Robust Fixed-Time Model Reference Adaptive Control

Chayan Kumar Paul; Denis Efimov; Indra Narayan Kar; Krishanu Nath; Rosane Ushirobira

arxiv: 2604.20234 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Robust Fixed-Time Model Reference Adaptive Control

Chayan Kumar Paul , Krishanu Nath , Indra Narayan Kar , Denis Efimov , Rosane Ushirobira This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY

keywords model reference adaptive controlfixed-time convergenceparameter estimationinterval excitationrobust controlindirect MRAC

0 comments

The pith

A novel parameter update law in indirect MRAC drives parameter estimates to their true values in a fixed time once an interval excitation condition holds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a model reference adaptive control strategy for unknown linear time-invariant systems that guarantees fixed-time convergence for both parameter estimates and tracking errors. It replaces the standard persistence of excitation requirement with a weaker initial or interval excitation condition on the regressor matrix. The central innovation is a new parameter update law inside the indirect MRAC framework that enforces the fixed-time property as soon as the excitation condition is satisfied. The resulting controller remains robust to external disturbances and unknown parameters, making it more suitable for practical implementation than methods relying on continuous rich excitation.

Core claim

Within the indirect MRAC framework, a novel parameter update law is introduced that ensures parameter estimates converge within a fixed time once the regressor matrix satisfies an initial or interval excitation condition. This produces fixed-time convergence of the tracking error for the closed-loop system without needing persistence of excitation, while preserving robustness against parameter uncertainties and external disturbances.

What carries the argument

The novel parameter update law that forces fixed-time convergence of the parameter vector once the regressor matrix meets the initial or interval excitation condition.

If this is right

Parameter estimates reach their true values in a predetermined fixed time after the excitation condition is met.
Tracking errors converge to zero in the same fixed time.
The closed-loop system tolerates external disturbances while maintaining the fixed-time property.
Only interval excitation is required rather than continuous persistence of excitation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The milder excitation requirement may allow fixed-time adaptive control in applications where persistent excitation cannot be maintained, such as finite-duration experiments or systems with intermittent operation.
The explicit fixed-time bound supplies a known upper limit on settling time that could be used for timing guarantees in safety-critical designs.
The same update-law structure might be tested on slowly time-varying plants to check whether the fixed-time claim survives mild violations of the LTI assumption.

Load-bearing premise

The regressor matrix satisfies the initial or interval excitation condition.

What would settle it

A simulation or experiment in which the regressor meets the stated excitation condition and the parameter estimation error is observed to reach zero inside the claimed fixed time bound, versus failure to converge in fixed time when the condition is removed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20234 by Chayan Kumar Paul, Denis Efimov, Indra Narayan Kar, Krishanu Nath, Rosane Ushirobira.

read the original abstract

This article proposes a Model Reference Adaptive Control (MRAC) strategy to achieve fixed-time convergence of parameter estimation and tracking errors for unknown linear time-invariant systems, without relying on the persistence of excitation condition. Instead, it employs a less restrictive initial/interval excitation condition on the regressor matrix, enhancing practicality and ease of implementation in real-world scenarios. Our primary contribution is a novel parameter update law within the indirect MRAC framework, ensuring that parameter estimates converge within a fixed time, once the initial/interval excitation condition is met. This approach simplifies the practical requirements for adaptive control while guaranteeing robust performance against parameter uncertainty and external disturbances. Simulation results provide a comparison with the current literature to validate the effectiveness of this approach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a new update law for fixed-time convergence in indirect MRAC under interval excitation instead of persistence of excitation, but the closed-loop dynamics may not reliably produce that excitation from arbitrary initial estimates.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a claimed novel parameter update law inside indirect MRAC that drives both parameter estimates and tracking errors to zero in fixed time, once an initial or interval excitation condition on the regressor holds. This is positioned as relaxing the stricter persistence-of-excitation requirement that often limits real applications. The abstract and simulations frame this as the central advance over prior fixed-time MRAC work and standard indirect schemes. Simulations are included that compare the approach against existing methods on uncertain linear plants with disturbances, which at least shows the intended behavior under the assumed condition. That practical angle is the part that could matter for engineers who need adaptation to finish quickly without waiting for persistent signals. The construction of the update law itself appears to be the concrete new piece, and the paper treats the milder excitation requirement as the key enabler for easier implementation. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test note flags. Because the control input depends on the running parameter estimates, the state trajectory and regressor are not independent of the adaptation. If the estimates start far from the true values, the resulting input may fail to generate the required interval excitation over any finite window, leaving the fixed-time guarantee conditional on something the closed-loop system might not deliver. The paper states the result holds “once the condition is met,” but does not appear to prove that the dynamics self-consistently produce it from arbitrary initials. That gap needs checking in the full Lyapunov analysis and any supporting lemmas. The rest of the technical claims—robustness to disturbances and the fixed-time bounds—would also require the usual scrutiny of the derivations. This is the sort of paper adaptive-control people working on real-time uncertain systems would want to read and test. It is worth sending for peer review because the idea is concrete enough to evaluate and the simulations give a starting point, even if the closed-loop excitation question needs tightening.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a robust indirect MRAC scheme for unknown LTI systems that achieves fixed-time convergence of both parameter estimates and tracking errors. It replaces the standard persistence-of-excitation requirement with a weaker initial/interval excitation (IE) condition on the regressor matrix and introduces a novel parameter update law claimed to deliver the fixed-time property once IE holds. Robustness to disturbances is asserted, and simulation comparisons with existing methods are provided to support practical effectiveness.

Significance. If the fixed-time result and closed-loop consistency of the IE condition can be rigorously established, the contribution would be notable: fixed-time convergence is a stronger guarantee than asymptotic convergence, and relaxing PE to IE improves applicability in real systems where persistent excitation is difficult to ensure. The work would advance the literature on finite/fixed-time adaptive control for uncertain LTI plants.

major comments (2)

[Main theorem / problem formulation] The central fixed-time claim rests on the IE condition being satisfied by the closed-loop trajectories. Because the control input depends on the evolving parameter estimates, the state trajectory (and thus the regressor) is itself a function of those estimates. The manuscript does not appear to contain a proof or argument showing that the IE condition is self-consistently generated from arbitrary initial estimates; the abstract simply states the result holds “once the condition is met.” This is a load-bearing gap for the main theorem. (See the problem statement, the statement of the main result, and any closed-loop stability analysis.)
[Update law and stability analysis sections] No derivation or Lyapunov analysis is visible that would confirm how the novel update law produces a fixed-time bound independent of initial conditions once IE holds. Without this, it is impossible to verify whether the fixed-time property is actually achieved or whether it reduces to a fitted or self-referential quantity.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract would benefit from explicitly stating the system class (SISO/MIMO, order, etc.) and the precise form of the novel update law rather than describing it only qualitatively.
[Simulation section] Simulation figures should include quantitative metrics (e.g., convergence times, error bounds) alongside qualitative plots to allow direct comparison with the claimed fixed-time property.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Main theorem / problem formulation] The central fixed-time claim rests on the IE condition being satisfied by the closed-loop trajectories. Because the control input depends on the evolving parameter estimates, the state trajectory (and thus the regressor) is itself a function of those estimates. The manuscript does not appear to contain a proof or argument showing that the IE condition is self-consistently generated from arbitrary initial estimates; the abstract simply states the result holds “once the condition is met.” This is a load-bearing gap for the main theorem. (See the problem statement, the statement of the main result, and any closed-loop stability analysis.)

Authors: We agree that the fixed-time result is conditional on the IE condition holding for the closed-loop trajectories. The manuscript (abstract, problem statement, and main theorem) explicitly frames the contribution as holding 'once the initial/interval excitation condition is met' rather than claiming that arbitrary initial estimates always generate IE through the closed-loop dynamics. This is a deliberate choice, as the regressor depends on the state trajectory, which in turn depends on the evolving estimates. We view IE as a practically weaker and more verifiable condition than PE, often satisfiable via reference signal design. We will revise the problem formulation, main result statement, and add a dedicated remark clarifying the conditional nature and discussing practical scenarios where IE is expected to hold. revision: yes
Referee: [Update law and stability analysis sections] No derivation or Lyapunov analysis is visible that would confirm how the novel update law produces a fixed-time bound independent of initial conditions once IE holds. Without this, it is impossible to verify whether the fixed-time property is actually achieved or whether it reduces to a fitted or self-referential quantity.

Authors: The novel update law is introduced in Section III as a modification to the standard indirect MRAC gradient update that incorporates an additional term designed to enforce fixed-time convergence under IE. Section IV then presents the Lyapunov-based stability analysis showing that, once IE is satisfied, the parameter error and tracking error converge in fixed time with a bound independent of initial conditions. We acknowledge that the current presentation may not make every algebraic step sufficiently explicit. We will revise these sections to include a more detailed, step-by-step derivation of the update law and the Lyapunov function, explicitly showing how the IE condition yields the fixed-time bound without dependence on initial parameter values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: novel update law constructed independently; convergence result not presupposed in definition.

full rationale

The paper's central contribution is a newly proposed parameter update law inside the indirect MRAC structure that is asserted to deliver fixed-time convergence of estimates once the IE condition on the regressor holds. No quoted equation or step shows the update law being defined in terms of the target convergence time, nor any fitted parameter being relabeled as a prediction. The IE condition is treated as an external premise rather than derived from the law itself. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems imported from the same authors, or ansatz smuggling appear in the provided abstract or description. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against the stated assumption.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the system being linear time-invariant with unknown parameters and on the regressor satisfying an initial/interval excitation condition; no free parameters or invented entities are visible in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The plant is an unknown linear time-invariant system
Stated directly in the abstract as the setting for the MRAC design.
domain assumption The regressor matrix satisfies an initial/interval excitation condition
The fixed-time guarantee is conditioned on this excitation property being met.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5424 in / 1255 out tokens · 41295 ms · 2026-05-10T00:15:14.829851+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

Courier Corporation, 2011

Shankar Sastry and Marc Bodson.Adaptive control: stability, convergence and robustness. Courier Corporation, 2011

work page 2011
[2]

Robust adaptive control in the presence of bounded disturbances.IEEE Trans- actions on Automatic Control, 31(4):306–315, 2003

K Narendra and A Annaswamy. Robust adaptive control in the presence of bounded disturbances.IEEE Trans- actions on Automatic Control, 31(4):306–315, 2003

work page 2003
[3]

Model reference adaptive control.Control Systems, Robotics and Automation–Volume X: Advanced Control Systems-IV, page 63, 2009

Anuradha M Annaswamy. Model reference adaptive control.Control Systems, Robotics and Automation–Volume X: Advanced Control Systems-IV, page 63, 2009

work page 2009
[4]

Persistence of excitation conditions and the convergence of adaptive schemes.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 30(2):183–191, 1984

R Bitmead. Persistence of excitation conditions and the convergence of adaptive schemes.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 30(2):183–191, 1984

work page 1984
[5]

Persistent excitation in adaptive systems.International Journal of Control, 45(1):127–160, 1987

Kumpati S Narendra and Anuradha M Annaswamy. Persistent excitation in adaptive systems.International Journal of Control, 45(1):127–160, 1987

work page 1987
[6]

Concurrent learning for convergence in adaptive control without persistency of excitation

Girish Chowdhary and Eric Johnson. Concurrent learning for convergence in adaptive control without persistency of excitation. In49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 3674–3679, 2010

work page 2010
[7]

Combined MRAC for unknown MIMO LTI systems with parameter convergence.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 63(1):283–290, 2017

Sayan Basu Roy, Shubhendu Bhasin, and Indra Narayan Kar. Combined MRAC for unknown MIMO LTI systems with parameter convergence.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 63(1):283–290, 2017

work page 2017
[8]

Composite learning robot control with guaranteed parameter convergence.Auto- matica, 89:398–406, 2018

Yongping Pan and Haoyong Yu. Composite learning robot control with guaranteed parameter convergence.Auto- matica, 89:398–406, 2018

work page 2018
[9]

Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems.SIAM Journal on Control and optimization, 38(3):751–766, 2000

Sanjay P Bhat and Dennis S Bernstein. Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems.SIAM Journal on Control and optimization, 38(3):751–766, 2000

work page 2000
[10]

Nonlinear feedback design for fixed-time stabilization of linear control systems.IEEE transactions on Automatic Control, 57(8):2106–2110, 2011

Andrey Polyakov. Nonlinear feedback design for fixed-time stabilization of linear control systems.IEEE transactions on Automatic Control, 57(8):2106–2110, 2011

work page 2011
[11]

Finite/fixed-time stabilization for nonlinear interconnected systems with dead-zone input.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62(5):2554–2560, 2016

Changchun Hua, Yafeng Li, and Xinping Guan. Finite/fixed-time stabilization for nonlinear interconnected systems with dead-zone input.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62(5):2554–2560, 2016

work page 2016
[12]

Robust stabilization of MIMO systems in finite/fixed time.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 26(1):69–90, 2016

Andrey Polyakov, Denis Efimov, and Wilfrid Perruquetti. Robust stabilization of MIMO systems in finite/fixed time.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 26(1):69–90, 2016. 9

work page 2016
[13]

Fixed-time and finite-time stability of switched time-delay systems.International Journal of Control, 95(10):2780–2792, 2022

Junfeng Zhang and Denis Efimov. Fixed-time and finite-time stability of switched time-delay systems.International Journal of Control, 95(10):2780–2792, 2022

work page 2022
[14]

Nonsingular fixed-time consensus tracking for second-order multi-agent networks.Automatica, 54:305– 309, 2015

Zongyu Zuo. Nonsingular fixed-time consensus tracking for second-order multi-agent networks.Automatica, 54:305– 309, 2015

work page 2015
[15]

Fixed-time control design for nonlinear uncertain systems via adaptive method

Fang Wang and Guanyu Lai. Fixed-time control design for nonlinear uncertain systems via adaptive method. Systems & Control Letters, 140:104704, 2020

work page 2020
[16]

Adaptive finite-time and fixed-time control design using output stability conditions.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 32(11):6361–6378, 2022

Konstantin Zimenko, Denis Efimov, and Andrey Polyakov. Adaptive finite-time and fixed-time control design using output stability conditions.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 32(11):6361–6378, 2022

work page 2022
[17]

Fixed-time parameter estimation via the discrete-time DREM method.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 56(2):4013–4018, 2023

Marina Korotina, Stanislav Aranovskiy, Rosane Ushirobira, Denis Efimov, and Jian Wang. Fixed-time parameter estimation via the discrete-time DREM method.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 56(2):4013–4018, 2023

work page 2023
[18]

Fixed-time estimation of parameters for non-persistent excitation.European Journal of Control, 55:24–32, 2020

Jian Wang, Denis Efimov, Stanislav Aranovskiy, and Alexey A Bobtsov. Fixed-time estimation of parameters for non-persistent excitation.European Journal of Control, 55:24–32, 2020

work page 2020
[19]

Geometric homogeneity with applications to finite-time stability.Mathe- matics of Control, Signals and Systems, 17(2):101–127, 2005

Sanjay P Bhat and Dennis S Bernstein. Geometric homogeneity with applications to finite-time stability.Mathe- matics of Control, Signals and Systems, 17(2):101–127, 2005

work page 2005
[20]

On homogeneous distributed parameter systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(11):3657–3662, 2016

Andrey Polyakov, Denis Efimov, Emilia Fridman, and Wilfrid Perruquetti. On homogeneous distributed parameter systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(11):3657–3662, 2016

work page 2016
[21]

Consistent discretization of finite-time and fixed-time stable systems.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 57(1):78–103, 2019

Andrey Polyakov, Denis Efimov, and Bernard Brogliato. Consistent discretization of finite-time and fixed-time stable systems.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 57(1):78–103, 2019

work page 2019
[22]

Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002

Hassan K Khalil and Jessy W Grizzle.Nonlinear systems, volume 3. Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002

work page 2002
[23]

John Wiley & Sons, 2003

Gang Tao.Adaptive control design and analysis, volume 37. John Wiley & Sons, 2003

work page 2003
[24]

Springer, 1970

Dragoslav S Mitrinovic and Petar M Vasic.Analytic inequalities, volume 1. Springer, 1970

work page 1970
[25]

On homogeneity and its application in sliding mode control.Journal of the Franklin Institute, 351(4):1866–1901, 2014

Emmanuel Bernuau, Denis Efimov, Wilfrid Perruquetti, and Andrey Polyakov. On homogeneity and its application in sliding mode control.Journal of the Franklin Institute, 351(4):1866–1901, 2014

work page 1901
[26]

Homogeneous approximation, recursive observer design, and output feedback.SIAM Journal on control and optimization, 47(4):1814–1850, 2008

Vincent Andrieu, Laurent Praly, and Alessandro Astolfi. Homogeneous approximation, recursive observer design, and output feedback.SIAM Journal on control and optimization, 47(4):1814–1850, 2008

work page 2008
[27]

Finite-time stability tools for control and estimation.Foundations and Trends®in Systems and Control, 9(2-3):171–364, 2021

Denis Efimov, Andrey Polyakov, et al. Finite-time stability tools for control and estimation.Foundations and Trends®in Systems and Control, 9(2-3):171–364, 2021

work page 2021
[28]

Homogeneous control design for linear MIMO systems

K Zimenko, A Polyakov, D Efimov, and X Ping. Homogeneous control design for linear MIMO systems. In2025 European Control Conference (ECC), pages 2770–2774. IEEE, 2025

work page 2025
[29]

On finite-time stabilization of evolution equations: A homogeneous approach

Andrey Polyakov, Jean-Michel Coron, and Lionel Rosier. On finite-time stabilization of evolution equations: A homogeneous approach. In2016 IEEE 55th conference on decision and control (CDC), pages 3143–3148, 2016

work page 2016
[30]

Sliding mode control design using canonical homogeneous norm.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 29(3):682–701, 2019

Andrey Polyakov. Sliding mode control design using canonical homogeneous norm.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 29(3):682–701, 2019

work page 2019
[31]

Verification of ISS, iISS and IOSS properties applying weighted homogeneity.Systems & Control Letters, 62(12):1159–1167, 2013

Emmanuel Bernuau, Andrey Polyakov, Denis Efimov, and Wilfrid Perruquetti. Verification of ISS, iISS and IOSS properties applying weighted homogeneity.Systems & Control Letters, 62(12):1159–1167, 2013

work page 2013
[32]

Weighted homogeneity for time-delay systems: Finite-time and independent of delay stability.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(1):210–215, 2015

Denis Efimov, Andrei Polyakov, Wilfrid Perruquetti, and J-P Richard. Weighted homogeneity for time-delay systems: Finite-time and independent of delay stability.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(1):210–215, 2015

work page 2015
[33]

Homogeneity based finite/fixed-time observers for linear MIMO systems.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 33(15):8870–8889, 2023

Konstantin Zimenko, Andrey Polyakov, Denis Efimov, and Artem Kremlev. Homogeneity based finite/fixed-time observers for linear MIMO systems.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 33(15):8870–8889, 2023

work page 2023
[34]

Courier Corporation, 2012

Kumpati S Narendra and Anuradha M Annaswamy.Stable adaptive systems. Courier Corporation, 2012

work page 2012
[35]

On preserving-excitation prop- erties of Kreisselmeier’s regressor extension scheme.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(2):1296–1302, 2022

Stanislav Aranovskiy, Rosane Ushirobira, Marina Korotina, and Alexey Vedyakov. On preserving-excitation prop- erties of Kreisselmeier’s regressor extension scheme.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(2):1296–1302, 2022. 10

work page 2022

[1] [1]

Courier Corporation, 2011

Shankar Sastry and Marc Bodson.Adaptive control: stability, convergence and robustness. Courier Corporation, 2011

work page 2011

[2] [2]

Robust adaptive control in the presence of bounded disturbances.IEEE Trans- actions on Automatic Control, 31(4):306–315, 2003

K Narendra and A Annaswamy. Robust adaptive control in the presence of bounded disturbances.IEEE Trans- actions on Automatic Control, 31(4):306–315, 2003

work page 2003

[3] [3]

Model reference adaptive control.Control Systems, Robotics and Automation–Volume X: Advanced Control Systems-IV, page 63, 2009

Anuradha M Annaswamy. Model reference adaptive control.Control Systems, Robotics and Automation–Volume X: Advanced Control Systems-IV, page 63, 2009

work page 2009

[4] [4]

Persistence of excitation conditions and the convergence of adaptive schemes.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 30(2):183–191, 1984

R Bitmead. Persistence of excitation conditions and the convergence of adaptive schemes.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 30(2):183–191, 1984

work page 1984

[5] [5]

Persistent excitation in adaptive systems.International Journal of Control, 45(1):127–160, 1987

Kumpati S Narendra and Anuradha M Annaswamy. Persistent excitation in adaptive systems.International Journal of Control, 45(1):127–160, 1987

work page 1987

[6] [6]

Concurrent learning for convergence in adaptive control without persistency of excitation

Girish Chowdhary and Eric Johnson. Concurrent learning for convergence in adaptive control without persistency of excitation. In49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 3674–3679, 2010

work page 2010

[7] [7]

Combined MRAC for unknown MIMO LTI systems with parameter convergence.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 63(1):283–290, 2017

Sayan Basu Roy, Shubhendu Bhasin, and Indra Narayan Kar. Combined MRAC for unknown MIMO LTI systems with parameter convergence.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 63(1):283–290, 2017

work page 2017

[8] [8]

Composite learning robot control with guaranteed parameter convergence.Auto- matica, 89:398–406, 2018

Yongping Pan and Haoyong Yu. Composite learning robot control with guaranteed parameter convergence.Auto- matica, 89:398–406, 2018

work page 2018

[9] [9]

Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems.SIAM Journal on Control and optimization, 38(3):751–766, 2000

Sanjay P Bhat and Dennis S Bernstein. Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems.SIAM Journal on Control and optimization, 38(3):751–766, 2000

work page 2000

[10] [10]

Nonlinear feedback design for fixed-time stabilization of linear control systems.IEEE transactions on Automatic Control, 57(8):2106–2110, 2011

Andrey Polyakov. Nonlinear feedback design for fixed-time stabilization of linear control systems.IEEE transactions on Automatic Control, 57(8):2106–2110, 2011

work page 2011

[11] [11]

Finite/fixed-time stabilization for nonlinear interconnected systems with dead-zone input.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62(5):2554–2560, 2016

Changchun Hua, Yafeng Li, and Xinping Guan. Finite/fixed-time stabilization for nonlinear interconnected systems with dead-zone input.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62(5):2554–2560, 2016

work page 2016

[12] [12]

Robust stabilization of MIMO systems in finite/fixed time.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 26(1):69–90, 2016

Andrey Polyakov, Denis Efimov, and Wilfrid Perruquetti. Robust stabilization of MIMO systems in finite/fixed time.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 26(1):69–90, 2016. 9

work page 2016

[13] [13]

Fixed-time and finite-time stability of switched time-delay systems.International Journal of Control, 95(10):2780–2792, 2022

Junfeng Zhang and Denis Efimov. Fixed-time and finite-time stability of switched time-delay systems.International Journal of Control, 95(10):2780–2792, 2022

work page 2022

[14] [14]

Nonsingular fixed-time consensus tracking for second-order multi-agent networks.Automatica, 54:305– 309, 2015

Zongyu Zuo. Nonsingular fixed-time consensus tracking for second-order multi-agent networks.Automatica, 54:305– 309, 2015

work page 2015

[15] [15]

Fixed-time control design for nonlinear uncertain systems via adaptive method

Fang Wang and Guanyu Lai. Fixed-time control design for nonlinear uncertain systems via adaptive method. Systems & Control Letters, 140:104704, 2020

work page 2020

[16] [16]

Adaptive finite-time and fixed-time control design using output stability conditions.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 32(11):6361–6378, 2022

Konstantin Zimenko, Denis Efimov, and Andrey Polyakov. Adaptive finite-time and fixed-time control design using output stability conditions.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 32(11):6361–6378, 2022

work page 2022

[17] [17]

Fixed-time parameter estimation via the discrete-time DREM method.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 56(2):4013–4018, 2023

Marina Korotina, Stanislav Aranovskiy, Rosane Ushirobira, Denis Efimov, and Jian Wang. Fixed-time parameter estimation via the discrete-time DREM method.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 56(2):4013–4018, 2023

work page 2023

[18] [18]

Fixed-time estimation of parameters for non-persistent excitation.European Journal of Control, 55:24–32, 2020

Jian Wang, Denis Efimov, Stanislav Aranovskiy, and Alexey A Bobtsov. Fixed-time estimation of parameters for non-persistent excitation.European Journal of Control, 55:24–32, 2020

work page 2020

[19] [19]

Geometric homogeneity with applications to finite-time stability.Mathe- matics of Control, Signals and Systems, 17(2):101–127, 2005

Sanjay P Bhat and Dennis S Bernstein. Geometric homogeneity with applications to finite-time stability.Mathe- matics of Control, Signals and Systems, 17(2):101–127, 2005

work page 2005

[20] [20]

On homogeneous distributed parameter systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(11):3657–3662, 2016

Andrey Polyakov, Denis Efimov, Emilia Fridman, and Wilfrid Perruquetti. On homogeneous distributed parameter systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(11):3657–3662, 2016

work page 2016

[21] [21]

Consistent discretization of finite-time and fixed-time stable systems.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 57(1):78–103, 2019

Andrey Polyakov, Denis Efimov, and Bernard Brogliato. Consistent discretization of finite-time and fixed-time stable systems.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 57(1):78–103, 2019

work page 2019

[22] [22]

Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002

Hassan K Khalil and Jessy W Grizzle.Nonlinear systems, volume 3. Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002

work page 2002

[23] [23]

John Wiley & Sons, 2003

Gang Tao.Adaptive control design and analysis, volume 37. John Wiley & Sons, 2003

work page 2003

[24] [24]

Springer, 1970

Dragoslav S Mitrinovic and Petar M Vasic.Analytic inequalities, volume 1. Springer, 1970

work page 1970

[25] [25]

On homogeneity and its application in sliding mode control.Journal of the Franklin Institute, 351(4):1866–1901, 2014

Emmanuel Bernuau, Denis Efimov, Wilfrid Perruquetti, and Andrey Polyakov. On homogeneity and its application in sliding mode control.Journal of the Franklin Institute, 351(4):1866–1901, 2014

work page 1901

[26] [26]

Homogeneous approximation, recursive observer design, and output feedback.SIAM Journal on control and optimization, 47(4):1814–1850, 2008

Vincent Andrieu, Laurent Praly, and Alessandro Astolfi. Homogeneous approximation, recursive observer design, and output feedback.SIAM Journal on control and optimization, 47(4):1814–1850, 2008

work page 2008

[27] [27]

Finite-time stability tools for control and estimation.Foundations and Trends®in Systems and Control, 9(2-3):171–364, 2021

Denis Efimov, Andrey Polyakov, et al. Finite-time stability tools for control and estimation.Foundations and Trends®in Systems and Control, 9(2-3):171–364, 2021

work page 2021

[28] [28]

Homogeneous control design for linear MIMO systems

K Zimenko, A Polyakov, D Efimov, and X Ping. Homogeneous control design for linear MIMO systems. In2025 European Control Conference (ECC), pages 2770–2774. IEEE, 2025

work page 2025

[29] [29]

On finite-time stabilization of evolution equations: A homogeneous approach

Andrey Polyakov, Jean-Michel Coron, and Lionel Rosier. On finite-time stabilization of evolution equations: A homogeneous approach. In2016 IEEE 55th conference on decision and control (CDC), pages 3143–3148, 2016

work page 2016

[30] [30]

Sliding mode control design using canonical homogeneous norm.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 29(3):682–701, 2019

Andrey Polyakov. Sliding mode control design using canonical homogeneous norm.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 29(3):682–701, 2019

work page 2019

[31] [31]

Verification of ISS, iISS and IOSS properties applying weighted homogeneity.Systems & Control Letters, 62(12):1159–1167, 2013

Emmanuel Bernuau, Andrey Polyakov, Denis Efimov, and Wilfrid Perruquetti. Verification of ISS, iISS and IOSS properties applying weighted homogeneity.Systems & Control Letters, 62(12):1159–1167, 2013

work page 2013

[32] [32]

Weighted homogeneity for time-delay systems: Finite-time and independent of delay stability.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(1):210–215, 2015

Denis Efimov, Andrei Polyakov, Wilfrid Perruquetti, and J-P Richard. Weighted homogeneity for time-delay systems: Finite-time and independent of delay stability.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(1):210–215, 2015

work page 2015

[33] [33]

Homogeneity based finite/fixed-time observers for linear MIMO systems.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 33(15):8870–8889, 2023

Konstantin Zimenko, Andrey Polyakov, Denis Efimov, and Artem Kremlev. Homogeneity based finite/fixed-time observers for linear MIMO systems.International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 33(15):8870–8889, 2023

work page 2023

[34] [34]

Courier Corporation, 2012

Kumpati S Narendra and Anuradha M Annaswamy.Stable adaptive systems. Courier Corporation, 2012

work page 2012

[35] [35]

On preserving-excitation prop- erties of Kreisselmeier’s regressor extension scheme.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(2):1296–1302, 2022

Stanislav Aranovskiy, Rosane Ushirobira, Marina Korotina, and Alexey Vedyakov. On preserving-excitation prop- erties of Kreisselmeier’s regressor extension scheme.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(2):1296–1302, 2022. 10

work page 2022