Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Can Large Multimodal Models Understand Agricultural Scenes? Benchmarking with AgroMind

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.12207 v3 pith:QEREYWCS submitted 2025-05-18 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords agriculturalagromindlmmsmodelsscenetaskbenchmarkscomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) has demonstrated capabilities across various domains, but comprehensive benchmarks for agricultural remote sensing (RS) remain scarce. Existing benchmarks designed for agricultural RS scenarios exhibit notable limitations, primarily in terms of insufficient scene diversity in the dataset and oversimplified task design. To bridge this gap, we introduce AgroMind, a comprehensive agricultural remote sensing benchmark covering four task dimensions: spatial perception, object understanding, scene understanding, and scene reasoning, with a total of 13 task types, ranging from crop identification and health monitoring to environmental analysis. We curate a high-quality evaluation set by integrating eight public datasets and one private farmland plot dataset, containing 27,247 QA pairs and 19,615 images. The pipeline begins with multi-source data pre-processing, including collection, format standardization, and annotation refinement. We then generate a diverse set of agriculturally relevant questions through the systematic definition of tasks. Finally, we employ LMMs for inference, generating responses, and performing detailed examinations. We evaluated 20 open-source LMMs and 4 closed-source models on AgroMind. Experiments reveal significant performance gaps, particularly in spatial reasoning and fine-grained recognition, it is notable that human performance lags behind several leading LMMs. By establishing a standardized evaluation framework for agricultural RS, AgroMind reveals the limitations of LMMs in domain knowledge and highlights critical challenges for future work. Data and code can be accessed at https://rssysu.github.io/AgroMind/.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HM-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models in Hyperspectral Remote Sensing

    cs.CV 2026-04 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    HM-Bench is the first benchmark for MLLMs on hyperspectral images, showing models struggle with complex spatial-spectral reasoning and perform better with visual PCA images than textual reports.

  2. VertiCue-Bench: Diagnosing Whether MLLMs Use Height Cues to Resolve 2D Ambiguity in Remote Sensing Natural Scenes

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    VertiCue-Bench shows MLLMs can read raw CHM height cues but largely fail to integrate them into reliable semantic reasoning, often underperforming RGB-only baselines.

  3. AgroTools: A Benchmark for Tool-Augmented Multimodal Agents in Agriculture

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    AgroTools is a new benchmark for tool-augmented multimodal agents in agriculture featuring 539 QA pairs, 1,097 images, five task families, and 14 tools, with evaluations showing major limitations in current models' to...

  4. AgroCoT: A Chain-of-Thought Benchmark for Evaluating Reasoning in Vision-Language Models for Agriculture

    cs.AI 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    AgroCoT is a new Chain-of-Thought VQA benchmark with 4759 samples to evaluate reasoning capabilities of vision-language models in agriculture.

Pith tools