The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2606.06209 · v1 · pith:RJHPR23R · submitted 2026-06-04 · gr-qc

The first decade of gravitational-wave measurements of black hole spins

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-06-28 00:16 UTCgrok-4.3pith:RJHPR23Rrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesblack hole spinsbinary black holesformation channelspopulation constraintseffective spinastrophysical implications
0
0 comments X

The pith

The catalog of over one hundred gravitational-wave events is yielding population-level constraints on stellar-mass black hole spins.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review compiles predictions for black hole spin magnitudes and orientations from four main formation channels and compares them to what the first decade of detections has measured. It explains how spin imprints appear in the waveforms and what population statistics on effective spins and their mass-redshift correlations have emerged so far. A reader would care because these statistics test which channels dominate binary black hole formation. The paper closes with prospects for tighter constraints once detector sensitivity improves.

Core claim

The growing catalog of over one hundred confirmed gravitational-wave events is revealing new insights into the spins of stellar-mass black holes, including population-level constraints on spin magnitudes, orientations, effective spin parameters, and correlations with mass and redshift.

What carries the argument

Effective spin parameters that encode the combined effect of component spins on the gravitational waveform, enabling population inferences across the catalog.

If this is right

  • Tighter bounds on spin magnitudes and orientations will emerge as the catalog grows beyond one hundred events.
  • Correlations between spin and mass or redshift will become measurable and usable to rank formation channels.
  • Improved detector sensitivity will yield more precise spin measurements for both individual loud events and the overall population.
  • Open questions about spin distributions can be addressed directly with next-generation data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same catalog may eventually allow cross-checks between spin-based channel inferences and electromagnetic signatures of black hole environments.
  • If multiple channels contribute, future data could quantify their relative rates rather than identify a single dominant channel.
  • Orientation measurements could test whether spin alignment persists across different redshift ranges.

Load-bearing premise

The leading formation channels produce sufficiently distinct spin signatures to be distinguishable in current and future data.

What would settle it

A large sample of events whose spin distribution matches none of the four channel predictions would undermine the claimed distinguishability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06209 by Sylvia Biscoveanu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic summarizing the formation of binary black holes via several leading formation channels: isolated binary evolution including either stable mass transfer or a common envelope phase, chemically homogeneous evolution, dynamical formation in clusters, formation in the disks of active galactic nuclei (AGN), and hierarchical triples. Adapted from Ref. [14] using AI. very massive, low-metallicity progeni… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) spin magnitudes and (b) tilts ordered by the maximum posterior value of the primary for all the events with FAR < 1/yr from GWTC-4, and the five exceptional events from later in O4. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: χeff ordered by the maximum posterior value for all the events with FAR < 1/yr from GWTC-4, and the five exceptional events from later in O4. 0 ◦ 30 ◦ 60 ◦ 90 ◦ 120 ◦ 150 ◦ 180◦ 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 ◦ 30 ◦ 60 ◦ 90 ◦ 120 ◦ 150 ◦ 180◦ GW190412 cS1/(Gm2 1) cS2/(Gm2 2) magnitude tilt (a) 0 ◦ 30 ◦ 60 ◦ 90 ◦ 120 ◦ 150 ◦ 180◦ 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 ◦ 30 ◦ 60 ◦ 90 ◦ 120 ◦ 150 ◦ 180◦ GW190521 cS1/(Gm2 1) cS2/(Gm2 2… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spin disk plots for exceptional GW events with notable spin measurements: (a) GW190412, (b) GW190521, (c) GW231123, (d) GW241011, and (e) GW241110. The left (right) hemisphere of each panel shows the inferred spin of the primary (secondary) object. The radial direction indicates the spin magnitude and the angular direction the tilt angle with respect to the orbital angular momentum. Regions of higher poste… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Inferred spin magnitude distribution for GWTC-4 [4,237] using a strongly-modeled truncated Gaussian distribution (green) and a weakly-modeled B-spline (blue), Middle: cos θ distribu￾tion inferred using a phenomenological mixture model between isotropic and truncated Gaussian subpopulations (green) and B-splines (blue), Right: χeff distribution inferred using skew normal (red) and truncated Gaussian (… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A decade after the first direct detection of gravitational waves, the growing catalog of over one hundred confirmed events is revealing new insights into the spins of stellar-mass black holes. Spin measurements have long been heralded as a promising tracer of compact-object binary formation and evolution, as different formation channels predict unique spin signatures on a population level. In this review, we summarize the astrophysics, phenomenology, and current measurements of black hole spins. We begin with an overview of the predictions for black hole spin magnitudes and orientations from leading formation channels--isolated binary evolution, dynamical formation in clusters, formation in AGN disks, and hierarchical triples. We then describe the imprint of spin effects on the gravitational waveform and the measurability of spin in individual events. Finally, we review current population-level constraints on spin magnitudes, orientations, and effective spin parameters, including correlations with mass and redshift, and discuss their astrophysical implications. We conclude by highlighting open questions and future prospects, emphasizing how improved detector sensitivity will enable increasingly precise spin measurements for both individual events and the binary black hole population as a whole.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article summarizing the first decade of gravitational-wave observations of stellar-mass black hole spins. It covers predictions for spin magnitudes and orientations from leading formation channels (isolated binary evolution, dynamical formation in clusters, AGN disks, and hierarchical triples), the imprint of spin on gravitational waveforms and individual-event measurability, population-level constraints on spin magnitudes, orientations, effective spin parameters, and correlations with mass and redshift, plus astrophysical implications, open questions, and future prospects with improved detector sensitivity.

Significance. If the cited literature is accurately and comprehensively summarized, the review would serve as a useful consolidation of how black-hole spins act as tracers of binary formation and evolution. It explicitly notes the growth of the catalog beyond 100 events and the potential for future detectors to tighten both individual and population constraints, providing a clear roadmap for the field.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'unique spin signatures on a population level' could be qualified to note that current data show partial overlaps between channels; a brief parenthetical on the degree of distinguishability would improve precision.
  2. The review structure outlined (predictions, waveform phenomenology, population constraints, future prospects) is logical, but the manuscript should ensure that the section on measurability explicitly references the latest waveform models (e.g., IMRPhenomX or SEOBNR variants) used in recent LVK analyses.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately reflects the scope and content of the review, and we are pleased that it is viewed as a useful consolidation of the field.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review article with no internal derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

This is a review paper that summarizes astrophysics, waveform phenomenology, and population constraints drawn entirely from external literature on gravitational-wave events and black-hole formation channels. No original equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations are introduced within the manuscript itself. All claims rest on citations to prior independent work rather than any self-contained chain that could reduce to its own inputs by construction. As such the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper drawing exclusively from existing literature; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5709 in / 1134 out tokens · 18845 ms · 2026-06-28T00:16:39.024705+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Distinct spin properties and astrophysical origin of low mass binary black holes in gravitational wave data

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of GWTC-5.0 data identifies a mass transition at 15.2 solar masses separating distinct effective-spin distributions, pointing to different formation channels for low-mass binary black holes.

  2. Joint population and strong-lensing inference for resolved gravitational-wave events probes the black-hole merger rate beyond the peak of star formation

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Joint strong-lensing and population inference on resolved gravitational-wave events finds no lensed events and tightens constraints on the black-hole merger rate peak redshift and high-redshift tail.

  3. Modern tidal interaction models for rapid binary population synthesis: II. Binary black hole formation, mergers, and spins

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Simulations with a new tidal model in COMPAS predict that merging binary black holes from isolated evolution are strongly biased to low effective spins, with one third below 0.05 and only 3% above 0.5, but the high-sp...

  4. When the black holes align: a subpopulation of aligned massive binary black holes observed via gravitational waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Non-parametric analysis of GWTC-5.0 data supports multiple subpopulations of binary black holes distinguished by effective spin, with one aligned subpopulation suggesting dynamical formation.

  5. Evidence for additional structure in the effective spin distribution hints at multiple formation pathways in GWTC-5.0

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    GWTC-5.0 analysis finds evidence for structure beyond a non-skewed Gaussian bulk in χ_eff, with suggestive mass-dependent excess of positive over negative spins outside the bulk at 13:1 odds in one mass bin.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 294 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 135 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    GWTC-4.0: Methods for Identifying and Characterizing Gravitational-wave Transients

    Abac, A.G.; et al. GWTC-4.0: Methods for Identifying and Characterizing Gravitational-wave Transients2025. [arXiv:gr- qc/2508.18081]

  2. [2]

    GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation

    Abac, A.G.; et al. GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation2025. [arXiv:astro-ph.CO/2509.04348]

  3. [3]

    GWTC-4.0: An Introduction to Version 4.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    Abac, A.G.; et al. GWTC-4.0: An Introduction to Version 4.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog.Astrophys. J. Lett.2025, 995, L18, [arXiv:gr-qc/2508.18080]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c06

  4. [4]

    GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

    Abac, A.G.; et al. GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries2025. [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2508.18083]

  5. [5]

    GWTC-4.0: Searches for Gravitational-Wave Lensing Signatures2025

    Abac, A.G.; et al. GWTC-4.0: Searches for Gravitational-Wave Lensing Signatures2025. [arXiv:gr-qc/2512.16347]

  6. [6]

    GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and General Tests

    Abac, A.G.; et al. GWTC-4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and General Tests2026. [arXiv:gr-qc/2603.19019]

  7. [7]

    GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run

    Abac, A.G.; et al. GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run2025. [arXiv:gr-qc/2508.18082]

  8. [8]

    GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors

    Abac, A.G.; et al. GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors2026. [arXiv:gr- qc/2605.11703]. https://doi.org/10.1103/gzrj-mwv3

  9. [9]

    GWTC-5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    Abac, A.G.; et al. GWTC-5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog2026. [arXiv:gr- qc/2605.27223]

  10. [10]

    GWTC-5.0: Methods for Identifying and Characterizing Gravitational-wave Transients

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and The Virgo Collaboration and The KAGRA Collaboration. GWTC-5.0: Methods for Identifying and Characterizing Gravitational-wave Transients2026. [arXiv:gr-qc/2605.27224]

  11. [11]

    GWTC-5.0: Observations from the Second Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run and Updates to the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and The Virgo Collaboration and The KAGRA Collaboration. GWTC-5.0: Observations from the Second Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run and Updates to the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog2026. [arXiv:gr-qc/2605.27225]

  12. [12]

    GWTC-5.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and The Virgo Collaboration and The KAGRA Collaboration. GWTC-5.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries2026. [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2605.27226]

  13. [13]

    GWTC-5.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and The Virgo Collaboration and The KAGRA Collaboration. GWTC-5.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation2026. [arXiv:astro-ph.CO/2605.27227]

  14. [14]

    2022, Physics Reports, 955, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.01.003

    Mandel, I.; Farmer, A. Merging stellar-mass binary black holes.Phys. Rept.2022,955, 1–24, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1806.05820]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2022.01.003

  15. [15]

    Formation Channels of Single and Binary Stellar-Mass Black Holes

    Mapelli, M. Formation Channels of Single and Binary Stellar-Mass Black Holes. InHandbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy; Springer, Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_16-1

  16. [16]

    The binary pulsar: physical processes, possible companions, and evolutionary histories.Astrophys

    Smarr, L.L.; Blandford, R. The binary pulsar: physical processes, possible companions, and evolutionary histories.Astrophys. J. 1976,207, 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1086/154524

  17. [17]

    The Evolution of Compact Binary Star Systems

    Postnov, K.A.; Yungelson, L.R. The Evolution of Compact Binary Star Systems.Living Rev. Rel.2014,17, 3, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1403.4754]. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2014-3. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 Galaxies2026,1, 0 16 of 29

  18. [18]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society260, 675–678 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/260.3.675

    Tutukov, A.V .; YungelSon, L.R. The merger rate of neutron star and black hole binaries.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.1993, 260, 675–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/260.3.675

  19. [19]

    Formation of Double Compact Objects

    Kalogera, V .; Belczynski, K.; Kim, C.; O’Shaughnessy, R.W.; Willems, B. Formation of Double Compact Objects.Phys. Rept.2007, 442, 75–108, [astro-ph/0612144]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.008

  20. [20]

    Common Envelope Evolution: Where we stand and how we can move forward

    Ivanova, N.; et al. Common Envelope Evolution: Where we stand and how we can move forward.Astron. Astrophys. Rev.2013, 21, 59, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1209.4302]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2

  21. [21]

    The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two 40-100 Msun stars

    Belczynski, K.; Holz, D.E.; Bulik, T.; O’Shaughnessy, R. The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two 40-100 Msun stars.Nature2016,534, 512, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1602.04531]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18322

  22. [22]

    Formation pathway of Population III coalescing binary black holes through stable mass transfer

    Inayoshi, K.; Hirai, R.; Kinugawa, T.; Hotokezaka, K. Formation pathway of Population III coalescing binary black holes through stable mass transfer.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.2017,468, 5020–5032, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1701.04823]. https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx757

  23. [23]

    Stability of mass transfer from massive giants: double black-hole binary formation and ultra-luminous X-ray sources

    Pavlovskii, K.; Ivanova, N.; Belczynski, K.; Van, K.X. Stability of mass transfer from massive giants: double black hole binary formation and ultraluminous X-ray sources.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.2017,465, 2092–2100, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1606.04921]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2786

  24. [24]

    Forming short-period Wolf-Rayet X-ray binaries and double black holes through stable mass transfer

    van den Heuvel, E.P .J.; Portegies Zwart, S.F.; de Mink, S.E. Forming short-period Wolf–Rayet X-ray binaries and double black holes through stable mass transfer.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.2017,471, 4256–4264, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1701.02355]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1430

  25. [25]

    J., Vigna-G \'o mez , A., Stevenson, S., et al

    Neijssel, C.J.; Vigna-Gómez, A.; Stevenson, S.; Barrett, J.W.; Gaebel, S.M.; Broekgaarden, F.; de Mink, S.E.; Szécsi, D.; Vinciguerra, S.; Mandel, I. The effect of the metallicity-specific star formation history on double compact object mergers.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.2019,490, 3740–3759, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1906.08136]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2840

  26. [27]

    The chemically homogeneous evolutionary channel for binary black hole mergers: rates and properties of gravitational-wave events detectable by advanced LIGO

    de Mink, S.E.; Mandel, I. The chemically homogeneous evolutionary channel for binary black hole mergers: rates and properties of gravitational-wave events detectable by advanced LIGO.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.2016,460, 3545–3553, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1603.02291]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1219

  27. [28]

    A new route towards merging massive black holes

    Marchant, P .; Langer, N.; Podsiadlowski, P .; Tauris, T.M.; Moriya, T.J. A new route towards merging massive black holes.Astron. Astrophys.2016,588, A50, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1601.03718]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628133

  28. [29]

    Black hole mergers in the universe

    Portegies Zwart, S.F.; McMillan, S. Black hole mergers in the universe.Astrophys. J. Lett.2000,528, L17, [astro-ph/9910061]. https://doi.org/10.1086/312422

  29. [30]

    Primordial black holes in globular clusters.Nature1993,364, 423–425

    Sigurdsson, S.; Hernquist, L. Primordial black holes in globular clusters.Nature1993,364, 423–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/36 4423a0

  30. [31]

    Mergers of Stellar-Mass Black Holes in Nuclear Star Clusters

    Miller, M.; Lauburg, V .M. Mergers of Stellar-Mass Black Holes in Nuclear Star Clusters.Astrophys. J.2009,692, 917–923, [arXiv:astro-ph/0804.2783]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/917

  31. [32]

    The formation of massive black holes through collision runaway in dense young star clusters

    Portegies Zwart, S.F.; Baumgardt, H.; Hut, P .; Makino, J.; McMillan, S.L.W. The Formation of massive black holes through collision runaway in dense young star clusters.Nature2004,428, 724, [astro-ph/0402622]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02448

  32. [33]

    Intermediate mass black holes in AGN disks: I. Production & Growth

    McKernan, B.; Ford, K.E.S.; Lyra, W.; Perets, H.B. Intermediate mass black holes in AGN disks: I. Production & Growth.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.2012,425, 460, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/1206.2309]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21486.x

  33. [34]

    Migration Traps in Disks Around Supermassive Black Holes

    Bellovary, J.M.; Mac Low, M.M.; McKernan, B.; Ford, K.E.S. Migration Traps in Disks Around Supermassive Black Holes. Astrophys. J. Lett.2016,819, L17, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/1511.00005]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/819/2/L17

  34. [35]

    Rapid and Bright Stellar-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei

    Bartos, I.; Kocsis, B.; Haiman, Z.; Márka, S. Rapid and Bright Stellar-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei. Astrophys. J.2017,835, 165, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1602.03831]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165

  35. [36]

    Assisted Inspirals of Stellar Mass Black Holes Embedded in AGN Disks: Solving the "Final AU Problem"

    Stone, N.C.; Metzger, B.D.; Haiman, Z. Assisted inspirals of stellar mass black holes embedded in AGN discs: solving the ‘final au problem’.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.2017,464, 946–954, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/1602.04226]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stw2260

  36. [37]

    Orbital Migration of Interacting Stellar Mass Black Holes in Disks around Supermassive Black Holes.Astrophys

    Secunda, A.; Bellovary, J.; Mac Low, M.M.; Saavik Ford, K.E.; McKernan, B.; Leigh, N.; Lyra, W.; Sándor, Z. Orbital Migration of Interacting Stellar Mass Black Holes in Disks around Supermassive Black Holes.Astrophys. J.2019,878, 85, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1807.02859]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab20ca

  37. [38]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9b8c

    Tagawa, H.; Haiman, Z.; Kocsis, B. Formation and Evolution of Compact Object Binaries in AGN Disks.ApJ2020,898, 25. arXiv:1912.08218 [astro-ph.GA], https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab9b8c

  38. [39]

    Lidov-Kozai Cycles with Gravitational Radiation: Merging Black Holes in Isolated Triple Systems

    Silsbee, K.; Tremaine, S. Lidov-Kozai Cycles with Gravitational Radiation: Merging Black Holes in Isolated Triple Systems. Astrophys. J.2017,836, 39, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1608.07642]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa5729

  39. [40]

    2018, title Black Hole and Neutron Star Binary Mergers in Triple Systems: Merger Fraction and Spin-Orbit Misalignment , Astrophys

    Liu, B.; Lai, D. Black Hole and Neutron Star Binary Mergers in Triple Systems: Merger Fraction and Spin–Orbit Misalignment. ApJ2018,863, 68. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad09f. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 Galaxies2026,1, 0 17 of 29

  40. [41]

    Binary black hole mergers from field triples: properties, rates and the impact of stellar evolution

    Antonini, F.; Toonen, S.; Hamers, A.S. Binary black hole mergers from field triples: properties, rates and the impact of stellar evolution.Astrophys. J.2017,841, 77, [arXiv:astro-ph.GA/1703.06614]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6f5e

  41. [42]

    L., Petrovich , C., & Fischer , C

    Antonini, F.; Rodriguez, C.L.; Petrovich, C.; Fischer, C.L. Precessional dynamics of black hole triples: binary mergers with near-zero effective spin.Mon Not R Astron Soc Lett2018,480, L58–L62. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/sly126

  42. [43]

    2022 a , title Evolution of massive stellar triples and implications for compact object binary formation , Mon

    Stegmann, J.; Antonini, F.; Moe, M. Evolution of massive stellar triples and implications for compact object binary formation. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.2022,516, 1406–1427, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/2112.10786]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2192

  43. [44]

    Lindstedt \`a l' \'e tude du mouvement des com \`e tes p \'e riodiques

    von Zeipel, H. Sur l’application des séries de M. Lindstedt à l’étude du mouvement des comètes périodiques.Astronomische Nachrichten1910,183, 345. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.19091832202

  44. [45]

    , year = 1962, month = oct, volume =

    Lidov, M.L. The evolution of orbits of artificial satellites of planets under the action of gravitational perturbations of external bodies.Planet. Space Sci.1962,9, 719–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0

  45. [46]

    , year = 1962, month = nov, volume =

    Kozai, Y. Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity.Astron. J.1962,67, 591–598. https: //doi.org/10.1086/108790

  46. [47]

    The Eccentric Kozai-Lidov Effect and Its Applications

    Naoz, S. The Eccentric Kozai-Lidov Effect and Its Applications.Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.2016,54, 441–489, [arXiv:astro- ph.EP/1601.07175]. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

  47. [48]

    Fast core rotation in red-giant stars revealed by gravity-dominated mixed modes

    Beck, P .G.; et al. Fast core rotation in red-giant stars revealed by gravity-dominated mixed modes.Nature2012,481, 55, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1112.2825]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10612

  48. [49]

    Spin down of the core rotation in red giants

    Mosser, B.; et al. Spin down of the core rotation in red giants.Astron. Astrophys.2012,548, A10, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1209.3336]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220106

  49. [50]

    Implications of Rapid Core Rotation in Red Giants for Internal Angular Momentum Transport in Stars

    Tayar, J.; Pinsonneault, M.H. Implications of Rapid Core Rotation in Red Giants for Internal Angular Momentum Transport in Stars.Astrophys. J. Lett.2013,775, L1, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1306.3986]. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L1

  50. [51]

    Seismic constraints on the radial dependence of the internal rotation profiles of six Kepler subgiants and young red giants

    Deheuvels, S.; et al. Seismic constraints on the radial dependence of the internal rotation profiles of six Kepler subgiants and young red giants.Astron. Astrophys.2014,564, A27, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1401.3096]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322779

  51. [52]

    Angular Momentum Transport via Internal Gravity Waves in Evolving Stars

    Fuller, J.; Lecoanet, D.; Cantiello, M.; Brown, B. Angular Momentum Transport via Internal Gravity Waves in Evolving Stars.ApJ 2014,796, 17. arXiv:1409.6835 [astro-ph.SR], https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/17

  52. [53]

    Angular momentum transport within evolved low-mass stars

    Cantiello, M.; Mankovich, C.; Bildsten, L.; Christensen-Dalsgaard, J.; Paxton, B. Angular momentum transport within evolved low-mass stars.Astrophys. J.2014,788, 93, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1405.1419]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/93

  53. [54]

    White Dwarf Rotation as a Function of Mass and a Dichotomy of Mode Linewidths: Kepler Observations of 27 Pulsating DA White Dwarfs Through K2 Campaign 8

    Hermes, J.J.; Gaensicke, B.T.; Kawaler, S.D.; Greiss, S.; Tremblay, P .E.; Fusillo, N.P .G.; Raddi, R.; Fanale, S.M.; Bell, K.J.; Dennihy, E.; et al. White Dwarf Rotation as a Function of Mass and a Dichotomy of Mode Linewidths: Kepler Observations of 27 Pulsating DA White Dwarfs Through K2 Campaign 8.ApJS2017,232, 23. arXiv:1709.07004 [astro-ph.SR], http...

  54. [55]

    Core rotation braking on the red giant branch for various mass ranges

    Gehan, C.; Mosser, B.; Michel, E.; Samadi, R.; Kallinger, T. Core rotation braking on the red giant branch for various mass ranges. A&A2018,616, A24. arXiv:1802.04558 [astro-ph.SR], https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832822

  55. [56]

    , year = 1973, month = jan, volume =

    Tayler, R.J. The Adiabatic Stability of Stars Containing Magnetic Fields–I: T OROIDAL F IELDS.Mon Not R Astron Soc1973, 161, 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/161.4.365

  56. [57]

    Dynamo action by differential rotation in a stably stratified stellar interior.A&A2002,381, 923–932

    Spruit, H.C. Dynamo action by differential rotation in a stably stratified stellar interior.A&A2002,381, 923–932. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20011465

  57. [58]

    Slowing the Spins of Stellar Cores

    Fuller, J.; Piro, A.L.; Jermyn, A.S. Slowing the Spins of Stellar Cores.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2019, 485, 3661–3680. arXiv:1902.08227 [astro-ph.SR], https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz514

  58. [59]

    2019, title Most Black Holes Are Born Very Slowly Rotating , , 881, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b

    Fuller, J.; Ma, L. Most Black Holes are Born Very Slowly Rotating.ApJL2019,881, L1. arXiv:1907.03714 [astro-ph.SR], https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b

  59. [60]

    2019, Mon

    Ma, L.; Fuller, J. Angular momentum transport in massive stars and natal neutron star rotation rates.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2019,488, 4338–4355. arXiv:1907.03713 [astro-ph.SR], https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2009

  60. [61]

    E., et al

    Belczynski, K.; Klencki, J.; Fields, C.E.; Olejak, A.; Berti, E.; Meynet, G.; Fryer, C.L.; Holz, D.E.; O’Shaughnessy, R.; Brown, D.A.; et al. The evolutionary roads leading to low effective spins, high black hole masses, and O1/O2 rates of LIGO/Virgo binary black holes.A&A2020,636, A104. arXiv:1706.07053 [astro-ph.HE], https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936528

  61. [62]

    doi:10.3390/galaxies10040076 , url =

    Spera, M.; Trani, A.A.; Mencagli, M. Compact Binary Coalescences: Astrophysical Processes and Lessons Learned.Galaxies2022, 10, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies10040076

  62. [63]

    Suspicious Siblings: The Distribution of Mass and Spin across Component Black Holes in Isolated Binary Evolution.Astrophys

    Zevin, M.; Bavera, S.S. Suspicious Siblings: The Distribution of Mass and Spin across Component Black Holes in Isolated Binary Evolution.Astrophys. J.2022,933, 86, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2203.02515]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac6f5d

  63. [64]

    The χeff − z correlation of field binary black hole mergers and how 3G gravitational-wave detectors can constrain it.Astron

    Bavera, S.S.; Fishbach, M.; Zevin, M.; Zapartas, E.; Fragos, T. The χeff − z correlation of field binary black hole mergers and how 3G gravitational-wave detectors can constrain it.Astron. Astrophys.2022,665, A59, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2204.02619]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243724

  64. [65]

    GW150914: Spin based constraints on the merger time of the progenitor system

    Kushnir, D.; Zaldarriaga, M.; Kollmeier, J.A.; Waldman, R. GW150914: Spin based constraints on the merger time of the progenitor system.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.2016,462, 844–849, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1605.03839]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw168 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies1010000 Galaxies2026,1, 0 18 of 29

  65. [66]

    Implications of the low binary black hole aligned spins observed by LIGO

    Hotokezaka, K.; Piran, T. Implications of the low binary black hole aligned spins observed by LIGO.Astrophys. J.2017,842, 111, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1702.03952]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6f61

  66. [67]

    The expected spins of gravitational wave sources with isolated field binary progenitors.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2018,473, 4174–4178

    Zaldarriaga, M.; Kushnir, D.; Kollmeier, J.A. The expected spins of gravitational wave sources with isolated field binary progenitors.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society2018,473, 4174–4178. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2577

  67. [68]

    The spin of the second-born black hole in coalescing binary black holes

    Qin, Y.; Fragos, T.; Meynet, G.; Andrews, J.; Sørensen, M.; Song, H.F. The spin of the second-born black hole in coalescing binary black holes.Astron. Astrophys.2018,616, A28, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1802.05738]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832839

  68. [69]

    S., Fragos, T., Zevin, M., et al

    Bavera, S.S.; et al. The impact of mass-transfer physics on the observable properties of field binary black hole populations.Astron. Astrophys.2021,647, A153, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2010.16333]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039804

  69. [70]

    2023, ApJ, 952, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74

    Ma, L.; Fuller, J. Tidal Spin-up of Black Hole Progenitor Stars.Astrophys. J.2023,952, 53, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2305.08356]. [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 965, (2024)], https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acdb74

  70. [71]

    Reassessing the Spin of Second-born Black Holes in Coa- lescing Binary Black Holes and Its Connection to the chi_eff-q Correlation.Astron

    Wang, Z.Y.; Qin, Y.; Hu, R.C.; Wang, Y.Z.; Meynet, G.; Song, H.F. Reassessing the Spin of Second-born Black Holes in Coa- lescing Binary Black Holes and Its Connection to the chi_eff-q Correlation.Astron. Astrophys.2026,708, A62, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2509.05976]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557224

  71. [72]

    S., Berry , C

    Zevin, M.; Bavera, S.S.; Berry, C.P .L.; Kalogera, V .; Fragos, T.; Marchant, P .; Rodriguez, C.L.; Antonini, F.; Holz, D.E.; Pankow, C. One Channel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways.Astrophys. J.2021,910, 152, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2011.10057]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abe40e

  72. [73]

    2024, title Unequal-mass highly spinning binary black hole mergers in the stable mass transfer formation channel , , 689, A305, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450480

    Olejak, A.; Klencki, J.; Xu, X.T.; Wang, C.; Belczynski, K.; Lasota, J.P . Unequal-mass highly spinning binary black hole mergers in the stable mass transfer formation channel.A&A2024,689, A305. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450480

  73. [74]

    Black Hole Accretion and Spin-up through Stellar Collisions in Dense Star Clusters.Astrophys

    Kıro˘ glu, F.; Kremer, K.; Biscoveanu, S.; Prieto, E.G.; Rasio, F.A. Black Hole Accretion and Spin-up through Stellar Collisions in Dense Star Clusters.Astrophys. J.2025,979, 237, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2410.01879]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ada26b

  74. [75]

    2021, Nature Astron., 5, 749, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01398-w

    Gerosa, D.; Fishbach, M. Hierarchical mergers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures.Nat Astron 2021,5, 749–760. arXiv:2105.03439 [astro-ph.HE], https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01398-w

  75. [76]

    Evolution of Binary Black Hole Spacetimes

    Pretorius, F. Evolution of Binary Black Hole Spacetimes.Phys. Rev. Lett.2005,95, 121101. arXiv:gr-qc/0507014, https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.121101

  76. [77]

    High-accuracy waveforms for binary black hole inspiral, merger, and ringdown

    Scheel, M.A.; Boyle, M.; Chu, T.; Kidder, L.E.; Matthews, K.D.; Pfeiffer, H.P . High-accuracy waveforms for binary black hole inspiral, merger, and ringdown.Phys. Rev. D2009,79, 024003. arXiv:0810.1767 [gr-qc], https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.0 24003

  77. [78]

    Gravitational-wave Kicks Impact the Spins of Black Holes from Hierarchical Mergers

    Borchers, A.; Ye, C.S.; Fishbach, M. Gravitational-wave Kicks Impact the Spins of Black Holes from Hierarchical Mergers. Astrophys. J.2025,987, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2503.21278]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/addec6

  78. [79]

    Total recoil: the maximum kick from nonspinning black-hole binary inspiral

    Gonzalez, J.A.; Sperhake, U.; Bruegmann, B.; Hannam, M.; Husa, S. Total recoil: The Maximum kick from nonspinning black-hole binary inspiral.Phys. Rev. Lett.2007,98, 091101, [gr-qc/0610154]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.091101

  79. [80]

    Large Merger Recoils and Spin Flips From Generic Black-Hole Binaries

    Campanelli, M.; Lousto, C.O.; Zlochower, Y.; Merritt, D. Large merger recoils and spin flips from generic black-hole binaries. Astrophys. J. Lett.2007,659, L5–L8, [gr-qc/0701164]. https://doi.org/10.1086/516712

  80. [81]

    The Distribution of Recoil Velocities from Merging Black Holes

    Schnittman, J.D.; Buonanno, A. The Distribution of Recoil Velocities from Merging Black Holes.Astrophys. J. Lett.2007,662, L63, [astro-ph/0702641]. https://doi.org/10.1086/519309

Showing first 80 references.