pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.22023 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-26 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions of QCD in a magnetic field

Patrick Copinger , Minoru Eto , Muneto Nitta , Zebin Qiu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-thnucl-th
keywords domain-wall Skyrmionchiral soliton latticeQCD in magnetic fieldbaryon numberfermion statisticsneutral pionstrong magnetic field
0
0 comments X

The pith

The smallest domain-wall Skyrmions in strong magnetic QCD are fermions carrying baryon number one.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that the minimal-energy Skyrmions sitting on the chiral soliton lattice in a background magnetic field are fermionic objects with baryon number one. A previously studied bosonic Skyrmion with baryon number two can be split, without any energy cost, into two such fermions attached to opposite faces of a single chiral soliton. The boundary separating the pure chiral-soliton-lattice phase from the domain-wall-Skyrmion phase stays exactly the same. In the chiral limit the neutral-pion field inside each soliton becomes linear in the magnetic-field direction, while the fermionic Skyrmions occupy every half-period.

Core claim

The minimum domain-wall Skyrmions are fermions with baryon number one; a bosonic domain-wall Skyrmion can be separated without energy cost into two fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions attached on the opposite sides of a chiral soliton. The phase boundary between the CSL and domain-wall Skyrmion phases is unchanged.

What carries the argument

The domain-wall Skyrmion induced on a neutral-pion chiral soliton in an external magnetic field, whose topological charge equals one and whose statistics are fermionic.

If this is right

  • The domain-wall Skyrmion phase is populated by fermionic rather than bosonic quasiparticles.
  • The transition line from the pure chiral-soliton lattice to the Skyrmion-carrying phase remains at the same magnetic-field strength.
  • In the chiral limit the fermionic Skyrmions sit at equal half-period intervals along the magnetic-field direction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fermionic nature may alter the equation of state and transport properties of magnetized dense matter compared with the bosonic picture.
  • Pairing or crystallization patterns inside the domain-wall Skyrmion phase could differ from those expected for integer-spin objects.

Load-bearing premise

The Skyrme model or chiral effective Lagrangian accurately captures the formation and energetics of domain walls and induced Skyrmions in a background magnetic field.

What would settle it

A lattice simulation or effective-model calculation that finds the lowest-energy excitation on a single chiral soliton to carry baryon number two instead of one, or to obey bosonic statistics.

read the original abstract

The ground state of low-energy QCD matter in strong magnetic fields is either a chiral soliton lattice (CSL), a periodic array of neutral pion domain walls (chiral solitons) perpendicular to the magnetic field, or domain-wall Skyrmion phase, in which Skyrmions are induced on top of the CSL. Previously found domain-wall Skyrmions are bosons with the baryon number two. In this paper, we show that the minimum domain-wall Skyrmions are fermions with baryon number one; a bosonic domain-wall Skyrmion can be separated without energy cost into two fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions attached on the opposite sides of a chiral soliton. The phase boundary between the CSL and domain-wall Skyrmion phases is unchanged. In the chiral limit, the CSL reduces to a linearly dependent neutral pion on the direction of the magnetic field, while fermionic domain-wall Skyrmions sit in an equal distance of half a period.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the phase structure of low-energy QCD in strong magnetic fields within the Skyrme model augmented by the Wess-Zumino term. It claims that the minimal-energy domain-wall Skyrmions induced on the chiral soliton lattice (CSL) are fermionic excitations carrying baryon number B=1, in contrast to previously reported bosonic B=2 configurations. A key result is that a bosonic B=2 domain-wall Skyrmion can be continuously separated, without energy cost, into two B=1 fermionic Skyrmions attached to opposite faces of a single chiral soliton; the CSL–domain-wall-Skyrmion phase boundary remains unchanged. In the chiral limit the neutral-pion profile is linear in the magnetic-field direction and the fermionic Skyrmions sit at half-period separation.

Significance. If the zero-cost separation and fermionic assignment hold, the work would establish the existence of stable fermionic topological solitons in the magnetized QCD vacuum and would refine the phase diagram relevant to magnetar interiors and heavy-ion collisions. The explicit demonstration that the Wess-Zumino term enforces fermionic statistics for the minimal B=1 objects, together with the invariance of the critical magnetic field, would constitute a concrete, falsifiable prediction for the low-energy effective theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (18)] §3.2 and Eq. (18): the claim that the bosonic B=2 configuration can be separated into two B=1 fermions at exactly zero additional energy is supported only by a single numerical energy scan at fixed magnetic field; no explicit computation of the interaction potential V(d) or its second derivative at d = L/2 (half-period) is provided, nor is robustness under variation of the Skyrme parameter or inclusion of higher-order terms demonstrated.
  2. [§4.1, Fig. 4] §4.1, Fig. 4: the phase boundary between the CSL and domain-wall-Skyrmion phases is stated to be unchanged by the presence of the B=1 pair, yet the energy comparison is performed only for the minimal configurations; a systematic scan of the total energy density as a function of magnetic field strength for both the pure CSL and the CSL plus two B=1 Skyrmions is needed to confirm that the critical field is insensitive to the fermionic excitations.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the chiral field U(x) and the neutral-pion profile π^0(z) is introduced without an explicit statement of the ansatz used for the domain-wall Skyrmion; a short paragraph defining the collective coordinates and the embedding into SU(2) would improve readability.
  2. Reference list omits the original Skyrme-model treatment of domain-wall Skyrmions in magnetic fields (e.g., the 2019–2021 works on CSL-Skyrmion phases); adding these would clarify the novelty of the fermionic assignment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (18)] §3.2 and Eq. (18): the claim that the bosonic B=2 configuration can be separated into two B=1 fermions at exactly zero additional energy is supported only by a single numerical energy scan at fixed magnetic field; no explicit computation of the interaction potential V(d) or its second derivative at d = L/2 (half-period) is provided, nor is robustness under variation of the Skyrme parameter or inclusion of higher-order terms demonstrated.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's request for a more detailed characterization of the separation process. The original numerical scan at fixed magnetic field was performed by varying the separation d continuously and observing that the total energy remains constant to within numerical precision, which directly implies a flat interaction potential. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit plot of V(d) (new Fig. 3) together with its numerical derivative, confirming that both V(d) and V'(d) are consistent with zero for d near L/2. We have also repeated the scan for two additional values of the Skyrme parameter e and find the flatness persists. A comprehensive scan over the full parameter space and inclusion of higher-order operators lies beyond the scope of the present effective-theory study, but the leading-order result is robust within the model employed. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4.1, Fig. 4] §4.1, Fig. 4: the phase boundary between the CSL and domain-wall-Skyrmion phases is stated to be unchanged by the presence of the B=1 pair, yet the energy comparison is performed only for the minimal configurations; a systematic scan of the total energy density as a function of magnetic field strength for both the pure CSL and the CSL plus two B=1 Skyrmions is needed to confirm that the critical field is insensitive to the fermionic excitations.

    Authors: We agree that a direct comparison of energy densities over a range of magnetic fields strengthens the claim. In the revised §4.1 we have added a new panel to Fig. 4 that displays the total energy density versus magnetic-field strength for both the pure CSL and the CSL containing the minimal B=1 pair. The curves cross at the same critical field value (within the resolution of our lattice), confirming that the phase boundary is insensitive to the presence of the fermionic excitations. Because the B=1 Skyrmions are the lowest-energy topological objects, higher-multiplicity configurations would only raise the energy further and cannot alter the boundary. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained in effective model

full rationale

The paper analyzes domain-wall Skyrmions within the Skyrme model plus Wess-Zumino term in an external magnetic field, deriving the fermionic character of B=1 configurations and the zero-cost separation of a B=2 bosonic state into two B=1 states from the equations of motion and topological properties. These outcomes follow from minimizing the energy functional on the CSL background and are not obtained by redefining inputs, fitting parameters to the target observables, or invoking self-citations as load-bearing uniqueness theorems. The phase-boundary invariance is likewise presented as a direct consequence of the same energy comparison rather than a tautology. No quoted step reduces the claimed result to its own premise by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies insufficient detail to list specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the analysis rests on the standard chiral effective theory framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1086 out tokens · 194439 ms · 2026-05-16T19:33:08.117458+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Baryonic vortices in rotating nuclear matter

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Global baryonic vortices in rotating nuclear matter become energetically viable due to causality-enforced finite size, competing with local vortices under tunable rotation, size, and chemical potential.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The phase diagram of dense QCD

    K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda,The phase diagram of dense QCD,Rept. Prog. Phys.74 (2011) 014001 [1005.4814]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    The phase structure of QCD

    C. Schmidt and S. Sharma,The phase structure of QCD,J. Phys. G44(2017) 104002 [1701.04707]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    C. S. Fischer,QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson–Schwinger equations,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.105(2019) 1 [1810.12938]. – 18 – [4]STARcollaboration,Precision Measurement of Net-Proton-Number Fluctuations in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 142301 [2504.00817]. [5]STARcollaboration,Production of light nuclei in Au+A...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Scherer and M

    S. Scherer and M. R. Schindler,A Primer for Chiral Perturbation Theory, vol. 830. 2012, 10.1007/978-3-642-19254-8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19254-8 2012

  5. [5]

    S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl and A. Schwenk,From low-momentum interactions to nuclear structure,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.65(2010) 94 [0912.3688]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    D. T. Son and A. R. Zhitnitsky,Quantum anomalies in dense matter,Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 074018 [hep-ph/0405216]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  7. [7]

    D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov,Axial anomaly and magnetism of nuclear and quark matter, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 014021 [0710.1084]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Vilenkin,Equilibrium parity-violating current in a magnetic field,Phys

    A. Vilenkin,Equilibrium parity-violating current in a magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 3080

    work page 1980

  9. [9]

    M. A. Metlitski and A. R. Zhitnitsky,Anomalous axion interactions and topological currents in dense matter,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 045011 [hep-ph/0505072]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  10. [10]

    Notes on Anomaly Induced Transport

    K. Landsteiner,Notes on Anomaly Induced Transport,Acta Phys. Polon. B47(2016) 2617 [1610.04413]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    M. Eto, K. Hashimoto and T. Hatsuda,Ferromagnetic neutron stars: axial anomaly, dense neutron matter, and pionic wall,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 081701 [1209.4814]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Chiral Soliton Lattice and Charged Pion Condensation in Strong Magnetic Fields

    T. Brauner and N. Yamamoto,Chiral Soliton Lattice and Charged Pion Condensation in Strong Magnetic Fields,JHEP04(2017) 132 [1609.05213]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    Anomalous low-temperature thermodynamics of QCD in strong magnetic fields

    T. Brauner and S. V. Kadam,Anomalous low-temperature thermodynamics of QCD in strong magnetic fields,JHEP11(2017) 103 [1706.04514]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Anomalous electrodynamics of neutral pion matter in strong magnetic fields

    T. Brauner and S. Kadam,Anomalous electrodynamics of neutral pion matter in strong magnetic fields,JHEP03(2017) 015 [1701.06793]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Brauner, H

    T. Brauner, H. Koleˇ sov´ a and N. Yamamoto,Chiral soliton lattice phase in warm QCD,Phys. Lett. B823(2021) 136767 [2108.10044]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Brauner and H

    T. Brauner and H. Koleˇ sov´ a,Chiral soliton lattice at next-to-leading order,JHEP07(2023) 163 [2302.06902]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Anomalous effects of dense matter under rotation

    X.-G. Huang, K. Nishimura and N. Yamamoto,Anomalous effects of dense matter under rotation,JHEP02(2018) 069 [1711.02190]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Nishimura and N

    K. Nishimura and N. Yamamoto,Topological term, QCD anomaly, and theη ′ chiral soliton lattice in rotating baryonic matter,JHEP07(2020) 196 [2003.13945]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Chen, X.-G

    H.-L. Chen, X.-G. Huang and J. Liao,QCD Phase Structure Under Rotation,Lect. Notes Phys.987(2021) 349 [2108.00586]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Phases of rotating baryonic matter: non-Abelian chiral – 19 – soliton lattices, antiferro-isospin chains, and ferri/ferromagnetic magnetization,JHEP08 (2022) 305 [2112.01381]

    work page arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Domain-wall Skyrmion phase in a rapidly rotating QCD matter,JHEP03(2024) 019 [2310.17511]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Non-Abelian chiral soliton lattice in rotating QCD matter: Nambu-Goldstone and excited modes,JHEP03(2024) 035 [2312.10927]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Eto and M

    M. Eto and M. Nitta,Quantum nucleation of topological solitons,JHEP09(2022) 077 [2207.00211]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Higaki, K

    T. Higaki, K. Kamada and K. Nishimura,Formation of a chiral soliton lattice,Phys. Rev. D 106(2022) 096022 [2207.00212]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Dislocations and crystallization dynamics of chiral soliton lattices,JHEP(2025) 164 [2506.16354]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    M. A. G. Amano, M. Eto, M. Nitta and S. Sasaki,Holographic QCD Matter: Chiral Soliton Lattices in Strong Magnetic Field,JHEP (to appear)(2025) [2507.16897]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Qiu and M

    Z. Qiu and M. Nitta,Baryonic vortex phase and magnetic field generation in QCD with isospin and baryon chemical potentials,JHEP06(2024) 139 [2403.07433]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Hamada, M

    Y. Hamada, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Baryons as linked vortices in QCD matter with isospin asymmetry,2509.20844

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Qiu and M

    Z. Qiu and M. Nitta,Quasicrystals in QCD,JHEP05(2023) 170 [2304.05089]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Yamada and N

    A. Yamada and N. Yamamoto,Floquet vacuum engineering: Laser-driven chiral soliton lattice in the QCD vacuum,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 054041 [2107.07074]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Brauner, G

    T. Brauner, G. Filios and H. Koleˇ sov´ a,Chiral soliton lattice in QCD-like theories,JHEP12 (2019) 029 [1905.11409]

    work page arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Anomaly-Induced Inhomogeneous Phase in Quark Matter without the Sign Problem

    T. Brauner, G. Filios and H. Koleˇ sov´ a,Anomaly-Induced Inhomogeneous Phase in Quark Matter without the Sign Problem,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 012001 [1902.07522]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Nitta and S

    M. Nitta and S. Sasaki,Solitonic ground state in supersymmetric theory in background, JHEP10(2024) 178 [2404.12066]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Canfora, N

    F. Canfora, N. Grandi, M. Lagos, L. Urrutia-Reyes and A. Vera,Universality of the chiral soliton lattice in the low energy limit of QCD,2510.11946

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    G. W. Evans and A. Schmitt,Chiral anomaly induces superconducting baryon crystal,JHEP 09(2022) 192 [2206.01227]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    G. W. Evans and A. Schmitt,Chiral Soliton Lattice turns into 3D crystal,JHEP2024 (2024) 041 [2311.03880]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Josephson vortices and the Atiyah-Manton construction

    M. Nitta,Josephson vortices and the Atiyah-Manton construction,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 125004 [1207.6958]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  38. [38]

    Jewels on a wall ring

    M. Kobayashi and M. Nitta,Sine-Gordon kinks on a domain wall ring,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 085003 [1302.0989]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    Correspondence between Skyrmions in 2+1 and 3+1 Dimensions

    M. Nitta,Correspondence between Skyrmions in 2+1 and 3+1 Dimensions,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 025013 [1210.2233]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    Matryoshka Skyrmions

    M. Nitta,Matryoshka Skyrmions,Nucl. Phys. B872(2013) 62 [1211.4916]. – 20 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [41]

    S. B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Incarnations of Skyrmions,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 085007 [1407.7210]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    S. B. Gudnason and M. Nitta,Domain wall Skyrmions,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 085022 [1403.1245]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    Non-Abelian Sine-Gordon Solitons: Correspondence between $SU(N)$ Skyrmions and ${\mathbb C}P^{N-1}$ Lumps

    M. Eto and M. Nitta,Non-Abelian Sine-Gordon Solitons: Correspondence betweenSU(N) Skyrmions andCP N−1 Lumps,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 085044 [1501.07038]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    Cheng, M

    R. Cheng, M. Li, A. Sapkota, A. Rai, A. Pokhrel, T. Mewes et al.,Magnetic domain wall skyrmions,Phys. Rev. B99(2019) 184412

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    V. M. Kuchkin, B. Barton-Singer, F. N. Rybakov, S. Bl¨ ugel, B. J. Schroers and N. S. Kiselev,Magnetic skyrmions, chiral kinks and holomorphic functions,Phys. Rev. B102 (2020) 144422 [2007.06260]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Ross and M

    C. Ross and M. Nitta,Domain-wall skyrmions in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B107(2023) 024422 [2205.11417]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Amari and M

    Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Chiral magnets from string theory,JHEP11(2023) 212 [2307.11113]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Amari, C

    Y. Amari, C. Ross and M. Nitta,Domain-wall skyrmion chain and domain-wall bimerons in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B109(2024) 104426 [2311.05174]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Amari and M

    Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Skyrmion crystal phase on a magnetic domain wall in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B111(2025) 134441 [2409.07943]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    S. B. Gudnason, Y. Amari and M. Nitta,Creation of domain-wall Skyrmions in chiral magnets,Nucl. Phys. B1019(2025) 117106 [2406.19056]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Leask,Manipulation and trapping of magnetic skyrmions with domain walls in chiral magnetic thin films,J

    P. Leask,Manipulation and trapping of magnetic skyrmions with domain walls in chiral magnetic thin films,J. Phys. Condens. Matter37(2025) 135804 [2407.06959]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    S. Lee, T. Fujimori, M. Nitta and S. K. Kim,Domain wall networks as skyrmion crystals in chiral magnets,Phys. Rev. B112(2025) 064422 [2407.04007]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Nagase et al.,Observation of domain wall bimerons in chiral magnets,Nature Commun

    T. Nagase et al.,Observation of domain wall bimerons in chiral magnets,Nature Commun. 12(2021) 3490 [2004.06976]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    K. Yang, K. Nagase, Y. Hirayama, T. D. Mishima, M. B. Santos and H. Liu,Wigner solids of domain wall skyrmions,Nature Commun.12(2021) 6006 [2110.08069]

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Amari, M

    Y. Amari, M. Eto and M. Nitta,Domain-wall Skyrmion phase of QCD in magnetic field: gauge field dynamics,JHEP05(2025) 037 [2409.08841]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Domain-Wall Skyrmion Phase in Dense QCD at Strong Magnetic Fields Using Leading-Order Chiral Perturbation Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 181902 [2304.02940]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    M. Eto, K. Nishimura and M. Nitta,Phase diagram of QCD matter with magnetic field: domain-wall Skyrmion chain in chiral soliton lattice,JHEP12(2023) 032 [2311.01112]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Amari, M

    Y. Amari, M. Nitta and R. Yokokura,Spin statistics and surgeries of topological solitons in QCD matter in magnetic field,JHEP02(2025) 171 [2406.14419]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Phys. Lett. B37 (1971) 95. – 21 –

    work page 1971

  60. [60]

    Witten,Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confinement,Nucl

    E. Witten,Current Algebra, Baryons, and Quark Confinement,Nucl. Phys. B223(1983) 433

    work page 1983

  61. [61]

    Goldstone and F

    J. Goldstone and F. Wilczek,Fractional quantum numbers on solitons,Phys. Rev. Lett.47 (1981) 986

    work page 1981

  62. [62]

    Manton,A remark on the scattering of bps monopoles,Physics Letters B110(1982) 54

    N. Manton,A remark on the scattering of bps monopoles,Physics Letters B110(1982) 54

    work page 1982

  63. [63]

    M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi and N. Sakai,Manifestly supersymmetric effective Lagrangians on BPS solitons,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 125008 [hep-th/0602289]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  64. [64]

    Non-Abelian Sine-Gordon Solitons

    M. Nitta,Non-Abelian Sine-Gordon Solitons,Nucl. Phys. B895(2015) 288 [1412.8276]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Amari, M

    Y. Amari, M. Nitta and Z. Qiu,Phase boundary of nuclear matter in magnetic field,JHEP 10(2025) 180 [2504.08379]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Amari, M

    Y. Amari, M. Eto and M. Nitta,Topological solitons stabilized by a background gauge field and soliton-anti-soliton asymmetry,JHEP11(2024) 127 [2403.06778]. – 22 –

    work page arXiv 2024