pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18513 · v1 · pith:HVZSQG6Anew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

A 4200-hour HyperFlash and \'ECLAT campaign on the hyperactive FRB 20240114A: constraining energetics with the most brilliant bursts

O.S. Ould-Boukattine , A.J. Cooper , A.M. Cook , J.W.T. Hessels , D.M. Hewitt , J. Huang , I. Cognard , T.J. Dijkema
show 9 more authors
M.P. Gawro\'nski W. Herrmann F. Kirsten A. Moroianu Z. Pleunis W. Puchalska S. Ranguin M.P. Snelders T. Telkamp
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 09:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords fast radio burstsFRB 20240114Arepeating FRBsburst energeticsenergy distributiondispersion measuremagnetar model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Highest-energy bursts from FRB 20240114A release twice the total radio energy of thousands of weaker bursts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

A 4200-hour campaign on the hyperactive repeating fast radio burst FRB 20240114A detected 178 high-energy bursts whose combined radio output reaches 4.4 times 10 to the 42 erg. This total is roughly twice the energy released by about 11,000 lower-energy bursts seen in other observations, showing that rare powerful events account for most of the source's radio energy loss. One standout burst, called the STROOP, supplies about one-third of the measured energy and sits at the upper limit of energies recorded for both repeating and one-off FRBs. The data also reveal a break in the energy distribution near 2 times 10 to the 40 erg and a steady linear rise in dispersion measure over several months.

Core claim

The 4200-hour HyperFlash and ECLAT campaign detected 178 bursts with energies from 10 to the 40 to 10 to the 42 erg, for a cumulative radio energy of 4.4 times 10 to the 42 erg assuming isotropic emission and 1-GHz bandwidth. This cumulative energy is about twice that of roughly 11,000 lower-energy bursts detected with FAST. The single most brilliant burst, termed the STROOP, contributes roughly one-third of the total energy and reaches the maximum energy seen across studies of both repeating and apparently one-off FRBs.

What carries the argument

The cumulative radio-energy sum of the 178 high-energy bursts compared against the much larger sample of lower-energy bursts, which demonstrates the dominant contribution of the rarest events to overall energy depletion.

If this is right

  • The rarest, highest-energy bursts play the main role in depleting the central engine's stored energy.
  • The burst energy distribution shows a clear break near 2 times 10 to the 40 erg.
  • Dispersion measure rises linearly by 0.96 plus or minus 0.06 pc cm to the minus 3 over 318 days.
  • The measured energetics can be compared directly to intermediate and giant flares from Galactic magnetars.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the energy-distribution break appears in other repeaters, it may mark a shared physical cutoff in the emission mechanism.
  • Longer monitoring could check whether single-burst dominance of the energy budget is common among hyperactive sources.
  • The observed DM increase offers a measurable probe of evolving local plasma that future observations can track for changes in rate or direction.

Load-bearing premise

Absolute energies are calculated assuming isotropic emission and a 1-GHz emission bandwidth; if either assumption fails, all energy values and comparisons to other FRBs scale by an unknown factor.

What would settle it

A future campaign that measures more total energy from the numerous lower-energy bursts than from the high-energy sample under identical assumptions, or records a burst whose energy clearly exceeds the current observed maximum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18513 by A.J. Cooper, A.M. Cook, A. Moroianu, D.M. Hewitt, F. Kirsten, I. Cognard, J. Huang, J.W.T. Hessels, M.P. Gawro\'nski, M.P. Snelders, O.S. Ould-Boukattine, S. Ranguin, T.J. Dijkema, T. Telkamp, W. Herrmann, W. Puchalska, Z. Pleunis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Cumulative sum of isotropic-equivalent burst energies for the HyperFlash sample (purple), the FAST burst sample (black: 34 h total observing time; Zhang et al. 2025) and the NRT burst sample (red: 56 h of observations; J. Huang in prep.)). The energies have been scaled to a 1 GHz emission bandwidth. The corresponding cumulative emitted energies, as observed by these telescopes, are 𝐸 HF tot = 4.4 × 1042 er… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Dynamic spectra and time series of the brightest burst in our sample, which we have named “the STROOP” (in Dutch: “de STerkste snelle Radioflits Ooit OPgevangen”). The STROOP was detected with both Toruń (left) and Westerbork (right). The orange bar indicates the gap in observing range of 45 MHz between Toruń and Westerbork. In both panels, the time resolution is 16 µs and the frequency resolution is 500 k… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Cumulative burst rate distribution of isotropic-equivalent spectral energy densities for bursts detected at L-band (∼1.4 GHz). HyperFlash bursts (purple) consist of bursts detected with Onsala, Toruń, Stockert and Westerbork. The black data points are bursts detected with FAST and the red represent bursts detected by NRT. We constrain the burst window to the FAST burst-detection period between MJD 60337 − … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: DM evolution of 13 bursts from FRB 20240114A observed at L￾band (∼1.4 GHz; 12 bursts) and P-band (324 MHz; 1 burst) detected with Onsala, Westerbork, and Toruń. The bursts were selected based on the pres￾ence of temporal microstructure (emission on timescales < 100 µs) and the availability of baseband data, which enabled precise DM measurements (see Appendix Figure B3 for a selection of the dynamic spectra… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hyperactive repeaters provide a unique window into the evolving environments and energy budgets of fast radio burst (FRB) sources, though they may not be representative of the FRB population in general. High-cadence observations are key to capturing the rarest and most energetic bursts, which occur only once per hundreds to thousands of hours. Here we present an unprecedented $4{,}200$-hour observing campaign targeting FRB 20240114A as part of the HyperFlash and \'ECLAT FRB monitoring programs. Over $806$ days, we detected $178$ high-energy ($\sim$$10^{40-42}$ erg) bursts with HyperFlash, which together amount to $4.4 \times 10^{42}$ erg of released radio energy (assuming isotropic emission and 1-GHz emission bandwidth). The cumulative energy of the HyperFlash bursts is about twice that of $\sim$$11{,}000$ lower-energy bursts detected with FAST, emphasising the significant role that the highest-energy bursts play in depleting the central engine's stored energy. In fact, the single most brilliant burst from our sample, which we term the STROOP, contributes roughly $1/3$ of all the energy we measure, and is at the maximum energy seen in studies of both repeating and apparently one-off FRBs alike. We also find a break in the burst energy distribution at $\sim$$2\times10^{40}$ erg and a linear dispersion measure (DM) increase of $+0.96 \pm 0.06$ pc cm$^{-3}$ over a period of $318$ days. We discuss these findings in the context of a magnetar source model and highlight comparisons with the energetics of intermediate and giant X-ray/$\gamma$-ray flares from Galactic sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper presents findings from an extensive 4,200-hour radio observation campaign targeting the hyperactive repeating fast radio burst FRB 20240114A, conducted under the HyperFlash and ECLAT programs. The authors report detecting 178 high-energy bursts (~10^40-42 erg) over 806 days, with a cumulative radio energy release of 4.4 × 10^42 erg assuming isotropic emission and a 1 GHz bandwidth. This total is claimed to be approximately twice the energy from ~11,000 lower-energy bursts observed by FAST, underscoring the importance of the most energetic events. A standout burst termed the 'STROOP' is said to account for roughly one-third of the measured energy and matches the highest energies seen in both repeating and apparently non-repeating FRBs. Additional results include a break in the burst energy distribution around 2 × 10^40 erg and a linear dispersion measure (DM) increase of +0.96 ± 0.06 pc cm^{-3} over 318 days. These are interpreted within a magnetar central engine framework, with comparisons to X-ray and gamma-ray flares from Galactic sources.

Significance. Should the energy calculations prove accurate with proper error analysis and completeness, this study significantly advances understanding of FRB energy budgets by demonstrating that infrequent, high-energy bursts can dominate the total energy output, potentially depleting the source's reservoir more efficiently than numerous low-energy events. The long-term monitoring provides a valuable dataset for tracking environmental changes via the DM trend. The work merits credit for its high-cadence, long-duration observations that captured these rare events and for placing the results in the context of magnetar flare energetics, offering a bridge between repeating FRBs and other high-energy astrophysical phenomena.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract and §4 (Results on energetics): The total energy of 4.4 × 10^{42} erg is presented without error bars, uncertainty propagation, or discussion of detection thresholds and completeness corrections for the 178 bursts. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the HyperFlash cumulative energy is twice the FAST sample and that the highest-energy bursts dominate depletion of the central engine.
  2. §3 (Energy and distance conversion): The manuscript does not specify the luminosity distance, redshift, or host galaxy assumptions used to convert observed quantities to erg, nor does it propagate uncertainties from these into the reported totals or the STROOP fraction. This directly affects the absolute scale needed for comparisons to other FRB studies and Galactic magnetar flares.
minor comments (2)
  1. The acronym 'STROOP' for the brightest burst should be defined on first use in the abstract and introduction with a brief note on its fluence or peak flux.
  2. Figure showing the energy distribution (presumably in §4) should explicitly mark the reported break at ~2×10^{40} erg and include the fitted parameters with uncertainties.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of rigorous error analysis and clear assumptions in our energy calculations. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen these aspects of the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and §4 (Results on energetics): The total energy of 4.4 × 10^{42} erg is presented without error bars, uncertainty propagation, or discussion of detection thresholds and completeness corrections for the 178 bursts. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the HyperFlash cumulative energy is twice the FAST sample and that the highest-energy bursts dominate depletion of the central engine.

    Authors: We agree that the total energy estimate requires explicit uncertainty treatment to support the central claims. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to the cumulative radio energy, describe the propagation of fluence uncertainties for the 178 bursts, and include a dedicated discussion of detection thresholds and completeness corrections above the relevant energy range. We will also clarify the comparison to the FAST sample by noting differences in sensitivity and energy coverage, thereby reinforcing that the highest-energy events dominate the observed energy release. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §3 (Energy and distance conversion): The manuscript does not specify the luminosity distance, redshift, or host galaxy assumptions used to convert observed quantities to erg, nor does it propagate uncertainties from these into the reported totals or the STROOP fraction. This directly affects the absolute scale needed for comparisons to other FRB studies and Galactic magnetar flares.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting this omission. In the revised §3 we will explicitly state the luminosity distance, redshift, and host-galaxy association adopted for FRB 20240114A, together with the cosmological parameters used. We will propagate the associated uncertainties into the total energy, the STROOP fraction, and all derived energetics so that absolute scales and comparisons to other FRB and magnetar-flare studies are placed on a transparent footing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: energies and comparisons derived directly from new observations under explicit assumptions

full rationale

The paper reports burst detections and energy sums from a new 4200-hour campaign on FRB 20240114A. Cumulative radio energy (4.4e42 erg) is obtained by summing individual burst fluences converted under the stated isotropic + 1 GHz assumptions; the factor-of-two comparison to the external FAST sample and the 1/3 contribution of the brightest burst follow arithmetically from those sums. No equations, fits, or self-citations are invoked that reduce the reported totals or ratios back to the inputs by construction. The assumptions are flagged as such and affect absolute scale uniformly, but do not create definitional or fitted-input circularity within the derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Energy calculations rest on two standard but untested assumptions for FRB work plus an implicit distance or redshift value needed to convert observed flux to erg; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • 1-GHz emission bandwidth
    Explicitly assumed in the abstract to convert fluence to energy; changes the absolute scale of all reported erg values.
  • isotropic emission
    Stated assumption used to obtain total radio energy; if beaming is present the true energy is lower by the beaming factor.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The redshift or luminosity distance to FRB 20240114A is known and can be used to convert observed flux to isotropic-equivalent energy.
    Required for any erg value but not stated or referenced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5973 in / 1579 out tokens · 60117 ms · 2026-05-20T09:12:49.501470+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 113 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169...39A 169, 39

    Abbott T. C., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169...39A 169, 39

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad9451 2025

  2. [2]

    Radio Monitoring Campaign of Active Repeater FRB 20220912A with CHIME

    Abbott T. C., et al., 2026, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2604.09098 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260409098A p. arXiv:2604.09098

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.09098 2026

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Agarwal D., Aggarwal K., Burke-Spolaor S., Lorimer D. R., Garver-Daniels N., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1856 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.1661A 497, 1661

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1856 2020

  4. [4]

    Alstott J., Bullmore E., Plenz D., 2014, @doi [PLoS ONE] 10.1371/journal.pone.0085777 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PLoSO...985777A 9, e85777

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085777 2014

  5. [5]

    Anna-Thomas R., et al., 2023, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.abo6526 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Sci...380..599A 380, 599

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abo6526 2023

  6. [6]

    J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-014-0054-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016SSRv..198...47A 198, 47

    Aschwanden M. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-014-0054-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016SSRv..198...47A 198, 47

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0054-6 2016

  7. [7]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A\

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  8. [8]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..123A 156, 123

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  9. [9]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935..167A 935, 167

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  10. [10]

    Bak P., Tang C., Wiesenfeld K., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987PhRvL..59..381B 59, 381

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.381 1987

  11. [11]

    D., et al., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt1440 , 435, 2234

    Barr E. D., et al., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stt1440 , 435, 2234

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1440 2013

  12. [12]

    M., Howell, E

    Barsdell B. R., Bailes M., Barnes D. G., Fluke C. J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20622.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.422..379B 422, 379

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20622.x 2012

  13. [13]

    Beniamini P., Kumar P., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adb8e6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...982...45B 982, 45

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb8e6 2025

  14. [14]

    Beniamini P., Wadiasingh Z., Trigg A., Chirenti C., Burns E., Younes G., Negro M., Granot J., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ada947 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...980..211B 980, 211

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada947 2025

  15. [15]

    Bhardwaj M., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0b68 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...992L..35B 992, L35

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0b68 2025

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Bochenek C. D., Ravi V., Belov K. V., Hallinan G., Kocz J., Kulkarni S. R., McKenna D. L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Natur.587...59B 587, 59

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x 2020

  17. [17]

    M., Levin Y., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ae50f2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1001L..13B 1001, L13

    Bransgrove A., Beloborodov A. M., Levin Y., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ae50f2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1001L..13B 1001, L13

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae50f2 2026

  18. [18]

    Burns E., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...907L..28B 907, L28

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c8 2021

  19. [19]

    CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad188 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...863...48C 863, 48

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad188 2018

  20. [20]

    CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Natur.587...54C 587, 54

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y 2020

  21. [21]

    CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ae3828 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJS..283...34C 283, 34

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3828 2026

  22. [22]

    arXiv:2508.01648

    Caleb M., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2508.01648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250801648C p. arXiv:2508.01648

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.01648 2025

  23. [23]

    , year = 1996, month = aug, volume =

    Cheng B., Epstein R. I., Guyer R. A., Young A. C., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1038/382518a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996Natur.382..518C 382, 518

    work page doi:10.1038/382518a0 1996

  24. [24]

    Discovery of 30 Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources and Uniform Population Statistics of 80 Repeating Sources from CHIME/FRB

    Cook A. M., et al., 2026, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260508410C p. arXiv:2605.08410

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    J., Wijers R

    Cooper A. J., Wijers R. A. M. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slab099 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508L..32C 508, L32

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slab099 2021

  26. [26]

    , year = 1970, month = nov, volume =

    Crawford D. F., Jauncey D. L., Murdoch H. S., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1086/150672 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970ApJ...162..405C 162, 405

    work page doi:10.1086/150672 1970

  27. [27]

    Eppel F., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202453563 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695L..10E 695, L10

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453563 2025

  28. [28]

    Ester M., Kriegel H.-P., Sander J., Xu X., 1996, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. KDD'96. AAAI Press, p. 226–231

    work page 1996

  29. [29]

    G \"o tz D., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...445..313G 445, 313

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053648 2006

  30. [30]

    G., Hessels J

    Gourdji K., Michilli D., Spitler L. G., Hessels J. W. T., Seymour A., Cordes J. M., Chatterjee S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...877L..19G 877, L19

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8a 2019

  31. [31]

    M., Kouveliotou C., van Paradijs J., Briggs M

    G \"o g \"u s E., Woods P. M., Kouveliotou C., van Paradijs J., Briggs M. S., Duncan R. C., Thompson C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312380 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...526L..93G 526, L93

    work page doi:10.1086/312380 1999

  32. [32]

    M., Kouveliotou C., van Paradijs J., Briggs M

    G \"o g \"u s E., Woods P. M., Kouveliotou C., van Paradijs J., Briggs M. S., Duncan R. C., Thompson C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312583 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...532L.121G 532, L121

    work page doi:10.1086/312583 2000

  33. [33]

    Gupta V., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3683 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.2316G 501, 2316

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3683 2021

  34. [34]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris C. R., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , 585, 357

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Hewitt D. M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.3577H 515, 3577

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1960 2022

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Hewitt D. M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2847 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.2039H 526, 2039

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2847 2023

  37. [37]

    M., Huang J., Hessels J

    Hewitt D. M., Huang J., Hessels J. W. T., Cognard I., Guillemot L., Ould-Boukattine O. S., Snelders M. P., Kirsten F., 2024, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ATel16597....1H 16597, 1

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Huang Y.-X., et al., 2025, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/ade34e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025RAA....25h5009H 25, 085009

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ade34e 2025

  39. [39]

    Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment

    Hunter J. D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  40. [40]

    Hurley K., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1038/16199 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Natur.397...41H 397, 41

    work page doi:10.1038/16199 1999

  41. [41]

    I., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/322248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...558..237I 558, 237

    Ibrahim A. I., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/322248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...558..237I 558, 237

    work page doi:10.1086/322248 2001

  42. [42]

    W., Ekers R

    James C. W., Ekers R. D., Macquart J. P., Bannister K. W., Shannon R. M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3031 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.1342J 483, 1342

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3031 2019

  43. [43]

    M., Beloborodov A

    Kaspi V. M., Beloborodov A. M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023329 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ARA&A..55..261K 55, 261

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023329 2017

  44. [44]

    Keimpema A., et al., 2015, @doi [Experimental Astronomy] 10.1007/s10686-015-9446-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ExA....39..259K 39, 259

    work page doi:10.1007/s10686-015-9446-1 2015

  45. [45]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Kirsten F., Snelders M. P., Jenkins M., Nimmo K., van den Eijnden J., Hessels J. W. T., Gawro \'n ski M. P., Yang J., 2021, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-020-01246-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021NatAs...5..414K 5, 414

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01246-3 2021

  46. [46]

    Kirsten F., et al., 2024, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-02153-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024NatAs...8..337K 8, 337

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02153-z 2024

  47. [47]

    pp 87--90

    Kluyver T., et al., 2016, in Loizides F., Schmidt B., eds, Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas. pp 87--90

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2296 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.3331K 534, 3331

    Konijn D. C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2296 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.3331K 534, 3331

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2296 2024

  49. [49]

    K., Gourgouliatos K

    Lander S. K., Gourgouliatos K. N., Wadiasingh Z., Antonopoulou D., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ae31f5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ...997L...7L 997, L7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae31f5 2026

  50. [50]

    K., et al., 2021a, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-021-01302-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021NatAs...5..378L 5, 378

    Li C. K., et al., 2021a, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-021-01302-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021NatAs...5..378L 5, 378

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01302-6

  51. [51]

    Li D., et al., 2021b, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-021-03878-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Natur.598..267L 598, 267

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03878-5

  52. [52]

    Limaye P., Spitler L. G., Manaswini N., Ben \'a c ek J., Eppel F., Kadler M., Nicotera L., Wongphechauxsorn J., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2510.08367 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv251008367L p. arXiv:2510.08367

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.08367 2025

  53. [53]

    Lu W., Kumar P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/sly200 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483L..93L 483, L93

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly200 2019

  54. [54]

    Luo J.-W., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ade0b9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...988...62L 988, 62

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade0b9 2025

  55. [55]

    Lyubarsky Y., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slu046 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442L...9L 442, L9

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu046 2014

  56. [56]

    P., Ekers R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2083 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.4211M 480, 4211

    Macquart J. P., Ekers R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2083 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480.4211M 480, 4211

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2083 2018

  57. [57]

    Manaswini N., et al., 2026, arXiv e-prints

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    Marcote B., Kirsten F., Hessels J., Nimmo K., Paragi Z., Project P., 2022, in European VLBI Network Mini-Symposium and Users' Meeting 2021. p. 35 ( @eprint arXiv 2202.11644 ), @doi 10.22323/1.399.0035

    work page doi:10.22323/1.399.0035 2022

  59. [59]

    D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abac57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...899L..27M 899, L27

    Margalit B., Beniamini P., Sridhar N., Metzger B. D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abac57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...899L..27M 899, L27

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abac57 2020

  60. [60]

    P., Golentskii S

    Mazets E. P., Golentskii S. V., Ilinskii V. N., Aptekar R. L., Guryan I. A., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1038/282587a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979Natur.282..587M 282, 587

    work page doi:10.1038/282587a0 1979

  61. [61]

    Mckinven R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acc65f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...950...12M 950, 12

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc65f 2023

  62. [62]

    Mereghetti S., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aba2cf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898L..29M 898, L29

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aba2cf 2020

  63. [63]

    D., Margalit B., Sironi L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz700 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.4091M 485, 4091

    Metzger B. D., Margalit B., Sironi L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz700 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.4091M 485, 4091

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz700 2019

  64. [64]

    Michilli D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature25149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.553..182M 553, 182

    work page doi:10.1038/nature25149 2018

  65. [65]

    M., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ae28c7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ...996L..16M 996, L16

    Moroianu A. M., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ae28c7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ...996L..16M 996, L16

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae28c7 2026

  66. [66]

    Nimmo K., et al., 2021, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-021-01321-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021NatAs...5..594N 5, 594

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01321-3 2021

  67. [67]

    Nimmo K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad269 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.2281N 520, 2281

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad269 2023

  68. [68]

    S., et al., 2024, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ATel16432....1O 16432, 1

    Ould-Boukattine O. S., et al., 2024, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ATel16432....1O 16432, 1

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    S., et al., 2025, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ATel16967....1O 16967, 1

    Ould-Boukattine O. S., et al., 2025, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ATel16967....1O 16967, 1

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    S., et al., 2026a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf1937 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.545f1937O 545, staf1937

    Ould-Boukattine O. S., et al., 2026a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf1937 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.545f1937O 545, staf1937

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1937

  71. [71]

    S., et al., 2026b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stag090 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.546ag090O 546, stag090

    Ould-Boukattine O. S., et al., 2026b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stag090 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.546ag090O 546, stag090

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag090

  72. [72]

    M., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature03525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.434.1107P 434, 1107

    Palmer D. M., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature03525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005Natur.434.1107P 434, 1107

    work page doi:10.1038/nature03525 2005

  73. [73]

    Panda U., Roy J., Bhattacharyya S., Dudeja C., Kudale S., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adeb74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...989...15P 989, 15

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adeb74 2025

  74. [74]

    Pandhi A., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ae52f8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026ApJ..1000L..53P 1000, L53

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae52f8 2026

  75. [75]

    Pelliciari D., Geminardi A., Bernardi G., Pilia M., Esposito P., Naldi G., 2024, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ATel16434....1P 16434, 1

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    E., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CSE.....9c..21P 9, 21

    Perez F., Granger B. E., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science and Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CSE.....9c..21P 9, 21

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.53 2007

  77. [77]

    Petroff E., Hessels J. W. T., Lorimer D. R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-022-00139-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&ARv..30....2P 30, 2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00139-w 2022

  78. [78]

    Pleunis Z., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac33ac , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...923....1P 923, 1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac33ac 2021

  79. [79]

    Hyperflares of SGRs as an engine for millisecond extragalactic radio bursts

    Popov S. B., Postnov K. A., 2010, in Harutyunian H. A., Mickaelian A. M., Terzian Y., eds, Evolution of Cosmic Objects through their Physical Activity. pp 129--132 ( @eprint arXiv 0710.2006 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.0710.2006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0710.2006 2010

  80. [80]

    Ransom S., 2011, PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1107.017 ( @eprint ascl 1107.017 )

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.