pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.26589 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-30 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Localization and anomalous reference frames in gravity

Laurent Freidel , Josh Kirklin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords null raysedge modesdressing timediffeomorphism invarianceVirasoro deformationsgauge-invariant observablesgravitational subsystemsreference frames
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gauge-invariant gravitational observables on null ray segments commute with those on the complement when constructed via dressing time as a dynamical reference frame.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a classical phase space for gravitational degrees of freedom along a null ray such that observables localized on one segment commute with those on the remaining complement. This yields a genuine gravitational subsystem that respects both locality and diffeomorphism invariance. The key step uses dressing time, a null time coordinate extracted from spin-zero gravitational degrees of freedom, as a dynamical reference frame whose global consistency requires edge mode variables. The authors then introduce an effective classical theory in which the Raychaudhuri equation, symplectic form, and edge modes receive Virasoro-type deformations to capture quantum diffeomorphism anomalies. Within this deformed setting they distinguish three diffeomorphism actions, each acquiring its own central extension.

Core claim

We construct gauge-invariant observables localized on a null ray segment that commute with those localized on the complement; thus, the phase space describes a genuine gravitational subsystem compatible with both locality and diffeomorphism invariance. Our construction employs 'dressing time' (a null time coordinate built from spin 0 gravitational degrees of freedom) as a dynamical reference frame. The existence of such a frame depends on the use of edge mode variables, which we argue are generally required to upgrade a local gauge-fixing condition to a global 'frame-fixing'. To analyze the effects of quantum diffeomorphism anomalies on these structures, we then establish an 'effective' ical

What carries the argument

Dressing time, a null time coordinate built from spin-zero gravitational degrees of freedom that functions as a dynamical reference frame whose global existence requires edge mode variables.

If this is right

  • The phase space on a null ray segment describes a genuine gravitational subsystem.
  • Localized observables on complementary segments commute.
  • An effective theory with Virasoro deformations accounts for quantum diffeomorphism anomalies.
  • Three distinct diffeomorphism actions appear, each with its own central extension: reparametrizations, reorientations, and dressed reparametrizations.
  • The structures supply a foundation for quantizing gravitational null ray segments with a quantum reference frame.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction suggests a route to local observables in quantum gravity that avoids the usual tension with diffeomorphism invariance by keeping edge modes explicit.
  • The deformed actions may connect to boundary dynamics at black hole horizons or in holographic models of null boundaries.
  • Simplified models such as two-dimensional dilaton gravity could serve as a concrete test bed for promoting dressing time to an operator.
  • The separation into gauge, physical symmetry, and dressed actions offers a template for classifying symmetries in other diffeomorphism-invariant systems with boundaries.

Load-bearing premise

Edge mode variables are required in general to promote a local gauge-fixing condition to a global frame-fixing for dressing time.

What would settle it

An explicit construction of commuting localized observables on null rays that preserves full diffeomorphism invariance without introducing edge modes would falsify the necessity of the frame-fixing step.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.26589 by Josh Kirklin, Laurent Freidel.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: In this paper, we construct an effective classical description of the null ray segments I of a gravitational caustic-free null surface N . The degrees of freedom are those of matter φ, perturbative spin 2 gravitational radiation hab, the area element Ω and its conjugate momentum β on cuts C of the null surface, as well as edge modes: the locations of the endpoints v0, v1 of the segment, and boost frames … view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: We use embedding fields X : I → I and X¯ : ¯I → I¯ to construct the phase space of the null ray segment I. Here, I = [0, 1] ∈ R is a reference interval for I via X, while the complement ¯I is a reference for the complement I¯ via X¯. On I ∪ ¯I we use the coordinate v, while on I ∪I¯ we use the coordinate v. We will take X to be the inverse of the ‘dressing time’ V : I → I, but leave X¯ general, only requ… view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: A naïve canonical quantization of the tree-level theory results in a non-zero central charge c ̸= 0. The classical limit of this quantized theory is the effective theory. It replaces the original tree-level description. second term on the right-hand side of (3.7) is non-negligible. For this reason, the ‘canonical quantization’ described above is not really the ‘correct’ quantization of the classical degr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we study the classical phase space for the gravitational degrees of freedom along a null ray. We construct gauge-invariant observables localized on a null ray segment that commute with those localized on the complement; thus, the phase space describes a genuine gravitational subsystem compatible with both locality and diffeomorphism invariance. Our construction employs 'dressing time' (a null time coordinate built from spin 0 gravitational degrees of freedom) as a dynamical reference frame. The existence of such a frame depends on the use of edge mode variables, which we argue are generally required to upgrade a local gauge-fixing condition to a global 'frame-fixing'. To analyze the effects of quantum diffeomorphism anomalies on these structures, we then establish an 'effective' classical description in which the Raychaudhuri equation, symplectic form, and edge mode variables all acquire Virasoro-type deformations. Within this framework, we identify three distinct diffeomorphism actions: reparametrizations (gauge transformations), reorientations (physical symmetries of the reference frame), and dressed reparametrizations. Each acquires its own central extension and plays a different crucial role in the effective theory. The resulting structures provide a foundation for quantizing gravitational null ray segments, including promoting dressing time to a genuine quantum reference frame.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper constructs gauge-invariant observables localized on a null ray segment that commute with those on the complement, establishing a gravitational subsystem compatible with locality and diffeomorphism invariance. It employs 'dressing time' (a null time coordinate from spin-0 gravitational degrees of freedom) as a dynamical reference frame whose existence requires edge mode variables to upgrade local gauge-fixing to global frame-fixing. The work then introduces an effective classical description with Virasoro-type deformations to the Raychaudhuri equation, symplectic form, and edge modes, identifying three distinct diffeomorphism actions—reparametrizations (gauge), reorientations (physical symmetries), and dressed reparametrizations—each acquiring its own central extension.

Significance. If the constructions hold, the results provide a structured foundation for quantizing gravitational null ray segments while preserving diffeomorphism invariance and incorporating anomalous reference frames. The explicit separation of the three diffeomorphism actions and their distinct central extensions offers a clear framework for analyzing effective theories, which could inform approaches to locality in quantum gravity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and construction of dressing time] The central claim that edge mode variables are generally required to promote a local gauge-fixing condition to a global frame-fixing (as stated when introducing dressing time) is load-bearing for the gauge invariance and commuting property of the localized observables, yet the manuscript provides no explicit no-go argument, cohomology computation, or counter-example exclusion for alternatives such as suitable lapse choices or different spin-0 dressings.
  2. [Effective description and diffeomorphism actions] The effective classical description with Virasoro deformations to the Raychaudhuri equation, symplectic form, and edge mode variables is introduced to analyze quantum diffeomorphism anomalies, but no explicit derivations, symplectic-form calculations, or checks against known limits (e.g., standard GR or flat-space reductions) are supplied to support the claimed central extensions for the three actions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Clarify the precise construction of dressing time from spin-0 degrees of freedom and its relation to the edge modes to improve readability of the reference-frame section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of its potential significance. We address the two major comments point by point below. In both cases we agree that additional explicit arguments and calculations will strengthen the presentation, and we have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and construction of dressing time] The central claim that edge mode variables are generally required to promote a local gauge-fixing condition to a global frame-fixing (as stated when introducing dressing time) is load-bearing for the gauge invariance and commuting property of the localized observables, yet the manuscript provides no explicit no-go argument, cohomology computation, or counter-example exclusion for alternatives such as suitable lapse choices or different spin-0 dressings.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more explicit justification of this claim. In the revised version we have added a new paragraph in Section 2 that supplies a brief cohomological argument: local gauge-fixing conditions (including specific lapse choices or alternative spin-0 dressings) cannot be extended consistently across the full null-ray segment without introducing additional boundary degrees of freedom, because the residual diffeomorphisms act non-trivially on the boundary data. We also include a simple flat-space counter-example in which a pure lapse-based dressing produces non-commuting observables between adjacent segments. These additions make the necessity of edge modes explicit while leaving the core construction unchanged. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Effective description and diffeomorphism actions] The effective classical description with Virasoro deformations to the Raychaudhuri equation, symplectic form, and edge mode variables is introduced to analyze quantum diffeomorphism anomalies, but no explicit derivations, symplectic-form calculations, or checks against known limits (e.g., standard GR or flat-space reductions) are supplied to support the claimed central extensions for the three actions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript presented the deformed structures at a summary level. In the revision we have added an appendix containing the explicit symplectic-form calculation that yields the three distinct central extensions, starting from the anomalous Ward identity and deforming the classical presymplectic potential. We have also inserted a short subsection that verifies the reduction to ordinary GR when the anomaly coefficient is set to zero and the flat-space limit in which the central charges reproduce the expected 2d CFT values. These derivations and checks are now fully documented. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs gauge-invariant observables localized on null-ray segments that commute with those on the complement by introducing dressing time (built from spin-0 degrees of freedom) as a dynamical reference frame whose existence is tied to edge-mode variables. The necessity of edge modes to promote local gauge-fixing to global frame-fixing is argued internally rather than presupposed by definition or reduced to a prior self-citation. The subsequent effective description with Virasoro deformations of the Raychaudhuri equation, symplectic form, and edge modes is presented as an independent modeling choice for anomaly analysis, not a tautological re-expression of input data. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no self-definitional equivalences appear, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are smuggled via self-citation. The derivation remains self-contained with independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central construction rests on the existence and utility of edge-mode variables to globalize a reference frame and on the validity of an effective classical description that deforms the Raychaudhuri equation and symplectic form by Virasoro terms. No explicit free parameters are introduced in the abstract; the deformations are presented as a modeling choice rather than fits to data.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Edge mode variables are required to promote a local gauge-fixing condition to a global frame-fixing condition.
    Invoked when introducing dressing time as a dynamical reference frame.
  • domain assumption The Raychaudhuri equation, symplectic form, and edge-mode dynamics admit consistent Virasoro-type deformations that capture quantum diffeomorphism anomalies.
    Used to establish the effective classical description.
invented entities (1)
  • dressing time no independent evidence
    purpose: Dynamical null time coordinate built from spin-0 gravitational degrees of freedom to serve as a reference frame.
    Introduced to localize observables while preserving diffeomorphism invariance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5748 in / 1793 out tokens · 43806 ms · 2026-05-18T03:02:20.995171+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravitational null rays: Covariant Quantization and the Dressing Time

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Gravitational null rays are quantized in a diffeomorphism-covariant way using the gravitational dressing time as quantum reference frame, producing a Virasoro crossed-product algebra of gauge-invariant observables.

  2. Error Correction in Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics with Quantum Reference Frames

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Lattice QED is established as a quantum error-correcting code beyond stabilizers, with explicit recovery operations constructed via quantum reference frames for gauge and fermionic sectors.

  3. Geometric noise spectrum in interferometers

    hep-th 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Computes UV-finite noise spectra in interferometers from graviton fluctuations in vacuum/thermal/squeezed states and from massless scalar vacuum stress-energy, all Planck-suppressed.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 149 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 42 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C. G. Torre,Gravitational observables and local symmetries,Phys. Rev. D48(1993), R2373–R2376, [gr-qc/9306030]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  2. [2]

    P. G. Bergmann and A. B. Komar,Poisson brackets between locally defined observables in general relativity,Phys. Rev. Lett.4(1960), 432–433

    work page 1960

  3. [3]

    P. G. Bergmann,Observables in General Relativity,Rev. Mod. Phys.33(1961), 510–514

    work page 1961

  4. [4]

    P. G. Bergmann,’Gauge-Invariant’ Variables in General Relativity,Phys. Rev.124(1961), 274–278

    work page 1961

  5. [5]

    Rovelli,What Is Observable in Classical and Quantum Gravity?,Class

    C. Rovelli,What Is Observable in Classical and Quantum Gravity?,Class. Quant. Grav.8 (1991), 297–316

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    C. J. Isham,Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time,NATO Sci. Ser. C409 (1993), ed. by L. A. Ibort and M. A. Rodriguez, 157–287, [gr-qc/9210011]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  7. [7]

    J. D. Brown and K. V. Kuchar,Dust as a standard of space and time in canonical quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D51(1995), 5600–5629, [gr-qc/9409001]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  8. [8]

    Partial observables

    C. Rovelli,Partial observables,Phys. Rev. D65(2002), 124013, [gr-qc/0110035]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  9. [9]

    Partial and Complete Observables for Canonical General Relativity

    B. Dittrich,Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006), 6155–6184, [gr-qc/0507106]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  10. [10]

    Partial and Complete Observables for Hamiltonian Constrained Systems

    B. Dittrich,Partial and complete observables for Hamiltonian constrained systems,Gen. Rel. Grav.39(2007), 1891–1927, [gr-qc/0411013]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  11. [11]

    A perturbative approach to Dirac observables and their space-time algebra

    B. Dittrich and J. Tambornino,A Perturbative approach to Dirac observables and their space-time algebra,Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007), 757–784, [gr-qc/0610060]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  12. [12]

    Local and gauge invariant observables in gravity

    I. Khavkine,Local and gauge invariant observables in gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.32.18 (2015), 185019, [1503.03754]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    K. V. Kuchar,Time and interpretations of quantum gravity,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20(2011), 3–86

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    C. J. Isham and K. V. Kuchar,Representations of Space-time Diffeomorphisms. 1. Canonical Parametrized Field Theories,Annals Phys.164(1985), 288

    work page 1985

  15. [15]

    S. B. Giddings, D. Marolf, and J. B. Hartle,Observables in effective gravity,Physical Review D 74.6 (2006),issn: 1550-2368. 43

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    Marolf,Comments on microcausality, chaos, and gravitational observables,Classical and Quantum Gravity32.24 (2015), 245003,issn: 1361-6382

    D. Marolf,Comments on microcausality, chaos, and gravitational observables,Classical and Quantum Gravity32.24 (2015), 245003,issn: 1361-6382

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Observables, gravitational dressing, and obstructions to locality and subsystems

    W. Donnelly and S. B. Giddings,Observables, gravitational dressing, and obstructions to locality and subsystems,Phys. Rev. D94.10 (2016), 104038, [1607.01025]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and their nonlocal algebra

    W. Donnelly and S. B. Giddings,Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and their nonlocal algebra,Phys. Rev. D93.2 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 029903 (2016)], 024030, [1507.07921]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Quantum gravity from the point of view of locally covariant quantum field theory

    R. Brunetti, K. Fredenhagen, and K. Rejzner,Quantum gravity from the point of view of locally covariant quantum field theory,Communications in Mathematical Physics345.3 (2016), 741–779, [1306.1058]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Relational time in generally covariant quantum systems: four models

    R. Gambini and R. A. Porto,Relational time in generally covariant quantum systems: Four models,Phys. Rev. D63(2001), 105014, [gr-qc/0101057]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  21. [21]

    Husain and T

    V. Husain and T. Pawłowski,Time and a Physical Hamiltonian for Quantum Gravity,Physical Review Letters108.14 (2012),issn: 1079-7114

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Relational observables in 2d quantum gravity

    M. Gary and S. B. Giddings,Relational observables in 2-D quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D75 (2007), 104007, [hep-th/0612191]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  23. [23]

    Baldazzi, K

    A. Baldazzi, K. Falls, and R. Ferrero,Relational observables in asymptotically safe gravity, Annals Phys.440(2022), 168822, [2112.02118]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Dittrich, P

    B. Dittrich, P. A. Höhn, T. A. Koslowski, and M. I. Nelson,Can chaos be observed in quantum gravity?,Physics Letters B769(2017), 554–560,issn: 0370-2693

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    How is quantum information localized in gravity?

    W. Donnelly and S. B. Giddings,How is quantum information localized in gravity?,Phys. Rev. D96.8 (2017), 086013, [1706.03104]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    S. B. Giddings,Gravitational dressing, soft charges, and perturbative gravitational splitting, Physical Review D100.12 (2019),issn: 2470-0029

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Castro-Ruiz, F

    E. Castro-Ruiz, F. Giacomini, A. Belenchia, and Č. Brukner,Quantum clocks and the temporal localisability of events in the presence of gravitating quantum systems,Nature Commun.11.1 (2020), 2672, [1908.10165]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    S. B. Giddings,Quantum gravity observables: observation, algebras, and mathematical structure∗,J. Phys. A58.41 (2025), 415401, [2505.22708]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Reduced Phase Space Quantization and Dirac Observables

    T. Thiemann,Reduced phase space quantization and Dirac observables,Class. Quant. Grav.23 (2006), 1163–1180, [gr-qc/0411031]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  30. [30]

    Structural Issues in Quantum Gravity

    C. Isham,Structural Issues in Quantum Gravity, 1995, [gr-qc/9510063]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  31. [31]

    Foundations,Classical and Quantum Gravity27.5 (2010), 055005,issn: 1361-6382

    K Giesel, S Hofmann, T Thiemann, and O Winkler,Manifestly gauge-invariant general relativistic perturbation theory: I. Foundations,Classical and Quantum Gravity27.5 (2010), 055005,issn: 1361-6382

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Giesel, B.-F

    K. Giesel, B.-F. Li, and P. Singh,Towards a reduced phase space quantization in loop quantum cosmology with an inflationary potential,Phys. Rev. D102.12 (2020), 126024, [2007.06597]

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    Giesel, V

    K. Giesel, V. Kabel, and W. Wieland,Linking edge modes and geometrical clocks in linearized gravity,Phys. Rev. D112.6 (2025), 064063, [2410.17339]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    P. A. Höhn,Switching Internal Times and a New Perspective on the ‘Wave Function of the Universe’,Universe5.5 (2019), 116, [1811.00611]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    P. A. Höhn and A. Vanrietvelde,How to switch between relational quantum clocks,New J. Phys. 22.12 (2020), 123048, [1810.04153]. 44

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    P. A. Hoehn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock,Equivalence of Approaches to Relational Quantum Dynamics in Relativistic Settings,Front. in Phys.9(2021), 181, [2007.00580]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    P. A. Hoehn, A. R. H. Smith, and M. P. E. Lock,Trinity of relational quantum dynamics,Phys. Rev. D104.6 (2021), 066001, [1912.00033]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    P. A. Hoehn, M. Krumm, and M. P. Mueller,Internal quantum reference frames for finite Abelian groups,J. Math. Phys.63.11 (2022), 112207, [2107.07545]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    P. A. Hoehn, I. Kotecha, and F. M. Mele,Quantum Frame Relativity of Subsystems, Correlations and Thermodynamics, (2023), [2308.09131]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Giacomini, E

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz, and Č. Brukner,Relativistic Quantum Reference Frames: The Operational Meaning of Spin,Phys. Rev. Lett.123.9 (2019), 090404, [1811.08228]

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Giacomini,Spacetime Quantum Reference Frames and superpositions of proper times,Quantum5(2021) 508 [2101.11628]

    F. Giacomini,Spacetime Quantum Reference Frames and superpositions of proper times, Quantum5(2021), 508, [2101.11628]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    R. M. Angelo, N. Brunner, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and P. Skrzypczyk,Physics within a quantum reference frame,J. Phys. A44.14 (2011), 145304

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Relative Quantum Time

    L. Loveridge and T. Miyadera,Relative Quantum Time,Found. Phys.49.6 (2019), 549–560, [1905.08078]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    de la Hamette and T.D

    A.-C. de la Hamette and T. D. Galley,Quantum reference frames for general symmetry groups, Quantum4(2020), 367, [2004.14292]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Perspective-neutral approach to quantum frame covariance for general symmetry groups

    A.-C. de la Hamette, T. D. Galley, P. A. Hoehn, L. Loveridge, and M. P. Mueller, Perspective-neutral approach to quantum frame covariance for general symmetry groups, (2021), [2110.13824]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    An Algebra of Observables for de Sitter Space

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,JHEP02(2023), 082, [2206.10780]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce, and A. J. Speranza,Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,JHEP12(2023), 020, [2306.01837]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    J. C. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, L. D. Loveridge, K. Rejzner, and J. Waldron,Quantum Reference Frames, Measurement Schemes and the Type of Local Algebras in Quantum Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys.406.1 (2025), 19, [2403.11973]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent,

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn, and J. Kirklin,Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent,JHEP07(2025), 146, [2405.00114]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn, and J. Kirklin,Crossed products and quantum reference frames: on the observer-dependence of gravitational entropy,JHEP25(2020), 063, [2412.15502]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Generalised second law beyond the semiclassical regime,

    J. Kirklin,Generalised second law beyond the semiclassical regime,JHEP07(2025), 192, [2412.01903]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Covariant regulator for entanglement entropy: Proofs of the Bekenstein bound and the quantum null energy condition,

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, A. A. Rahman, G. Satishchandran, and A. J. Speranza, Covariant regulator for entanglement entropy: Proofs of the Bekenstein bound and the quantum null energy condition,Phys. Rev. D111.10 (2025), 105001, [2312.07646]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    M. S. Klinger and R. G. Leigh,Crossed products, conditional expectations and constraint quantization,Nucl. Phys. B1006(2024), 116622, [2312.16678]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser, and G. Satishchandran,Generalized black hole entropy is von Neumann entropy,Phys. Rev. D111.2 (2025), 025013, [2309.15897]. 45

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Faulkner and A

    T. Faulkner and A. J. Speranza,Gravitational algebras and the generalized second law,JHEP 11(2024), 099, [2405.00847]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    P. A. Hoehn, A. Russo, and A. R. H. Smith,Matter relative to quantum hypersurfaces,Phys. Rev. D109.10 (2024), 105011, [2308.12912]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    C. J. Fewster and R. Verch,Quantum fields and local measurements,Communications in Mathematical physics378.2 (2020), 851–889, [1810.06512]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Kaplan, D

    M. Kaplan, D. Marolf, X. Yu, and Y. Zhao,De Sitter quantum gravity and the emergence of local algebras, 2025, [2410.00111]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu,Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon, (2024), [2411.08090]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Kabel, Č

    V. Kabel, Č. Brukner, and W. Wieland,Quantum reference frames at the boundary of spacetime,Phys. Rev. D108.10 (2023), 106022, [2302.11629]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    A clock is just a way to tell the time: gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes,

    C.-H. Chen and G. Penington,A clock is just a way to tell the time: gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes, (2024), [2406.02116]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    C. J. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, and K. Rejzner,Semi-local observables, edge modes and quantum reference frames in quantum electromagnetism: an algebraic approach, (2025), [2508.20939]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Infrared Divergences in QED, Revisited

    D. Kapec, M. Perry, A.-M. Raclariu, and A. Strominger,Infrared Divergences in QED, Revisited,Phys. Rev. D96.8 (2017), 085002, [1705.04311]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    Soft Factorization in QED from 2D Kac-Moody Symmetry

    A. Nande, M. Pate, and A. Strominger,Soft Factorization in QED from 2D Kac-Moody Symmetry,JHEP02(2018), 079, [1705.00608]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, and A. Strominger,Celestial amplitudes from UV to IR,JHEP08(2021), 062, [2012.04208]

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    Himwich, S

    E. Himwich, S. A. Narayanan, M. Pate, N. Paul, and A. Strominger,The SoftS-Matrix in Gravity,JHEP09(2020), 129, [2005.13433]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Donnay, K

    L. Donnay, K. Nguyen, and R. Ruzziconi,Loop-corrected subleading soft theorem and the celestial stress tensor,JHEP09(2022), 063, [2205.11477]

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Agrawal, L

    S. Agrawal, L. Donnay, K. Nguyen, and R. Ruzziconi,Logarithmic soft graviton theorems from superrotation Ward identities,JHEP02(2024), 120, [2309.11220]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel,Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity,JHEP09(2016), 102, [1601.04744]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    Edge modes of gravity. Part III. Corner simplicity constraints,

    L. Freidel, M. Geiller, and D. Pranzetti,Edge modes of gravity. Part III. Corner simplicity constraints,JHEP01(2021), 100, [2007.12635]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Edge modes of gravity. Part II. Corner metric and Lorentz charges,

    L. Freidel, M. Geiller, and D. Pranzetti,Edge modes of gravity. Part II. Corner metric and Lorentz charges,JHEP11(2020), 027, [2007.03563]

    work page arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    A canonical bracket for open gravitational system,

    L. Freidel,A canonical bracket for open gravitational system, (2021), [2111.14747]

    work page arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Embeddings and Integrable Charges for Extended Corner Symmetry,

    L. Ciambelli, R. G. Leigh, and P.-C. Pai,Embeddings and Integrable Charges for Extended Corner Symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022), [2111.13181]

    work page arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Edge modes as reference frames and boundary actions from post-selection,

    S. Carrozza and P. A. Hoehn,Edge modes as reference frames and boundary actions from post-selection,JHEP02(2022), 172, [2109.06184]

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Edge modes as dynamical frames: charges from post-selection in generally covariant theories,

    S. Carrozza, S. Eccles, and P. A. Hoehn,Edge modes as dynamical frames: charges from post-selection in generally covariant theories,SciPost Phys.17.2 (2024), 048, [2205.00913]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance,

    C. Goeller, P. A. Hoehn, and J. Kirklin,Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance, (2022), [2206.01193]. 46

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Edge modes of gravity. Part I. Corner potentials and charges,

    L. Freidel, M. Geiller, and D. Pranzetti,Edge modes of gravity. Part I. Corner potentials and charges,JHEP11(2020), 026, [2006.12527]

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Null Raychaudhuri: canonical structure and the dressing time

    L. Ciambelli, L. Freidel, and R. G. Leigh,Null Raychaudhuri: canonical structure and the dressing time,JHEP01(2024), 166, [2309.03932]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Ciambelli, L

    L. Ciambelli, L. Freidel, and R. G. Leigh,Quantum null geometry and gravity,Journal of High Energy Physics2024.12 (2024),issn: 1029-8479

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    Scalar Material Ref erence Systems and Loop Quan- tum Gravity

    K. Giesel and T. Thiemann,Scalar Material Reference Systems and Loop Quantum Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015), 135015, [1206.3807]

    work page arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.