Language Agents as Digital Representatives in Collective Decision-Making
read the original abstract
Consider the process of collective decision-making, in which a group of individuals interactively select a preferred outcome from among a universe of alternatives. In this context, "representation" is the activity of making an individual's preferences present in the process via participation by a proxy agent -- i.e. their "representative". To this end, learned models of human behavior have the potential to fill this role, with practical implications for multi-agent scenario studies and mechanism design. In this work, we investigate the possibility of training \textit{language agents} to behave in the capacity of representatives of human agents, appropriately expressing the preferences of those individuals whom they stand for. First, we formalize the setting of \textit{collective decision-making} -- as the episodic process of interaction between a group of agents and a decision mechanism. On this basis, we then formalize the problem of \textit{digital representation} -- as the simulation of an agent's behavior to yield equivalent outcomes from the mechanism. Finally, we conduct an empirical case study in the setting of \textit{consensus-finding} among diverse humans, and demonstrate the feasibility of fine-tuning large language models to act as digital representatives.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Continuous Latent Diffusion Language Model
Cola DLM proposes a hierarchical latent diffusion model that learns a text-to-latent mapping, fits a global semantic prior in continuous space with a block-causal DiT, and performs conditional decoding, establishing l...
-
Agora: Teaching the Skill of Consensus-Finding with AI Personas Grounded in Human Voice
Agora uses AI to ground policy discussions in real human voices and a small study shows it improves users' perspective-taking compared to numerical summaries alone.
-
AI and Collective Decisions: Strengthening Legitimacy and Losers' Consent
An AI system that elicits personal experiences and visualizes policy support increased perceived legitimacy and perspective-taking in collective decisions despite unfavorable outcomes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.