Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SuperEdit: Rectifying and Facilitating Supervision for Instruction-Based Image Editing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.02370 v1 pith:LUAPTOMQ submitted 2025-05-05 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

SuperEdit: Rectifying and Facilitating Supervision for Instruction-Based Image Editing

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG
keywords editinginstructionsimagesupervisionfurthermodelspairssignals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Due to the challenges of manually collecting accurate editing data, existing datasets are typically constructed using various automated methods, leading to noisy supervision signals caused by the mismatch between editing instructions and original-edited image pairs. Recent efforts attempt to improve editing models through generating higher-quality edited images, pre-training on recognition tasks, or introducing vision-language models (VLMs) but fail to resolve this fundamental issue. In this paper, we offer a novel solution by constructing more effective editing instructions for given image pairs. This includes rectifying the editing instructions to better align with the original-edited image pairs and using contrastive editing instructions to further enhance their effectiveness. Specifically, we find that editing models exhibit specific generation attributes at different inference steps, independent of the text. Based on these prior attributes, we define a unified guide for VLMs to rectify editing instructions. However, there are some challenging editing scenarios that cannot be resolved solely with rectified instructions. To this end, we further construct contrastive supervision signals with positive and negative instructions and introduce them into the model training using triplet loss, thereby further facilitating supervision effectiveness. Our method does not require the VLM modules or pre-training tasks used in previous work, offering a more direct and efficient way to provide better supervision signals, and providing a novel, simple, and effective solution for instruction-based image editing. Results on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches. Compared with previous SOTA SmartEdit, we achieve 9.19% improvements on the Real-Edit benchmark with 30x less training data and 13x smaller model size.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ImgEdit: A Unified Image Editing Dataset and Benchmark

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    ImgEdit supplies 1.2 million curated edit pairs and a three-part benchmark that let a VLM-based model outperform prior open-source editors on adherence, quality, and detail preservation.

  2. RewardDance: Reward Scaling in Visual Generation

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    RewardDance reframes visual reward modeling as a yes/no judgment task in a VLM and reports consistent gains in text-to-image, text-to-video, and image-to-video generation as the reward model scales from 1B to 26B.

  3. Step1X-Edit: A Practical Framework for General Image Editing

    cs.CV 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Step1X-Edit integrates a multimodal LLM with a diffusion decoder, trained on a custom high-quality dataset, to deliver image editing performance that surpasses open-source baselines and approaches proprietary models o...