Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Prompting Strategies for Enabling Large Language Models to Infer Causation from Correlation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.13952 v1 pith:TAK4YOSR submitted 2024-12-18 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Prompting Strategies for Enabling Large Language Models to Infer Causation from Correlation

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords causalpromptingllmssubquestionalgorithmcorrelationlanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) are attracting increasing attention. In this work, we focus on causal reasoning and address the task of establishing causal relationships based on correlation information, a highly challenging problem on which several LLMs have shown poor performance. We introduce a prompting strategy for this problem that breaks the original task into fixed subquestions, with each subquestion corresponding to one step of a formal causal discovery algorithm, the PC algorithm. The proposed prompting strategy, PC-SubQ, guides the LLM to follow these algorithmic steps, by sequentially prompting it with one subquestion at a time, augmenting the next subquestion's prompt with the answer to the previous one(s). We evaluate our approach on an existing causal benchmark, Corr2Cause: our experiments indicate a performance improvement across five LLMs when comparing PC-SubQ to baseline prompting strategies. Results are robust to causal query perturbations, when modifying the variable names or paraphrasing the expressions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Why LLMs Fail at Causal Discovery and How Interventional Agents Escape

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LLMs fail causal discovery due to a kernel obstruction in observational learning, but interventional agents using frozen LLMs in Bayesian loops succeed without training on causal graph benchmarks.

  2. CausalGuard: Conformal Inference under Graph Uncertainty

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CausalGuard aggregates LLM-proposed and data-pruned DAGs to weight doubly robust pseudo-outcomes and applies conformal calibration to deliver finite-sample marginal coverage for conditional average treatment effects u...

  3. When Do We Need LLMs? A Diagnostic for Language-Driven Bandits

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Lightweight numerical bandits on text embeddings match or exceed LLM accuracy in contextual bandits at a fraction of the cost, with an embedding-based diagnostic to choose between them.