pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.09928 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-10 · 💻 cs.RO

HiF-VLA: Hindsight, Insight and Foresight through Motion Representation for Vision-Language-Action Models

Minghui Lin , Pengxiang Ding , Shu Wang , Zifeng Zhuang , Yang Liu , Xinyang Tong , Wenxuan Song , Shangke Lyu
show 2 more authors
Siteng Huang Donglin Wang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 22:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords Vision-Language-Action ModelsRobotic ManipulationMotion RepresentationLong-Horizon TasksTemporal ReasoningHindsightForesight
0
0 comments X

The pith

HiF-VLA adds motion-based hindsight and foresight to vision-language-action models to overcome temporal myopia in long-horizon robotic tasks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Vision-language-action models usually rely only on the current observation, which makes them lose track of how scenes evolve over many steps. The paper treats motion as a compact signal that shows state changes while ignoring static visual noise. HiF-VLA builds a motion-centric world model that encodes past motion as hindsight priors, predicts future motion through foresight reasoning, and fuses both inside a hindsight-modulated joint expert. This lets the model generate actions while continuously reasoning about dynamics, described as a think-while-acting approach. The method reports stronger results on LIBERO-Long and CALVIN benchmarks plus real-robot trials, all with almost no extra inference time.

Core claim

HiF-VLA introduces a unified framework that equips VLAs with a motion-centric world model. Past dynamics are captured through hindsight priors, future motion is anticipated via foresight reasoning, and the two are integrated by a hindsight-modulated joint expert. This structure supplies bidirectional temporal reasoning that replaces the Markov assumption and supports coherent action generation across extended horizons.

What carries the argument

The motion-centric world model that encodes past dynamics through hindsight priors, anticipates future motion via foresight reasoning, and integrates both through a hindsight-modulated joint expert.

If this is right

  • Long-horizon manipulation maintains coherence because the model reasons explicitly about temporal dynamics during action generation.
  • Performance exceeds strong baselines on LIBERO-Long and CALVIN ABC-D benchmarks.
  • Real-world long-horizon robotic tasks show substantial gains.
  • Inference latency remains nearly unchanged despite the added reasoning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same motion encoding could reduce the size of context windows needed in other sequential robot policies.
  • Foresight predictions might be extended to multi-step planning beyond single-action generation.
  • Motion priors could improve robustness when visual inputs contain heavy noise or occlusion.

Load-bearing premise

Motion serves as a more compact and informative representation of temporal context and world dynamics than raw observations.

What would settle it

An ablation that removes the motion components and shows no drop in long-horizon success rates on LIBERO-Long or CALVIN would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.09928 by Donglin Wang, Minghui Lin, Pengxiang Ding, Shangke Lyu, Shu Wang, Siteng Huang, Wenxuan Song, Xinyang Tong, Yang Liu, Zifeng Zhuang.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: HiF-VLA Pipeline. (a) In Hindsight Prior Acquisition (see Sec. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Performance comparison on different hindsight embed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Real-world long-horizon tasks. (a) We deploy our system on the AgileX Piper robotic arm equipped with an external scene [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Architecture of the hindsight-modulated joint expert. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Convergence of the foresight-motion L1 loss during [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Example rollouts of three tasks in LIBERO-Long, illustrating the close alignment between the predicted foresight motion and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example rollouts of real-world tasks. Failed to place! Failed to press! Failed to stack! (a) Place blocks on the plates. Failed to place! Failed to press! Failed to stack! (b) Cover block and stack bowls. Failed to place! Failed to press! Failed to stack! (c) Press buttons in order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have recently enabled robotic manipulation by grounding visual and linguistic cues into actions. However, most VLAs assume the Markov property, relying only on the current observation and thus suffering from temporal myopia that degrades long-horizon coherence. In this work, we view motion as a more compact and informative representation of temporal context and world dynamics, capturing inter-state changes while filtering static pixel-level noise. From this perspective, HiF-VLA equips a motion-centric world model for the VLA, enabling agents to reason about temporal dynamics for future evolution during action generation. Building on this idea, we propose HiF-VLA (Hindsight, Insight, and Foresight for VLAs), a unified framework that leverages motion for bidirectional temporal reasoning. HiF-VLA encodes past dynamics through hindsight priors, anticipates future motion via foresight reasoning, and integrates both through a hindsight-modulated joint expert to enable a ''think-while-acting'' paradigm for long-horizon manipulation. As a result, HiF-VLA surpasses strong baselines on LIBERO-Long and CALVIN ABC-D benchmarks, while incurring negligible additional inference latency. Furthermore, HiF-VLA achieves substantial improvements in real-world long-horizon manipulation tasks, demonstrating its broad effectiveness in practical robotic settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes HiF-VLA, a motion-centric extension to Vision-Language-Action models that encodes past dynamics via hindsight priors, anticipates future motion via foresight reasoning, and fuses both signals through a hindsight-modulated joint expert. This enables bidirectional temporal reasoning to mitigate the Markov assumption and temporal myopia in long-horizon robotic manipulation. The manuscript reports that HiF-VLA outperforms strong baselines on LIBERO-Long and CALVIN ABC-D while adding negligible inference latency, and demonstrates substantial gains in real-world long-horizon tasks.

Significance. If the motion representation is shown to be the load-bearing factor, the framework offers a compact alternative to raw observations for capturing world dynamics, supporting a 'think-while-acting' paradigm that could improve coherence in extended manipulation sequences without latency penalties. The approach aligns with growing interest in world models for robotics and could influence subsequent VLA architectures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experiments] Experiments section (and associated ablations): no controlled experiment holds the hindsight-modulated joint expert fixed while swapping motion features for direct observation features (or vice versa). The central claim that motion is a strictly more compact and informative encoding of temporal dynamics therefore remains unisolated; gains on LIBERO-Long and CALVIN ABC-D could be driven primarily by the expert's modulation mechanism rather than the motion prior.
  2. [§4] §4 (results): quantitative tables report benchmark improvements but supply no error bars, statistical significance tests, or per-task breakdown that would allow assessment of whether the motion-centric components are responsible for the reported lift versus baseline variance.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: states 'surpasses strong baselines' and 'substantial improvements' without any numerical deltas or latency figures; move at least headline metrics (e.g., success-rate deltas and ms latency) into the abstract for immediate readability.
  2. [§3] Notation: 'hindsight priors' and 'foresight reasoning' are introduced without a compact equation or diagram that distinguishes them from standard conditioning; a single schematic or equation block would clarify the information flow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify our contributions and will revise the paper to strengthen the experimental isolation of the motion representation and improve the statistical presentation of results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section (and associated ablations): no controlled experiment holds the hindsight-modulated joint expert fixed while swapping motion features for direct observation features (or vice versa). The central claim that motion is a strictly more compact and informative encoding of temporal dynamics therefore remains unisolated; gains on LIBERO-Long and CALVIN ABC-D could be driven primarily by the expert's modulation mechanism rather than the motion prior.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current ablations compare HiF-VLA variants (with/without hindsight or foresight) but do not include a direct swap of motion features for raw observations while holding the hindsight-modulated joint expert fixed. This leaves open the possibility that gains stem primarily from the modulation mechanism. In the revised manuscript we will add a controlled ablation that replaces the motion encoder outputs with equivalent-dimensional direct observation features fed into the identical expert architecture. We expect this to demonstrate that motion provides a more compact encoding by filtering static noise and explicitly capturing dynamics, but we will report the results transparently regardless of outcome. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (results): quantitative tables report benchmark improvements but supply no error bars, statistical significance tests, or per-task breakdown that would allow assessment of whether the motion-centric components are responsible for the reported lift versus baseline variance.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of error bars, significance testing, and per-task breakdowns limits the ability to attribute improvements specifically to the motion-centric components. In the revised version we will update all quantitative tables in Section 4 to report mean and standard deviation across multiple random seeds, include paired statistical significance tests (e.g., t-tests) against baselines, and add per-task performance breakdowns for both LIBERO-Long and CALVIN ABC-D. These additions will make it possible to evaluate whether the reported lifts are driven by the hindsight/foresight motion priors rather than variance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework is additive architectural proposal without equations or self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper introduces HiF-VLA as a unified framework that encodes past dynamics through hindsight priors, anticipates future motion via foresight reasoning, and integrates both through a hindsight-modulated joint expert. No equations, derivations, or fitted parameters are referenced in the provided text. The central premise—that motion is a more compact representation of temporal context—is presented as a viewpoint enabling the architecture, not derived from or reducing to any self-citation, ansatz, or input fit. Claims of benchmark improvements are empirical and do not reduce by construction to quantities defined within the paper. The architecture is described as additive with negligible latency, consistent with an independent contribution rather than a tautological renaming or self-definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1007 out tokens · 21206 ms · 2026-05-16T22:58:56.863035+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EvoScene-VLA: Evolving Scene Beliefs Inside the Action Decoder for Chunked Robot Control

    cs.RO 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    EvoScene-VLA maintains an action-updated scene prior across control chunks in VLA policies, raising success rates on RoboTwin tasks from 87.2% to 89.1% fixed and 86.1% to 88.5% randomized while outperforming baselines...

  2. Beyond Binary: Reframing GUI Critique as Continuous Semantic Alignment

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BBCritic uses contrastive learning to align GUI actions in a continuous affordance space, outperforming larger binary critic models on a new four-level hierarchical benchmark while enabling zero-shot transfer.

  3. Beyond Binary: Reframing GUI Critique as Continuous Semantic Alignment

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BBCritic reframes GUI critique as continuous semantic alignment via contrastive learning in an affordance space, outperforming larger binary SOTA models on a new four-level hierarchical benchmark without extra annotations.

  4. Towards Generalizable Robotic Manipulation in Dynamic Environments

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DOMINO dataset and PUMA architecture enable better dynamic robotic manipulation by incorporating motion history, delivering 6.3% higher success rates than prior VLA models.

  5. RoboMemArena: A Comprehensive and Challenging Robotic Memory Benchmark

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RoboMemArena is a new large-scale robotic memory benchmark with real-world tasks, and PrediMem is a dual VLA system that outperforms baselines by managing memory buffers with predictive coding.

  6. ElasticFlow: One-Step Physics-Consistent Policy with Elastic Time Horizons for Language-Guided Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ElasticFlow delivers one-step physics-consistent diffusion policies for language-guided robot control by modeling average velocity fields and using elastic time horizons to overcome spectral bias.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Qwen Technical Report

    Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, et al. Qwen technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023. 1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfer

    Lucas Beyer, Andreas Steiner, Andr ´e Susano Pinto, Alexan- der Kolesnikov, Xiao Wang, Daniel Salz, Maxim Neumann, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Michael Tschannen, Emanuele Bugliarello, et al. PaliGemma: A versatile 3B VLM for transfer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07726, 2024. 1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots

    Johan Bjorck, Fernando Casta ˜neda, Nikita Cherniadev, Xingye Da, Runyu Ding, Linxi Fan, Yu Fang, Dieter Fox, Fengyuan Hu, Spencer Huang, et al. Gr00t n1: An open foundation model for generalist humanoid robots.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14734, 2025. 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Kevin Black, Noah Brown, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, Lachy Groom, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter, et al.π 0: A vision-language- action flow model for general robot control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164, 2024. 1, 6, 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Zero-shot robotic manipulation with pre-trained image-editing diffusion models

    Kevin Black, Mitsuhiko Nakamoto, Pranav Atreya, Homer Rich Walke, Chelsea Finn, Aviral Kumar, and Sergey Levine. Zero-shot robotic manipulation with pre-trained image-editing diffusion models. InProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations,

    work page

  6. [6]

    Closed-loop visuomotor control with gener- ative expectation for robotic manipulation

    Qingwen Bu, Jia Zeng, Li Chen, Yanchao Yang, Guyue Zhou, Junchi Yan, Ping Luo, Heming Cui, Yi Ma, and Hongyang Li. Closed-loop visuomotor control with gener- ative expectation for robotic manipulation. InProceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 139002–139029, 2024. 6

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    UniVLA: Learning to Act Anywhere with Task-centric Latent Actions

    Qingwen Bu, Yanting Yang, Jisong Cai, Shenyuan Gao, Guanghui Ren, Maoqing Yao, Ping Luo, and Hongyang Li. UniVLA: Learning to act anywhere with task-centric latent actions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.06111, 2025. 6, 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    GR-2: A Generative Video-Language-Action Model with Web-Scale Knowledge for Robot Manipulation

    Chi-Lam Cheang, Guangzeng Chen, Ya Jing, Tao Kong, Hang Li, Yifeng Li, Yuxiao Liu, Hongtao Wu, Jiafeng Xu, Yichu Yang, et al. GR-2: A generative video-language- action model with web-scale knowledge for robot manipu- lation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06158, 2024. 3, 7, 1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Diffusion Forcing: Next-token prediction meets full-sequence diffu- sion.Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:24081–24125, 2024

    Boyuan Chen, Diego Mart ´ı Mons´o, Yilun Du, Max Sim- chowitz, Russ Tedrake, and Vincent Sitzmann. Diffusion Forcing: Next-token prediction meets full-sequence diffu- sion.Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:24081–24125, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    On scaling up a multilingual vision and language model.Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14432–14444, 2023

    Xi Chen, Josip Djolonga, Piotr Padlewski, Basil Mustafa, Soravit Changpinyo, Jialin Wu, Carlos Riquelme Ruiz, Se- bastian Goodman, Xiao Wang, Yi Tay, et al. On scaling up a multilingual vision and language model.Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14432–14444, 2023. 1

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Syl- vain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. InProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representati...

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Yoav HaCohen, Nisan Chiprut, Benny Brazowski, Daniel Shalem, Dudu Moshe, Eitan Richardson, Eran Levin, Guy Shiran, Nir Zabari, Ori Gordon, et al

    Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Ziyan Yang, Zhibei Ma, Zhi- jie Lin, Zhenheng Yang, Dahua Lin, and Lu Jiang. Long context tuning for video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10589, 2025. 3

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Video prediction policy: A generalist robot policy with predictive visual representations

    Yucheng Hu, Yanjiang Guo, Pengchao Wang, Xiaoyu Chen, Yen-Jen Wang, Jianke Zhang, Koushil Sreenath, Chaochao Lu, and Jianyu Chen. Video prediction policy: A generalist robot policy with predictive visual representations. InPro- ceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, 2025. 6, 1

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    ThinkAct: Vision- language-action reasoning via reinforced visual latent plan- ning

    Chi-Pin Huang, Yueh-Hua Wu, Min-Hung Chen, Yu- Chiang Frank Wang, and Fu-En Yang. ThinkAct: Vision- language-action reasoning via reinforced visual latent plan- ning. InProceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Physical Intelligence, Kevin Black, Noah Brown, James Darpinian, Karan Dhabalia, Danny Driess, Adnan Esmail, Michael Equi, Chelsea Finn, Niccolo Fusai, et al.π 0.5: a vision-language-action model with open-world generaliza- tion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16054, 2025. 1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    RynnVLA-001: Using human demonstrations to improve robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15212, 2025

    Yuming Jiang, Siteng Huang, Shengke Xue, Yaxi Zhao, Jun Cen, Sicong Leng, Kehan Li, Jiayan Guo, Kexiang Wang, Mingxiu Chen, Fan Wang, Deli Zhao, and Xin Li. RynnVLA-001: Using human demonstrations to improve robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15212, 2025. 1

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Video-LaVIT: Unified video-language pre- training with decoupled visual-motional tokenization

    Yang Jin, Zhicheng Sun, Kun Xu, Liwei Chen, Hao Jiang, Quzhe Huang, Chengru Song, Yuliang Liu, Di Zhang, Yang Song, et al. Video-LaVIT: Unified video-language pre- training with decoupled visual-motional tokenization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024. 2, 3

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Pris- matic VLMs: Investigating the design space of visually- conditioned language models

    Siddharth Karamcheti, Suraj Nair, Ashwin Balakrishna, Percy Liang, Thomas Kollar, and Dorsa Sadigh. Pris- matic VLMs: Investigating the design space of visually- conditioned language models. InProceedings of the Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning, 2024. 1, 6

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model

    Moo Jin Kim, Karl Pertsch, Siddharth Karamcheti, Ted Xiao, Ashwin Balakrishna, Suraj Nair, Rafael Rafailov, Ethan Fos- ter, Grace Lam, Pannag Sanketi, et al. OpenVLA: An open-source vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246, 2024. 1, 2, 5, 6

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Success

    Moo Jin Kim, Chelsea Finn, and Percy Liang. Fine-tuning vision-language-action models: Optimizing speed and suc- cess.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19645, 2025. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    MPEG: A video compression standard for multimedia applications.Communications of the ACM, 34 (4):46–58, 1991

    Didier Le Gall. MPEG: A video compression standard for multimedia applications.Communications of the ACM, 34 (4):46–58, 1991. 3

    work page 1991

  22. [22]

    Spatial forcing: Implicit spatial representation alignment for vision- language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.12276, 2025

    Fuhao Li, Wenxuan Song, Han Zhao, Jingbo Wang, Pengxiang Ding, Donglin Wang, Long Zeng, and Haoang Li. Spatial Forcing: Implicit spatial representation align- ment for vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.12276, 2025. 2 9

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    CogACT: A Foundational Vision-Language-Action Model for Synergizing Cognition and Action in Robotic Manipulation

    Qixiu Li, Yaobo Liang, Zeyu Wang, Lin Luo, Xi Chen, Mozheng Liao, Fangyun Wei, Yu Deng, Sicheng Xu, Yizhong Zhang, et al. CogACT: A foundational vision- language-action model for synergizing cognition and action in robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19650,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Unified Video Action Model

    Shuang Li, Yihuai Gao, Dorsa Sadigh, and Shuran Song. Unified video action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00200, 2025. 5

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    LIBERO: Benchmarking knowl- edge transfer for lifelong robot learning

    Bo Liu, Yifeng Zhu, Chongkai Gao, Yihao Feng, Qiang Liu, Yuke Zhu, and Peter Stone. LIBERO: Benchmarking knowl- edge transfer for lifelong robot learning. InProceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 44776–44791, 2023. 6, 2

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    What Matters in Building Vision-Language-Action Models for Generalist Robots

    Huaping Liu, Xinghang Li, Peiyan Li, Minghuan Liu, Dong Wang, Jirong Liu, Bingyi Kang, Xiao Ma, Tao Kong, and Hanbo Zhang. Towards generalist robot policies: What matters in building vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14058, 2025. 1, 2, 3, 6

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    RDT-1B: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manip- ulation

    Songming Liu, Lingxuan Wu, Bangguo Li, Hengkai Tan, Huayu Chen, Zhengyi Wang, Ke Xu, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. RDT-1B: a diffusion foundation model for bimanual manip- ulation. InProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    CALVIN: A benchmark for language- conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manip- ulation tasks.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(3): 7327–7334, 2022

    Oier Mees, Lukas Hermann, Erick Rosete-Beas, and Wol- fram Burgard. CALVIN: A benchmark for language- conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manip- ulation tasks.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(3): 7327–7334, 2022. 6

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    DINOv2: Learning robust visual features without supervi- sion.Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2024

    Maxime Oquab, Timoth ´ee Darcet, Th ´eo Moutakanni, Huy V o, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, et al. DINOv2: Learning robust visual features without supervi- sion.Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2024. 5, 1

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Open X-Embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and RT-X models : Open X-Embodiment collaboration

    Abby O’Neill, Abdul Rehman, Abhiram Maddukuri, Ab- hishek Gupta, Abhishek Padalkar, Abraham Lee, Acorn Poo- ley, Agrim Gupta, Ajay Mandlekar, Ajinkya Jain, et al. Open X-Embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and RT-X models : Open X-Embodiment collaboration. In2024 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 6892–

    work page

  31. [31]

    MemoryVLA: Perceptual-Cognitive Memory in Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation

    Hao Shi, Bin Xie, Yingfei Liu, Lin Sun, Fengrong Liu, Tian- cai Wang, Erjin Zhou, Haoqiang Fan, Xiangyu Zhang, and Gao Huang. MemoryVLA: Perceptual-cognitive memory in vision-language-action models for robotic manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.19236, 2025. 5, 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    History-Guided Video Diffusion

    Kiwhan Song, Boyuan Chen, Max Simchowitz, Yilun Du, Russ Tedrake, and Vincent Sitzmann. History-guided video diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06764, 2025. 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    RoFormer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomputing, 568:127063,

    Jianlin Su, Murtadha Ahmed, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Wen Bo, and Yunfeng Liu. RoFormer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomputing, 568:127063,

    work page

  34. [34]

    Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

    Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean- Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, Katie Millican, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023. 1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy

    Octo Model Team, Dibya Ghosh, Homer Walke, Karl Pertsch, Kevin Black, Oier Mees, Sudeep Dasari, Joey Hejna, Tobias Kreiman, Charles Xu, et al. Octo: An open-source generalist robot policy.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12213, 2024. 1, 3, 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Predictive inverse dynam- ics models are scalable learners for robotic manipulation

    Yang Tian, Sizhe Yang, Jia Zeng, Ping Wang, Dahua Lin, Hao Dong, and Jiangmiao Pang. Predictive inverse dynam- ics models are scalable learners for robotic manipulation. InProceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. 2, 3, 5, 6

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    VLA-Adapter: An effective paradigm for tiny-scale vision-language-action model

    Yihao Wang, Pengxiang Ding, Lingxiao Li, Can Cui, Zirui Ge, Xinyang Tong, Wenxuan Song, Han Zhao, Wei Zhao, Pengxu Hou, et al. VLA-Adapter: An effective paradigm for tiny-scale vision-language-action model. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2025. 2

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Unified vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19850,

    Yuqi Wang, Xinghang Li, Wenxuan Wang, Junbo Zhang, Yingyan Li, Yuntao Chen, Xinlong Wang, and Zhaoxi- ang Zhang. Unified vision-language-action model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19850, 2025. 3

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    DexVLA: Vision-Language Model with Plug-In Diffusion Expert for General Robot Control

    Junjie Wen, Yichen Zhu, Jinming Li, Zhibin Tang, Chaomin Shen, and Feifei Feng. DexVLA: Vision-language model with plug-in diffusion expert for general robot control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05855, 2025. 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Youpeng Wen, Junfan Lin, Yi Zhu, Jianhua Han, Hang Xu, Shen Zhao, and Xiaodan Liang. VidMan: Exploiting implicit dynamics from video diffusion model for effective robot ma- nipulation.Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, 37:41051–41075, 2024. 6, 1

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Overview of the H

    Thomas Wiegand, Gary J Sullivan, Gisle Bjontegaard, and Ajay Luthra. Overview of the H. 264/A VC video coding standard.IEEE Transactions On Circuits and Systems For Video Technology, 13(7):560–576, 2003. 3

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    Unleashing Large-Scale Video Generative Pre-training for Visual Robot Manipulation

    Hongtao Wu, Ya Jing, Chilam Cheang, Guangzeng Chen, Jiafeng Xu, Xinghang Li, Minghuan Liu, Hang Li, and Tao Kong. Unleashing large-scale video generative pre- training for visual robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13139, 2023. 1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation

    Hongtao Wu, Ya Jing, Chilam Cheang, Guangzeng Chen, Ji- afeng Xu, Xinghang Li, Minghuan Liu, Hang Li, and Tao Kong. Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation. InProceedings of the Interna- tional Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. 6

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Understanding and improving layer normaliza- tion.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32,

    Jingjing Xu, Xu Sun, Zhiyuan Zhang, Guangxiang Zhao, and Junyang Lin. Understanding and improving layer normaliza- tion.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32,

    work page

  45. [45]

    Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training

    Xiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Lucas Beyer. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 11975–11986, 2023. 5, 1

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    UP- VLA: A unified understanding and prediction model for embodied agent.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18867, 2025

    Jianke Zhang, Yanjiang Guo, Yucheng Hu, Xiaoyu Chen, Xi- ang Zhu, and Jianyu Chen. UP-VLA: A unified understand- ing and prediction model for embodied agent.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18867, 2025. 2, 3, 6

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    DreamVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model Dreamed with Comprehensive World Knowledge

    Wenyao Zhang, Hongsi Liu, Zekun Qi, Yunnan Wang, Xinqiang Yu, Jiazhao Zhang, Runpei Dong, Jiawei He, 10 He Wang, Zhizheng Zhang, et al. DreamVLA: a vision- language-action model dreamed with comprehensive world knowledge.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.04447, 2025. 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Ta- vla: Elucidating the design space of torque-aware vision- language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07962, 2025

    Zongzheng Zhang, Haobo Xu, Zhuo Yang, Chenghao Yue, Zehao Lin, Huan-ang Gao, Ziwei Wang, and Hao Zhao. Ta- vla: Elucidating the design space of torque-aware vision- language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07962,

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    CoT-VLA: Visual chain-of-thought reasoning for vision-language-action mod- els

    Qingqing Zhao, Yao Lu, Moo Jin Kim, Zipeng Fu, Zhuoyang Zhang, Yecheng Wu, Zhaoshuo Li, Qianli Ma, Song Han, Chelsea Finn, Ankur Handa, Tsung-Yi Lin, Gordon Wet- zstein, Ming-Yu Liu, and Donglai Xiang. CoT-VLA: Visual chain-of-thought reasoning for vision-language-action mod- els. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern R...

    work page

  50. [50]

    3D- VLA: A 3D vision-language-action generative world model

    Haoyu Zhen, Xiaowen Qiu, Peihao Chen, Jincheng Yang, Xin Yan, Yilun Du, Yining Hong, and Chuang Gan. 3D- VLA: A 3D vision-language-action generative world model. InProceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024. 1

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    TraceVLA: Visual trace prompting enhances spatial-temporal awareness for generalist robotic policies

    Ruijie Zheng, Yongyuan Liang, Shuaiyi Huang, Jianfeng Gao, Hal Daum ´e III, Andrey Kolobov, Furong Huang, and Jianwei Yang. TraceVLA: Visual trace prompting enhances spatial-temporal awareness for generalist robotic policies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. 1, 3, 2

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Flowvla: Visual chain of thought-based motion reason- ing for vision-language-action models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18269,

    Zhide Zhong, Haodong Yan, Junfeng Li, Xiangchen Liu, Xin Gong, Wenxuan Song, Jiayi Chen, and Haoang Li. FlowVLA: Thinking in motion with a visual chain of thought.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18269, 2025. 2

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    RT-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control

    Brianna Zitkovich, Tianhe Yu, Sichun Xu, Peng Xu, Ted Xiao, Fei Xia, Jialin Wu, Paul Wohlhart, Stefan Welker, Ayzaan Wahid, et al. RT-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. InProceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning, pages 2165–2183, 2023. 1, 2 11 HiF-VLA: Hindsight, Insight and Foresight through Motion Represen...

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    These details complement the high-level description given in the main text

    More Implementation Details Beyond the SigLIP [45] and DINOv2 [29] image encoders and the Prismatic VLM [18] backbone described in the main text, we provide further additional implementation details for the two core modules used in HiF-VLA: the Hindsight Encoder and the Hindsight-Modulated Joint Expert. These details complement the high-level description ...

    work page

  55. [55]

    Comparison with Video-Generation VLAs Compared to VLA approaches that rely on video genera- tion [8, 13, 40, 42], our method differs fundamentally in how it models temporal dynamics. A large body of recent work [8, 13, 40, 42] employs general-purpose video genera- tive models to predict future frames, using these predictions either for inverse dynamics co...

    work page

  56. [56]

    w/o action prediction

    More Experimental Results 8.1. Comprehensive Evaluation on the LIBERO Benchmark We report detailed evaluation results on all four suites of the LIBERO benchmark [25] and compare our method against a broad set of baseline models, as summarized in Tab. 4. While achieving its greatest margin of superiority under the most challenging LIBERO-Long suite, HiF-VL...

    work page

  57. [57]

    Real-World Experiments 9.1. Real-World Experimental Setup We evaluate our method on a series of long-horizon real- world tasks using an AgileX Piper robot, which is equipped with a 6-DoF manipulator and a 1-DoF gripper. A single In- tel RealSense D435 camera provides third-person observa- tions, while an additional USB wrist-mounted camera pro- vides egoc...

    work page