pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11138 · v2 · pith:6FXJC4DInew · submitted 2026-05-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cs.IT· hep-th· math.IT· stat.ME

Field Theory of Data: Anomaly Detection via the Functional Renormalization Group. The 2D Ising Model as a Benchmark

Riccardo Finotello , Vincent Lahoche , Parham Radpay , Dine Ousmane Samary This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cs.IThep-thmath.ITstat.ME
keywords anomaly detectionrenormalization groupIsing modelphase transitionsMarchenko-Pastur distributionfield theorystatistical inferencenon-equilibrium systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Anomaly detection in noisy data corresponds to renormalization group flow in non-equilibrium field theories, with noise-to-signal ratio acting as temperature.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets up a direct mapping between anomaly detection tasks in high-noise regimes and the renormalization group evolution of field theories. It proves that locating phase transitions in interacting non-equilibrium systems reduces to examining an effective equilibrium theory close to its Gaussian fixed point, which is identified with the Marchenko-Pastur distribution. Treating the noise-to-signal ratio as an effective temperature lets the signal appear as ordered domains inside a background of fluctuations. Benchmarked against the exact solution of the two-dimensional Ising model, the method recovers critical thresholds to within 4 percent error and improves on standard information-theoretic measures.

Core claim

The detection of phase transitions in interacting non-equilibrium systems maps to the study of an effective equilibrium field theory near its Gaussian fixed point, identified with the universal Marchenko-Pastur distribution. The noise-to-signal ratio acts as a physical temperature, and the signal emerges as ordered domains within a thermalized background of fluctuations.

What carries the argument

Functional renormalization group flow applied to the two-dimensional Model A, which tracks how increasing the noise-to-signal ratio drives the system through the critical point.

If this is right

  • Critical thresholds in interacting systems can be located to within 4 percent error by following the renormalization-group trajectory.
  • The approach outperforms the Kullback-Leibler divergence when identifying transitions in the same benchmark data.
  • A single universal strategy becomes available for extracting structure from complex datasets that sit near criticality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mapping could be tested on datasets whose underlying dynamics are not Ising-like, to check whether the Marchenko-Pastur identification remains useful.
  • If the temperature analogy holds, standard field-theory scaling relations might directly predict how anomaly-detection performance changes with data size or dimensionality.
  • Random-matrix features already known to appear in high-dimensional data would then acquire a dynamical interpretation through the renormalization-group flow.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the noise-to-signal ratio functions exactly as a physical temperature, so that the signal forms ordered domains inside a fluctuating background.

What would settle it

A direct numerical check in which the renormalization-group trajectory for the two-dimensional Ising model fails to recover the known Onsager critical value within the stated accuracy when the noise-to-signal ratio is varied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11138 by Dine Ousmane Samary, Parham Radpay, Riccardo Finotello, Vincent Lahoche.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: The presence of a heavy tail (red pattern) in the spectrum is usually hard to separate from the true noise (the bulk). While isolated spikes can be identified as the principal components of the data, a noise model (black dashed line) derived from random matrix theory provides a reliable separation. Wishart matrix Z = XT X/R converges weakly toward the MP distribution: µMP (λ) = p (λ+ − λ)(λ − λ−) 2πσ2qλ … view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Numerical simulation of a quench for N = 100: starting at t = 0 at a very high temperature, the spins are plunged into a thermal bath below the critical temperature. The left image shows step 0, and the next two images correspond to time steps 3 × 103 and 39 × 103 . Although this mapping is exact at the level of the effective action, numerical convergence toward the Onsager temperature is only achieved i… view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Canonical dimensions for a random matrix X ∈ R N×P , where N = 4×104 , and P/N = 0.5, plotted against the interpolation of the eigenvalue spectrum. dimτ(u2n) = −2(n − 2) dt dτ + (n − 1)dimτ(u4), (3.15) where dτ = d ln L(k) and t ′ = dt/dτ. The sign of the canonical dimension determines the rele￾vance of the couplings: couplings with dimτ(u2n) ≥ 0 are relevant, while those with dimτ(u2n) < 0 are irrelevan… view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Behavior of the canonical dimension by decreasing the NSR from higher values (top left), to intermediate values (top right), to a pure MP contribution (bottom). Data extracted from our previous work [8]. Definition 1 Let C be a Wishart3 matrix depending on some parameters (α1, α2, . . . , αk) and let Ik ⊂ R k the domain of the parameters. Then, C is in the MP universality class at p ∈ Ik if: 1. The empir… view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Behavior of the spectrum found by the KL-proxy for high temperature, T = 5 (top left), in the vicinity of the critical regime T = 0.648 (top right) and below the critical temperature T = 0.350 (bottom) for b = 0.8. where λc,u2n = λdim(u2n)=0 is the point in the spectrum where the coupling becomes marginal. Generally, λc,u4 > λc,u6 , but λc,u6 is numerically unstable, whereas λc,u4 benefits from an eigen￾… view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Behavior of the Binder cumulant for different grid sizes with b = 0.4 (left). Empirical behavior of λc for different temperatures with different methods for b = 0.8 (right). identified as the crossing point of the different curves4 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: Comparison of the critical temperatures Tc(b) obtained by the various methods, for different values of b. The final point at b ≈ 1.8, corresponding to the “Ising-like” case, is in good agreement with Onsager’s temperature (≈ 0.57). The mean-field approximation obtained through the Hartree method is given by the green curve. J = 1/4. The results are summarized in Figures 4.4 and 4.5. The Binder cumulants … view at source ↗
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4: Position of λc as a function of T with different methods: dim(u4) (top left), dim(u6) (top right), and KL divergence (bottom). prediction. This constitutes yet another rigorous validation of GSA: the canonical dimension of the sextic coupling detects the Ising transition with less than 2% error, simply by observing when the interaction couplings reach the marginality threshold. Note that the KL method pr… view at source ↗
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.5. Figure 4.5: Binder cumulant (left) and absolute magnetization (right) for the Ising model. provides higher precision than standard estimation based on the KL divergence minimization. These results establish GSA as a robust, high-precision approach for anomaly detection in the high-NSR regime. GSA can be viewed as a minimal approach, as it only considers the flow behavior around the Gaussian fixed point. In this spec… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We establish a correspondence between anomaly detection in high-noise regimes and the renormalization group flow of non-equilibrium field theories. We provide a physical grounding for this framework by proving that the detection of phase transitions in interacting non-equilibrium systems maps to the study of an effective equilibrium field theory near its Gaussian fixed point, which we identify with the universal Marchenko-Pastur distribution. Applying the Functional Renormalization Group to the two-dimensional Model A, we demonstrate that the noise-to-signal ratio acts as a physical temperature, where the signal emerges as ordered domains within a thermalized background of fluctuations. Using the exact Onsager solution as a benchmark, we show that this approach identifies critical thresholds with an error below 4%, significantly outperforming standard information-theoretic metrics such as the Kullback-Leibler divergence. Our results provide a universal strategy for resolving structures in complex datasets near criticality, bridging the gap between statistical mechanics and statistical inference.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to establish a correspondence between anomaly detection in high-noise regimes and the renormalization group flow of non-equilibrium field theories. It asserts a proof that detection of phase transitions in interacting non-equilibrium systems maps to the study of an effective equilibrium field theory near its Gaussian fixed point, identified with the universal Marchenko-Pastur distribution. Applying the Functional Renormalization Group to the two-dimensional Model A, the noise-to-signal ratio is shown to act as a physical temperature with the signal emerging as ordered domains in a thermalized background. Using the exact Onsager solution for the 2D Ising model as benchmark, critical thresholds are identified with error below 4%, outperforming the Kullback-Leibler divergence.

Significance. If the mapping and its derivation hold, the work offers a novel bridge between statistical mechanics tools (FRG) and statistical inference for anomaly detection near criticality, with the benchmark against an exact solution providing a concrete test. The identification of the Gaussian fixed point with Marchenko-Pastur and the temperature analogy could enable universal strategies if substantiated, but the absence of explicit steps undermines immediate assessment of novelty or correctness.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion of a 'proof' of the mapping from non-equilibrium phase transition detection to an effective equilibrium field theory near the Gaussian fixed point (identified with Marchenko-Pastur) is not accompanied by any derivation steps, explicit FRG equations, or reduction showing how the non-equilibrium dynamics yield this equivalence.
  2. [Abstract] The central claim that varying the noise-to-signal ratio in the FRG equations for 2D Model A drives the system across the phase transition exactly as temperature does in the equilibrium Ising model (matching Onsager value within <4%) requires an explicit demonstration that the FRG truncation produces this equivalence; no such steps or error analysis are provided.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the benchmark result of <4% error on critical thresholds and outperformance of KL divergence is stated without data details, fitting procedure, or comparison methodology, preventing verification that the result is not circular in the noise-to-signal parameter.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise truncation scheme used in the FRG application to Model A and how the Marchenko-Pastur law emerges as the fixed-point distribution.
  2. Provide the explicit definition of the noise-to-signal ratio and its mapping to the temperature parameter in the effective theory.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review. We clarify below that the detailed proofs, derivations, and benchmark procedures are contained in the main text, with the abstract serving as a high-level summary. We address each major comment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion of a 'proof' of the mapping from non-equilibrium phase transition detection to an effective equilibrium field theory near the Gaussian fixed point (identified with Marchenko-Pastur) is not accompanied by any derivation steps, explicit FRG equations, or reduction showing how the non-equilibrium dynamics yield this equivalence.

    Authors: The proof of the mapping is provided in Section 2, including the reduction of non-equilibrium dynamics to the effective equilibrium field theory near the Gaussian fixed point and its identification with the Marchenko-Pastur distribution. Explicit FRG equations are derived in Section 3. We will update the abstract to reference these sections. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that varying the noise-to-signal ratio in the FRG equations for 2D Model A drives the system across the phase transition exactly as temperature does in the equilibrium Ising model (matching Onsager value within <4%) requires an explicit demonstration that the FRG truncation produces this equivalence; no such steps or error analysis are provided.

    Authors: An explicit demonstration of the FRG truncation for 2D Model A and the role of the noise-to-signal ratio as temperature is given in Section 4, along with the error analysis showing agreement with the Onsager solution within <4%. revision: no

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the benchmark result of <4% error on critical thresholds and outperformance of KL divergence is stated without data details, fitting procedure, or comparison methodology, preventing verification that the result is not circular in the noise-to-signal parameter.

    Authors: Section 5 details the benchmark procedure, data from the 2D Ising model, fitting of critical thresholds, and comparison to KL divergence. The analysis is not circular as the critical point is determined from the FRG flow independently, benchmarked against the exact Onsager solution. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained against external benchmark

full rationale

The paper applies the FRG to 2D Model A, identifies the noise-to-signal ratio with temperature via an effective equilibrium mapping, and benchmarks the resulting critical thresholds directly against the independent exact Onsager solution (error <4%). This external validation, together with explicit comparison to Kullback-Leibler divergence, keeps the central correspondence falsifiable and independent of any fitted parameter or self-citation chain. No equations or steps in the provided text reduce a claimed prediction to an input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract; central claim rests on the proposed correspondence and temperature analogy without independent evidence or derivations supplied.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The noise-to-signal ratio acts as a physical temperature where the signal emerges as ordered domains within a thermalized background of fluctuations.
    Invoked in abstract to ground the FRG application to Model A.
  • ad hoc to paper Detection of phase transitions in interacting non-equilibrium systems maps to an effective equilibrium field theory near its Gaussian fixed point identified with the Marchenko-Pastur distribution.
    Core mapping asserted as proven in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1460 out tokens · 28039 ms · 2026-05-25T06:41:54.167872+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    PCA meets RG

    S Bradde and W Bialek. “PCA meets RG.”Journal of statistical physics167 (2017), 462–475.doi:10. 1007/s10955-017-1770-6

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Generalized scale behavior and renormalization group for data analysis

    V Lahoche, D Ousmane Samary, and M Tamaazousti. “Generalized scale behavior and renormalization group for data analysis.”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2022.3 (Mar. 2022), 033101.doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ac52a6

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ac52a6 2022

  3. [3]

    Field Theoretical Approach for Signal Detection in Nearly Continuous Positive Spectra I: Matricial Data

    V Lahoche, D Ousmane Samary, and M Tamaazousti. “Field Theoretical Approach for Signal Detection in Nearly Continuous Positive Spectra I: Matricial Data.”Entropy23.9 (2021).doi:10.3390/e23091132

    work page doi:10.3390/e23091132 2021

  4. [4]

    Field Theoretical Approach for Signal Detection in Nearly Continuous Positive Spectra II: Tensorial Data

    V Lahoche, M Ouerfelli, D Ousmane Samary, and M Tamaazousti. “Field Theoretical Approach for Signal Detection in Nearly Continuous Positive Spectra II: Tensorial Data.”Entropy23.7 (2021).doi:10.3390/ e23070795

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Signal Detection in Nearly Continuous Spectra and Z2-Symmetry Breaking

    V Lahoche, D Ousmane Samary, and M Tamaazousti. “Signal Detection in Nearly Continuous Spectra and Z2-Symmetry Breaking.”Symmetry14.3 (2022), 486.doi:10.3390/sym14030486. arXiv:2011.05447

    work page doi:10.3390/sym14030486 2022

  6. [6]

    Functionalrenormalizationgroupapproachforsignal detection

    VLahoche,DOusmaneSamary,andMTamaazousti.“Functionalrenormalizationgroupapproachforsignal detection.”SciPost Phys. Core7 (2024), 077.doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.7.4.077. arXiv:2201.04250

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.7.4.077 2024

  7. [7]

    Functional renormalization group for signal detection and stochastic ergodicity breaking

    H Erbin, R Finotello, BW Kpera, V Lahoche, and D Ousmane Samary. “Functional renormalization group for signal detection and stochastic ergodicity breaking.”J. Stat. Mech.2024.8 (2024), 083203.doi:10.1088/ 1742-5468/ad5c5c

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Functional Renormalization for Signal Detection: Dimensional Analysis and Dimensional Phase Transition for Nearly Continuous Spectra Effective Field Theory

    R Finotello, V Lahoche, and D Ousmane Samary. “Functional renormalisation for signal detection: dimen- sional analysis and dimensional phase transition for nearly continuous spectra effective field theory.”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2026.4 (2026), 043403.doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ae5a21. arXiv:2507.01064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ae5a21 2026

  9. [9]

    Cambridge University Press, 2017.doi:10.1017/9781107278974

    R Livi and P Politi.Nonequilibrium statistical physics: a modern perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2017.doi:10.1017/9781107278974

    work page doi:10.1017/9781107278974 2017

  10. [10]

    Spectral analysis of finite-time correlation matrices near equilibrium phase transitions

    Vinayak, T Prosen, B Buča, and TH Seligman. “Spectral analysis of finite-time correlation matrices near equilibrium phase transitions.”Europhysics Letters108.2 (Oct. 2014), 20006.doi:10.1209/0295- 5075/ 108/20006

    work page doi:10.1209/0295- 2014

  11. [11]

    Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory

    J Veraart, DS Novikov, D Christiaens, B Ades-aron, J Sijbers, and E Fieremans. “Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory.”NeuroImage142 (2016), 394–406.doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.016 2016

  12. [12]

    Cambridge University Press, 2020.doi:10.1017/9781108768900

    M Potters and JP Bouchaud.A First Course in Random Matrix Theory: for Physicists, Engineers and Data Scientists. Cambridge University Press, 2020.doi:10.1017/9781108768900

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108768900 2020

  13. [13]

    Noise Dressing of Financial Correlation Matrices

    L Laloux, P Cizeau, JP Bouchaud, and M Potters. “Noise Dressing of Financial Correlation Matrices.” Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (7 1999), 1467–1470.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1467

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.1467 1999

  14. [14]

    Randommatrixtheoryandfinancialcorrelations

    LLaloux,PCizeau,MPotters,andJPBouchaud.“Randommatrixtheoryandfinancialcorrelations.”Inter- national Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance03.03(2000),391–397.doi:10.1142/s0219024900000255

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219024900000255 2000

  15. [15]

    Cleaning large correlation matrices: Tools from Random Matrix Theory

    J Bun, JP Bouchaud, and M Potters. “Cleaning large correlation matrices: Tools from Random Matrix Theory.”Physics Reports666 (2017). Cleaning large correlation matrices: tools from random matrix theory, 1–109.doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.005 2017

  16. [16]

    Random matrix theory analysis of cross correlations in financial markets

    A Utsugi, K Ino, and M Oshikawa. “Random matrix theory analysis of cross correlations in financial markets.”Phys. Rev. E70 (2 Aug. 2004), 026110.doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.70.026110. 18 B RECOVERING THE ISING MODEL

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.70.026110 2004

  17. [17]

    Random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data

    V Plerou, P Gopikrishnan, B Rosenow, LAN Amaral, T Guhr, and HE Stanley. “Random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data.”Phys. Rev. E65 (6 June 2002), 066126.doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.65. 066126

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.65 2002

  18. [18]

    A new method to estimate the noise in financial correlation matrices

    T Guhr and B Kälber. “A new method to estimate the noise in financial correlation matrices.”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General36.12 (Mar. 2003), 3009.doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/12/310

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/12/310 2003

  19. [19]

    Signal and noise in correlation matrix

    Z Burda, A Görlich, A Jarosz, and J Jurkiewicz. “Signal and noise in correlation matrix.”Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications343 (2004), 295–310.doi:10.1016/j.physa.2004.05.048

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2004.05.048 2004

  20. [20]

    Universal correlations and power-law tails in financial covariance matrices

    G Akemann, J Fischmann, and P Vivo. “Universal correlations and power-law tails in financial covariance matrices.”Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications389.13 (2010), 2566–2579.doi:10.1016/ j.physa.2010.02.026

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    Active matter, then and now

    EF Keller. “Active matter, then and now.”History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences38.3 (2016), 11. doi:10.1007/s40656-016-0112-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s40656-016-0112-3 2016

  22. [22]

    Oxford Univer- sity Press (2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814788.001.0001

    J Zinn-Justin.Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena. Oxford University Press, 2002.doi:10. 1093/acprof:oso/9780198509233.001.0001

    work page arXiv 2002

  23. [23]

    Cambridge University Press, 2004.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511606571

    M Le Bellac, F Mortessagne, and GG Batrouni.Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Statistical Thermody- namics. Cambridge University Press, 2004.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511606571

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606571 2004

  24. [24]

    Theory of dynamic critical phenomena

    PC Hohenberg and BI Halperin. “Theory of dynamic critical phenomena.”Rev. Mod. Phys.49 (3 July 1977), 435–479.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.49.435

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.49.435 1977

  25. [25]

    Theory of phase-ordering kinetics

    A Bray. “Theory of phase-ordering kinetics.”Advances in Physics43.3 (1994), 357–459.doi:10 . 1080 / 00018739400101505

    work page 1994

  26. [26]

    R Finotello, V Lahoche, P Radpay, and D Ousmane Samary.Functional Renormalization for Signal De- tection: A review on theory, methods and applications. 2026

    work page 2026

  27. [27]

    An Introduction to the Nonperturbative Renormalization Group

    B Delamotte. “An Introduction to the Nonperturbative Renormalization Group.” In:Renormalization Group and Effective Field Theory Approaches to Many-Body Systems. Ed. by A Schwenk and J Polonyi. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, 49–132.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27320-9_2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27320-9_2 2012

  28. [28]

    Oxford University Press, 2019.doi:10.1093/oso/ 9780198787754.001.0001

    J Zinn-Justin.From random walks to random matrices. Oxford University Press, 2019.doi:10.1093/oso/ 9780198787754.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/ 2019

  29. [29]

    Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics

    ET Jaynes. “Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics.”Phys. Rev.106 (4 1957), 620–630.doi:10. 1103/PhysRev.106.620

    work page 1957

  30. [30]

    Non-perturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics

    J Berges, N Tetradis, and C Wetterich. “Non-perturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics.”Physics Reports363.4 (2002). Renormalization group theory in the new millennium. IV, 223–386.doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00098-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00098-9 2002

  31. [31]

    Optimisation of the exact renormalisation group

    DF Litim. “Optimisation of the exact renormalisation group.”Physics Letters B486.1 (2000), 92–99. doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00748-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00748-6 2000

  32. [32]

    Nonperturbative renormalization group beyond the melonic sector: The effective vertex expansion method for group fields theories

    V Lahoche and D Ousmane Samary. “Nonperturbative renormalization group beyond the melonic sector: The effective vertex expansion method for group fields theories.”Phys. Rev. D98 (12 2018), 126010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.126010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.126010 2018

  33. [33]

    Functional renormalization group for “p = 2

    V Lahoche and D Ousmane Samary. “Functional renormalization group for “p = 2” like glassy matrices in the planar approximation I. Vertex expansion at equilibrium.”Nuclear Physics B1005 (2024), 116582. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116582

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116582 2024

  34. [34]

    Time-translation invariance symmetry break- ing hidden by finite-scale singularities

    I Achitouv, V Lahoche, D Ousmane Samary, and P Radpay. “Time-translation invariance symmetry break- ing hidden by finite-scale singularities.”Physica Scripta101.11 (Mar. 2026), 115201.doi:10.1088/1402- 4896/ae4cd1

    work page doi:10.1088/1402- 2026

  35. [35]

    BBB Natta, V Lahoche, D Ousmane Samary, and P Radpay.Ward identities and local potential approxi- mation for large time quantum (2+p)-spin glass dynamics. 2024. arXiv:2411.11089

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    I Achitouv, V Lahoche, D Ousmane Samary, and P Radpay.Constructing the low-temperature phase dia- gram for the2 +p-quantum spin glass using the nonperturbative renormalization group. 2025. arXiv:2503. 12247

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Critical Binder cumulant of two-dimensional Ising models

    W Selke. “Critical Binder cumulant of two-dimensional Ising models.”The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems51.2 (2006), 223–228.doi:10.1140/epjb/e2006-00209-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2006-00209-7 2006

  38. [38]

    Langevin dynamics of fluctuation-induced first-order phase transitions: Self- consistent Hartree approximation

    R Mulet and DA Stariolo. “Langevin dynamics of fluctuation-induced first-order phase transitions: Self- consistent Hartree approximation.”Phys. Rev. B75 (6 Feb. 2007), 064108.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75. 064108. 19

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75 2007