pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.01496 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-02 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· quant-ph

Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality in τ^+ τ^- at the LHC using Machine Learning for Neutrino Reconstruction

Yulei Zhang , Bai-Hong Zhou , Qi-Bin Liu , Tong Arthur Wu , Shu Li , Tao Han , Shih-Chieh Hsu , Matthew Low This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 22:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exquant-ph
keywords Bell nonlocalityquantum entanglementtau lepton pairsLHCmachine learningneutrino reconstructionspin density matrixquantum tomography
0
0 comments X

The pith

Machine learning reconstruction of neutrinos enables observation of Bell nonlocality above 5 sigma in tau pairs at the LHC.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors simulate the production of tau lepton pairs at the LHC and apply machine learning to reconstruct the momenta of the neutrinos from their decays. This reconstruction allows them to determine the full spin density matrix of the tau plus tau minus system. Their analysis shows that this system exhibits quantum entanglement and violates Bell inequalities with a statistical significance exceeding five standard deviations. If correct, this positions the tau pair as a practical system for quantum information research in collider experiments, similar to but distinct from top quark pairs.

Core claim

Detailed simulations of pp to tau+ tau- X at the LHC, combined with machine learning for neutrino momentum reconstruction, permit precise quantum tomography of the tau pair state, resulting in a clear observation of Bell nonlocality with high statistical significance surpassing 5 sigma.

What carries the argument

Machine learning technique for neutrino momentum reconstruction that enables precise measurement of the full spin density matrix without the biases from missing momenta that limited prior studies.

If this is right

  • tau+ tau- serves as an ideal system for quantum information studies in high-energy collisions
  • the approach complements insights from the top anti-top system
  • high expected sensitivity for Bell nonlocality is achievable
  • the system has high experimental feasibility at the LHC

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar machine learning methods could be tested on other processes with invisible particles to enable quantum tomography.
  • If validated on real data, this could expand the range of quantum tests possible at colliders beyond current systems.
  • Potential for using the measured density matrix to explore other quantum correlations in particle physics.

Load-bearing premise

The machine learning model reconstructs neutrino momenta with enough accuracy and without introducing biases that would invalidate the spin density matrix measurement or the Bell nonlocality observation.

What would settle it

A measurement in actual LHC data of the tau pair correlations that fails to show Bell inequality violation at the claimed significance level, or independent validation of the machine learning method revealing significant reconstruction errors or biases.

read the original abstract

Experiments at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) have accumulated an unprecedented amount of data corresponding to a large variety of quantum states. Although searching for new particles beyond the Standard Model of particle physics remains a high priority for the LHC program, precision measurements of the physical processes predicted in the Standard Model continue to lead us to a deeper understanding of nature at high energies. We carry out detailed simulations for the process $pp \to \tau^+\tau^- X$ to perform quantum tomography and to measure the quantum entanglement and the Bell nonlocality of the $\tau^+\tau^-$ two qubit state, including both statistical and systematic uncertainties. By using advanced machine learning techniques for neutrino momentum reconstruction, we achieve precise measurements of the full spin density matrix, a critical advantage over previous studies limited by reconstruction challenges for missing momenta. Our analysis reveals a clear observation of Bell nonlocality with high statistical significance, surpassing 5$\sigma$, establishing $\tau^+ \tau^-$ as an ideal system for quantum information studies in high-energy collisions. Given its experimental feasibility and the high expected sensitivity for Bell nonlocality, we propose that $\tau^+ \tau^-$ should be regarded as the new benchmark system for quantum information studies at the LHC, complementing and extending the insights gained from the $t\bar{t}$ system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents Monte Carlo simulations of the process pp → τ⁺τ⁻X at the LHC. It employs machine learning techniques to reconstruct neutrino momenta, enabling quantum tomography of the τ⁺τ⁻ two-qubit system. The work extracts the full spin density matrix, measures entanglement and Bell nonlocality, and reports a statistical significance exceeding 5σ for Bell nonlocality. It concludes that τ⁺τ⁻ constitutes an ideal benchmark system for quantum information studies at the LHC, complementing the t t-bar system.

Significance. If the ML-based neutrino reconstruction achieves the claimed accuracy without introducing biases and the simulation results translate to real data, the study would provide a valuable extension of quantum information techniques to tau-lepton pairs at colliders. The approach addresses a key experimental limitation (missing momenta) that has constrained prior work, potentially enabling more precise spin correlations in processes with neutrinos.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'our analysis reveals a clear observation of Bell nonlocality with high statistical significance, surpassing 5σ' is derived entirely from Monte Carlo simulations of pp → τ⁺τ⁻X that incorporate the ML neutrino reconstruction. This wording is load-bearing for the headline result, as it frames a sensitivity projection as an empirical observation; the distinction between simulation-based projection and actual data analysis must be clarified to support the interpretation that τ⁺τ⁻ is established as an 'ideal system'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and Section on results: No explicit validation (e.g., closure tests, bias studies, or comparison to alternative reconstruction methods) of the ML neutrino momentum reconstruction is referenced in support of the claim that it enables a 'precise' full spin density matrix measurement without invalidating the Bell test. This is load-bearing because the >5σ significance and the advantage over prior studies rest on the reconstruction fidelity.
minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript should include a dedicated subsection comparing the ML reconstruction performance metrics (resolution, efficiency) against traditional methods to quantify the improvement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity of our presentation. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'our analysis reveals a clear observation of Bell nonlocality with high statistical significance, surpassing 5σ' is derived entirely from Monte Carlo simulations of pp → τ⁺τ⁻X that incorporate the ML neutrino reconstruction. This wording is load-bearing for the headline result, as it frames a sensitivity projection as an empirical observation; the distinction between simulation-based projection and actual data analysis must be clarified to support the interpretation that τ⁺τ⁻ is established as an 'ideal system'.

    Authors: We agree that the original abstract wording could be read as implying an analysis of experimental data rather than a Monte Carlo study. We have revised the abstract to state explicitly that the results, including the >5σ significance, are obtained from detailed simulations of pp → τ⁺τ⁻X that incorporate the ML neutrino reconstruction. The revised text now frames the work as a projection demonstrating the expected sensitivity and feasibility, thereby supporting the proposal of τ⁺τ⁻ as a benchmark system without overstating the current status. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Section on results: No explicit validation (e.g., closure tests, bias studies, or comparison to alternative reconstruction methods) of the ML neutrino momentum reconstruction is referenced in support of the claim that it enables a 'precise' full spin density matrix measurement without invalidating the Bell test. This is load-bearing because the >5σ significance and the advantage over prior studies rest on the reconstruction fidelity.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the submitted manuscript does not contain explicit validation studies (closure tests, bias assessments, or comparisons to other methods) for the ML neutrino reconstruction. While the method and its application to the simulated events are described, we acknowledge that additional documentation is needed to substantiate the claim of precision. We have added a dedicated subsection detailing validation procedures performed on the simulated samples, including closure tests against truth-level momenta, bias studies, and comparisons with alternative reconstruction approaches. These additions confirm that the reconstruction fidelity supports the reported spin-density-matrix precision and does not invalidate the Bell test. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained in standard simulations

full rationale

The paper conducts quantum tomography and Bell nonlocality analysis exclusively via detailed Monte Carlo simulations of the standard process pp → τ⁺τ⁻X, applying established spin-density-matrix reconstruction and Bell inequality tests after ML-based neutrino momentum recovery. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional loops, or self-citation chains; the central significance claim (>5σ) follows directly from applying textbook quantum-information observables to the simulated ensemble without redefining inputs in terms of outputs. The pipeline is externally falsifiable against independent MC generators and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior author work as justification for the result itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract, no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable; the work relies on standard LHC simulation assumptions and ML methods whose details are not provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5805 in / 1091 out tokens · 67040 ms · 2026-05-22T22:13:08.559913+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Odd Physics Off the Diagonal: Constraining CP-violating SMEFT with Quantum Tomography

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Quantum tomography of diboson spin density matrices yields superior sensitivity to CP-even and CP-odd SMEFT contributions, including quadratic new-physics terms not captured by traditional angular observables.

  2. Automated computation of spin-density matrices and quantum observables for collider physics

    hep-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An automated framework in MadGraph5_aMC@NLO computes tree-level production spin-density matrices and quantum observables for generic collider processes, with validation on ttbar and VV and new applications to multi-to...

  3. Spin Correlation and Quantum Entanglement of Fermion Pairs in Transversely Polarized $e^-e^+$ Collisions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Transverse polarization in e+e- collisions generates maximally entangled fermion pairs in QED processes and boosts entanglement in electroweak and Bhabha scattering.

  4. Understanding Bell locality tests at colliders

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Under mild assumptions, local hidden variable theories become testable at colliders and can be disproved via Bell-like inequalities for muon and tau pairs.

  5. Entanglement entropy, Monte Carlo event generators, and soft gluons DIScovery

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Including soft gluons in Monte Carlo generators for DIS aligns parton distributions with inclusive PDFs and makes entropy grow with decreasing x, indicating initial-state origin of the bulk entropy.

  6. Probing Quantum Entanglement in $\tau^+\tau^-$ Pairs via the $\pi\pi$ Channel at STCF

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Monte Carlo simulation at the proposed STCF reconstructs a concurrence of 0.279 ± 0.007 for tau+ tau- pairs in the pi pi channel, showing feasibility for quantum entanglement studies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC,

    Y. Afik and J.R.M.n. de Nova,Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 907 [2003.02280]

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and G. Panizzo,Testing Bell Inequalities at the LHC with Top-Quark Pairs,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 161801 [2102.11883]

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities,

    C. Severi, C.D.E. Boschi, F. Maltoni and M. Sioli,Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 285 [2110.10112]

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Afik and J.R.M.n

    Y. Afik and J.R.M.n. de Nova,Quantum information with top quarks in QCD,Quantum6 (2022) 820 [2203.05582]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops,

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J.A. Casas,Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 666 [2205.00542]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Con- straining new physics in entangled two-qubit systems: top-quark, tau-lepton and photon pairs,

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and E. Gabrielli,Constraining new physics in entangled two-qubit systems: top-quark, tau-lepton and photon pairs,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 162 [2208.11723]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Z. Dong, D. Gon¸ calves, K. Kong and A. Navarro,Entanglement and Bell inequalities with boosted tt¯,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 115023 [2305.07075]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    T. Han, M. Low and T.A. Wu,Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation in semi-leptonic top decays,JHEP07(2024) 192 [2310.17696]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair pro- duction at the LHC,

    R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni and L. Mantani,Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 055007 [2203.05619]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Quantum entanglement and top spin correlations in SMEFT at higher orders,

    C. Severi and E. Vryonidou,Quantum entanglement and top spin correlations in SMEFT at higher orders,JHEP01(2023) 148 [2210.09330]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Aoude, E

    R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni and L. Mantani,Probing new physics through entanglement in diboson production,JHEP12(2023) 017 [2307.09675]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Maltoni, C

    F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou,Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair production at the LHC,JHEP03(2024) 099 [2401.08751]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    M. Duch, A. Strumia and A. Titov,New physics in spin entanglement,Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 151 [2403.14757]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Fabbrichesi, M

    M. Fabbrichesi, M. Low and L. Marzola,The trace distance between density matrices, a nifty tool in new-physics searches,2501.03311. – 38 – 0 e e Separable States ( = 0) Bell Local States ( 0) 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 = 0.76 +0.00 0.00 +0.00 0.00 +0.00 0.00 0.04 > 5 = 0.77 +0.00 0.00 +0.00 0.00 +0.00 0.00 0.06 > 5 = 0.77 +0.03 0.03 +0.03 0.03 +0.01 0.01 4.16 > ...

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Afik and J.R.M.n

    Y. Afik and J.R.M.n. de Nova,Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 221801 [2209.03969]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    T. Han, M. Low, N. McGinnis and S. Su,Measuring Quantum Discord at the LHC,2412.21158

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    White and M.J

    C.D. White and M.J. White,Magic states of top quarks,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 116016 [2406.07321]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Aguilar-Saavedra,Postdecay quantum entanglement in top pair production,Phys

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Postdecay quantum entanglement in top pair production,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 076025 [2307.06991]

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Aguilar-Saavedra,A closer look at post-decayt ¯tentanglement,Phys

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra,A closer look at post-decayt ¯tentanglement,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 096027 [2401.10988]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Aguilar-Saavedra and J.A

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J.A. Casas,Entanglement Autodistillation from Particle Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 111801 [2401.06854]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Maltoni, C

    F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou,Quantum tops at circular lepton colliders, – 40 – JHEP09(2024) 001 [2404.08049]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Optimizing fictitious states for Bell inequality violation in bipartite qubit systems with applications to the tt¯system,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 116005 [2311.09166]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Optimizing entanglement and Bell inequality violation in top antitop events,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 033004 [2407.01672]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Quantum Tomography at Colliders: With or Without Decays, 2410.08303

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Aguilar-Saavedra,Laboratory-frame tests of quantum entanglement in H→WW,Phys

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Laboratory-frame tests of quantum entanglement in H→WW,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 076016 [2209.14033]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in weak gauge boson production at the LHC and future colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C 83(2023) 823 [2302.00683]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Morales,Exploring Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in vector boson scattering, Eur

    R.A. Morales,Exploring Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in vector boson scattering, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138(2023) 1157 [2306.17247]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Bi, Q.-H

    Q. Bi, Q.-H. Cao, K. Cheng and H. Zhang,New observables for testing Bell inequalities in W boson pair production,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 036022 [2307.14895]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Grossi, G

    M. Grossi, G. Pelliccioli and A. Vicini,From angular coefficients to quantum observables: a phenomenological appraisal in di-boson systems,JHEP12(2024) 120 [2409.16731]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Aguilar-Saavedra, A

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Bernal, J.A. Casas and J.M. Moreno,Testing entanglement and Bell inequalities in H→ZZ,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 016012 [2209.13441]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Bernal, P

    A. Bernal, P. Caban and J. Rembieli´ nski,Entanglement and Bell inequalities violation in H→ZZwith anomalous coupling,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1050 [2307.13496]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    A. Ruzi, Y. Wu, R. Ding, S. Qian, A.M. Levin and Q. Li,Testing Bell inequalities and probing quantum entanglement at a muon collider,JHEP10(2024) 211 [2408.05429]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Y. Wu, R. Jiang, A. Ruzi, Y. Ban, X. Yan and Q. Li,Testing Bell inequalities and probing quantum entanglement at CEPC,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 036008 [2410.17025]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Y. Afik, Y. Kats, J.R.M.n. de Nova, A. Soffer and D. Uzan,Entanglement and Bell nonlocality with bottom-quark pairs at hadron colliders,2406.04402

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    S. Wu, C. Qian, Q. Wang and X.-R. Zhou,Bell nonlocality and entanglement in e+e-→YY¯at BESIII,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 054012 [2406.16298]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Gabrielli and L

    E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Entanglement and Bell Inequality Violation in B→ϕϕDecays, Symmetry16(2024) 1036 [2408.05010]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    L. Gao, A. Ruzi, Q. Li, C. Zhou, L. Chen, X. Zhang et al.,Quantum state tomography with muons,2411.12518

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Cheng and B

    K. Cheng and B. Yan,Bell Inequality Violation of Light Quarks in Back-to-Back Dihadron Pair Production at Lepton Colliders,2501.03321

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Sakurai and M

    K. Sakurai and M. Spannowsky,Three-Body Entanglement in Particle Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett. 132(2024) 151602 [2310.01477]. – 41 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Aguilar-Saavedra,Tripartite entanglement in H→ZZ,WW decays,Phys

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Tripartite entanglement in H→ZZ,WW decays,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 113004 [2403.13942]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Morales,Tripartite entanglement and Bell non-locality in loop-induced Higgs boson decays, Eur

    R.A. Morales,Tripartite entanglement and Bell non-locality in loop-induced Higgs boson decays, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 581 [2403.18023]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Subba and R

    A. Subba and R. Rahaman,On bipartite and tripartite entanglement at present and future particle colliders,2404.03292

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Altomonte and A.J

    C. Altomonte and A.J. Barr,Quantum state-channel duality for the calculation of Standard Model scattering amplitudes,Phys. Lett. B847(2023) 138303 [2312.02242]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    A.J. Barr, M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation at colliders,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.139(2024) 104134 [2402.07972]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Altomonte, A.J

    C. Altomonte, A.J. Barr, M. Eckstein, P. Horodecki and K. Sakurai,Prospects for quantum process tomography at high energies,2412.01892

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    Altakach, P

    M.M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari and K. Sakurai,Quantum information and CP measurement in H→τ+τ- at future lepton colliders,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 093002 [2211.10513]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Fabbrichesi and L

    M. Fabbrichesi and L. Marzola,Quantum tomography withτleptons at the FCC-ee: Entanglement, Bell inequality violation, sinθW, and anomalous couplings,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 076004 [2405.09201]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Ma and T

    K. Ma and T. Li,Testing Bell inequality throughh→τ τat CEPC*,Chin. Phys. C48(2024) 103105 [2309.08103]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Ehat¨ aht, M

    K. Ehat¨ aht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola and C. Veelken,Probing entanglement and testing Bell inequality violation with e+e-→τ+τ- at Belle II,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 032005 [2311.17555]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    T. Han, M. Low and Y. Su,Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality inτ +τ − at the BEPC, 2501.04801

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Letter of intent: The feasibility of bell-type tests at future lepton colliders inz→τ τevents

    L. Lee and K.F.D. Petrillo, “Letter of intent: The feasibility of bell-type tests at future lepton colliders inz→τ τevents.”

    work page

  52. [52]

    Lo Chiatto,Interference Resurrection of theτDipole through Quantum Tomography, 2408.04553

    P. Lo Chiatto,Interference Resurrection of theτDipole through Quantum Tomography, 2408.04553

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    M. Chen, S. Mei, J. Fan and M. Wang,An overview of diffusion models: Applications, guided generation, statistical rates and optimization, 2024

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Sohl-Dickstein, E.A

    J. Sohl-Dickstein, E.A. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan and S. Ganguli,Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics, 2015

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Amram and K

    O. Amram and K. Pedro,Denoising diffusion models with geometry adaptation for high fidelity calorimeter simulation, 2023

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Mikuni and B

    V. Mikuni and B. Nachman,CaloScore v2: single-shot calorimeter shower simulation with diffusion models,JINST19(2024) P02001 [2308.03847]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Acosta, V

    F.T. Acosta, V. Mikuni, B. Nachman, M. Arratia, B. Karki, R. Milton et al.,Comparison of point cloud and image-based models for calorimeter fast simulation,JINST19(2024) P05003 [2307.04780]. – 42 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Buhmann, S

    E. Buhmann, S. Diefenbacher, E. Eren, F. Gaede, G. Kasieczka, A. Korol et al.,CaloClouds: fast geometry-independent highly-granular calorimeter simulation,JINST18(2023) P11025 [2305.04847]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Mikuni, B

    V. Mikuni, B. Nachman and M. Pettee,Fast point cloud generation with diffusion models in high energy physics,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 036025 [2304.01266]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Devlin, J.-W

    P. Devlin, J.-W. Qiu, F. Ringer and N. Sato,Diffusion model approach to simulating electron-proton scattering events,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 016030 [2310.16308]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Sengupta, M

    D. Sengupta, M. Leigh, J.A. Raine, S. Klein and T. Golling,Improving new physics searches with diffusion models for event observables and jet constituents,Journal of High Energy Physics 2024(2024) 109

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Raine, M

    J.A. Raine, M. Leigh, K. Zoch and T. Golling,Fast and improved neutrino reconstruction in multineutrino final states with conditional normalizing flows,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 012005

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Mikuni and B

    V. Mikuni and B. Nachman,Solving Key Challenges in Collider Physics with Foundation Models,2404.16091

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Mikuni and B

    V. Mikuni and B. Nachman,A Method to Simultaneously Facilitate All Jet Physics Tasks, 2502.14652

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    Fano,Pairs of two-level systems,Rev

    U. Fano,Pairs of two-level systems,Rev. Mod. Phys.55(1983) 855

    work page 1983

  66. [66]

    Quantum entanglement

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki and K. Horodecki,Quantum entanglement,Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2009) 865 [quant-ph/0702225]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  67. [67]

    Entanglement of a Pair of Quantum Bits

    S. Hill and W.K. Wootters,Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits,Phys. Rev. Lett.78(1997) 5022 [quant-ph/9703041]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  68. [68]

    Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits

    W.K. Wootters,Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(1998) 2245 [quant-ph/9709029]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  69. [69]

    Bell,On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,Physics Physique Fizika1(1964) 195

    J.S. Bell,On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,Physics Physique Fizika1(1964) 195

    work page 1964

  70. [70]

    Clauser, M.A

    J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony and R.A. Holt,Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.23(1969) 880

    work page 1969

  71. [71]

    Banerjee, A.Y

    S. Banerjee, A.Y. Korchin, E. Richter-Was and Z. Was,Electron-positron, parton-parton, and photon-photon production ofτ-lepton pairs: Anomalous magnetic and electric dipole moments spin effects,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 013002 [2307.03526]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,Journal of High Energy Physics2014(2014)

    work page 2014

  73. [73]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J.R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten et al.,An introduction to pythia 8.2,Computer Physics Communications191(2015) 159–177

    work page 2015

  74. [74]

    de Favereau, C

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Mertens et al.,Delphes 3: a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment,Journal of High Energy Physics2014(2014)

    work page 2014

  75. [75]

    Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow

    A. Sergeev and M.D. Balso,Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow, arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05799(2018) . – 43 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    NERSC,Perlmutter architecture, 2025

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    J. Song, C. Meng and S. Ermon,Denoising diffusion implicit models, 2022

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    J. Ho, A. Jain and P. Abbeel,Denoising diffusion probabilistic models, 2020

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Elagin, P

    A. Elagin, P. Murat, A. Pranko and A. Safonov,A new mass reconstruction technique for resonances decaying toτ τ,Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment654(2011) 481

    work page 2011

  80. [80]

    Bhimji et al.,FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Challenge Competition,2410.02867

    W. Bhimji et al.,FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Challenge Competition,2410.02867

    work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.