentration b...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 138 canonical work pages · cited by 19 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dy- namics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    https://github.com/qutip/qutip-paper-v5-examples

    work page

  4. [4]

    https://github.com/qutip/qutip-tutorials

    work page

  5. [5]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt,et al., Array programming with NumPy, Nature585, 357 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New Journal of Physics16, 063065 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Giannozziet al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter21, 395502 (2009)

    P. Giannozziet al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter21, 395502 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    R. T. McGibbon, K. A. Beauchamp, M. P. Harrigan, C. Klein, J. M. Swails, C. X. Hernández, C. R. Schwantes, L.-P. Wang, T. J. Lane, and V. S. Pande, MDTraj: A modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories, Biophysical Journal109, 1528 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    The Astropy Collaborationet al., The Astropy Project: Sustaining and growing a community-oriented open-source project and the latest major release (v5.0) of the core package, The Astrophysical Journal 935, 167 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    W. Zeng, B. Johnson, R. Smith, N. Rubin, M. Reagor, C. Ryan, and C. Rigetti, First quantum computers need smart software, Nature News549, 149 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Dargan, The quantum insider: Top 35 open source quantum computing tools (2024)

    J. Dargan, The quantum insider: Top 35 open source quantum computing tools (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    D. S. Steiger, T. Häner, and M. Troyer, ProjectQ: an open source software framework for quantum computing, Quantum2, 49 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    J.R.McCleanet al.,OpenFermion: theelectronicstructurepackageforquantumcomputers,Quantum Science and Technology5, 034014 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Quantum computing with Qiskit

    A. Javadi-Abhari, M. Treinish, K. Krsulich, C. J. Wood, J. Lishman, J. Gacon, S. Martiel, P. D. Nation, L. S. Bishop, A. W. Cross, B. R. Johnson, and J. M. Gambetta, Quantum computing with Qiskit, arXiv:2405.08810 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    S. M. Tan, The quantum optics toolbox for MATLAB (2002)

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems(Oxford University Press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  17. [17]

    D. A. Lidar, Lecture Notes on the Theory of Open Quantum Systems, arXiv:1902.00967 [quant-ph] (2019). 75

    work page arXiv 1902

  18. [18]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright,et al., SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods17, 261 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Behnel, R

    S. Behnel, R. Bradshaw, C. Citro, L. Dalcin, D. S. Seljebotn, and K. Smith, Cython: The best of both worlds, Computing in Science & Engineering13, 31 (2011)

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Comput. Sci. Eng.9, 90 (2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    B. Li, S. Ahmed, S. Saraogi, N. Lambert, F. Nori, A. Pitchford, and N. Shammah, Pulse-level noisy quantum circuits with qutip, Quantum6, 630 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Lambert, T

    N. Lambert, T. Raheja, S. Cross, P. Menczel, S. Ahmed, A. Pitchford, D. Burgarth, and F. Nori, QuTiP-BoFiN: A bosonic and fermionic numerical hierarchical-equations-of-motion library with appli- cationsinlight-harvesting, quantumcontrol, andsingle-moleculeelectronics,PhysicalReviewResearch 5(2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Shammah, S

    N. Shammah, S. Ahmed, N. Lambert, S. De Liberato, and F. Nori, Open quantum systems with local and collective incoherent processes: Efficient numerical simulations using permutational invariance, Phys. Rev. A98, 063815 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Google Summer of Code, https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/

    work page

  25. [25]

    https://github.com/qgrad/qgrad

    work page

  26. [26]

    https://github.com/qutip/qutip-jax

    work page

  27. [27]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    https://github.com/qutip/qutip-cupy

    work page

  29. [29]

    https://github.com/qutip/qutip-tensorflow

    work page

  30. [30]

    https://github.com/qutip/qutip-tensornetwork

    work page

  31. [31]

    https://data-apis.org/array-api/latest

    work page

  32. [32]

    Guilmin, R

    P. Guilmin, R. Gautier, A. Bocquet, and É. Genois, Dynamiqs: an open-source Python library for GPU-accelerated and differentiable simulation of quantum systems (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Luo, J.-G

    X.-Z. Luo, J.-G. Liu, P. Zhang, and L. Wang, Yao.jl: Extensible, Efficient Framework for Quantum Algorithm Design, Quantum4, 341 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    P. D. Nation, Steady-state solution methods for open quantum optical systems, arXiv:1504.06768 [quant-ph] (2015)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    Dalibard, Y

    J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 580 (1992)

    work page 1992

  36. [36]

    Gneiting, A

    C. Gneiting, A. Koottandavida, A. V. Rozhkov, and F. Nori, Unraveling the topology of dissipative quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023036 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Gneiting, A

    C. Gneiting, A. V. Rozhkov, and F. Nori, Jump-time unraveling of Markovian open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A104, 062212 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    R.Dum, P.Zoller,andH.Ritsch,Montecarlosimulationoftheatomicmasterequationforspontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. A45, 4879 (1992). 76

    work page 1992

  39. [39]

    Mølmer, Y

    K. Mølmer, Y. Castin, and J. Dalibard, Monte carlo wave-function method in quantum optics, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B10, 524 (1993)

    work page 1993

  40. [40]

    Radaelli, G

    M. Radaelli, G. T. Landi, and F. C. Binder, Gillespie algorithm for quantum jump trajectories, Phys. Rev. A110, 062212 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Breuer, Genuine quantum trajectories for non-Markovian processes, Phys

    H.-P. Breuer, Genuine quantum trajectories for non-Markovian processes, Phys. Rev. A70, 012106 (2004)

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    Piilo, S

    J. Piilo, S. Maniscalco, K. Härkönen, and K.-A. Suominen, Non-Markovian Quantum Jumps, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 180402 (2008)

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    B. I. C. Donvil and P. Muratore-Ginanneschi, On the Unraveling of Open Quantum Dynamics, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Breuer, B

    H.-P. Breuer, B. Kappler, and F. Petruccione, Stochastic wave-function method for non-Markovian quantum master equations, Phys. Rev. A59, 1633 (1999)

    work page 1999

  45. [45]

    M. R. Hush, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Garrahan, Generic map from non-Lindblad to Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A91, 032113 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Menczel, K

    P. Menczel, K. Funo, M. Cirio, N. Lambert, and F. Nori, Non-hermitian pseudomodes for strongly coupled open quantum systems: Unravelings, correlations, and thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033237 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Donvil and P

    B. Donvil and P. Muratore-Ginanneschi, Quantum trajectory framework for general time-local master equations, Nat Commun13, 4140 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Donvil and P

    B. Donvil and P. Muratore-Ginanneschi, Unraveling-paired dynamical maps recover the input of quan- tum channels, New J. Phys.25, 053031 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Davidović, Completely Positive, Simple, and Possibly Highly Accurate Approximation of the Red- field Equation, Quantum4, 326 (2020)

    D. Davidović, Completely Positive, Simple, and Possibly Highly Accurate Approximation of the Red- field Equation, Quantum4, 326 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Gneiting, Disorder-dressed quantum evolution, Phys

    C. Gneiting, Disorder-dressed quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. B101, 214203 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Groszkowski, A

    P. Groszkowski, A. Seif, J. Koch, and A. A. Clerk, Simple master equations for describing driven systems subject to classical non-Markovian noise, Quantum7, 972 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Floquet, Sur les équations différentielles linéaires à coefficients périodiques, Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure2e série, 12, 47 (1883)

    G. Floquet, Sur les équations différentielles linéaires à coefficients périodiques, Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure2e série, 12, 47 (1883)

    work page

  53. [53]

    J. H. Shirley, Solution of the Schrödinger equation with a Hamiltonian periodic in time, Phys. Rev. 138, B979 (1965)

    work page 1965

  54. [54]

    Grifoni and P

    M. Grifoni and P. Hänggi, Driven quantum tunneling, Physics Reports304, 229 (1998)

    work page 1998

  55. [55]

    Creffield, Location of crossings in the Floquet spectrum of a driven two-level system, Phys

    C. Creffield, Location of crossings in the Floquet spectrum of a driven two-level system, Phys. Rev. B 67, 165301 (2003)

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    Clawson and E

    F. Clawson and E. B. Flagg, Floquet-Lindblad master equation approach to open quantum system dynamics, arXiv:2410.18046 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Tanimura, Numerically “exact” approach to open quantum dynamics: The hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM), The Journal of Chemical Physics153, 020901 (2020)

    Y. Tanimura, Numerically “exact” approach to open quantum dynamics: The hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM), The Journal of Chemical Physics153, 020901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Tanimura and R

    Y. Tanimura and R. Kubo, Time evolution of a quantum system in contact with a nearly gaussian- markoffian noise bath, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan58, 101 (1989). 77

    work page 1989

  59. [59]

    Cygorek and E

    M. Cygorek and E. M. Gauger, ACE: A general-purpose non-Markovian open quantum systems sim- ulation toolkit based on process tensors, The Journal of Chemical Physics161, 074111 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Cirio, N

    M. Cirio, N. Lambert, P. Liang, P.-C. Kuo, Y.-N. Chen, P. Menczel, K. Funo, and F. Nori, Pseud- ofermion method for the exact description of fermionic environments: From single-molecule electronics to the Kondo resonance, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033011 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    P.-C. Kuo, N. Lambert, M. Cirio, Y.-T. Huang, F. Nori, and Y.-N. Chen, Kondo QED: The Kondo effect and photon trapping in a two-impurity Anderson model ultrastrongly coupled to light, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043177 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Rahman and U

    H. Rahman and U. Kleinekathöfer, Chebyshev hierarchical equations of motion for systems with arbitrary spectral densities and temperatures, The Journal of Chemical Physics150, 244104 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    Ishizaki and G

    A. Ishizaki and G. R. Fleming, Theoretical examination of quantum coherence in a photosynthetic system at physiological temperature, PNAS106, 17255 (2009)

    work page 2009

  64. [64]

    Härtle, G

    R. Härtle, G. Cohen, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Decoherence and lead-induced interdot cou- pling in nonequilibrium electron transport through interacting quantum dots: A hierarchical quantum master equation approach, Phys. Rev. B88, 235426 (2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [65]

    Wenderoth, J

    S. Wenderoth, J. Bätge, and R. Härtle, Sharp peaks in the conductance of a double quantum dot and a quantum-dot spin valve at high temperatures: A hierarchical quantum master equation approach, Phys. Rev. B94, 121303 (2016)

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    Huang, P.-C

    Y.-T. Huang, P.-C. Kuo, N. Lambert, M. Cirio, S. Cross, S.-L. Yang, F. Nori, and Y.-N. Chen, An effi- cient Julia framework for hierarchical equations of motion in open quantum systems, Communications Physics6, 313 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Lambert, S

    N. Lambert, S. Ahmed, M. Cirio, and F. Nori, Modelling the ultra-strongly coupled spin-boson model with unphysical modes, Nat. Commun.10, 3721 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    M. Xu, Y. Yan, Q. Shi, J. Ankerhold, and J. T. Stockburger, Taming Quantum Noise for Efficient Low Temperature Simulations of Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 230601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Wenderoth, H.-P

    S. Wenderoth, H.-P. Breuer, and M. Thoss, Non-markovian effects in the spin-boson model at zero temperature, Physical Review A104, 012213 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    Zhou and J

    Y. Zhou and J. Shao, Solving the spin-boson model of strong dissipation with flexible random- deterministic scheme, The Journal of Chemical Physics128, 034106 (2008)

    work page 2008

  71. [71]

    Wang and M

    H. Wang and M. Thoss, From coherent motion to localization: dynamics of the spin-boson model at zero temperature, New Journal of Physics10, 115005 (2008)

    work page 2008

  72. [72]

    Takahashi, S

    H. Takahashi, S. Rudge, C. Kaspar, M. Thoss, and R. Borrelli, High accuracy exponential decompo- sition of bath correlation functions for arbitrary and structured spectral densities: Emerging method- ologies and new approaches, The Journal of Chemical Physics160, 204105 (2024)

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Suárez and M

    G. Suárez and M. Horodecki, Making non-markovian master equations accessible with approximate environments, arXiv:2506.22346 [quant-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    https://github.com/qutip/qutip-tutorials/blob/main/tutorials-v5/visualization/animation-demo.md

    work page

  75. [75]

    https://github.com/qutip/qutip-tutorials/blob/main/tutorials-v5/miscellaneous/excitation-number- restricted-states-jc-chain.md

    work page

  76. [76]

    Lednev, F

    M. Lednev, F. J. García-Vidal, and J. Feist, Lindblad master equation capable of describing hybrid quantum systems in the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 106902 (2024). 78

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Román-Roche, E

    J. Román-Roche, E. Sánchez-Burillo, and D. Zueco, Bound states in ultrastrong waveguide QED, Phys. Rev. A102, 023702 (2020)

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    Zhang, Y.-x

    J. Zhang, Y.-x. Liu, R.-B. Wu, K. Jacobs, and F. Nori, Quantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications, Physics Reports679, 1–60 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    A. L. Grimsmo, Time-delayed quantum feedback control, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 060402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  80. [80]

    Arranz Regidor, G

    S. Arranz Regidor, G. Crowder, H. Carmichael, and S. Hughes, Modeling quantum light-matter in- teractions in waveguide QED with retardation, nonlinear interactions, and a time-delayed feedback: Matrix product states versus a space-discretized waveguide model, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023030 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.