Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

A Survey of LLM times DATA

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.18458 v3 pith:T6QNMILN submitted 2025-05-24 cs.DB cs.AIcs.CLcs.IRcs.LG

A Survey of LLM times DATA

classification cs.DB cs.AIcs.CLcs.IRcs.LG
keywords datallmsmanagementstoragehandintegrationlikemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The integration of large language model (LLM) and data management (DATA) is rapidly redefining both domains. In this survey, we comprehensively review the bidirectional relationships. On the one hand, DATA4LLM, spanning large-scale data processing, storage, and serving, feeds LLMs with high quality, diversity, and timeliness of data required for stages like pre-training, post-training, retrieval-augmented generation, and agentic workflows: (i) Data processing for LLMs includes scalable acquisition, deduplication, filtering, selection, domain mixing, and synthetic augmentation; (ii) Data Storage for LLMs focuses on efficient data and model formats, distributed and heterogeneous storage hierarchies, KV-cache management, and fault-tolerant checkpointing; (iii) Data serving for LLMs tackles challenges in RAG (e.g., knowledge post-processing), LLM inference (e.g., prompt compression, data provenance), and training strategies (e.g., data packing and shuffling). On the other hand, in LLM4DATA, LLMs are emerging as general-purpose engines for data management. We review recent advances in (i) data manipulation, including automatic data cleaning, integration, discovery; (ii) data analysis, covering reasoning over structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data, and (iii) system optimization (e.g., configuration tuning, query rewriting, anomaly diagnosis), powered by LLM techniques like retrieval-augmented prompting, task-specialized fine-tuning, and multi-agent collaboration.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MaDI-Bench: An End-to-End Data Integration Benchmark

    cs.DB 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MaDI-Bench supplies the first end-to-end benchmark tasks for full relational data integration pipelines across domains plus a variant-generation method to slow saturation.

  2. PrepBench: How Far Are We from Natural-Language-Driven Data Preparation?

    cs.DB 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PrepBench is a benchmark showing that state-of-the-art LLMs still struggle with natural-language-driven data preparation involving disambiguation, code generation, and workflow translation.

  3. Tracing the Roots: A Multi-Agent Framework for Uncovering Data Lineage in Post-Training LLMs

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A multi-agent framework reconstructs the evolutionary graph of post-training LLM datasets, revealing domain patterns like vertical refinement in math data and systemic issues like redundancy and benchmark contaminatio...

  4. Automating Database-Native Function Code Synthesis with LLMs

    cs.DB 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    DBCooker automates synthesis of database native functions via LLM-guided characterization, coding plans, hybrid filling, and progressive validation, delivering 34.55% higher accuracy than baselines on SQLite, PostgreS...

  5. Talking Trees: Reasoning-Assisted Induction of Decision Trees for Tabular Data

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Reasoning LLMs with minimal tools for tree construction and analysis induce decision trees that outperform CART, compete with ensembles on low-resource tabular data, and provide human-readable reasoning traces.

  6. Bridging Generation and Training: A Systematic Review of Quality Issues in LLMs for Code

    cs.SE 2026-05 accept novelty 6.0

    A review of 114 studies creates taxonomies for code and data quality issues, formalizes 18 propagation mechanisms from training data defects to LLM-generated code defects, and synthesizes detection and mitigation techniques.

  7. LLMs+Graphs: Toward Graph-Native, Synergistic AI Systems

    cs.DB 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper synthesizes three synergies between LLMs and graphs—augmented retrieval/reasoning, bidirectional KG integration, and graph-enhanced agents—plus LLM uses in graph data management and ML.