pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.20027 · v2 · pith:JMLE4CXGnew · submitted 2025-09-24 · ✦ hep-ph

Belle II Constraints on the Non-Minimal Universal Extra Dimensional Model

Avirup Shaw This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords universal extra dimensionsBelle IIB meson decayKaluza-Klein statesbranching ratiocompactification radiusnon-minimal modelneutrino decay
0
0 comments X

The pith

Belle II data sets 900 GeV lower limit on non-minimal universal extra dimensions

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper interprets the Belle II measurement of the B+ to K+ nu nubar branching ratio, which shows a 3.5 sigma excess over the Standard Model, as a constraint on the non-minimal universal extra dimensional model. In this setup, boundary localized terms create different Kaluza-Klein mass spectra and couplings than in the minimal version. The resulting analysis raises the lower bound on the inverse compactification radius to roughly 900 GeV. The same data yields no lower bound when boundary terms are removed entirely.

Core claim

The deviation reported by Belle II in the B+ to K+ nu nubar branching ratio imposes a lower limit of approximately 900 GeV on the inverse compactification radius within the non-minimal universal extra dimensional model, while the minimal model variant with all boundary terms set to zero permits no such bound.

What carries the argument

Non-minimal universal extra dimensional model with boundary localized terms that alter Kaluza-Klein mass profiles and interactions

Load-bearing premise

The non-minimal model incorporates boundary localized terms that produce distinct mass profiles and interactions among Kaluza-Klein states, enabling the observed deviation to set a meaningful bound.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the B+ to K+ nu nubar branching ratio that matches the Standard Model prediction within uncertainties small enough to rule out the reported excess would eliminate the new physics contribution required by this model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.20027 by Avirup Shaw.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The decay process B+ → K+νν¯ receives the contributions from the Z-penguin diagrams. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The self-energy diagrams contribute to the decay process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Box diagrams that play a role in the decay processes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The branching ratio of the decay process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: This figure illustrates the exclusion contours derived from the branching ratio of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent measurements by the Belle II Collaboration report a branching ratio for the decay $B^+\to K^+ \nu \bar{\nu}$ with a 3.5$\sigma$ significance and deviating by 2.7$\sigma$ from Standard Model expectation. In this article, we interpret this experimental result through the lens of a Non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensional model, where the mass profiles and interactions among various Kaluza-Klein states differ remarkably from those in the minimal scenario. Our analysis indicates that, according to the model's parameters, the lower limit on the inverse of the compactification radius has been elevated to approximately 900 GeV. In contrast, conducting the same analysis within the model variant in which all boundary terms are nullified does not permit the determination of a lower bound on the inverse compactification radius.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper interprets the recent Belle II measurement of BR(B+ → K+ νν̄), which deviates by 2.7σ from the SM expectation, in a non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensions (UED) model that includes boundary localized terms (BLTs). These BLTs alter the Kaluza-Klein mass spectra and couplings relative to minimal UED, leading to enhanced contributions to the b → sνν effective operators. The central claim is that this allows a lower bound of approximately 900 GeV on the inverse compactification radius 1/R in the non-minimal case, while the same analysis in minimal UED (vanishing BLTs) yields no bound.

Significance. If the central result is robust, the work provides a timely phenomenological constraint on extra-dimensional models using the latest flavor data, illustrating how non-minimal boundary terms can generate observable deviations in rare decays that are absent in the minimal scenario. The explicit contrast between the two model variants is a clear strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the parameter discussion: the quoted lower limit of ~900 GeV on 1/R is stated to hold 'according to the model's parameters,' yet the manuscript does not demonstrate that this numerical bound remains stable when the BLT coefficients (commonly denoted r_f for fermions and r_V for gauge bosons) are varied over their phenomenologically allowed range (|r| ≲ 1 to avoid tachyons or unitarity violation). If the KK mass shifts and modified loop functions revert toward the minimal-UED limit for some choices of these coefficients, the enhancement in the b → sνν amplitude would weaken and the 900 GeV bound would not survive, rendering the headline result parameter-specific rather than a general model constraint.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'model's parameters' without a concise statement of the specific BLT values adopted or the range scanned; adding one sentence on this point would improve clarity for readers unfamiliar with the non-minimal UED literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment regarding the stability of the quoted bound with respect to variations in the boundary localized term coefficients.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the parameter discussion: the quoted lower limit of ~900 GeV on 1/R is stated to hold 'according to the model's parameters,' yet the manuscript does not demonstrate that this numerical bound remains stable when the BLT coefficients (commonly denoted r_f for fermions and r_V for gauge bosons) are varied over their phenomenologically allowed range (|r| ≲ 1 to avoid tachyons or unitarity violation). If the KK mass shifts and modified loop functions revert toward the minimal-UED limit for some choices of these coefficients, the enhancement in the b → sνν amplitude would weaken and the 900 GeV bound would not survive, rendering the headline result parameter-specific rather than a general model constraint.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical value of the bound depends on the specific choice of the BLT coefficients r_f and r_V. The non-minimal UED model is defined by the presence of these non-vanishing boundary terms, which alter the KK mass spectra and couplings relative to the minimal case. Our analysis employs representative benchmark values of r_f and r_V within the allowed range (|r| ≲ 1) that are consistent with theoretical consistency requirements and existing phenomenological bounds. For these choices the enhancement in the b → sνν amplitude is sufficient to yield the ~900 GeV lower limit on 1/R from the Belle II data. We already contrast this explicitly with the minimal UED limit (all BLTs set to zero), where no bound is obtained. To improve clarity we will make a partial revision: the abstract will be rephrased to state that the bound applies for non-zero BLTs in the phenomenologically viable range, and a short explanatory paragraph will be added in the main text noting the dependence on r_f, r_V while underscoring that the qualitative distinction from minimal UED persists for typical allowed values. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: bound from external Belle II data

full rationale

The paper derives a lower limit on the inverse compactification radius (∼900 GeV) by comparing non-minimal UED model predictions—including modified KK masses and couplings induced by boundary localized terms—to the external Belle II measurement of BR(B⁺ → K⁺ νν̄). This is a standard external-data constraint procedure, not an internal fit or self-referential loop. The abstract explicitly contrasts the result with the minimal UED case (no bound), confirming the distinction arises from the model's boundary terms rather than any redefinition or self-citation that forces the outcome. No equations or steps reduce the claimed bound to a fitted input or prior self-result by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Limited to abstract; the non-minimal framework introduces boundary terms as distinguishing features whose specific values function as adjustable parameters to produce the quoted bound.

free parameters (1)
  • Boundary localized term coefficients
    These coefficients modify KK mass profiles and couplings; their values are implicitly scanned or chosen to derive the 900 GeV limit from the decay rate.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The effective four-dimensional theory after compactification and inclusion of boundary terms accurately captures contributions to low-energy flavor-changing processes.
    Invoked when mapping the extra-dimensional model to the B decay branching ratio.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5660 in / 1397 out tokens · 74123 ms · 2026-05-18T14:54:40.592195+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dark Matter emission at Belle II and NA62 in Minimal Flavor Violation framework

    hep-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A single nearly degenerate dark matter multiplet in the MFV framework can accommodate either the K+ to pi+ nu nubar or B+ to K+ nu nubar excess but not both simultaneously.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 58 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Allwicher, D

    L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and O. Sumensari,Understanding the first measurement of B(B→Kνν¯),Phys. Lett. B848(2024) 138411 [2309.02246]

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Bause, H

    R. Bause, H. Gisbert and G. Hiller,Implications of an enhanced B→Kνν¯branching ratio, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 015006 [2309.00075]

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Altmannshofer, A

    W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia and J. Martin Camalich,Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075008 [2311.14629]

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    McKeen, J

    D. McKeen, J. N. Ng and D. Tuckler,Higgs portal interpretation of the Belle II B+→K+νν measurement,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075006 [2312.00982]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Fridell, M

    K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui and K. Tobioka,Decoding the B→Kννexcess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 115006 [2312.12507]. 29

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Gabrielli, L

    E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, K. M¨ u¨ ursepp and M. Raidal,Explaining theB+ →K +ν¯νexcess via a massless dark photon,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 460 [2402.05901]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Felkl, A

    T. Felkl, A. Giri, R. Mohanta and M. A. Schmidt,When energy goes missing: new physics inb→sννwith sterile neutrinos,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1135 [2309.02940]

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Z. S. Wang, H. K. Dreiner and J. Y. G¨ unther,The decayB→K+ν+ ¯νat Belle II and a massless bino in R-parity-violating supersymmetry,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 66 [2309.03727]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    He, X.-D

    X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma and G. Valencia,Revisiting models that enhance B+→K+νν¯in light of the new Belle II measurement,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 075019 [2309.12741]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Datta, D

    A. Datta, D. Marfatia and L. Mukherjee,B→Kνν¯, MiniBooNE and muon g-2 anomalies from a dark sector,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L031701 [2310.15136]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    S.-Y. Ho, J. Kim and P. Ko,Recent B+→K+νν¯excess and muon g-2 illuminating light dark sector with Higgs portal,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 055029 [2401.10112]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    F.-Z. Chen, Q. Wen and F. Xu,CorrelatingB→K (∗)ν¯νand flavor anomalies in SMEFT, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1012 [2401.11552]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Hou, X.-Q

    B.-F. Hou, X.-Q. Li, M. Shen, Y.-D. Yang and X.-B. Yuan,Deciphering the Belle II data on B→Kν νdecay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation,JHEP06(2024) 172 [2402.19208]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    He, X.-D

    X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia and R. R. Volkas,Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II B +→K ++ invisible measurement,JHEP07(2024) 168 [2403.12485]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik and M. Novoa-Brunet,Signatures of light new particles in B→K(*)Emiss,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 055001 [2403.13887]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    A. J. Buras, J. Harz and M. A. Mojahed,Disentangling new physics inK→πν νand B→K(K ∗)ν νobservables,JHEP10(2024) 087 [2405.06742]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Altmannshofer and S

    W. Altmannshofer and S. Roy,Joint explanation of the B→πK puzzle and the B→Kνν¯ excess,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 075029 [2411.06592]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Marzocca, M

    D. Marzocca, M. Nardecchia, A. Stanzione and C. Toni,Implications ofB→Kν¯νunder rank-one flavor violation hypothesis,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1217 [2404.06533]. 30

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Hu,Are the new particles heavy or light inb→sE miss?,Eur

    Q.-Y. Hu,Are the new particles heavy or light inb→sE miss?,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 556 [2412.19084]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Allwicher, M

    L. Allwicher, M. Bordone, G. Isidori, G. Piazza and A. Stanzione,Probing third-generation New Physics with K→πνν¯and B→K(∗)νν¯,Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139295 [2410.21444]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Berezhnoy and D

    A. Berezhnoy and D. Melikhov,B→K ∗MX vsB→KM X as a probe of a scalar-mediator dark matter scenario,EPL145(2024) 14001 [2309.17191]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Calibbi, T

    L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee and M. A. Schmidt,Is Dark Matter the origin of the B→Kν¯νexcess at Belle II?,2502.04900

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Lee,New physics effects inR(K (∗)),B s →µ +µ−, andB + →K +ν¯ν,2502.06370

    J.-P. Lee,New physics effects inR(K (∗)),B s →µ +µ−, andB + →K +ν¯ν,2502.06370

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Athron, R

    P. Athron, R. Martinez and C. Sierra,B meson anomalies and largeB + →K +ννin non-universal U(1) ′ models,JHEP02(2024) 121 [2308.13426]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Rosauro-Alcaraz and L

    S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and L. P. S. Leal,Disentangling left and right-handed neutrino effects in B→K (∗)νν,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 795 [2404.17440]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik and M. Novoa-Brunet,Impact of new invisible particles on B→K(*)Emiss observables,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 035010 [2503.19025]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    T. M. Aliev, A. Elpe, L. Selbuz and I. Turan,Explaining Belle data on B→K(*)νν¯decays via dark Z resonances,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015025 [2503.22347]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    G. R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, M. Kolanovic and F. Nitti,The Power of brane induced gravity, Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 084004 [hep-ph/0102216]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  29. [29]

    Branes and Orbifolds are Opaque

    M. Carena, T. M. P. Tait and C. E. M. Wagner,Branes and Orbifolds are Opaque,Acta Phys. Polon. B33(2002) 2355 [hep-ph/0207056]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  30. [30]

    Bulk fields with general brane kinetic terms

    F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria and J. Santiago,Bulk fields with general brane kinetic terms,JHEP02(2003) 051 [hep-th/0302023]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  31. [31]

    Some consequences of brane kinetic terms for bulk fermions

    F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria and J. Santiago,Some consequences of brane kinetic terms for bulk fermions, in38th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, 5, 2003,hep-ph/0305119

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  32. [32]

    Physics of Brane Kinetic Terms

    F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria and J. Santiago,Physics of brane kinetic terms,Acta Phys. Polon. B34(2003) 5511 [hep-ph/0310353]. 31

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  33. [33]

    Higgsless fermion masses and unitarity

    C. Schwinn,Higgsless fermion masses and unitarity,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 116005 [hep-ph/0402118]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  34. [34]

    Non-minimal universal extra dimensions

    T. Flacke, A. Menon and D. J. Phalen,Non-minimal universal extra dimensions,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 056009 [0811.1598]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  35. [35]

    Universal Extra-Dimensional models with boundary localized kinetic terms: Probing at the LHC

    A. Datta, U. K. Dey, A. Shaw and A. Raychaudhuri,Universal Extra-Dimensional Models with Boundary Localized Kinetic Terms: Probing at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 076002 [1205.4334]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  36. [36]

    Phenomenology of Universal Extra Dimensions with Bulk-Masses and Brane-Localized Terms

    T. Flacke, K. Kong and S. C. Park,Phenomenology of Universal Extra Dimensions with Bulk-Masses and Brane-Localized Terms,JHEP05(2013) 111 [1303.0872]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    Elastic Scattering and Direct Detection of Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter

    G. Servant and T. M. P. Tait,Elastic Scattering and Direct Detection of Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter,New J. Phys.4(2002) 99 [hep-ph/0209262]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  38. [38]

    Is the Lightest Kaluza-Klein Particle a Viable Dark Matter Candidate?

    G. Servant and T. M. P. Tait,Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?,Nucl. Phys. B650(2003) 391 [hep-ph/0206071]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  39. [39]

    Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter

    H.-C. Cheng, J. L. Feng and K. T. Matchev,Kaluza-Klein dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 211301 [hep-ph/0207125]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  40. [40]

    Detection Rates for Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter

    D. Majumdar,Detection rates for Kaluza-Klein dark matter,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 095010 [hep-ph/0209277]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  41. [41]

    The Abundance of Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter with Coannihilation

    F. Burnell and G. D. Kribs,The Abundance of Kaluza-Klein dark matter with coannihilation,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 015001 [hep-ph/0509118]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  42. [42]

    Precise Calculation of the Relic Density of Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter in Universal Extra Dimensions

    K. Kong and K. T. Matchev,Precise calculation of the relic density of Kaluza-Klein dark matter in universal extra dimensions,JHEP01(2006) 038 [hep-ph/0509119]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  43. [43]

    Relic abundance of dark matter in the minimal universal extra dimension model

    M. Kakizaki, S. Matsumoto and M. Senami,Relic abundance of dark matter in the minimal universal extra dimension model,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 023504 [hep-ph/0605280]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [44]

    Dark matter in UED : the role of the second KK level

    G. Belanger, M. Kakizaki and A. Pukhov,Dark matter in UED: The Role of the second KK level,JCAP02(2011) 009 [1012.2577]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas and T. Gherghetta,Extra space-time dimensions and unification, Phys. Lett. B436(1998) 55 [hep-ph/9803466]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  46. [46]

    K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas and T. Gherghetta,Grand unification at intermediate mass scales through extra dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B537(1999) 47 [hep-ph/9806292]. 32

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  47. [47]

    Power law scaling in Universal Extra Dimension scenarios

    G. Bhattacharyya, A. Datta, S. K. Majee and A. Raychaudhuri,Power law blitzkrieg in universal extra dimension scenarios,Nucl. Phys. B760(2007) 117 [hep-ph/0608208]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  48. [48]

    Dark Matter in Universal Extra Dimension Models: $\gamma_{KK}$ vrs $\nu_{R,KK}$

    K. Hsieh, R. N. Mohapatra and S. Nasri,Dark matter in universal extra dimension models: Kaluza-Klein photon and right-handed neutrino admixture,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 066004 [hep-ph/0604154]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    Realization of lepton masses and mixing angles from point interactions in an extra dimension

    Y. Fujimoto, K. Nishiwaki, M. Sakamoto and R. Takahashi,Realization of lepton masses and mixing angles from point interactions in an extra dimension,JHEP10(2014) 191 [1405.5872]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  50. [50]

    P. R. Archer,The Fermion Mass Hierarchy in Models with Warped Extra Dimensions and a Bulk Higgs,JHEP09(2012) 095 [1204.4730]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  51. [51]

    126 GeV Higgs in Next-to-Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions

    T. Flacke, K. Kong and S. C. Park,126 GeV Higgs in Next-to-Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions,Phys. Lett. B728(2014) 262 [1309.7077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    Monoenergetic Gamma-Rays from Non-Minimal Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter Annihilations

    J. Bonnevier, H. Melbeus, A. Merle and T. Ohlsson,Monoenergetic Gamma-Rays from Non-Minimal Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter Annihilations,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 043524 [1104.1430]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  53. [53]

    Boundary Localized Terms in Universal Extra-Dimensional Models through a Dark Matter perspective

    A. Datta, U. K. Dey, A. Raychaudhuri and A. Shaw,Boundary Localized Terms in Universal Extra-Dimensional Models through a Dark Matter perspective,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 016011 [1305.4507]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    U. K. Dey and T. S. Ray,Constraining minimal and nonminimal universal extra dimension models with Higgs couplings,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 056016 [1305.1016]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  55. [55]

    Non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensions: The strongly interacting sector at the Large Hadron Collider

    A. Datta, K. Nishiwaki and S. Niyogi,Non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensions: The Strongly Interacting Sector at the Large Hadron Collider,JHEP11(2012) 154 [1206.3987]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensions with Brane Local Terms: The Top Quark Sector

    A. Datta, K. Nishiwaki and S. Niyogi,Non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensions with Brane Local Terms: The Top Quark Sector,JHEP01(2014) 104 [1310.6994]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    LHC limits on KK-parity non-conservation in the strong sector of universal extra-dimension models

    A. Datta, A. Raychaudhuri and A. Shaw,LHC limits on KK-parity non-conservation in the strong sector of universal extra-dimension models,Phys. Lett. B730(2014) 42 [1310.2021]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [58]

    KK-parity non-conservation in UED confronts LHC data

    A. Shaw,KK-parity non-conservation in UED confronts LHC data,Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 33 [1405.3139]. 33

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Status of exclusion limits of the KK-parity non-conserving resonance production with updated 13 TeV LHC

    A. Shaw,Status of exclusion limits of the KK-parity non-conserving resonance production with updated 13 TeV LHC,Acta Phys. Polon. B49(2018) 1421 [1709.08077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Exploring non minimal Universal Extra Dimensional Model at the LHC

    N. Ganguly and A. Datta,Exploring non minimal Universal Extra Dimensional Model at the LHC,JHEP10(2018) 072 [1808.08801]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    $Z \rightarrow b {\bar b}$ in non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensional Model

    T. Jha and A. Datta,Z→b bin non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensional Model,JHEP 03(2015) 012 [1410.5098]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  62. [62]

    Non-minimal UED confronts $B_{s}\rightarrow\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$

    A. Datta and A. Shaw,Nonminimal universal extra dimensional model confronts Bs →µ +µ−,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 055048 [1506.08024]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Effects of non-minimal Universal Extra Dimension on $B\rightarrow X_s\gamma$

    A. Datta and A. Shaw,Effects of non-minimal Universal Extra Dimension onB→X sγ, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 015033 [1610.09924]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    Looking for $B\rightarrow X_s \ell^+\ell^-$ in non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensional model

    A. Shaw,Looking forB→X sℓ+ℓ− in a nonminimal universal extra dimensional model, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 115030 [1903.10302]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    $\mathcal{R}(D^{(*)})$ anomalies in light of Non-Minimal Universal Extra Dimension

    A. Biswas, A. Shaw and S. K. Patra,R(D (∗))anomalies in light of a nonminimal universal extra dimension,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 035019 [1708.08938]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Status of Flavour Maximal Non-minimal Universal Extra Dimension

    S. Dasgupta, U. K. Dey, T. Jha and T. S. Ray,Status of a flavor-maximal nonminimal universal extra dimension model,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 055006 [1801.09722]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Lee,Banomalies in the nonminimal universal extra dimension model,Phys

    J.-P. Lee,Banomalies in the nonminimal universal extra dimension model,Phys. Rev. D 100(2019) 075005 [1906.07345]

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    U. K. Dey and T. Jha,Rare top decays in minimal and nonminimal universal extra dimension models,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 056011 [1602.03286]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  69. [69]

    $t\to cg$ and $t\to cZ$ in Universal Extra Dimensional Models

    C.-W. Chiang, U. K. Dey and T. Jha,t→cgandt→cZin universal extra-dimensional models,Eur. Phys. J. Plus134(2019) 210 [1807.01481]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    Shaw,The impact of nonminimal Universal Extra Dimensional model on∆B= 2 transitions,Eur

    A. Shaw,The impact of nonminimal Universal Extra Dimensional model on∆B= 2 transitions,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 137 [2006.12164]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Unitarity Constraints on non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensional Model

    T. Jha,Unitarity Constraints on non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensional Model,J. Phys. G45(2018) 115002 [1604.02481]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    A note on gauge-fixing in the electroweak sector of nmUED

    A. Datta and A. Shaw,A note on gauge-fixing in the electroweak sector of non-minimal UED,Mod. Phys. Lett. A31(2016) 1650181 [1408.0635]. 34

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    Rare B \to K^{(*)} \nu\bar\nu Decays at B Factories

    P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, P. Santorelli and E. Scrimieri,RareB→K (∗) neutrino anti-neutrino decays atBfactories,Phys. Lett. B395(1997) 339 [hep-ph/9610297]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  74. [74]

    New strategies for New Physics search in B -> K* nu anti-nu, B -> K nu anti-nu and B -> X(s) nu anti-nu decays

    W. Altmannshofer, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub and M. Wick,New strategies for New Physics search inB→K ∗ν¯ν,B→Kν¯νandB→X sν¯νdecays,JHEP04(2009) 022 [0902.0160]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  75. [75]

    A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff and D. M. Straub,B→K (∗)ννdecays in the Standard Model and beyond,JHEP02(2015) 184 [1409.4557]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    A. J. Buras, M. Spranger and A. Weiler,The Impact of universal extra dimensions on the unitarity triangle and rare K and B decays,Nucl. Phys. B660(2003) 225 [hep-ph/0212143]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  77. [77]

    Buchalla and A

    G. Buchalla and A. J. Buras,QCD corrections to rare K and B decays for arbitrary top quark mass,Nucl. Phys. B400(1993) 225

    work page 1993

  78. [78]

    The Rare Decays $K\to\pi\nu\bar\nu$, $B\to X\nu\bar\nu$ and $B\to l^+l^-$ -- An Update

    G. Buchalla and A. J. Buras,The rare decaysK→πν¯ν,B→Xν¯νandB→l +l−: An Update,Nucl. Phys. B548(1999) 309 [hep-ph/9901288]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  79. [79]

    QCD corrections to FCNC decays mediated by Z-penguins and W-boxes

    M. Misiak and J. Urban,QCD corrections to FCNC decays mediated by Z penguins and W boxes,Phys. Lett. B451(1999) 161 [hep-ph/9901278]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  80. [80]

    J. Brod, M. Gorbahn and E. Stamou,Two-Loop Electroweak Corrections for theK→πν¯ν Decays,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 034030 [1009.0947]. [84]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 030001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

Showing first 80 references.