Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 12 cited by

Introduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read These notes argue that black hole thermodynamics is a derived consequence of quantum field theory on a curved background, not a separate postulate.

desk verdict A careful, honest, and readable introduction to black hole thermodynamics; no new results, but the derivations are clean and the limitations are flagged—worth refereeing as review. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16795 v5 pith:BNVDBRPP submitted 2024-12-21 hep-th gr-qc

Edward Witten This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 04.70.Dy04.62.+v
keywords blackholethermodynamicsevaporationhorizonentropyEuclideanactionvonNeumannentanglementcosmological
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

These notes set out to show that black hole thermodynamics is a derived consequence of quantum field theory in a curved background, not an independent postulate. The late-time radiation seen by a distant observer is traced back, through the near-horizon redshift, to the vacuum of a quantum field; the two-point function comes out thermal at temperature $T=1/8\pi GM$. With that temperature in hand, the First Law $dE=T\,dS$ fixes the entropy as $S=A/4G$, and the Euclidean action calculation reproduces the same value. The same thermal logic governs Rindler space, de Sitter space, and the two exteriors of the extended Schwarzschild geometry, and it motivates reading $A/4G$ as a genuine entropy whose microscopic state-counting remains an open problem.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the relation between a near-horizon null coordinate and a distant observer's time, $u = C e^{-t/4GM}$ for an outgoing null geodesic; it turns the universal short-distance vacuum two-point function into a thermal correlation function whose imaginary-time period is fixed. In the Euclidean formulation, the same physics appears as the smoothness condition on the cigar-like geometry $R^2\times S^2$: $t_E$ must be periodic with period $8\pi GM$, because any other period would leave a conical singularity at the horizon. The conical-singularity argument is what makes the entropy computation local on the horizon and independent of the matter content.

What would settle it

Measure the spectrum of a small but still semiclassical black hole and check whether it remains exactly thermal at $T=1/8\pi GM$; any detectable departure, or a calculation of gravitational corrections that changes the coefficient of $A/G$ in the entropy, would show the fixed-background derivation is only approximate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the two iconic numbers of black hole physics follow from the vacuum of a quantum field on a fixed Schwarzschild spacetime. An outgoing mode that reaches a late-time observer originates exponentially close to the horizon, and the coordinate mapping $u\sim e^{-t/4GM}$ converts the flat-space vacuum correlation function into one that is antiperiodic under $t\to t+8\pi GM i$, the signature of a thermal ensemble at temperature $T=1/8\pi GM$. Integrating the First Law then gives $S=4\pi GM^2=A/4G$. Independently, the Euclidean Schwarzschild metric is smooth and complete only when imaginary time is periodic with period $\beta_H=8\pi GM$; evaluating the gravitational action in that background gives $S=\beta_H^2/16\pi G=A/4G$. The paper presents these as complementary derivations of the same result, with the Euclidean route extending to other stationary black holes and to de Sitter space.

Load-bearing premise

The derivations assume the black hole is a fixed classical background whose gravitational back-reaction from the quantum fields is negligible, an approximation the paper says fails only near the Planck mass.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A black hole formed from collapse radiates thermally at $T=1/8\pi GM$, so it slowly evaporates; a solar-mass black hole in vacuum has a lifetime of order $10^{67}$ years.
  • The entropy is pinned to $A/4G$ by two independent routes, so the proportionality constant is not a convention; it is a prediction of the semiclassical framework.
  • The generalized second law survives the problematic case of very long-wavelength photons because the black hole strongly emits the same photons it absorbs.
  • The same horizon thermal structure applies to Rindler wedges and de Sitter static patches, and the extended Schwarzschild geometry is a thermofield double of two entangled exteriors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the fixed-background derivation holds up to near the Planck mass, any complete quantum theory of gravity must reproduce $T=1/8\pi GM$ and $S=A/4G$ in the semiclassical limit, making these formulas a boundary condition on quantum gravity rather than an output of a specific model.
  • Beyond the paper: the same Euclidean periodicity argument suggests that cosmological horizons carry entropy $A/4G$; if so, de Sitter entropy is observer-dependent in the same way that Rindler temperature depends on acceleration.
  • Beyond the paper: a quantitative next step would be to include small back-reaction corrections and predict how the thermal spectrum and entropy shift as the black hole shrinks, giving a testable signature for the final stages of evaporation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This is a substantial set of lecture notes (~130 pages) reviewing the foundations of black hole thermodynamics. It presents Bekenstein's generalized second law, Hawking's derivation of black hole radiation from the thermal two-point function on a Schwarzschild background (§3), gray body factors and thermodynamic instability (§4), the Rindler/Unruh analog (§5), the Euclidean approach including the Gibbons-Hawking action, the conical singularity method, the AdS and de Sitter cases, and the thermofield double state (§6), and then von Neumann entropy, entanglement entropy, the Bekenstein bound, the Ryu-Takayanagi formula, and the nature of white holes (§§7–10). The central technical claims are the standard ones: T_H = 1/8πGM follows from the imaginary-time periodicity of the two-point function (eq. 3.5), and S = A/4G follows from the First Law (eq. 3.7) and independently from the Euclidean action (eqs. 6.22–6.23) and the conical singularity method (eqs. 6.27–6.28). The paper explicitly flags its principal limitation, the fixed-background approximation valid for M much larger than the Planck mass (§3), and notes in §6.4 that the Euclidean computation lacks a direct state-counting interpretation.

Significance. This paper makes no claim to new technical results; its value lies in the clarity and correctness of its exposition. I checked the load-bearing algebra and found it internally consistent: (3.4)→(3.5) gives a two-point function antiperiodic under t → t + 8πGM i with the correct residue; the First Law integration in (3.7) returns S = A/4G; the regularized boundary action (6.22) gives I_BH = β_H²/16πG and hence (6.23); and the conical singularity computation (6.25)–(6.28) reproduces S = A/4G without assuming S(M=0)=0. The paper is unusually honest about its assumptions: the Planck-mass validity condition in §3, the absence of a state-counting interpretation in §6.4, the use of the First Law in the formula S = (1−β d/dβ) log Z, and the non-factorization of the Hilbert space in continuum QFT (footnotes 15, 29). There are no fitted parameters and no circular steps: the temperature emerges from the vacuum short-distance behavior of the two-point function, not from an assumed thermal state. As an introduction that takes a newcomer from Bekenstein's conjecture to the thermofield double and the Ryu-Takayanagi formula, the paper fills its stated purpose admirably.

minor comments (5)
  1. [§3] In the partial wave discussion, the phrase 'the two dimensions being the distance from the distance from the horizon and the time' contains a duplicated 'distance from'; it should read 'the distance from the horizon and the time.'
  2. [§5.2] The word 'comvinced' in 'A quick way to become comvinced that the observations of such an observer will be thermal' is a typo for 'convinced.'
  3. [§6.6] The word 'normaiization' in the definition of Ψ_W(φ_S) is a typo for 'normalization.'
  4. [§6.6] The citation of the Wikipedia article 'Bishop-Gromov Inequality' is stylistically out of keeping with the otherwise scholarly citation practice; citing the standard reference [50] alone would be more consistent.
  5. [§1 and §6.6] The informal asides (the nursery rhyme in §1 and 'According to Wikipedia' in footnote 1) are charming but may be trimmed if the journal prefers a formal register; this is purely a matter of house style.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Hawking temperature and the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy are derived from quantum field theory on a fixed Schwarzschild background and from the Euclidean action, with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central derivations are self-contained rather than circular. In Section 3, the Hawking temperature is obtained by tracing the vacuum two-point function of a chiral fermion along outgoing null geodesics: Eq. (3.1) follows from the Schwarzschild geodesic equation, Eq. (3.4) is the standard short-distance vacuum correlator, and substituting u = exp(C/4GM) exp(-t/4GM) gives Eq. (3.5), whose antiperiodicity with period 8πGM i identifies the temperature T_H = 1/8πGM by the standard KMS/thermal definition. No quantity is fitted to the target result. Section 3 then derives S = A/4G from the First Law dE = T dS, integrating dS = 8πGM dM; this uses the First Law as an independent input (for rotating black holes the paper cites the separately established Bardeen-Carter-Hawking first law) and is not equivalent to assuming the entropy formula. The Euclidean approach provides two further independent derivations: Section 6.2 computes the regularized GHY action I_BH = β_H^2/16πG and applies the standard thermodynamic relation S = (1 - β d/dβ) log Z, while Section 6.3 reproduces A/4G from the conical singularity generated by varying β at fixed M, using the Gauss-Bonnet theorem rather than a boundary subtraction. These are distinct computations, not re-statements of the input. The paper explicitly identifies its own limitations: the fixed-background approximation requires M much larger than the Planck mass (Section 3), and the Euclidean action lacks a direct state-counting interpretation (Section 6.4). These are scoping conditions and open interpretational questions, not circular steps. Self-citations such as [27] for KMS details and [35] for AdS boundary properties are supplementary technical references and are not load-bearing for the main derivation; no uniqueness theorem from the author's prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives. Overall, the derivation chain reduces neither by definition nor by fitted input to its own premises.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters, no ad hoc axioms, and no invented entities. It is a review that relies on standard assumptions of quantum field theory in curved spacetime, the First Law, Euclidean continuation, and established holographic results. The main load-bearing premise is the fixed-background approximation, which the paper itself flags as breaking down near the Planck mass.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Quantum field theory on a fixed curved background is valid for macroscopic black holes, with backreaction negligible.
    Invoked in section 3 to derive the thermal two-point function; the paper says for a realistic astrophysical black hole 'Hawking's approximation is expected to be excellent.'
  • domain assumption The universality of short-distance vacuum behavior: at very short distances any state looks like the vacuum, so <psi(u)psi(u')> = (du du')^(1/2)/(u-u') applies near the horizon.
    Used in section 3, eq. (3.4), to convert the vacuum correlation function into the thermal correlation function (3.5).
  • domain assumption The First Law dE = T dS applies to black holes, and Hawking's area theorem holds.
    The First Law is used in section 3 to obtain S = A/4G from T = 1/8piGM; the area theorem [10] motivates Bekenstein's ansatz in section 2.
  • standard math Euclidean analytic continuation of the Schwarzschild metric is meaningful, and smoothness of the Euclidean geometry fixes the inverse temperature at beta = 8piGM.
    The core of section 6.1: the requirement that the Euclidean metric have no conical singularity sets the period of t_E and connects to the thermal interpretation.
  • domain assumption The AdS/CFT duality is a correct framework for interpreting AdS black hole thermodynamics.
    Section 6.5 uses the boundary CFT interpretation of the Hawking-Page transition and the scaling laws (6.45), citing 'extensive' evidence for the duality.
  • domain assumption Established results in von Neumann entropy and holographic entanglement entropy, including the Page curve and the Ryu-Takayanagi formula, are correct as reviewed.
    Sections 7 through 9 review these results; the paper does not re-derive them from first principles.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Introduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BNVDBRPP

@misc{pith2026241216795,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Introduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BNVDBRPP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16795}
}
read the original abstract

These notes aim to provide an introduction to the basics of black hole thermodynamics. After explaining Bekenstein's original proposal that black holes have entropy, we discuss Hawking's discovery of black hole radiation, its analog for Rindler space in the Unruh effect, the Euclidean approach to black hole thermodynamics, some basics about von Neumann entropy and its applications, the Ryu-Takayanagi formula, and the nature of a white hole.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 12 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Information-Theoretic Black Hole Entropy I: Beyond the Area Law

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Black hole entropy is proposed to equal the Kullback-Leibler divergence between a mass-biased N-bit ensemble and the uniform ensemble, with the area law as the leading 1/N term.

  2. A revision to the QES prescription

    hep-th 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a weighted-sum revision of the quantum extremal surface formula, but the weight is assumed rather than derived.

  3. Thermodynamics of black and white holes in ensemble of Planckons

    gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A toy model counting pairs of Planckons gives integer black hole entropy, negative white hole entropy, charge-independent Reissner-Nordstrom entropy, and a quantized cosmological constant.

  4. Entanglement Entropy and Cauchy-Hadamard Renormalization

    hep-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A ratio of partition functions on branched covers, defined by Cauchy-Hadamard renormalization, transforms under Weyl rescalings exactly as twist-field correlation functions with weights Δ_j = (c/12) Σ (1 - 1/ord_f(z)).

  5. Acceleration radiation and HBAR thermodynamics for atoms falling into a BTZ black hole: A CQM quantum-optics approach

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An established atomic-detector model of black-hole radiation is extended to the 2+1-dimensional BTZ black hole, reproducing Hawking-temperature thermal emission and an entropy proportional to horizon 'area'.

  6. Probing phase transitions of regular black holes in anti-de Sitter space with Lyapunov exponent

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For charged regular AdS black holes in quasi-topological gravity, the null-geodesic Lyapunov exponent jumps at the first-order phase transition and its phase difference vanishes at the critical point with exponent 1/2...

  7. Quantum thermodynamics in a rotating BTZ black hole spacetime

    hep-th 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A detector in rotating BTZ spacetime thermalizes faster when heating than when cooling, but the effect traces to the two baths having different temperatures.

  8. Extracting more information from entropy

    hep-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The entropy stairway in a holographic plasma encodes twice the lowest quasi-normal mode, with entropy production rate proportional to the square of the pressure anisotropy.

  9. Quantum Scattering in Schwarzschild Spacetime: Hawking Radiation and Black Hole Atmospheres

    hep-th 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper derives a Bose-Einstein emission rate at the Hawking temperature and an atmosphere radius rAtm = 4 ln2 r_s from antibound poles of the Schwarzschild S-matrix, but the derivation is not self-consistent.

  10. Celestial Chiral Algebras and Self-Dual Gravity

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    This thesis derives deformations of celestial chiral algebras in self-dual gravity on curved backgrounds, obtaining W(infinity) on Eguchi-Hanson space, Ldiff_q(C) under Moyal deformation, and a two-parameter deformati...

  11. Bulk-boundary entanglement correspondence and the Ryu-Takayanagi conjecture in an $AdS_2/CFT_1$ setup

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    For a free scalar plus Majorana field in AdS2, boundary thermofield-double entanglement entropy matches, up to additive constants, the bulk horizon entanglement entropy and the log of a near-boundary geodesic length.

  12. The quantum relative entropy of the Schwarzschild black-hole and the area law

    gr-qc 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The quantum relative entropy of the Schwarzschild metric is claimed to obey an area law at large Schwarzschild radius, with a coefficient set by two free parameters.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 12 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Black Holes and Entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black Holes and Entropy,” Phys. Rev. D7 (1973) 2333-2346

    1973

  2. [2]

    Particle Creation By Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation By Black Holes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199-220

    1975

  3. [3]

    Reversible and Irreversible Transformations in Black-Hole Physics,

    D. Christodoulou, “Reversible and Irreversible Transformations in Black-Hole Physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 (1970) 1596. – 120 –

    1970

  4. [4]

    The Four Laws of Black Hole Mechanics,

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, “The Four Laws of Black Hole Mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973) 161-70

    1973

  5. [5]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, 1984)

    1984

  6. [6]

    S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, eds., General Relativity: an Einstein Centenary Survey (Cambridge University Press, 1979)

    1979

  7. [7]

    The Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “The Entropy of Hawking Radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021) 35002, arXiv:2006.06872

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Replica Wormholes and The Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and The Entropy of Hawking Radiation,” JHEP 05 (2020) 013, arXiv:1911.12333

    arXiv 2020

Show all 113 references
  1. [9]

    Light Rays, Singularities, and All That,

    E. Witten, “Light Rays, Singularities, and All That,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 (2020) 045004, arXiv:1901.03928

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Black Holes In General Relativity,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black Holes In General Relativity,” Commun. Math. Phys. 25 (1972) 152-66

    1972

  3. [11]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy,

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy,” Phys. Lett. B379 (1996), 99-104, hep-th/9601029

    1996 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Event Horizons in Static Vacuum Spacetimes,

    W. Israel, “Event Horizons in Static Vacuum Spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. 164 (1967) 1776-9

    1967

  5. [13]

    Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom,

    B. Carter, “Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 (1971) 331-333

    1971

  6. [14]

    Some Properties of the Noether Charge and a Proposal for Dynamical Black Hole Entropy,

    V. Iyer and R. Wald, “Some Properties of the Noether Charge and a Proposal for Dynamical Black Hole Entropy,” Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 846-64

    1994

  7. [15]

    Particle Emission From a Black Hole: Massless Particles From an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole,

    D. Page, “Particle Emission From a Black Hole: Massless Particles From an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole,” Phys. Rev. D13 (1976) 198-206

    1976

  8. [16]

    On The Derivation of the Hawking Radiation Associated With the Black Hole,

    K. Fredenhagen and R. Haag, “On The Derivation of the Hawking Radiation Associated With the Black Hole,” Commun. Math. Phys. 127 (1990) 273

    1990

  9. [17]

    Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search For Links,

    J. A. Wheeler, “Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search For Links,” in S. Kobayashi, ed., 3rd International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in Light (Physical Society of Japan, 1990), available at https://philpapers.org/archive/WHEIPQ.pdf

    1990

  10. [18]

    Comments on Magnetically Charged Black Holes,

    J. Maldacena, “Comments on Magnetically Charged Black Holes,” JHEP 04 (2021) 079, arXiv:2004.06084

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Black Holes in Thermal Equilibrium,

    G. W. Gibbons and M. J. Perry, “Black Holes in Thermal Equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 965-7

    1976

  12. [20]

    Black Holes and Thermal Green Functions,

    G. W. Gibbons and M. J. Perry, “Black Holes and Thermal Green Functions,” Proc. R. Sol. Lond. A358 (1978) 467-94

    1978

  13. [21]

    Notes on Black-Hole Evaporation,

    W. G. Unruh, “Notes on Black-Hole Evaporation,” Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 870-92

    1976

  14. [22]

    Instability of Flat Space at Finite Temperature,

    D. J. Gross, M. J. Perry, and L. Yaffe, “Instability of Flat Space at Finite Temperature,” Phys. Rev. D25 (1982) 330-55

    1982

  15. [23]

    Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Anti de Sitter Space,

    S. W. Hawking and D. Page, “Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Anti de Sitter Space,” Commun. Math. Phys. 87 (1983) 577

    1983

  16. [24]

    Acceleration Radiation in Interacting Field Theories,

    W. G. Unruh and N. Weiss, “Acceleration Radiation in Interacting Field Theories,” Phys. Rev. D29 (1984) 1656-62. – 121 –

    1984

  17. [25]

    On The Duality Condition For Quantum Fields,

    J. Bisognano and E. Wichmann, “On The Duality Condition For Quantum Fields,” J. Math. Phys. 17 (1976) 303-21

    1976

  18. [26]

    Quantum Fields On Manifolds: PCT and Gravitationally Induced Thermal States,

    G. L. Sewell, “Quantum Fields On Manifolds: PCT and Gravitationally Induced Thermal States,” Ann. Phys. 141 (1982) 201-24

    1982

  19. [27]

    Notes on Some Entanglement Properties of Quantum Field Theory,

    E. Witten, “Notes on Some Entanglement Properties of Quantum Field Theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 045003, arXiv:1803.04993

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2752-6

    1977

  21. [29]

    Path Integral Derivation of Black Hole Radiance,

    S. W. Hawking and J. Hartle, “Path Integral Derivation of Black Hole Radiance,” Phys. Rev. D13 (1976) 2188-2203

    1976

  22. [30]

    Role of Conformal Three-Geometry in the Dynamics of Gravitation,

    J. W. York, “Role of Conformal Three-Geometry in the Dynamics of Gravitation,” Phys. Rev, Lett. 28 (1972) 1082

    1972

  23. [31]

    The Off-Shell Black Hole,

    S. Carlip and C. Teitelboim, “The Off-Shell Black Hole,” arXiv:gr-qc/9312002

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Anti-de Sitter Space,

    S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, “Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Anti-de Sitter Space,” Commun. Math. Phys. 87 (1983) 577-88

    1983

  25. [33]

    The Large N Limit Of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N Limit Of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231-52

    1998

  26. [34]

    Gauge Theory Correlators From Noncritical String Theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge Theory Correlators From Noncritical String Theory,” Phys. Lett. B428 (1998) 105-14

    1998

  27. [35]

    Anti-de Sitter Space and Holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter Space and Holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253-91

    1998

  28. [36]

    Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, “Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity,” Annals Phys. 144 (1982) 249

    1982

  29. [37]

    Conformal Invariants,

    C. Fefferman and C. R. Graham, “Conformal Invariants,” in Elie Cartan et les Math´ ematiques d’Aujourdhui(Asterisque, 1985) 95

    1985

  30. [38]

    The AdS/CFT Correspondence,

    V. Hubeny, “The AdS/CFT Correspondence,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 12, arXiv:1501.00007

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    The AdS/CFT Correspondence,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The AdS/CFT Correspondence,” available at https: //link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-19-3079-9_65-1#Sec14

    doi

  32. [40]

    The D1/D5 System and Singular CFT,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “The D1/D5 System and Singular CFT,” JHEP 04 (1999) 017, hep-th/9903224

    1999 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,” Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2738-2751

    1977

  34. [42]

    Interacting Relativistic Boson Fields in the De Sitter Universe With Two Space-Time Dimensions,

    R. Figari, R. Hoegh-Krohn, and C. R. Nappi, “Interacting Relativistic Boson Fields in the De Sitter Universe With Two Space-Time Dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 44 (1975) 265-278

    1975

  35. [43]

    A Note On Hartle-Hawking Vacua,

    T. Jacobson, “A Note On Hartle-Hawking Vacua,” Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) R6031-R6032, gr-qc/9407022

    1994 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Theorems on the Uniqueness and Thermal Properties of Stationary, Nonsingular, Quasifree States On Space-Times with a Bifurcate Horizon,

    B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald, “Theorems on the Uniqueness and Thermal Properties of Stationary, Nonsingular, Quasifree States On Space-Times with a Bifurcate Horizon,”’ Phys. Rept. 207 (1991) 49-136

    1991

  37. [45]

    Quantum theory of scalar field in de Sitter space-time,

    N. A. Chernikov and E. A. Tagirov, “Quantum theory of scalar field in de Sitter space-time,” – 122 – Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e A IX (1968) 109

    1968

  38. [46]

    Conditions d’unicit´ e pour le propagateur ∆1(x; y) du champ scalaire dans l’univers de de Sitter,

    C. Schomblond and P. Spindel, “Conditions d’unicit´ e pour le propagateur ∆1(x; y) du champ scalaire dans l’univers de de Sitter,” Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e A XXV (1976) 67

    1976

  39. [47]

    Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting,

    T. S. Bunch and P. Davies, “Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London A360 (1978) 117-34

    1978

  40. [48]

    Particle Creation in de Sitter Space,

    E. Mottola, “Particle Creation in de Sitter Space,” Phys. Rev. D31 (1985) 754

    1985

  41. [49]

    Vacuum States in de Sitter Space,

    B. Allen, “Vacuum States in de Sitter Space,” Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 3136

    1985

  42. [50]

    R. L. Bishop and R. L. Crittenden, Geometry of Manifolds (Academic Press, 1964)

    1964

  43. [51]

    Thermo-field Dynamics of Black Holes,

    W. Israel, “Thermo-field Dynamics of Black Holes,” Phys. Lett. 57 (1976) 107-10

    1976

  44. [52]

    The Particle Problem in The General Theory of Relativity,

    A. Einstein and N. Rosen, “The Particle Problem in The General Theory of Relativity,” Phys. Rev. 48 (1935) 73-7

    1935

  45. [53]

    Topological Censorship,

    J. L. Friedman, K. Schleich, and D. M. Witt, “Topological Censorship,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1486-9, arXiv:gr-qc/9305017

    1993 arXiv

  46. [54]

    The AdS/CFT Correspondence And Topological Censorship,

    G. J. Galloway, K. Schleich, D. Witt, and E. Woolgar, “The AdS/CFT Correspondence And Topological Censorship,” Phys. Lett. B505 (2001) 255-62, hep-th/9912119

    2001 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Cool Horizons for Entangled Black Holes,

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool Horizons for Entangled Black Holes,” Fortschritte fur Physik 61 (2013) 781-811

    2013

  48. [56]

    Quantum Statistical Mechanics in a Closed System,

    J. M. Deutsch, “Quantum Statistical Mechanics in a Closed System,” Phys. Rev A43 (1991) 2046-9

    1991

  49. [57]

    Chaos and Quantum Thermalization,

    M. Srednicki, “Chaos and Quantum Thermalization,” Phys. Rev. E50 (1994) 888-901

    1994

  50. [58]

    Chapter 10: Quantum Shannon Theory,

    J, Preskill, “Chapter 10: Quantum Shannon Theory,” available at http://theory.caltech.edu/~preskill/ph219/chap10_6A_2022.pdf

  51. [59]

    A Mini-Introduction to Information Theory,

    E. Witten, “A Mini-Introduction to Information Theory,” La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 43 (2020) 187, arXiv:1805.11965

    2020 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Proof Of The Strong Subadditivity Of Quantum Mechanical Entropy,

    E. H. Lieb and M. B. Ruskai, “Proof Of The Strong Subadditivity Of Quantum Mechanical Entropy,” J. Math. Phys. 14 (1973) 1938

    1973

  53. [61]

    A Simple Proof of the Strong Subadditivity Inequality,

    M. A. Nielsen and D. Petz, “A Simple Proof of the Strong Subadditivity Inequality,” Quantum Information and Computation 5 (2005) 507-13, arXiv:quant-ph/0408130

    2005 arXiv

  54. [62]

    A Proof of the Generalized Second Law for Rapidly Changing Fields and Arbitrary Horizon Slices,

    A. C. Wall, “A Proof of the Generalized Second Law for Rapidly Changing Fields and Arbitrary Horizon Slices,” Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 104049, arXiv:1105.3445

    2012 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Information in Black Hole Radiation,

    D. Page, “Information in Black Hole Radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743-46, hep-th/9306083

    1993 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,” JHEP 09 (2020) 002, arXiv:1905.08255

    2020 arXiv

  57. [65]

    The Entropy of Bulk Quantum Fields and the Entanglement Wedge of an Evaporating Black Hole,

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, “The Entropy of Bulk Quantum Fields and the Entanglement Wedge of an Evaporating Black Hole,” JHEP 12 (2019) 063, arXiv:1905.08762

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    On The Entropy of a Vacuum Outside a Horizon,

    R.D. Sorkin, “On The Entropy of a Vacuum Outside a Horizon,” in B. Bertotti, F. de Fellice, and A. Pascolini, eds., General Relativity and Gravitation, proceedings of the GR10 Conference, Padova 1983 (Consiglio Nazionale della Ricerche, Roma, 1983) Vol. 2, available – 123 – at...

    1983 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Quantum Source of Entropy for Black Holes,

    L. Bombelli, R.K. Koul, J. Lee and R.D. Sorkin, “Quantum Source of Entropy for Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D34 (1986) 373

    1986

  60. [68]

    On The Quantum Structure Of A Black Hole,

    G. ’t Hooft, “On The Quantum Structure Of A Black Hole,” Nucl. Phys. B256 (1985) 727

    1985

  61. [69]

    Entropy and Area,

    M. Srednicki, “Entropy and Area,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 666-9, arXiv:hep-th/9303048

    1993 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Black Hole Entropy in Canonical Quantum Gravity and Superstring Theory,

    L. Susskind and J. Uglum, “Black Hole Entropy in Canonical Quantum Gravity and Superstring Theory,” hep-th/9401070

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Black Hole Entropy and Induced Gravity,

    T. Jacobson, “Black Hole Entropy and Induced Gravity,” arXiv:gr-qc/9404039

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations In Curved Space And The Theory Of Gravitation,

    A. D. Sakharov, “Vacuum Quantum Fluctuations In Curved Space And The Theory Of Gravitation,” Sov. Phys. Dokl. 12 (1968) 1040 [Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. 177 (1968) 70], reprinted in Gen. Rel. Grav. 32 (2000) 365-367

    1968

  65. [73]

    On Geometric Entropy,

    C. Callan and F. Wilczek, “On Geometric Entropy,” Phys. Lett. B333 (1994) 55-61, arXiv:hep-th/9401072

    1994 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Geometric and Renormalized Entropy in Conformal Field Theory,

    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen, and F. Wilczek, “Geometric and Renormalized Entropy in Conformal Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B424 (1994) 443-67, arXiv:hep-th/9403108

    1994 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Theory of Spin Glasses,

    S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, “Theory of Spin Glasses,” J. Phys. F5 (1975) 965

    1975

  68. [76]

    Entanglement Entropy and Quantum Field Theory,

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Entanglement Entropy and Quantum Field Theory,” J.Stat.Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002, arXiv:hep-th/0405152

    2004 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Entire Functions

    R. P. Boas, Jr., “Entire Functions” (Academic Press, New York, 1954)

    1954

  70. [78]

    The Conformal Field Theory of Orbifolds,

    L. J. Dixon, D. Friedan, E. Martinec, and S. H. Shenker, “The Conformal Field Theory of Orbifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B282 (1987) 13-73

    1987

  71. [79]

    Strings on Orbifolds,

    L. J. Dixon, J. A. Harvey, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, “Strings on Orbifolds,” Nucl. Phys. B261 (1985) 678-86

    1985

  72. [80]

    Universal Upper Bound on the Entropy-to-Energy Ratio for Bounded Systems,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Universal Upper Bound on the Entropy-to-Energy Ratio for Bounded Systems,” Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 287-98

    1981

  73. [81]

    Relative Entropy and the Bekenstein Bound,

    H. Casini, “Relative Entropy and the Bekenstein Bound,” Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 205021, arXiv:0804.2182

    2008 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Notes on Spacetime Thermodynamics and the Oberver-dependence of Entropy,

    D. Marolf, D. Minic, and S. F. Ross, “Notes on Spacetime Thermodynamics and the Oberver-dependence of Entropy,” Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 064006, arXiv:hep-th/03120022

    2004 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Relative Entropy of States of Von Neumann Algebras,

    H. Araki, “Relative Entropy of States of Von Neumann Algebras,” Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 11 (1976) 809-33

    1976

  76. [84]

    A Covariant Regulator for Entanglement Entropy: Proofs of the Bekenstein Bound and QNEC,

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, A. A. Rahman, G. Satishchandran, and A. J. Speranza, “A Covariant Regulator for Entanglement Entropy: Proofs of the Bekenstein Bound and QNEC,” arXiv:2312.07646

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602, arXiv:hep-th/0603001

    2006 arXiv

  78. [86]

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, “A Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy Proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062, arXiv:0705.0016

    2007 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Generalized Gravitational Entropy,

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, “Generalized Gravitational Entropy,” JHEP 08 (2013) 090, arXiv:1304.4926. – 124 –

    2013 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Holographic Entanglement Beyond Classical Gravity,

    T. Barrella, X. Dong, S. A. Hartnoll and V. L. Martin, “Holographic Entanglement Beyond Classical Gravity,” JHEP 09 (2013) 109, arXiv:1306.4682

    2013 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Quantum Corrections to Holographic Entanglement Entropy,

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, “Quantum Corrections to Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 11 (2013) 074, arXiv:1307.2892

    2013 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Beyond the Classical Regime,

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, “Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Beyond the Classical Regime,” JHEP 01 (2015) 073

    2015

  83. [91]

    Black Holes and the Butterfly Effect,

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Black Holes and the Butterfly Effect,” JHEP 03 (2014) 067, arXiv:1306.0622

    2014 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Multiple Shocks,

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Multiple Shocks,” JHEP 12 (2014) 046, arXiv:1312.3296

    2014 arXiv

  85. [93]

    The Effect of Spherical Shells of Matter on the Schwarzschild Black Hole,

    T. Dray and G. ’t Hooft, “The Effect of Spherical Shells of Matter on the Schwarzschild Black Hole,” Commun. Math. Phys. 99 (1985) 613

    1985

  86. [94]

    Twice Upon A Time: Timelike Separated Quantum Extremal Surfaces,

    N. Engelhardt, G. Penington, and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, “Twice Upon A Time: Timelike Separated Quantum Extremal Surfaces,” JHEP 01 (2024) 033, arXiv:2308.16226

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    The Black Hole In Three Dimensional Spacetime,

    M. Ba˜ nados, C. Teitelboim, and J.Zanelli, “The Black Hole In Three Dimensional Spacetime,”’ Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849-51, arXiv:hep-th/9204099

    1992 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Probing Phase Transitions of Holographic Entanglement Entropy With Fixed Area States,

    D Marolf, S. Wang, and Z. Wang, “Probing Phase Transitions of Holographic Entanglement Entropy With Fixed Area States,” arXiv:2006.10089

    2006 arXiv

  89. [97]

    A Holographic Proof of the Strong Subadditivity of Entanglement Entropy,

    M. Headrick and T. Takayanagi, “A Holographic Proof of the Strong Subadditivity of Entanglement Entropy,” Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 106013

    2007

  90. [98]

    Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covaeriant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,

    A. Wall, “Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covaeriant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007, arXiv:1211.3494

    2014 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Weyl Anomaly For Wilson Surfaces,

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, “Weyl Anomaly For Wilson Surfaces,” JHEP 9906 (1999) 012, arXiv:hep-th/9905163

    1999 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Conformal Anomaly of Submanifold Observables in AdS/CFT Correspondence,

    R. Graham and E. Witten, “Conformal Anomaly of Submanifold Observables in AdS/CFT Correspondence,” Nucl. Phys. B546 (1999) 52-64

    1999

  93. [101]

    Proof of the Holographic Formula for Entanglement Entropy,

    D. V. Fursaev, “Proof of the Holographic Formula for Entanglement Entropy,” arXiv:hep-th/0606184

    arXiv

  94. [102]

    The Gravitational Equations and the Problem of Motion,

    A. Einstein, L. Infeld, and B. Hoffman, “The Gravitational Equations and the Problem of Motion,” Ann. Math. 39 (1938) 65-100

    1938

  95. [103]

    Entanglement R´ enyi Entropies in Holographic Theories,

    M. Headrick, “Entanglement R´ enyi Entropies in Holographic Theories,” Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 126010, arXiv:1006.00473

    2010

  96. [104]

    The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix,

    B. Czech, J. L Karczmarek, F. Nogueira, and M. Van Raamsdonk, “The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix,” Class. Qtm. Grav., 29 (2012) 155009

    2012

  97. [105]

    Causality & Holographic Entanglement Entropy,

    M. Headrick, V. E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence, and M. Rangamani. “Causality & Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 12 (2014) 162

    2014

  98. [106]

    Relative Entropy Equals Bulk Relative Entropy,

    D. L Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena, and S Josephine Suh, “Relative Entropy Equals Bulk Relative Entropy,” JHEP 4 (2016)

    2016

  99. [107]

    Reconstruction of Bulk Operators Within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality,

    X. Dong, D. Harlow, and A. C Wall, “Reconstruction of Bulk Operators Within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601

    2016

  100. [108]

    Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong, and D. Harlow, “Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 04 (2015) 163 , arXiv:1411.7041. – 125 –

    2015 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Holographic Quantum Error-Correcting Codes: Toy Models for the Bulk/Boundary Correspondence,

    F.Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow, and J. Preskill, “Holographic Quantum Error-Correcting Codes: Toy Models for the Bulk/Boundary Correspondence,” JHEP 06 (2015) 149, arXiv:1503.06237

    2015 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation,

    P. W. Shor, “Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation,” Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE Comput. Soc. Press. (1996), pp. 56-65

    1996

  103. [111]

    Fast Scramblers,

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, “Fast Scramblers,” JHEP 10 (2008) 065, arXiv:0808.2096

    2008 arXiv

  104. [112]

    A Bound on Chaos,

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, “A Bound on Chaos,” JHEP 08 (2016) 106, arXiv:1503.01409

    2016 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Death of White Holes in the Early Universe,

    D. M. Eardley, “Death of White Holes in the Early Universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 442-4. – 126 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.