Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

OS-MAP: How Far Can Computer-Using Agents Go in Breadth and Depth?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.19132 v1 pith:7GQ7QF62 submitted 2025-07-25 cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.HC

OS-MAP: How Far Can Computer-Using Agents Go in Breadth and Depth?

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.CVcs.HC
keywords agentsacrosscomputer-usingos-mapautomationgeneralizationagentalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Computer-using agents have shown strong potential to boost human productivity and enable new application forms across platforms. While recent advances have led to usable applications, existing benchmarks fail to account for the internal task heterogeneity and the corresponding agent capabilities, as well as their alignment with actual user demands-hindering both targeted capability development and the reliable transition of research progress into practical deployment. To bridge the gap, we present OS-MAP, a benchmark for daily computer-using automation that organizes its 416 realistic tasks across 15 applications along two key dimensions: a five-level taxonomy of automation and a generalization scope derived from a real-world user demand hierarchy. To enable fine-grained analysis of required capabilities and alignment with real-world scenarios, OS-MAP evaluates agents along two dimensions: automation level across a five-level taxonomy, and generalization scope across a demand hierarchy. This design captures varying levels of required agent autonomy and generalization, forming a performance-generalization evaluation matrix for structured and comprehensive assessment. Experiments show that even State-of-the-Art agents with VLM backbones struggle with higher-level tasks involving perception, reasoning, and coordination-highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of current strengths and limitations to drive the future progress in computer-using agents research and deployment. All code, environments, baselines, and data are publicly available at https://github.com/OS-Copilot/OS-Map.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. OSWorld 2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks

    cs.AI 2026-06 accept novelty 7.0

    On 108 long-horizon real-world computer workflows, frontier agents complete at most 20.6% of tasks and fail mainly by losing hidden state, not by basic GUI control.

  2. OSReward: Instituting Standardized Evaluation for Cross-Platform Computer-Use Reward Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    VLM judges of CUA trajectories are systematically lenient; OSReward measures this with human gold, and OS-Shepherd open models close most of the reliability gap cheaply.

  3. OSWorld 2.0: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on Long-Horizon Real-World Tasks

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    OSWorld 2.0 is a benchmark of 108 realistic long-horizon computer-use tasks where current agents achieve only 20.6% binary completion, struggling with state inference and constraint tracking.