pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30691 · v1 · pith:3M7AVCVLnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Assessing the Predictability of δ Scuti Variable Stars for Spacecraft Navigation

Ahmed Khan , Linyi Hou , Siegfried Eggl This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 06:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords delta Scuti starsspacecraft navigationlight curve stabilitytiming uncertaintyKepler missionTESS validationvariable star predictability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Out of 120 δ Scuti variable stars, 32 have light curves predictable enough to support spacecraft navigation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether the periodic brightness changes of δ Scuti stars can serve as reliable references for determining spacecraft position and time, in the same way pulsars are used. It builds simple models of normalized flux from Kepler and K2 observations, then quantifies timing uncertainty with new metrics and checks how well the models forecast later measurements from TESS. Thirty-two of the 120 stars examined meet the criteria for acceptable timing uncertainty. If the metrics hold under actual flight conditions, these stars would add a new class of natural signals for autonomous navigation.

Core claim

A computational framework applied to 120 δ Scuti stars from Kepler and K2 data identifies 32 stars whose light-curve models yield timing uncertainties low enough to support spacecraft navigation, with model quality confirmed against TESS observations.

What carries the argument

Timing-uncertainty metrics applied to simple normalized-flux models of δ Scuti light curves, evaluated for prediction accuracy against TESS data.

Load-bearing premise

The timing-uncertainty metrics developed accurately translate into real-world navigation performance for spacecraft, and that light-curve stability observed in Kepler/K2 data persists at the precision needed for navigation as validated by TESS.

What would settle it

A direct spacecraft test showing that position or time fixes derived from one of the 32 candidate stars deviate from truth by more than the metric-predicted uncertainty when tracked over multiple variability cycles.

read the original abstract

Previous studies have shown that $\delta$ Scuti stars can be used for determining spacecraft position and time similar to X-ray pulsar navigation, but open questions remain regarding the light-curve stability, and, therefore, the navigation accuracy that can be derived from $\delta$ Scuti variable stars. Here, we develop a computational framework to identify $\delta$ Scuti variable stars with light curves that are suitable for spacecraft navigation purposes. Our approach emphasizes quantifying timing uncertainty through developing metrics and evaluating such metrics in the context of spacecraft navigation. We analyze over 110 $\delta$ Scuti variable stars from the Kepler space telescope and 10 additional stars from the K2 mission. For each star, we produce a simple model of its normalized flux as a function of time, along with several metrics used to assess its suitability for navigation. Model quality was further assessed through comparing predictions with observations from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). Out of the 120 $\delta$ Scuti variable stars we investigated in this study, 32 stars were identified as candidates predictable enough to enable spacecraft navigation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a computational framework to assess δ Scuti variable stars for spacecraft navigation by fitting normalized-flux models to Kepler and K2 light curves for 120 stars, deriving several timing-uncertainty metrics, validating model predictions against independent TESS observations, and selecting 32 stars as candidates whose light curves are sufficiently predictable for navigation use.

Significance. If the timing-uncertainty metrics can be shown to map to usable spacecraft position and time accuracy, the work would usefully expand the set of potential navigational sources beyond X-ray pulsars. The emphasis on quantitative metrics and the use of TESS as an independent validation dataset are strengths that support reproducibility and falsifiability of the predictability claims.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and framework description] Abstract and framework description: the central claim that the 32 selected stars are 'predictable enough to enable spacecraft navigation' is not supported by any explicit error-propagation analysis or simulated navigation fix demonstrating how the timing-uncertainty metrics translate (via light-travel-time geometry or phase referencing) into position/clock uncertainties that meet spacecraft requirements. This step is load-bearing for the navigation-utility conclusion and is absent from the reported workflow.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: no quantitative values for the timing-uncertainty metrics, selection thresholds, or model-fit statistics are supplied, which prevents readers from assessing the strength of the 32-candidate result without reading the full text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback and for recognizing the strengths of our quantitative metrics and TESS validation. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: the central claim that the 32 selected stars are 'predictable enough to enable spacecraft navigation' is not supported by any explicit error-propagation analysis or simulated navigation fix demonstrating how the timing-uncertainty metrics translate (via light-travel-time geometry or phase referencing) into position/clock uncertainties that meet spacecraft requirements. This step is load-bearing for the navigation-utility conclusion and is absent from the reported workflow.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not include an explicit error-propagation analysis or simulated navigation fix mapping the timing-uncertainty metrics to position/clock uncertainties via light-travel-time geometry or phase referencing. Our framework centers on deriving and validating timing-uncertainty metrics from Kepler/K2 light curves (with TESS cross-checks) to identify stars with stable, predictable behavior; the navigation context is drawn from prior δ Scuti navigation studies, with our metrics intended as direct inputs for such applications. A full end-to-end navigation simulation lies beyond the scope of assessing light-curve predictability. We will revise the manuscript by adding a new subsection that provides an illustrative error-propagation example (e.g., position uncertainty scaling as c × timing uncertainty) and discusses limitations, while adjusting the abstract and conclusions to describe the 32 stars as candidates whose navigation utility requires further dedicated study. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework uses independent TESS cross-validation on Kepler/K2 fits

full rationale

The derivation fits normalized-flux models to Kepler/K2 photometry, computes timing-uncertainty metrics from those fits, and validates model quality via direct comparison to separate TESS observations. The final selection of 32 candidates follows from those externally checked metrics. No equation reduces to its own inputs by construction, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction of the target quantity, and no load-bearing premise rests on self-citation. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described in the abstract. The work rests on observational datasets from Kepler, K2, and TESS whose processing details are not supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5726 in / 1119 out tokens · 52085 ms · 2026-07-01T06:31:30.290929+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Interplanetary Network Progress Report42, 193 (2013)

    Curkendall, D.W., Border, J.S.: Delta-dor: The one-nanoradian navigation measurement system of the deep space network—history, architecture, and componentry. The Interplanetary Network Progress Report42, 193 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    Broschart, S.B., Bradley, N., Bhaskaran, S.: Optical-based kinematic positioning for deep-space navigation (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets56(5), 1383–1392 (2019)

    Broschart, S.B., Bradley, N., Bhaskaran, S.: Kinematic approximation of posi- tion accuracy achieved using optical observations of distant asteroids. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets56(5), 1383–1392 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences72(2), 9 (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17609

    Hou, L., Bansal, I., Davis, C., Eggl, S.: Position and time determination without prior state knowledge via onboard optical observations of delta scuti variable stars. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences72(2), 9 (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17609

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Bowman, D.M., Kurtz, D.W., Breger, M., Murphy, S.J., Holdsworth, D.L.: Amplitude modulation inδsct stars: statistics from an ensemble study of kepler targets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society460(2), 1970–1989 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.1093/mnras/stw1153 https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/460/2/1970/13772782/stw1153.pdf

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1153 1970

  6. [6]

    700+ nights of photometry

    Breger, M.: Nonradial and radial period changes in theδscuti star 4 cvn - i. 700+ nights of photometry. A&A592, 97 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 201628473

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 2016

  7. [7]

    Reports on Progress in Physics79(3), 036901 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/3/036901

    Borucki, W.J.: Kepler mission: development and overview. Reports on Progress in Physics79(3), 036901 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/3/036901

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/3/036901 2016

  8. [8]

    Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of the Pacific126(938), 398–408 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 676406

    Howell, S.B., Sobeck, C., Haas, M., Still, M., Barclay, T., Mullally, F., Troeltzsch, J., Aigrain, S., Bryson, S.T., Caldwell, D., Chaplin, W.J., Cochran, W.D., Huber, D., Marcy, G.W., Miglio, A., Najita, J.R., Smith, M., Twicken, J.D., Fortney, J.J.: The k2 mission: Characterization and early results. Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of the Pac...

    2014

  9. [9]

    https: 65 //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17041173

    Khan, A.: AhmedKhan04/KEP TESS LightCurveModeling: Version 1.1.0. https: 65 //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17041173 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17041173

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17041173

  10. [10]

    The Earth Scientist28(1), 20–23 (2012)

    Donna, Y.: Pulsating variable stars and the hertzsprung–russell diagram. The Earth Scientist28(1), 20–23 (2012). Available at Harvard University via Chandra X-ray Center website

    2012

  11. [11]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences8(2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/ fspas.2021.653558

    Guzik, J.A.: Highlights of discoveries forδscuti variable stars from the kepler era. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences8(2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/ fspas.2021.653558

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    The Astro- physical Journal Letters940(1), 25 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ ac9f38

    Mart´ ınez-V´ azquez, C.E., Salinas, R., Vivas, A.K., Catelan, M.: A segmented period–luminosity relation for nearby extragalactic delta scuti stars. The Astro- physical Journal Letters940(1), 25 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ ac9f38

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ 2022

  13. [13]

    ApJ981(1), 35 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ adb1b4

    Mourabit, M., Weinberg, N.N.: Resonant mode coupling inδscuti stars. The Astrophysical Journal950(1), 6 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ acca16

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ 2023

  14. [14]

    In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol

    Handler, G.: Delta scuti variables. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1170. American Institute of Physics, ??? (2009).https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.09806

    work page arXiv 2009

  15. [15]

    In: Breger, M., Montgomery, M

    Breger, M.:δScuti stars (Review). In: Breger, M., Montgomery, M. (eds.) Delta Scuti and Related Stars. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol. 210, p. 3 (2000)

    2000

  16. [16]

    In: Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems, pp

    Handler, G.: Asteroseismology. In: Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems, pp. 207–

  17. [17]

    Springer, ??? (2013)

    2013

  18. [18]

    Opacity Effects on Pulsations of A-Type Stars

    Guzik, J.A., Fryer, C., Fontes, C.J.: Opacity Effects on Pulsations of A-Type Stars (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.00688

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Communications in Asteroseismology 147, 6–30 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1553/cia147s6

    Kurtz, D.W.: Stellar pulsation: an overview. Communications in Asteroseismology 147, 6–30 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1553/cia147s6

    work page doi:10.1553/cia147s6 2006

  20. [20]

    Celotti and G

    Su´ arez, J.C., Michel, E., Houdek, G., P´ erez Hern´ andez, F., Lebreton, Y.: Mode stability inδscuti stars: linear analysis versus observa- tions in open clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety379(1), 201–208 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11927. x https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/379/1/201/3927166/mnras0...

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11927 2007

  21. [21]

    Kurtz, D.W.: On the stability of observed frequencies in del SCT stars : a reanalysis of the Tuc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.193, 61–77 (1980) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/193.1.61

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/193.1.61 1980

  22. [22]

    66 arXiv preprint (2021) arXiv:2109.12574

    Balona, L.A.: The extraordinary frequency pattern variation in delta scuti stars. 66 arXiv preprint (2021) arXiv:2109.12574

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    In: Guzik, J.A., Bradley, P.A

    Breger, M.: Period Variations of Delta Scuti Stars. In: Guzik, J.A., Bradley, P.A. (eds.) Stellar Pulsation: Challenges for Theory and Observation. American Institute of Physics Conference Series, vol. 1170, pp. 410–414. AIP, ??? (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3246530

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3246530 2009

  24. [24]

    Brown, T.M., Latham, D.W., Everett, M.E., Esquerdo, G.A.: Kepler Input Cat- alog: Photometric Calibration and Stellar Classification. Astron. J.142(4), 112 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/112 arXiv:1102.0342 [astro- ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/112 2011

  25. [25]

    Accessed 26 Dec

    Caltech: Kepler Mission Information. Accessed 26 Dec. 2024 (2006). exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/docs/KeplerMission.html

    2024

  26. [26]

    Astrophysics Source Code Library (2018)

    Lightkurve Collaboration, Cardoso, J.V.d.M., Hedges, C., Gully-Santiago, M., Saunders, N., Cody, A.M., Barclay, T., Hall, O., Sagear, S., Turtelboom, E., Zhang, J., Tzanidakis, A., Mighell, K., Coughlin, J., Bell, K., Berta-Thompson, Z., Williams, P., Dotson, J., Barentsen, G.: Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python. Astrophysics Sourc...

    2018

  27. [27]

    The Astro- physical Journal Supplement Series236(1), 16 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4365/aab766

    VanderPlas, J.T.: Understanding the lomb–scargle periodogram. The Astro- physical Journal Supplement Series236(1), 16 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4365/aab766

    2018

  28. [28]

    The Astronomical Journal145(5) (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/145/5/132

    Chang, S.-W., Protopapas, P., Kim, D.-W., Byun, Y.-I.: Statistical properties of galacticδscuti stars: Revisited. The Astronomical Journal145(5) (2013) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/145/5/132

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/5/132 2013

  29. [29]

    Geoscientific Model Development15(14), 5481–5487 (2022) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022

    Hodson, T.O.: Root-mean-square error (rmse) or mean absolute error (mae): when to use them or not. Geoscientific Model Development15(14), 5481–5487 (2022) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022

    work page doi:10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022 2022

  30. [30]

    Stumpe, M.C., Smith, J.C., Van Cleve, J.E., Twicken, J.D., Barclay, T.S., Fanelli, M.N., Girouard, F.R., Jenkins, J.M., Kolodziejczak, J.J., McCauliff, S.D., Morris, R.L.: Kepler Presearch Data Conditioning I—Architecture and Algorithms for Error Correction in Kepler Light Curves. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.124(919), 985 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1086/667698 ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/667698 2012

  31. [31]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society465(1), 1181–1200 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2756

    Liakos, A., Niarchos, P.: Catalogue and properties ofδscuti stars in binaries. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society465(1), 1181–1200 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2756

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2756 2016

  32. [32]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16230452

    Davenport, J.: Kic2tic: KIC-TIC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16230452 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16230452 67

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16230452

  33. [33]

    Wang, D., Hogg, D.W., Foreman-Mackey, D., Sch¨ olkopf, B.: A Causal, Data- driven Approach to Modeling the Kepler Data. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 128(967), 094503 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/128/967/094503 arXiv:1508.01853 [astro-ph.EP]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1538-3873/128/967/094503 2016

  34. [34]

    The Astronom- ical Journal163(6), 284 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac625a

    Hattori, S., Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D.W., Montet, B.T., Angus, R., Pritchard, T.A., Curtis, J.L., Sch¨ olkopf, B.: The unpopular package: A data- driven approach to detrending tess full-frame image light curves. The Astronom- ical Journal163(6), 284 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac625a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac625a 2022

  35. [35]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo

    White, T.: K2-pleaides-dsct: Version 1.0.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 17010308 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17010308

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo

  36. [36]

    Vanderburg, A., Johnson, J.A.: A Technique for Extracting Highly Precise Pho- tometry for the Two-Wheeled Kepler Mission. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.126(944), 948 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1086/678764 arXiv:1408.3853 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/678764 2014

  37. [37]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17010322

    KenMighell: K2CE: Version 1.00. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17010322 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17010322

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17010322

  38. [38]

    The Planetary Science Journal4(10), 198 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/acf75e

    DellaGiustina, D.N., Nolan, M.C., Polit, A.T., Moreau, M.C., Golish, D.R., Simon, A.A., Adam, C.D., Antreasian, P.G., Ballouz, R.-L., Barnouin, O.S., Becker, K.J., Bennett, C.A., Binzel, R.P., Bos, B.J., Burns, R., Castro, N., Ches- ley, S.R., Christensen, P.R., Crombie, M.K., Daly, M.G., Daly, R.T., Enos, H.L., Farnocchia, D., Freund Kasper, S., Garcia, ...

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/acf75e 2023

  39. [39]

    Period Changes of Delta Scuti Stars and Stellar Evolution

    Breger, M., Pamyatnykh, A.: Period changes of delta scuti stars and stellar evolu- tion. Astronomy and Astrophysics332, 958–968 (1998) https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.astro-ph/9802076

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  40. [40]

    Astro- physics and Space Science333(1), 125–131 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10509-010-0574-9

    Boonyarak, C., Fu, J.-N., Khokhuntod, P., Jiang, S.-Y.: On the period vari- ations of several low declination high amplitude delta scuti variables. Astro- physics and Space Science333(1), 125–131 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10509-010-0574-9

    2011

  41. [41]

    Rauer, H., Aerts, C., Cabrera, J., Deleuil, M., Erikson, A., Gizon, L., Goupil, M., Heras, A., Lorenzo-Alvarez, J., Marliani, F., Martin-Garcia, C., Mas-Hesse, J.M., O’Rourke, L., Osborn, H., Pagano, I., Piotto, G., Pollacco, D., Ragazzoni, R., Ramsay, G., Udry, S., Appourchaux, T., Benz, W., Brandeker, A., G¨ udel, M., Janot-Pacheco, E., Kabath, P., Kjel...

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    CDS, Centre de Donn ˜A©es astronomiques de Strasbourg (1996)

    Ochsenbein, F.: The VizieR database of astronomical catalogues. CDS, Centre de Donn ˜A©es astronomiques de Strasbourg (1996). https://doi.org/10.26093/ CDS/VIZIER . https://vizier.cds.unistra.fr

    1996

  43. [43]

    Ochsenbein, F., Bauer, P., Marcout, J.: The VizieR database of astronomical catalogues. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser.143, 23–32 (2000) https://doi.org/10. 1051/aas:2000169 arXiv:astro-ph/0002122 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  44. [44]

    Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T.P., Tollerud, E.J., Greenfield, P., Droett- boom, M., Bray, E., Aldcroft, T., Davis, M., Ginsburg, A., Price-Whelan, A.M., Kerzendorf, W.E., Conley, A., Crighton, N., Barbary, K., Muna, D., Ferguson, H., Grollier, F., Parikh, M.M., Nair, P.H., Unther, H.M., Deil, C., Woillez, J., Con- seil, S., Kramer, R., Turner, J.E....

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  45. [45]

    Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A.M., Sip˝ ocz, B.M., G¨ unther, H.M., Lim, P.L., Crawford, S.M., Conseil, S., Shupe, D.L., Craig, M.W., Dencheva, N., Gins- burg, A., Vand erPlas, J.T., Bradley, L.D., P´ erez-Su´ arez, D., de Val-Borro, M., Aldcroft, T.L., Cruz, K.L., Robitaille, T.P., Tollerud, E.J., Ardelean, C., Babej, T., Bach, Y.P., Bachetti, M....

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  46. [46]

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package

    Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A.M., Lim, P.L., Earl, N., Starkman, N., Bradley, L., Shupe, D.L., Patil, A.A., Corrales, L., Brasseur, C.E., N”othe, M., Donath, A., Tollerud, E., Morris, B.M., Ginsburg, A., Vaher, E., Weaver, B.A., Tocknell, J., Jamieson, W., van Kerkwijk, M.H., Robitaille, T.P., Merry, B., Bachetti, M., G”unther, H.M., Aldcroft, T....

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  47. [47]

    CC0: Geometric Dilution Of Precision

    Xoneca, v.W.C. CC0: Geometric Dilution Of Precision. https://commons. wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geometric Dilution Of Precision.svg

  48. [48]

    GPS world10(5), 52–59 (1999)

    Langley, R.B.,et al.: Dilution of precision. GPS world10(5), 52–59 (1999)

    1999

  49. [49]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilution of precision (navigation)

    Dilution of precision (navigation). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilution of precision (navigation). Accessed: 2025-09-01 73

    2025