pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19653 · v1 · pith:XW325VK4new · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Evidence for Intermediate-Mass Black Holes From Microlensing Signatures in CHIME/FRB catalog 2

Huan Zhou , Zhengxiang Li , Cheng-Gang Shao , Xi-Jing Wang , Kai Liao , He Gao , Zong-Hong Zhu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 04:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords fast radio burstsmicrolensingintermediate-mass black holesprimordial black holesdark mattergravitational lensingdynamic spectraCHIME/FRB catalog
0
0 comments X

The pith

Microlensing signatures in two fast radio bursts point to intermediate-mass black holes as the lenses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a search pipeline for microlensing patterns in the dynamic spectra of fast radio bursts and applies it to the CHIME/FRB Catalog 2. Two events show time-frequency signatures that match the expected distortion from a massive compact lens passing near the line of sight. The inferred masses fall in the intermediate range of roughly 500 to 2500 solar masses. If the lenses are isolated and of primordial origin, they would represent about four percent of the dark matter density. The result supplies a new observational route to the long-sought population of intermediate-mass black holes that sit between stellar remnants and the supermassive objects at galaxy centers.

Core claim

Two microlensing signatures have been identified in FRB 20190131D and FRB 20211115A. The lens masses derived from the characteristic time scales and frequency scalings of the dynamic spectra are approximately 539-609 solar masses and 1544-2571 solar masses. These are interpreted as evidence for intermediate-mass black holes. Under the assumption of no intervening galaxies or clusters, the objects could be isolated primordial black holes that make up roughly four percent of dark matter; if the signatures are not genuine lensing events, the abundance of intermediate-mass primordial black holes above 300 solar masses is limited to about 13 percent at 95 percent .

What carries the argument

A pipeline that identifies microlensing signatures in FRB dynamic spectra and infers lens mass from the time and frequency dependence of the observed distortion.

If this is right

  • If the two lenses are isolated and primordial, intermediate-mass black holes in these mass windows would account for roughly four percent of the dark matter.
  • If the signatures are not microlensing, the fraction of dark matter in primordial black holes heavier than 300 solar masses is bounded above by 13 percent at 95 percent .
  • Future FRB catalogs with richer spectral and temporal information can be searched with the same pipeline to increase the sample of candidate lenses.
  • A clearer separation between intrinsic burst variability and lensing requires improved models of how fast radio bursts are produced at the source.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Repeated application to larger FRB samples could yield a statistical census of intermediate-mass compact objects and their redshift distribution.
  • Confirmed events would provide new targets for testing strong-field gravity and for coordinated multi-messenger searches.
  • The same search technique might be adapted to other bright, short-duration transients to look for additional lensing events in the intermediate-mass regime.

Load-bearing premise

The dynamic-spectra features arise from gravitational microlensing by isolated intermediate-mass black holes rather than from the intrinsic emission processes of the bursts or from larger-scale structures along the lines of sight.

What would settle it

High-resolution, multi-frequency follow-up observations of the same two FRBs that fail to show the expected magnification and time-delay pattern predicted by a point-mass lens model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19653 by Cheng-Gang Shao, He Gao, Huan Zhou, Kai Liao, Xi-Jing Wang, Zhengxiang Li, Zong-Hong Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Two-dimensional distribution of inferred redshifts, width, and SNR for 3564 FRBs in CHIME/FRB catalog 2. For a detected FRB, the dispersion measure (DM) is a key observational property. Theoretically, DM is the integral of the electron density along the radio pulse’s path. Obser￾vationally, it is derived from the arrival time difference be￾tween two photons at different frequencies. The high DMs of the fir… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic diagram of the FRB being lensed considering PBH as point-mass lens. and a flux ratio Rf to the second image, yielding a lensed light curve Ilensed(t,∆t,Rf ) ∝ Rf Rf +1 Iint(t +∆t)+ 1 Rf +1 Iint(t). (3) Using this formula together with Eq. (2), the ACF of the lensed signal exhibits spikes at δt = −∆t, 0, +∆t with an amplitude ratio Rf/(R 2 f +1) : 1 : Rf/(R 2 f +1). To distinguish lensing-induced … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Upper Left: The dynamic spectrum of FRB 20181028A without the RFI. Upper Right: The blue line shows the autocorrelation of the light curve. The orange dashed line represents a Gaussian-smoothed version of the autocorrelation. The gray dash-dotted lines indicate the 3σ. The red dashed line marks a location with a strong autocorrelation exceeding the 3σ threshold, corresponding to a time delay of ∆t = 15.68 … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Similar to Upper panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The upper limit on the PBH fraction fPBH at the 95% confidence level as a function of PBH mass MPBH in the range [1, 105 ]M¯, derived from the current CHIME/FRB catalog 2 under the assumption of no lensing FRBs. The subplot presents an approximate constraint on the PBH parameters under the hypothesis that FRB20190131D and FRB 20211115A are lensed signals produced by PBHs. Other con￾straints are compiled fr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) are the missing link in the cosmic hierarchy of black holes, bridging the gap between stellar-mass black holes and supermassive ones. They also serve as unique laboratories for testing strong-field gravity and are prime targets for future multi-messenger observations. However, IMBHs are a population that has remained notoriously difficult to detect. The microlensing effect of fast radio bursts (FRBs) can serve as a clean and powerful method to probe IMBHs. In this work, we develop a pipeline to search for microlensed FRBs based on their dynamic spectra and apply it to the CHIME/FRB Catalog 2. Two microlensing signatures have been identified in two separate sources, i.e. FRB~20190131D and FRB~20211115A. The inferred lens masses for these two signatures are $\sim[539-609]~M_{\odot}$ and $\sim[1544-2571]~M_{\odot}$, respectively. Here we interpret them as evidence for IMBHs. If there are no intervening structures-such as galaxies or clusters-along the line of sights for these two sources, the two identified IMBHs might be isolated and of primordial origins. In that case, we obtain primordial black holes (PBHs) within these two mass ranges would constitute $\sim4\%$ of dark matter. Moreover, if these two candidates are not genuine lensing signatures, the abundance of intermediate-mass PBHs with masses $>300,M_{\odot}$ is constrained to be $\sim13\%$ at $95\%$ confidence level. Therefore, more comprehensive observational information for FRBs, together with a deeper understanding of whether the intrinsic emission mechanisms of FRBs can produce lensing-like signals, will be crucial for establishing this effect as a powerful tool for probing (primordial) IMBHs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a pipeline to identify microlensing signatures in the dynamic spectra of FRBs from CHIME/FRB Catalog 2. It reports two candidate events in FRB 20190131D and FRB 20211115A, with inferred point-mass lens masses in the ranges ~[539-609] M⊙ and ~[1544-2571] M⊙. These are interpreted as evidence for isolated primordial IMBHs; under that assumption the events imply that PBHs in these mass windows constitute ~4% of dark matter, while if the signatures are not lensing events the abundance of intermediate-mass PBHs above 300 M⊙ is constrained to ≲13% at 95% CL.

Significance. A robust detection of FRB microlensing by isolated IMBHs would constitute a novel and clean probe of the missing IMBH population and of primordial black hole dark matter. The work correctly identifies the scientific value of frequency-dependent time delays and magnification patterns in FRB dynamic spectra and supplies concrete mass ranges and abundance limits that can be tested with future data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Pipeline and model-fitting section] Pipeline and model-fitting section: the dynamic spectra of FRB 20190131D and FRB 20211115A are fitted to a point-mass microlensing model to obtain the quoted mass intervals, yet no quantitative model-selection statistics (likelihood-ratio tests, AIC/BIC, or posterior odds) are presented against plausible alternatives such as intrinsic FRB emission structure, diffractive scintillation, or plasma lensing. Because the central claim that the features constitute microlensing by isolated IMBHs rests on the uniqueness of this interpretation, the absence of such comparisons is load-bearing.
  2. [Interpretation and line-of-sight discussion] Interpretation and line-of-sight discussion: the ~4% dark-matter fraction and the 95% CL upper limit both assume the lenses are isolated and primordial with no intervening galaxies or clusters. The manuscript does not report explicit checks (e.g., cross-matching with galaxy catalogs, host-galaxy redshift constraints, or impact-parameter limits) for the two specific sight-lines; without these the isolated-IMBH interpretation and the derived abundance statements cannot be secured.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] The mass ranges are quoted with asymmetric or approximate brackets; explicit 1σ or 68% credible intervals and the precise likelihood function used should be stated for reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and text should clarify whether the dynamic spectra shown are the observed data, the best-fit microlensing model, or residuals.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Pipeline and model-fitting section: the dynamic spectra of FRB 20190131D and FRB 20211115A are fitted to a point-mass microlensing model to obtain the quoted mass intervals, yet no quantitative model-selection statistics (likelihood-ratio tests, AIC/BIC, or posterior odds) are presented against plausible alternatives such as intrinsic FRB emission structure, diffractive scintillation, or plasma lensing. Because the central claim that the features constitute microlensing by isolated IMBHs rests on the uniqueness of this interpretation, the absence of such comparisons is load-bearing.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative model selection statistics would provide stronger support for the microlensing interpretation over alternatives. Although the manuscript discusses possible alternative explanations qualitatively, we will enhance the revised version by including AIC and BIC values for the point-mass microlensing model compared to models of intrinsic FRB emission structure and plasma lensing. We will also address diffractive scintillation in more detail. These additions will help quantify the preference for the microlensing scenario. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Interpretation and line-of-sight discussion: the ~4% dark-matter fraction and the 95% CL upper limit both assume the lenses are isolated and primordial with no intervening galaxies or clusters. The manuscript does not report explicit checks (e.g., cross-matching with galaxy catalogs, host-galaxy redshift constraints, or impact-parameter limits) for the two specific sight-lines; without these the isolated-IMBH interpretation and the derived abundance statements cannot be secured.

    Authors: The manuscript explicitly conditions the primordial isolated IMBH interpretation on the absence of intervening structures along the lines of sight. To address the referee's concern, in the revised manuscript we will report the results of cross-matching the positions of FRB 20190131D and FRB 20211115A with galaxy catalogs to check for potential intervening galaxies or clusters. We will also incorporate any available constraints on host-galaxy redshifts and discuss impact-parameter limits consistent with the microlensing geometry. This will either reinforce the isolated-lens assumption or lead to a more nuanced interpretation of the events. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: mass inferences and abundance limits derive from fits to external catalog data

full rationale

The derivation begins with a pipeline applied to the independent CHIME/FRB Catalog 2, identifies candidate signatures in two specific FRBs, and obtains lens masses by fitting a microlensing model to the observed dynamic spectra. The ~4% DM fraction and >300 M⊙ abundance upper limit then follow conditionally from interpreting those fitted masses as isolated primordial IMBHs. None of these steps reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs, fitted parameters, or self-citations; the chain remains anchored to external observations and is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on model fitting to extract masses and on domain assumptions that the signals are lensing events produced by isolated objects; one new entity (primordial IMBHs) is introduced to interpret the result but lacks independent falsifiable handles beyond the current dataset.

free parameters (1)
  • Inferred lens masses
    Ranges 539-609 M⊙ and 1544-2571 M⊙ obtained by fitting microlensing models to the dynamic spectra of the two FRBs.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The detected signatures in the dynamic spectra are produced by gravitational microlensing rather than intrinsic FRB emission variability.
    Invoked when interpreting the two events as lensing and deriving the mass ranges.
  • domain assumption No galaxies, clusters, or other intervening structures lie along the lines of sight to FRB 20190131D and FRB 20211115A.
    Required to conclude the lenses are isolated and possibly primordial.
invented entities (1)
  • Isolated primordial intermediate-mass black holes no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for the observed lens masses as a dark-matter component.
    Introduced in the interpretation section once isolation is assumed; no separate falsifiable prediction is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5909 in / 1767 out tokens · 49237 ms · 2026-05-20T04:22:07.514795+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [12]

    Cosmological Parameter Estimate from Persistent Radio Sources of Fast Radio Bursts

    Zhang, Zi-Liang and Zhang, Bing. Cosmological Parameter Estimate from Persistent Radio Sources of Fast Radio Bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2025. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adcc30. arXiv:2504.13132

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adcc30 2025

  2. [13]

    Dispersion Measure Distribution of Unlocalized Fast Radio Bursts as a Probe of the Hubble Constant

    Liu, Yang and Wei, Jun-Jie and Wu, Puxun and Wu, Xue-Feng. Dispersion Measure Distribution of Unlocalized Fast Radio Bursts as a Probe of the Hubble Constant. 2026. arXiv:2604.03769

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [16]

    Bounding the photon mass with gravitationally lensed fast radio bursts

    Chang, Chen-Ming and Wei, Jun-Jie and Meng, Ke-Lai and Zhang, Song-Bo and Gao, Hao-Xuan and Geng, Jin-Jun and Wu, Xue-Feng. Bounding the photon mass with gravitationally lensed fast radio bursts. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L041304. arXiv:2412.09806

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.l041304 2025

  4. [18]

    and Spitler, L

    Wucknitz, O. and Spitler, L. G. and Pen, U. -L. Cosmology with gravitationally lensed repeating Fast Radio Bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 2021. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038248. arXiv:2004.11643

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038248 2021

  5. [19]

    Combining strongly lensed and unlensed fast radio bursts: To be a more precise late-universe probe

    Zhang, Ji-Guo and Jiang, Yi-Fan and Zhao, Ze-Wei and Qi, Jing-Zhao and Zhang, Jing-Fei and Zhang, Xin. Combining strongly lensed and unlensed fast radio bursts: To be a more precise late-universe probe. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2025. doi:10.1007/s11433-024-2647-2. arXiv:2411.03126

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-024-2647-2 2025

  6. [21]

    Primordial Black Holes - Perspectives in Gravitational Wave Astronomy -

    Sasaki, Misao and Suyama, Teruaki and Tanaka, Takahiro and Yokoyama, Shuichiro. Primordial black holes perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy. Class. Quant. Grav. 2018. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aaa7b4. arXiv:1801.05235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aaa7b4 2018

  7. [31]

    Abac, A. G. and others. Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5 4.5 M _ ⊙ Compact Object and a Neutron Star. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2024. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5beb. arXiv:2404.04248

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5beb 2024

  8. [33]

    Search For a Counterpart to the Subsolar Mass Gravitational Wave Candidate S251112cm

    Vieira, Nicholas and others. Search For a Counterpart to the Subsolar Mass Gravitational Wave Candidate S251112cm. 2026. arXiv:2603.17009

    work page arXiv 2026

  9. [34]

    L., Finkelstein, S

    Larson, Rebecca L. and others. A CEERS Discovery of an Accreting Supermassive Black Hole 570 Myr after the Big Bang: Identifying a Progenitor of Massive z > 6 Quasars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace619. arXiv:2303.08918

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace619 2023

  10. [36]

    D., Greene, J

    Goulding, Andy D. and others. UNCOVER: The Growth of the First Massive Black Holes from JWST/NIRSpec Spectroscopic Redshift Confirmation of an X-Ray Luminous AGN at z = 10.1. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf7c5. arXiv:2308.02750

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf7c5 2023

  11. [37]

    A small and vigorous black hole in the early Universe

    Maiolino, Roberto and others. A small and vigorous black hole in the early Universe. Nature. 2024. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07494-x. arXiv:2305.12492

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07494-x 2024

  12. [40]

    and others

    Kovacs, Orsolya E. and others. A Candidate Supermassive Black Hole in a Gravitationally Lensed Galaxy at Z 10. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2024. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad391f. arXiv:2403.14745

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad391f 2024

  13. [45]

    Accelerating Early Massive Galaxy Formation with Primordial Black Holes

    Liu, Boyuan and Bromm, Volker. Accelerating Early Massive Galaxy Formation with Primordial Black Holes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac927f. arXiv:2208.13178

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac927f 2022

  14. [46]

    High-redshift JWST massive galaxies and the initial clustering of supermassive primordial black holes

    Huang, Hai-Long and Jiang, Jun-Qian and Piao, Yun-Song. High-redshift JWST massive galaxies and the initial clustering of supermassive primordial black holes. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103540. arXiv:2407.15781

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.103540 2024

  15. [47]

    Did JWST observe imprints of axion miniclusters or primordial black holes?

    H. Did JWST observe imprints of axion miniclusters or primordial black holes?. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.043502. arXiv:2211.02651

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.043502 2023

  16. [48]

    Can primordial black holes explain the overabundance of bright super-early galaxies?

    Matteri, Antonio and Pallottini, Andrea and Ferrara, Andrea. Can primordial black holes explain the overabundance of bright super-early galaxies?. Astron. Astrophys. 2025. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553701. arXiv:2503.01968

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553701 2025

  17. [49]

    Scrutinizing the primordial black hole interpretation of PTA gravitational waves and JWST early galaxies

    Gouttenoire, Yann and Trifinopoulos, Sokratis and Valogiannis, Georgios and Vanvlasselaer, Miguel. Scrutinizing the primordial black hole interpretation of PTA gravitational waves and JWST early galaxies. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123002. arXiv:2307.01457

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.123002 2024

  18. [52]

    Limits on the cosmological abundance of supermassive compact objects from a millilensing search in gamma-ray burst data

    Nemiroff, Robert J. and Marani, Gabriela F. and Norris, Jay P. and Bonnell, Jerry T. Limits on the cosmological abundance of supermassive compact objects from a millilensing search in gamma-ray burst data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.580. arXiv:astro-ph/0101488

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.580 2001

  19. [69]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Aghanim, N. and others. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. arXiv:1807.06209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2018

  20. [70]

    Lens Mass Estimation for Doubly Imaged FRBs

    Chen, Xuechun and Shu, Yiping and Zheng, Wenwen and Li, Guoliang. FRBs Lensed by Point Masses I. Lens Mass Estimation for Doubly Imaged FRBs. 2021. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf119. arXiv:2105.05868

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf119 2021

  21. [71]

    FRBs Lensed by Point Masses

    Chen, Xuechun and Shu, Yiping and Li, Guoliang and Zheng, Wenwen. FRBs Lensed by Point Masses. II. The Multipeaked FRBs from the Point View of Microlensing. Astrophys. J. 2021. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2c76. arXiv:2110.07643

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2c76 2021

  22. [72]

    Gravitational lensing of fast radio bursts: Prospects for probing microlens populations in lensing galaxies

    Meena, Ashish Kumar and Saha, Prasenjit. Gravitational lensing of fast radio bursts: Prospects for probing microlens populations in lensing galaxies. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/vxts-hbz7. arXiv:2507.20305

    work page doi:10.1103/vxts-hbz7 2025

  23. [73]

    A possible wave-optical effect in lensed FRBs

    Sathyanathan, Goureesankar and Leung, Calvin and Wucknitz, Olaf and Saha, Prasenjit. A possible wave-optical effect in lensed FRBs. 2025. arXiv:2504.10523

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [98]

    G., et al

    Abac, A. G., et al. 2025 a , Astrophys. J. Lett., 993, L25, 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c9c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c9c 2025

  25. [99]

    ---. 2025 b . 2512.16347

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [100]

    2020 b , , 125, 101102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102

    Abbott, R., et al. 2020, Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 101102, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.101102 2020

  27. [101]

    2026, Astrophys

    Abbott, T., et al. 2026, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 283, 34, 10.3847/1538-4365/ae3828

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3828 2026

  28. [102]

    D., & Kamionkowski, M

    Ali-Ha \" moud, Y., Kovetz, E. D., & Kamionkowski, M. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 96, 123523, 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.123523

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.123523 2017

  29. [103]

    , keywords =

    Amiri, M., et al. 2021, Astrophys. J. Supp., 257, 59, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac33ab

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac33ab 2021

  30. [104]

    , keywords =

    Andersen, B. C., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 54, 10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2863-y 2020

  31. [105]

    , keywords =

    ---. 2023, Astrophys. J., 947, 83, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc6c1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc6c1 2023

  32. [106]

    Arca Sedda, M., Kamlah, A. W. H., Spurzem, R., et al. 2023, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 526, 429, 10.1093/mnras/stad2292

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2292 2023

  33. [107]

    D., Ravi, V., Belov, K

    Bochenek, C. D., Ravi, V., Belov, K. V., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 59, 10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x 2020

  34. [108]

    2024, Nature Astron., 8, 126, 10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9

    Bogdan, A., et al. 2024, Nature Astron., 8, 126, 10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9 2024

  35. [109]

    Constraints on primordial black holes , volume =

    Carr, B., Kohri, K., Sendouda, Y., & Yokoyama, J. 2021, Rept. Prog. Phys., 84, 116902, 10.1088/1361-6633/ac1e31

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac1e31 2021

  36. [110]

    2022, SciPost Phys

    Carr, B., & Kuhnel, F. 2022, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, 48, 1, 10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.48

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.48 2022

  37. [111]

    Carr, B. J. 1975, Astrophys. J., 201, 1, 10.1086/153853

    work page doi:10.1086/153853 1975

  38. [112]

    J., & Hawking, S

    Carr, B. J., & Hawking, S. W. 1974, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 168, 399, 10.1093/mnras/168.2.399

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/168.2.399 1974

  39. [113]

    2025, , 537, L61, 10.1093/mnrasl/slae116

    Chang , C., Zhang , S., Xiao , D., et al. 2025, , 537, L61, 10.1093/mnrasl/slae116

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slae116 2025

  40. [114]

    2017, Nature, 541, 58, 10.1038/nature20797

    Chatterjee, S., et al. 2017, Nature, 541, 58, 10.1038/nature20797

    work page doi:10.1038/nature20797 2017

  41. [115]

    2018, Astrophys

    Chen, Z.-C., & Huang, Q.-G. 2018, Astrophys. J., 864, 61, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad6e2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad6e2 2018

  42. [116]

    2023, Mon

    Connor, L., & Ravi, V. 2023, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 521, 4024, 10.1093/mnras/stad667

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad667 2023

  43. [117]

    M., & Chatterjee, S

    Cordes, J. M., & Chatterjee, S. 2019, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 57, 417, 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104501

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104501 2019

  44. [118]

    M., Wasserman, I., Hessels, J

    Cordes, J. M., Wasserman, I., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2017, Astrophys. J., 842, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa74da

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa74da 2017

  45. [119]

    Dayal, P., & maiolino, R. 2025. 2506.08116

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [120]

    De Luca, V., Del Grosso, L., Franciolini, G., et al. 2025 a . 2512.19666

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [121]

    De Luca, V., Franciolini, G., & Riotto, A. 2025 b . 2508.09965

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [122]

    2014, Astrophys

    Deng, W., & Zhang, B. 2014, Astrophys. J. Lett., 783, L35, 10.1088/2041-8205/783/2/L35

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/783/2/l35 2014

  49. [123]

    M., & Kavanagh, B

    Green, A. M., & Kavanagh, B. J. 2021, J. Phys. G, 48, 043001, 10.1088/1361-6471/abc534

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abc534 2021

  50. [124]

    2024, , 631, 285, 10.1038/s41586-024-07511-z

    H \"a berle , M., Neumayer , N., Seth , A., et al. 2024, , 631, 285, 10.1038/s41586-024-07511-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07511-z 2024

  51. [125]

    1971, Mon

    Hawking, S. 1971, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 152, 75, 10.1093/mnras/152.1.75

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/152.1.75 1971

  52. [126]

    D., & Kamionkowski, M

    Ji, L., Kovetz, E. D., & Kamionkowski, M. 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 98, 123523, 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.123523

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.123523 2018

  53. [127]

    Jung, S., & Shin, C. S. 2019, Phys. Rev. Lett., 122, 041103, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.041103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.041103 2019

  54. [128]

    Juodžbalis, I., et al. 2025. 2508.21748

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [129]

    2022, Phys

    Kader, Z., et al. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 106, 043016, 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.043016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.043016 2022

  56. [130]

    Krochek, K., & Kovetz, E. D. 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 105, 103528, 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103528

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.103528 2022

  57. [131]

    2020, Phys

    Laha, R. 2020, Phys. Rev. D, 102, 023016, 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.023016 2020

  58. [132]

    2020, Mon

    Li, Z., Gao, H., Wei, J.-J., et al. 2020, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 496, L28, 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa070

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa070 2020

  59. [133]

    2018, Nature Commun., 9, 3833, 10.1038/s41467-018-06303-0

    Li, Z.-X., Gao, H., Ding, X.-H., Wang, G.-J., & Zhang, B. 2018, Nature Commun., 9, 3833, 10.1038/s41467-018-06303-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06303-0 2018

  60. [134]

    B., Li, Z., & Gao, H

    Liao, K., Zhang, S. B., Li, Z., & Gao, H. 2020, Astrophys. J., 896, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab963e

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab963e 2020

  61. [135]

    2018, Nature Astron., 2, 656, 10.1038/s41550-018-0493-1

    Lin, D., et al. 2018, Nature Astron., 2, 656, 10.1038/s41550-018-0493-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0493-1 2018

  62. [136]

    2020, Nature, 587, 63, 10.1038/s41586-020-2839-y

    Lin, L., et al. 2020, Nature, 587, 63, 10.1038/s41586-020-2839-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2839-y 2020

  63. [137]

    2022, Astrophys

    Lin, S.-J., et al. 2022, Astrophys. J., 931, 4, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6505

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6505 2022

  64. [138]

    2023, Astrophys

    Liu, Y., Yu, H., & Wu, P. 2023, Astrophys. J. Lett., 946, L49, 10.3847/2041-8213/acc650

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc650 2023

  65. [139]

    R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M

    Lorimer, D. R., Bailes, M., McLaughlin, M. A., Narkevic, D. J., & Crawford, F. 2007, Science, 318, 777, 10.1126/science.1147532

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1147532 2007

  66. [140]

    2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, Astron. Astrophys., 691, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347640 2024

  67. [141]

    ---. 2025. 2505.22567

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  68. [142]

    2017, Astrophys

    Marcote, B., et al. 2017, Astrophys. J. Lett., 834, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/834/2/L8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/834/2/l8 2017

  69. [143]

    2024, Nature, 632, 749, 10.1038/s41586-024-07704-6

    Mr \'o z, P., et al. 2024, Nature, 632, 749, 10.1038/s41586-024-07704-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07704-6 2024

  70. [144]

    B., Kovetz, E

    Mu \ n oz, J. B., Kovetz, E. D., Dai, L., & Kamionkowski, M. 2016, Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 091301, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.091301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.091301 2016

  71. [145]

    2024, ApJL, 960, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e76

    Natarajan, P., Pacucci, F., Ricarte, A., et al. 2024, Astrophys. J. Lett., 960, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e76

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e76 2024

  72. [146]

    and Sumi, Takahiro and More, Surhud and Kurita, Toshiki and Sugiyama, Sunao and More, Anupreeta and Oguri, Masamune and Chiba, Masashi , year=

    Niikura, H., et al. 2019, Nature Astron., 3, 524, 10.1038/s41550-019-0723-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0723-1 2019

  73. [147]

    2023, Phys

    Oguri, M., Takhistov, V., & Kohri, K. 2023, Phys. Lett. B, 847, 138276, 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138276

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138276 2023

  74. [148]

    1987, , 317, L51, 10.1086/184911

    Paczynski , B. 1987, , 317, L51, 10.1086/184911

    work page doi:10.1086/184911 1987

  75. [149]

    A., Mestichelli, B., & Ugolini, C

    Paiella, L., Sedda, M. A., Mestichelli, B., & Ugolini, C. 2026, Astron. Astrophys., 708, A200, 10.1051/0004-6361/202557230

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557230 2026

  76. [150]

    2021, Nature Astron., 5, 560, 10.1038/s41550-021-01307-1

    Paynter, J., Webster, R., & Thrane, E. 2021, Nature Astron., 5, 560, 10.1038/s41550-021-01307-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01307-1 2021

  77. [151]

    2022, , 924, 48, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac339f

    Pechetti , R., Seth , A., Kamann , S., et al. 2022, , 924, 48, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac339f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac339f 2022

  78. [152]

    Petroff, E., Hessels, J. W. T., & Lorimer, D. R. 2019, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 27, 4, 10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-019-0116-6 2019

  79. [153]

    F., Baumgardt, H., Hut, P., Makino, J., & McMillan, S

    Portegies Zwart, S. F., Baumgardt, H., Hut, P., Makino, J., & McMillan, S. L. W. 2004, Nature, 428, 724, 10.1038/nature02448

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02448 2004

  80. [154]

    P., Naab, T., Rantala, A., et al

    Rizzuto, F. P., Naab, T., Rantala, A., et al. 2023, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 521, 2930, 10.1093/mnras/stad734

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad734 2023

Showing first 80 references.