pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.04933 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-07 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Low-reheating scenario in dark Higgs inflation and its impact on dark photon dark matter production

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 00:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords dark photon dark matterdark Higgs inflationlow reheatingentropy dilutionU(1) dark gaugeWIMP and FIMPspectral indexnon-minimal coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a minimal dark U(1) extension the dark Higgs drives inflation while its low-reheating decay and scattering produce dark photon dark matter after substantial entropy dilution.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that a simple dark U(1)_D gauge extension of the Standard Model can simultaneously drive cosmic inflation with the dark Higgs and generate the observed dark photon dark matter abundance. Reheating occurs at temperatures as low as 1 GeV through inflaton decay or 1 MeV through scattering, each case producing enough entropy to dilute the dark matter yield. Both feeble and weak interaction regimes for the dark photon remain viable, and the model yields a spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio inside current Planck, BICEP/Keck and ACT bounds while requiring only a tiny non-minimal coupling to gravity. A reader would care because the construction links two major cosmological puzzles inside one renormalizable, testable framework without extra fields or large tunings.

Core claim

The dark Higgs field, non-minimally coupled to gravity with a small value, serves as the inflaton; its subsequent decay and 2-to-2 scattering into Standard Model particles reheat the universe to temperatures between roughly 1 MeV and 1 GeV. During this low-reheating epoch the dark photon dark matter is produced, either as a FIMP or WIMP, and then diluted by the entropy released in the inflaton decays. Quantum corrections and running couplings are included so that the resulting ns and r lie within observational limits, while the small non-minimal coupling avoids unitarity violation. Comprehensive scans confirm consistency with collider, direct-detection and cosmological constraints.

What carries the argument

Low-reheating dynamics realized through inflaton decay and scattering channels that generate entropy dilution of the dark photon relic abundance.

If this is right

  • Reheating temperatures down to 1 MeV become possible, permitting larger Higgs-portal mixing angles and improved detection prospects.
  • FIMP-type dark photon dark matter can accommodate stronger gauge couplings while still matching the observed relic density.
  • WIMP-type dark photon dark matter can be realized with weaker couplings than in standard high-reheating scenarios.
  • The spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio remain compatible with Planck, BICEP/Keck and ACT data after inclusion of quantum corrections.
  • The entire construction fits inside a minimal renormalizable extension without additional fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Low reheating may relax constraints on other early-universe relics such as the baryon asymmetry or gravitational waves.
  • The same entropy-dilution mechanism could be applied to other dark-sector candidates to bring them into experimental reach.
  • Small non-minimal couplings in dark Higgs models may generalize to other inflationary scenarios that avoid unitarity problems.
  • Future collider searches for the dark Higgs mixing angle could directly test the reheating-temperature window.

Load-bearing premise

The dark Higgs can drive inflation with a small non-minimal coupling and the chosen decay and scattering channels produce enough entropy dilution to yield the correct dark matter abundance without violating other cosmological bounds.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the tensor-to-scalar ratio lying outside the narrow band predicted for the allowed range of the non-minimal coupling, or a direct detection signal for dark photon dark matter whose coupling and mass are incompatible with the entropy-dilution factor required by the low-reheating temperature.

read the original abstract

We investigate dark matter (DM) phenomenology and cosmic inflation within a unified framework based on a dark $U(1)_D$ gauge extension of the Standard Model (SM). The associated dark gauge boson, namely the dark photon, serves as a viable DM candidate, which we call dark photon dark matter (DPDM), whilst the dark Higgs field drives inflation. We explore a low-reheating scenario where DM production occurs during reheating, resulting in significant entropy dilution of the DPDM abundance. Both weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) and feebly interacting massive particle (FIMP) DM scenarios are explored, depending on the dark gauge coupling strength. For FIMP-type DM, the entropy dilution allows for stronger couplings whilst maintaining the correct relic abundance, potentially bringing these candidates within the reach of current and near-future detection experiments. Similarly, WIMP-type DM can be realised with weaker couplings. We perform a comprehensive parameter scan incorporating constraints from collider data, DM direct and indirect detection experiments, and cosmological observations. Taking quantum corrections and running of the couplings into account, we demonstrate that dark Higgs inflation yields predictions for the spectral index $n_s$ and the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ that are consistent with the Planck, BICEP/Keck, and ACT data. The nonminimal coupling of the dark Higgs inflaton field to gravity is shown to be much smaller than in the case of the SM Higgs inflation scenario, avoiding unitarity concerns. We show that reheating temperatures as low as 1 GeV and 1 MeV can be achieved through the decay and scattering processes of the inflaton, respectively, with the latter allowing for larger Higgs mixing angles and enhanced detection prospects. Our results establish that this minimal extension successfully unifies DM physics with inflationary cosmology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates a dark U(1)_D gauge extension of the SM in which the dark Higgs drives inflation via a non-minimal coupling to gravity while the dark photon serves as DM. It focuses on a low-reheating scenario in which DM production occurs during reheating, producing significant entropy dilution that modifies the relic abundance in both WIMP and FIMP regimes. After a parameter scan that incorporates collider, direct/indirect detection, and cosmological bounds, and after including quantum corrections and RG running of couplings, the authors report that ns and r remain consistent with Planck, BICEP/Keck, and ACT data. Reheating temperatures as low as 1 GeV (via decay) and 1 MeV (via scattering) are stated to be achievable, with the small non-minimal coupling avoiding unitarity issues.

Significance. If the entropy-dilution and relic-density calculations are shown to be robust under the full time-dependent evolution, the work would provide a concrete example of a minimal extension that simultaneously addresses inflation and DM production, with the low-reheating regime potentially bringing FIMP dark photons into experimental reach while preserving standard inflationary observables.

major comments (2)
  1. [Reheating and DM production dynamics] The central claim that entropy dilution during low-reheating (T_rh ~ 1 MeV via scattering) yields the observed DPDM abundance for the quoted mixing angles and g_D values rests on the precise treatment of the yield integral. The temperature scaling T ~ a^{-3/8} in the inflaton-dominated phase introduces an extra suppression factor whose magnitude depends on the inflaton decay width and dark gauge coupling; if the manuscript uses an instantaneous-reheating approximation or an end-of-reheating effective dilution factor rather than the integrated Boltzmann equation, the relic contours can shift by O(1), potentially excluding the low-T_rh points or requiring larger mixing angles that reintroduce direct-detection tension.
  2. [Inflationary predictions and RG running] The reported consistency of ns and r with Planck/BICEP/Keck/ACT data after RG running is presented as a successful prediction, yet the non-minimal coupling xi and T_rh are free parameters that are scanned to fit the observables. It must be shown explicitly (e.g., via the slow-roll expressions and the RG-improved potential) that the final (ns, r) values are not simply reproduced by construction once xi and T_rh are chosen to satisfy the amplitude and spectral-index constraints.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions should explicitly state the values of xi, g_D, and mixing angle used for each curve so that the reader can reproduce the plotted relic-density contours without cross-referencing the text.
  2. The abstract states 'reheating temperatures as low as 1 GeV and 1 MeV can be achieved through the decay and scattering processes of the inflaton, respectively'; the corresponding sections should tabulate the decay widths and scattering rates that realize these temperatures to allow direct verification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, providing clarifications on our methodology and indicating where revisions will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Reheating and DM production dynamics] The central claim that entropy dilution during low-reheating (T_rh ~ 1 MeV via scattering) yields the observed DPDM abundance for the quoted mixing angles and g_D values rests on the precise treatment of the yield integral. The temperature scaling T ~ a^{-3/8} in the inflaton-dominated phase introduces an extra suppression factor whose magnitude depends on the inflaton decay width and dark gauge coupling; if the manuscript uses an instantaneous-reheating approximation or an end-of-reheating effective dilution factor rather than the integrated Boltzmann equation, the relic contours can shift by O(1), potentially excluding the low-T_rh points or requiring larger mixing angles that reintroduce direct-detection tension.

    Authors: We thank the referee for emphasizing the need for a precise treatment of the yield integral. Our analysis solves the integrated Boltzmann equation for the dark photon number density throughout the reheating epoch, explicitly incorporating the T ∝ a^{-3/8} scaling in the inflaton-dominated phase. The production rates (both decay and 2→2 scattering channels) are integrated numerically from the end of inflation until radiation domination, with the inflaton decay width and g_D entering the time-dependent Hubble rate and temperature evolution. This yields the entropy dilution factor self-consistently rather than via an instantaneous approximation. Our parameter scan confirms that the reported low-T_rh points achieve the observed relic density without requiring larger mixing angles that would violate direct-detection limits. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix with the explicit yield integral, the numerical integration procedure, and benchmark plots of the dilution factor versus T_rh. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Inflationary predictions and RG running] The reported consistency of ns and r with Planck/BICEP/Keck/ACT data after RG running is presented as a successful prediction, yet the non-minimal coupling xi and T_rh are free parameters that are scanned to fit the observables. It must be shown explicitly (e.g., via the slow-roll expressions and the RG-improved potential) that the final (ns, r) values are not simply reproduced by construction once xi and T_rh are chosen to satisfy the amplitude and spectral-index constraints.

    Authors: We agree that the inflationary observables must be shown to arise as genuine predictions. The non-minimal coupling ξ is fixed by normalizing the scalar amplitude A_s at the pivot scale using the RG-improved effective potential. The slow-roll parameters ε and η (and thus n_s = 1 − 6ε + 2η, r = 16ε) are then evaluated at horizon exit, whose location depends on the total number of e-folds set by the post-inflationary evolution including T_rh. Because RG running modifies the quartic coupling and the shape of the potential at the inflationary scale, the resulting n_s and r are non-trivial outcomes that must simultaneously satisfy the DM relic density, collider bounds, and reheating constraints. T_rh itself does not enter the slow-roll expressions directly but affects only the e-fold count. In the revised manuscript we will include the explicit slow-roll expressions in terms of the RG-improved potential, together with a new figure displaying n_s and r versus the inflaton field value for representative benchmark points that also satisfy all other constraints. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain remains self-contained.

full rationale

The paper constructs a dark U(1)_D extension where the dark Higgs potential plus non-minimal coupling generates slow-roll parameters that yield ns and r after RG evolution; these are then compared against Planck/BICEP/ACT bounds by scanning allowed values of the coupling and quartic, which is a standard consistency check rather than a reduction to the input data. Reheating temperature is obtained from explicit inflaton decay and 2-to-2 scattering widths, and the resulting entropy dilution factor is inserted into the Boltzmann equation for the dark-photon yield in both FIMP and WIMP regimes. None of these steps equates the output to the input by definition, nor does any load-bearing premise rest solely on a self-citation whose validity is presupposed. The calculations are independent of the final observational match and can be falsified by collider or direct-detection limits outside the fitted window.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on several standard extensions and ad-hoc choices whose independent evidence is not supplied in the abstract.

free parameters (4)
  • non-minimal coupling xi
    Chosen small to avoid unitarity violation; value fitted to produce correct ns and r.
  • dark gauge coupling g_D
    Scanned to realize WIMP or FIMP regimes while matching relic density after dilution.
  • reheating temperature T_RH
    Set to 1 GeV or 1 MeV via decay/scattering rates; directly controls entropy dilution factor.
  • Higgs mixing angle
    Allowed to be larger due to low T_RH; fitted within collider and detection bounds.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The dark Higgs potential and non-minimal coupling to gravity allow slow-roll inflation without additional fields.
    Invoked to justify using the dark Higgs as inflaton.
  • ad hoc to paper Reheating proceeds solely through inflaton decay and scattering into SM particles at the stated low temperatures.
    Central to the entropy dilution mechanism.
invented entities (1)
  • dark U(1)_D gauge boson (dark photon) no independent evidence
    purpose: Serves as DM candidate whose abundance is diluted by late entropy release.
    Postulated as part of the minimal extension; no independent evidence supplied beyond relic density fit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5635 in / 1499 out tokens · 81535 ms · 2026-05-18T00:35:37.851713+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravitational scalar production with a generic reheating scenario

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Gravitational scalar production yields reheating-dependent constraints on dark matter scalars, with dilution preserving viability for k<4 low-temperature reheating and factorization in multi-stage cases.

  2. Conventional and Unitarity-Conserving Peccei-Quinn Inflation Models and ACT

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Unitarity-conserving Peccei-Quinn inflation agrees with ACT data within 1 sigma and allows axion decay constants up to 6.4e13 GeV without post-inflation symmetry restoration, unlike the conventional model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies

    Y. Sofue and V. Rubin,Rotation curves of spiral galaxies,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.39 (2001) 137 [astro-ph/0010594]

  2. [2]

    Weak lensing mass reconstruction of the interacting cluster 1E0657-558: Direct evidence for the existence of dark matter

    D. Clowe, A. Gonzalez and M. Markevitch,Weak lensing mass reconstruction of the interacting cluster 1E0657-558: Direct evidence for the existence of dark matter,Astrophys. J.604(2004) 596 [astro-ph/0312273]. [3]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

  3. [3]

    The Waning of the WIMP? A Review of Models, Searches, and Constraints

    G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre et al.,The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 203 [1703.07364]. – 31 – [5]ATLAScollaboration,Search for new phenomena in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum inppcollisions at √s= 13TeV using the ATLA...

  4. [4]

    Singlet-Triplet Fermionic Dark Matter and LHC Phenomenology

    S. Choubey, S. Khan, M. Mitra and S. Mondal,Singlet-Triplet Fermionic Dark Matter and LHC Phenomenology,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 302 [1711.08888]

  5. [5]

    Bélanger, S

    G. Bélanger, S. Khan, R. Padhan, M. Mitra and S. Shil,Right handed neutrinos, TeV scale BSM neutral Higgs boson, and FIMP dark matter in an EFT framework,Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 055047 [2104.04373]

  6. [6]

    Biswas and S

    A. Biswas and S. Khan,(g−2) e, and strongly interacting dark matter with collider implications,JHEP07(2022) 037 [2112.08393]

  7. [7]

    L. Covi, S. Dey, S. Khan and S.K. Rai,Multicomponent dark matter with collider implications,JHEP08(2025) 046 [2504.09632]. [11]XENONcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 111302 [1805.12562]. [12]PandaX-4Tcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run,Phys. ...

  8. [8]

    Costa, S

    F. Costa, S. Khan and J. Kim,A two-component dark matter model and its associated gravitational waves,JHEP06(2022) 026 [2202.13126]

  9. [9]

    Covi and S

    L. Covi and S. Khan,Axion and FIMP dark matter in aU(1) extension of the Standard Model,JCAP09(2022) 064 [2205.10150]

  10. [10]

    Bélanger, S

    G. Bélanger, S. Choubey, R.M. Godbole, S. Khan, M. Mitra and A. Roy,WIMP and FIMP dark matter in singlet-triplet fermionic model,JHEP11(2022) 133 [2208.00849]

  11. [11]

    Costa, S

    F. Costa, S. Khan and J. Kim,A two-component vector WIMP — fermion FIMP dark matter model with an extended seesaw mechanism,JHEP12(2022) 165 [2209.13653]. – 32 –

  12. [12]

    S. Khan, J. Kim and P. Ko,Interplay between Higgs inflation and dark matter models with dark U(1) gauge symmetry,JHEP05(2024) 250 [2309.07839]

  13. [13]

    Choubey, S

    S. Choubey, S. Khan, M. Merchand and S. Vihonen,Constraining dark matter from strong phase transitions in a U(1)Lµ−Lτ model: implications for neutrino masses and muon g−2, JHEP10(2024) 186 [2406.16460]

  14. [14]

    S. Khan, J. Kim, J. Kim and P. Ko,Multi-component dark matter and Galactic 511 keV γ-ray emission,JHEP06(2025) 102 [2409.07851]

  15. [15]

    Khan and H.M

    S. Khan and H.M. Lee,WIMP-FIMP option and neutrino masses via a novel anomaly-free B-L symmetry,2503.02635

  16. [16]

    Khan,Evading Dark Matter Bounds through NLSP-Assisted Freeze-Out with Long-Lived Signatures,2506.10618

    S. Khan,Evading Dark Matter Bounds through NLSP-Assisted Freeze-Out with Long-Lived Signatures,2506.10618

  17. [17]

    Thermally Generated Gauge Singlet Scalars as Self-Interacting Dark Matter

    J. McDonald,Thermally generated gauge singlet scalars as selfinteracting dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 091304 [hep-ph/0106249]

  18. [18]

    Right-Handed Sneutrino as Cold Dark Matter

    T. Asaka, K. Ishiwata and T. Moroi,Right-handed sneutrino as cold dark matter,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 051301 [hep-ph/0512118]

  19. [19]

    L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West,Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter,JHEP03(2010) 080 [0911.1120]

  20. [20]

    Bhattiprolu, G

    P.N. Bhattiprolu, G. Elor, R. McGehee and A. Pierce,Freezing-in hadrophilic dark matter at low reheating temperatures,JHEP01(2023) 128 [2210.15653]

  21. [21]

    Cosme, F

    C. Cosme, F. Costa and O. Lebedev,Freeze-in at stronger coupling,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 075038 [2306.13061]

  22. [22]

    Silva-Malpartida, N

    J. Silva-Malpartida, N. Bernal, J. Jones-Pérez and R.A. Lineros,From WIMPs to FIMPs with low reheating temperatures,JCAP09(2023) 015 [2306.14943]

  23. [23]

    Arcadi, F

    G. Arcadi, F. Costa, A. Goudelis and O. Lebedev,Higgs portal dark matter freeze-in at stronger coupling: observational benchmarks,JHEP07(2024) 044 [2405.03760]

  24. [24]

    H.M. Lee, M. Park and V. Sanz,Gravity-Mediated Dark Matter at a low reheating temperature,JHEP05(2025) 126 [2412.07850]

  25. [25]

    Arias, B

    P. Arias, B. Diaz Saez and J. Jaeckel,Freezing-in the pure dark axion portal,JCAP06 (2025) 060 [2501.17234]

  26. [26]

    S. Khan, J. Kim and H.M. Lee,Higgs portal vector dark matter at a low reheating temperature,2503.17621

  27. [27]

    Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99

  28. [28]

    Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys

    A.H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

  29. [29]

    Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys

    A.D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108 (1982) 389

  30. [30]

    Albrecht and P.J

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220

  31. [31]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    A.D. Linde,Chaotic Inflation,Phys. Lett. B129(1983) 177. – 33 – [43]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]. [44]BICEP, Keckcollaboration,Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, Phys. ...

  32. [32]

    Futamase and K.-i

    T. Futamase and K.-i. Maeda,Chaotic Inflationary Scenario in Models Having Nonminimal Coupling With Curvature,Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 399

  33. [33]

    Fakir and W.G

    R. Fakir and W.G. Unruh,Improvement on cosmological chaotic inflation through nonminimal coupling,Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 1783

  34. [34]

    Induced gravity inflation in the standard model of particle physics

    J.L. Cervantes-Cota and H. Dehnen,Induced gravity inflation in the standard model of particle physics,Nucl. Phys. B442(1995) 391 [astro-ph/9505069]

  35. [35]

    Complete constraints on a nonminimally coupled chaotic inflationary scenario from the cosmic microwave background

    E. Komatsu and T. Futamase,Complete constraints on a nonminimally coupled chaotic inflationary scenario from the cosmic microwave background,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 064029 [astro-ph/9901127]

  36. [36]

    The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton

    F.L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton, Phys. Lett. B659(2008) 703 [0710.3755]

  37. [37]

    Inflation by non-minimal coupling

    S.C. Park and S. Yamaguchi,Inflation by non-minimal coupling,JCAP08(2008) 009 [0801.1722]

  38. [38]

    Higgs inflation

    J. Rubio,Higgs inflation,Front. Astron. Space Sci.5(2019) 50 [1807.02376]

  39. [39]

    Cheong, S.M

    D.Y. Cheong, S.M. Lee and S.C. Park,Progress in Higgs inflation,J. Korean Phys. Soc.78 (2021) 897 [2103.00177]

  40. [40]

    Gauge singlet scalar as inflaton and thermal relic dark matter

    R.N. Lerner and J. McDonald,Gauge singlet scalar as inflaton and thermal relic dark matter,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 123507 [0909.0520]

  41. [41]

    Inflation and dark matter in two Higgs doublet models

    J.-O. Gong, H.M. Lee and S.K. Kang,Inflation and dark matter in two Higgs doublet models,JHEP04(2012) 128 [1202.0288]

  42. [42]

    Higgs inflation with singlet scalar dark matter and right-handed neutrino in light of BICEP2

    N. Haba and R. Takahashi,Higgs inflation with singlet scalar dark matter and right-handed neutrino in light of BICEP2,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 115009 [1404.4737]

  43. [43]

    J. Kim, P. Ko and W.-I. Park,Higgs-portal assisted Higgs inflation with a sizeable tensor-to-scalar ratio,JCAP02(2017) 003 [1405.1635]

  44. [44]

    Higgs Portal to Inflation and Fermionic Dark Matter

    A. Aravind, M. Xiao and J.-H. Yu,Higgs Portal to Inflation and Fermionic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 123513 [1512.09126]

  45. [45]

    Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter from membrane inflationary paradigm

    S. Choudhury and A. Dasgupta,Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter from membrane inflationary paradigm,Phys. Dark Univ.13(2016) 35 [1510.08195]

  46. [46]

    A Strong Electroweak Phase Transition from the Inflaton Field

    T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen,A Strong Electroweak Phase Transition from the Inflaton Field,JCAP09(2016) 037 [1606.06063]

  47. [47]

    Standard Model-Axion-Seesaw-Higgs Portal Inflation. Five problems of particle physics and cosmology solved in one stroke

    G. Ballesteros, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald and C. Tamarit,Standard Model—axion—seesaw—Higgs portal inflation. Five problems of particle physics and cosmology solved in one stroke,JCAP08(2017) 001 [1610.01639]. – 34 –

  48. [48]

    WIMPflation

    D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, A.J. Long and S.D. Mcdermott,Can the Inflaton Also Be a Weakly Interacting Massive Particle?,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 091802 [1807.03308]

  49. [49]

    Choi, Y.-J

    S.-M. Choi, Y.-J. Kang, H.M. Lee and K. Yamashita,Unitary inflaton as decaying dark matter,JHEP05(2019) 060 [1902.03781]

  50. [50]

    S.-M. Choi, J. Kim, H.M. Lee and B. Zhu,Connecting between inflation and dark matter in models with gauged Z3 symmetry,JHEP06(2020) 135 [2003.11823]

  51. [51]

    Kawai and N

    S. Kawai and N. Okada,Messenger inflation in gauge mediation and super-WIMP dark matter,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 083539 [2103.11256]

  52. [52]

    Ghoshal, G

    A. Ghoshal, G. Lambiase, S. Pal, A. Paul and S. Porey,Inflection-point inflation and dark matter redux,JHEP09(2022) 231 [2206.10648]

  53. [53]

    Cheng, X

    W. Cheng, X. Liu and R. Zhou,Non-minimal coupling inflation and dark matter under the Z3 symmetry,JCAP05(2023) 049 [2206.12624]

  54. [54]

    Qi and H

    X. Qi and H. Sun,Inflation and dark matter in the Z5 model,JCAP05(2023) 051 [2303.15169]

  55. [55]

    Kawai, N

    S. Kawai, N. Okada and Q. Shafi,Standard model Higgs inflation supplemented by minimal dark matter,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 035026 [2307.08375]

  56. [56]

    S. Khan, J. Kim and H.M. Lee,Decaying vector dark matter with low reheating temperature for KM3NeT signal and its impact on gravitational waves,2509.17129

  57. [57]

    S. Khan, S. Roy and A. Tapadar,Constraining Inflation via FIMP dark matter using the b-function with collider implications,2506.23770

  58. [58]

    The Anatomy of Electro-Weak Symmetry Breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the Standard Model

    A. Djouadi,The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: The Higgs boson in the standard model,Phys. Rept.457(2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503172]

  59. [59]

    Neutralino with the Right Cold Dark Matter Abundance in (Almost) Any Supersymmetric Model

    G.B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo,Neutralino with the right cold dark matter abundance in (almost) any supersymmetric model,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 023510 [hep-ph/0602230]

  60. [60]

    micrOMEGAs: A program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov,MicrOMEGAs: A Program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM,Comput. Phys. Commun.149(2002) 103 [hep-ph/0112278]

  61. [61]

    Bélanger, N

    G. Bélanger, N. Bernal and A. Pukhov,Z’-mediated dark matter with low-temperature reheating,JHEP03(2025) 079 [2412.12303]. [76]ATLAS, CMScollaboration,Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at√s= 7and 8 TeV,JHEP08(2016) 045 [1606.02266]...

  62. [62]

    Heo, D.-W

    Y. Heo, D.-W. Jung and J.S. Lee,Higgs boson precision analysis of the full LHC run 1 and run 2 data,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 013003 [2402.02822]. – 35 – [81]ATLAScollaboration,Search for invisible Higgs-boson decays in events with vector-boson fusion signatures using 139 fb−1 of proton-proton data recorded by the ATLAS experiment, JHEP08(2022) 104 [2202.07953]

  63. [63]

    The Scalar Strange Content of the Nucleon from Lattice QCD

    P. Junnarkar and A. Walker-Loud,Scalar strange content of the nucleon from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 114510 [1301.1114]

  64. [64]

    Higgs Portal Inflation

    O. Lebedev and H.M. Lee,Higgs Portal Inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1821 [1105.2284]

  65. [65]

    A more accurate analytic calculation of the spectrum of cosmological perturbations produced during inflation

    E.D. Stewart and D.H. Lyth,A More accurate analytic calculation of the spectrum of cosmological perturbations produced during inflation,Phys. Lett. B302(1993) 171 [gr-qc/9302019]

  66. [66]

    Formalising the Slow-Roll Approximation in Inflation

    A.R. Liddle, P. Parsons and J.D. Barrow,Formalizing the slow roll approximation in inflation,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 7222 [astro-ph/9408015]

  67. [67]

    Cosmological parameter estimation and the inflationary cosmology

    S.M. Leach, A.R. Liddle, J. Martin and D.J. Schwarz,Cosmological parameter estimation and the inflationary cosmology,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 023515 [astro-ph/0202094]

  68. [68]

    Power-counting and the Validity of the Classical Approximation During Inflation

    C.P. Burgess, H.M. Lee and M. Trott,Power-counting and the Validity of the Classical Approximation During Inflation,JHEP09(2009) 103 [0902.4465]

  69. [69]

    On the Naturalness of Higgs Inflation

    J.L.F. Barbon and J.R. Espinosa,On the Naturalness of Higgs Inflation,Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 081302 [0903.0355]

  70. [70]

    Higgs Inflation and Naturalness

    R.N. Lerner and J. McDonald,Higgs Inflation and Naturalness,JCAP04(2010) 015 [0912.5463]

  71. [71]

    Comment on Higgs Inflation and Naturalness

    C.P. Burgess, H.M. Lee and M. Trott,Comment on Higgs Inflation and Naturalness,JHEP 07(2010) 007 [1002.2730]

  72. [72]

    On Inflation with Non-minimal Coupling

    M.P. Hertzberg,On Inflation with Non-minimal Coupling,JHEP11(2010) 023 [1002.2995]

  73. [73]

    Higgs inflation: consistency and generalisations

    F. Bezrukov, A. Magnin, M. Shaposhnikov and S. Sibiryakov,Higgs inflation: consistency and generalisations,JHEP01(2011) 016 [1008.5157]

  74. [74]

    Higgs inflation at the critical point

    F. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,Higgs inflation at the critical point,Phys. Lett. B734 (2014) 249 [1403.6078]

  75. [75]

    Higgs inflation still alive

    Y. Hamada, H. Kawai, K.-y. Oda and S.C. Park,Higgs Inflation is Still Alive after the Results from BICEP2,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 241301 [1403.5043]

  76. [76]

    Higgs inflation from Standard Model criticality

    Y. Hamada, H. Kawai, K.-y. Oda and S.C. Park,Higgs inflation from Standard Model criticality,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 053008 [1408.4864]. [96]ACTcollaboration,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods andLCDM Parameters,2503.14452

  77. [77]

    Distinguishing Higgs inflation and its variants

    R.N. Lerner and J. McDonald,Distinguishing Higgs inflation and its variants,Phys. Rev. D 83(2011) 123522 [1104.2468]

  78. [78]

    J.L. Cook, E. Dimastrogiovanni, D.A. Easson and L.M. Krauss,Reheating predictions in single field inflation,JCAP04(2015) 047 [1502.04673]

  79. [79]

    On initial conditions for the Hot Big Bang

    F. Bezrukov, D. Gorbunov and M. Shaposhnikov,On initial conditions for the Hot Big Bang,JCAP06(2009) 029 [0812.3622]. – 36 –

  80. [80]

    J.-O. Gong, S. Pi and G. Leung,Probing reheating with primordial spectrum,JCAP05 (2015) 027 [1501.03604]

Showing first 80 references.