Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 71 references

Radiative decays of $X(3872)$ within $D{\bar D}^*$ molecular framework

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Neutral decay of X(3872) predicted 10× wider than charged

desk verdict Competent XEFT calculation of X(3872) → D D̄ γ with a real gap in sensitivity analysis read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06046 v1 pith:2B2TYVUQ submitted 2026-07-07 hep-ph

Hao-Dong Cai , Run-Hao Chen , Yuan-Jun Gao , Zhao-Sai Jia , Gang Li , Shi-Dong Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords gammawidthdecaychargedeffectframeworkmolecularpartial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper calculates the radiative decay widths of the X(3872) particle — an exotic hadron discovered in 2003 whose mass sits almost exactly at the threshold for a neutral D meson and anti-D* meson pair — into D anti-D plus a photon, treating the X(3872) as a molecule-like bound state of a D* and an anti-D meson. The authors use a nonrelativistic effective field theory called XEFT, whose degrees of freedom are charmed mesons and pions moving at low relative velocities. They compute both tree-level diagrams and corrections from D anti-D rescattering (final-state interactions), assuming the X(3872) is a pure S-wave bound state with equal neutral and charged components. The central result is a striking hierarchy: the neutral channel X(3872) → D0 anti-D0 gamma has a partial width of about 11 keV, while the charged channel X(3872) → D+ D- gamma is below 1 keV — more than a factor of ten smaller. The D anti-D rescattering effect enhances the neutral channel by 6% but suppresses the charged channel by 38%. This large asymmetry arises primarily because the magnetic transition D*0 → D0 gamma is far stronger than D*+ → D+ gamma, a consequence of the different quark charges in the neutral and charged mesons. All predicted widths sit well below current experimental upper limits set by BESIII.

What carries the argument

The calculation rests on XEFT, a nonrelativistic effective field theory whose degrees of freedom are D0, D*0, anti-D0, anti-D*0, and pi0 mesons. The X(3872) wave function is written as a superposition of D*0 anti-D0 and D*+ D- bound-state configurations (plus charge conjugates), with a mixing angle theta = pi/4 giving equal neutral and charged weights. Coupling constants gn and gc are extracted from residues of the D0 anti-D*0 – D+ D*- coupled-channel scattering T-matrix at the X(3872) pole. The D anti-D rescattering is incorporated by replacing the isoscalar contact interaction C0D with the D anti-D scattering amplitude T_DD = 2*pi/mu_DD / (1/a + i*p), parameterized by a scattering length a

What would settle it

If future experiments measure the ratio of neutral-to-charged radiative decay widths and find it is not large (i.e., not roughly 10:1 or larger), or if either channel's absolute width significantly exceeds the predicted values (about 11 keV for neutral, below 1 keV for charged), the pure molecular picture with equal mixing would be challenged. Conversely, observing the predicted hierarchy would support the molecular interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's key finding is that if X(3872) is a D anti-D* molecular state with equal neutral and charged components, its radiative decay into the neutral D meson pair plus a photon is more than ten times wider than the corresponding charged-channel decay. The neutral partial width is approximately 11 keV versus less than 1 keV for the charged channel, and the D anti-D rescattering correction pushes these in opposite directions — a modest 6% enhancement for the neutral channel but a substantial 38% suppression for the charged channel. This hierarchy is a direct, testable consequence of the molecular picture and the very different magnetic transition moments of the neutral and charged D* meson

Load-bearing premise

The entire calculation assumes X(3872) is a pure S-wave D anti-D* molecular bound state with exactly equal neutral and charged components (mixing angle theta = pi/4), with no admixture of tetraquark or charmonium structure, and that isospin-breaking effects in the final-state interactions can be neglected.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript calculates the radiative decay widths of X(3872) to D Dbar gamma within the XEFT framework, treating X(3872) as a pure S-wave D* Dbar molecular state with equal neutral and charged components (theta = pi/4). The calculation includes tree-level diagrams and D Dbar final-state rescattering contributions. The authors find a strong hierarchy between the neutral and charged channels: the tree-level partial width for X -> D0 Dbar0 gamma is approximately 11 keV (with a 6% enhancement from rescattering), while the charged channel X -> D+ D- gamma is below 1 keV (with a 38% suppression from rescattering). The loop integrals are ultraviolet convergent, and the theoretical framework follows standard nonrelativistic EFT methods.

Significance. The predicted hierarchy between neutral and charged radiative decay channels provides a falsifiable signature of the molecular picture of X(3872), testable at future experiments. The calculation is grounded in a well-established EFT framework (XEFT) with ultraviolet-convergent loop integrals. The dependence on the binding energy E_n is explored systematically (Figs. 2-3). The work contributes to the broader program of using radiative decays to discriminate between molecular and alternative structural interpretations of X(3872).

major comments (2)
  1. The headline 38% suppression of the charged channel is driven by the interference between tree-level amplitudes (Eqs. 7, 10, independent of C0_D) and rescattering amplitudes (Eqs. 8-9, 11-12, linear in C0_D). From Table I: Gamma_Tree = 0.41 keV, Gamma_Res = 0.02 keV, Gamma_Total = 0.26 keV, so the cross-term contributes approximately -0.17 keV. This interference is directly proportional to C0_D, which the paper itself states is 'not well constrained' (text following Eq. 5). The adopted value C0_D = -1 fm^2 is taken from Refs. [36, 59] without independent justification for this decay channel. The paper varies E_n (Figs. 2-3) but never varies C0_D, leaving the sensitivity of the headline 38% figure untested. A sensitivity analysis varying C0_D (or equivalently the scattering length a) is needed to establish the robustness of the charged-channel result. Without it, the 38% suppression could
  2. range from mild enhancement to strong suppression depending on the sign and magnitude of C0_D, making the quantitative claim in the abstract and conclusion not yet reliably established.
minor comments (6)
  1. The experimental upper limits in Table I are cited as '<83.30 [9]' and '<47.60 [9]', but the text in the introduction (citing Ref. [60], BESIII) gives branching ratio upper limits relative to X -> pi+ pi- J/psi. The table appears to list absolute width upper limits in keV, but the conversion from branching ratio to width is not explained. Please clarify how these numbers were obtained.
  2. In the text following Eq. (5), the scattering length is given as a = -1/262 MeV^{-1}. This should be -1/262 MeV^{-1} or equivalently a ~ -0.76 fm. Please verify the units and sign convention are stated consistently.
  3. Figures 2 and 3: the axis labels and legends are small and difficult to read. The legend entries 'Total', 'Tree', 'Rescattering' could be made clearer with more descriptive labels or a caption explaining the line styles.
  4. The phrase 'banding energy' appears in the description of Fig. 2 (Section III); this should be 'binding energy'.
  5. The abstract states the charged-channel width is 'less than 1.0 keV' while Table I gives 0.26 keV. Consider stating the actual value in the abstract for precision.
  6. Eq. (1) and surrounding text: the assumption theta = pi/4 is justified by a footnote stating that isospin-breaking effects in final-state interactions are not considered. This is a reasonable simplification, but the sensitivity of the results to theta is not discussed. A brief comment on how the hierarchy would change for theta != pi/4 would strengthen the paper.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and a constructive suggestion. The referee correctly identifies that the 38% suppression in the charged channel depends on C0_D, which we acknowledge is not well constrained. We agree to add a sensitivity analysis varying C0_D in the revised manuscript. We emphasize, however, that the primary neutral/charged hierarchy is driven by the magnetic moment difference and is robust.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The headline 38% suppression of the charged channel is driven by interference between tree-level and rescattering amplitudes, directly proportional to C0_D, which the paper states is 'not well constrained.' The adopted value C0_D = -1 fm^2 is taken from Refs. [36, 59] without independent justification. The paper varies E_n but never varies C0_D, leaving the sensitivity of the 38% figure untested. A sensitivity analysis varying C0_D is needed.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation, which is well taken. The referee is correct that the 38% suppression in the charged channel arises from the interference between tree-level and rescattering amplitudes, and that this interference is linear in C0_D. We also agree that C0_D is not well constrained and that the paper does not currently test the sensitivity of our results to its value. We will add a sensitivity analysis varying C0_D (or equivalently the D Dbar scattering length a) in the revised manuscript, including a new figure showing the charged- and neutral-channel widths as functions of C0_D over a physically reasonable range. This will allow readers to assess the robustness of the 38% figure directly. We will also add an explicit caveat in the abstract and conclusion that the quantitative suppression factor in the charged channel carries a systematic uncertainty associated with C0_D. We note, however, that the primary hierarchy between the neutral and charged channels — approximately 11 keV versus less than 1 keV — is driven primarily by the large difference in magnetic transition moments (mu_D0 = 0.56 GeV^{-1} versus mu_D+ = -0.15 GeV^{-1}), which enters at tree level and is independent of C0_D. The tree-level charged width is already suppressed by more than an order of magnitude relative to the neutral one. Therefore, while the referee is correct that the specific 38% figure is sensitive to C0_D and must be qualified accordingly, the qualitative prediction of a strong neutral-over-charged hierarchy is robust and does not depend on the rescattering parameter. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Without [a sensitivity analysis], the 38% suppression could range from mild enhancement to strong suppression depending on the sign and magnitude of C0_D, making the quantitative claim in the abstract and conclusion not yet reliably established.

    Authors: We agree with this assessment. The quantitative claim of 'roughly 38%' suppression in the abstract and conclusion should be qualified. In the revised manuscript, we will: (1) present the C0_D sensitivity analysis as described above; (2) rephrase the abstract and conclusion to state that the rescattering correction to the charged channel is sensitive to the poorly constrained C0_D parameter, and that the 38% suppression corresponds to the adopted value C0_D = -1 fm^2; and (3) emphasize that the robust, model-independent prediction is the tree-level hierarchy, which is unaffected by C0_D. We believe this addresses the referee's concern while preserving the main physics message of the paper. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the decay width predictions are computed from external inputs (magnetic moments, binding energies, contact terms) without fitting to the target observables.

full rationale

The paper computes radiative decay widths Γ(X→D̄Dγ) from a standard EFT framework. The key inputs are: (1) magnetic moments μ_D0 and μ_D+ extracted from measured D*→Dγ decay widths (external experimental data, Eq. 4 and surrounding text), (2) coupling constants g_n, g_c derived from binding energies E_n, E_c and the X(3872) pole position (Eq. 3, using PDG masses), (3) the contact term C_0_D taken from Refs. [36, 59] with an explicitly stated value C_0_D = −1 fm², and (4) the mixing angle θ = π/4 adopted as a model assumption (Eq. 1). The decay amplitudes (Eqs. 7–12) are then computed from Feynman diagrams using these inputs, and the partial widths in Table I are genuine predictions — none of the input parameters were fitted to the D̄Dγ decay widths themselves. The paper compares its predictions against experimental upper limits from BESIII (Table I, last column) and notes they lie well below these limits. While the C_0_D value is acknowledged as 'not well constrained' and is taken from prior work by overlapping author groups (Refs. [36, 59]), this is a parameter sensitivity concern (correctness risk), not circularity: the cited value was derived for a different process (D⁰D̄⁰ bound state scattering length), not fitted to the present decay widths. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks, and no step reduces to its own output by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. It relies on established entities (D mesons, X(3872)) and standard effective field theory parameters.

free parameters (3)
  • E_n = 0.01-0.80 MeV (varied)
    The binding energy of X(3872) relative to the D*0 D0 threshold. It is not predicted by the theory but is a necessary input for the coupling constants and the loop integrals.
  • C0_D = -1 fm^2
    The isoscalar contact term for D D-bar interactions. The paper states it is 'not well constrained' and adopts a value from Refs. [36, 59] corresponding to a scattering length of -1/262 MeV^-1.
  • theta = pi/4
    The phase angle describing the mixing of neutral and charged components. Fixed to pi/4 for equal admixture, justified by neglecting isospin-breaking in FSI.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption X(3872) is a pure S-wave D*D-bar molecular state.
    Stated in Eq. (1) and surrounding text. This is the foundational assumption of the model.
  • domain assumption The isovector D D-bar final-state interaction is negligible.
    Stated in Sec II.A and Appendix A. This simplifies the calculation by dropping C1_D terms.
  • domain assumption Nonrelativistic effective field theory (XEFT) is valid for this decay process.
    Implicit in the use of nonrelativistic propagators and Lagrangians throughout the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radiative decays of $X(3872)$ within $D{\bar D}^*$ molecular framework." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2B2TYVUQ

@misc{pith2026260706046,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radiative decays of $X(3872)$ within $D\bar D^*$ molecular framework},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2B2TYVUQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06046}
}
abstract

Within the framework of nonrelativistic effective field theory, we calculate the radiative decay width of the process $X(3872) \to \bar{D} D \gamma$ while taking into account the $D\bar{D}$ final-state interactions. In this work, the $X(3872)$, with the spin-parity quantum numbers $J^{PC}=1^{++}$, is treated as a $D^*\bar{D} +\rm c.c.$ bound state comprising equal proportions of neutral and charged components. Our numerical calculations predict the tree-level partial decay width of approximately $11.0$ keV for the decay process $X(3872) \to \bar{D}^0 D^0\gamma$, while the partial width for $X(3872) \to D^- D^+\gamma$ is less than $1.0$ keV. It is found that the $D\bar{D}$ rescattering effect enhances the tree-level width of $X(3872) \to \bar{D}^0 D^0\gamma$ by $6\%$. In contrast, the rescattering effect makes a suppression to the charged channel $X(3872)\to D^- D^+\gamma $ by roughly $38\%$. We expect that the present predictions based on the molecular picture of the $X(3872)$ can be tested by future experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06046 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Feynman diagrams for the decay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Decay widths for the process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Decay widths for the process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives

    J.-M. Richard, Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives, Few Body Syst.57, 1185 (2016), arXiv:1606.08593 [hep- ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Exotic Hadrons with Heavy Flavors -X, Y, Z and Related States-

    A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y, Z, and related states, PTEP2016, 062C01 (2016), arXiv:1603.09229 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Exotics: Heavy Pen- taquarks and Tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.97, 123 (2017), arXiv:1706.00610 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Pentaquark and Tetraquark states

    Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Pentaquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.107, 237 (2019), arXiv:1903.11976 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys.86, 026201 (2023), arXiv:2204.02649 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    S. K. Choi et al. (Belle), Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusiveB ± →K ±π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003), arXiv:hep- ex/0309032

    work page arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    Determination of the X(3872) meson quantum numbers

    R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Determination of theX(3872) meson quantum numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 222001 (2013), arXiv:1302.6269 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    F. E. Close and P. R. Page, TheD ∗0 ¯D0 threshold resonance, Phys. Lett. B578, 119 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0309253

    2004

  3. [11]

    Pakvasa and M

    S. Pakvasa and M. Suzuki, On the hidden charm state at 3872 MeV, Phys. Lett. B579, 67 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0309294

    2004

  4. [12]

    E. S. Swanson, Short range structure in theX(3872), Phys. Lett. B588, 189 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0311229

    2004 arXiv

  5. [13]

    E. S. Swanson, Diagnostic decays of theX(3872), Phys. Lett. B598, 197 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0406080

    2004 arXiv

  6. [14]

    N. A. Tornqvist, Isospin breaking of the narrow charmo- nium state of Belle at 3872 MeV as a deuson, Phys. Lett. B590, 209 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0402237

    2004 arXiv

  7. [15]

    M. B. Voloshin, Interference and binding effects in decays of possible molecular component ofX(3872), Phys. Lett. B579, 316 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0309307

    2004 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Wong, Molecular states of heavy quark mesons, Phys

    C.-Y. Wong, Molecular states of heavy quark mesons, Phys. Rev. C69, 055202 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0311088

    2004 arXiv

  9. [17]

    M. T. AlFiky, F. Gabbiani, and A. A. Petrov,X(3872): Hadronic molecules in effective field theory, Phys. Lett. 7 B640, 238 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0506141

    2006 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Braaten and M

    E. Braaten and M. Lu, Operator Product Expansion in the Production and Decay of theX(3872), Phys. Rev. D 74, 054020 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0606115

    2006 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Fleming, M

    S. Fleming, M. Kusunoki, T. Mehen, and U. van Kolck, Pion interactions in theX(3872), Phys. Rev. D76, 034006 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0703168

    2007 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Ding, J.-F

    G.-J. Ding, J.-F. Liu, and M.-L. Yan, Dynamics of Hadronic Molecule in One-Boson Exchange Approach and Possible Heavy Flavor Molecules, Phys. Rev. D79, 054005 (2009), arXiv:0901.0426 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, S. Kovalenko, and V. E. Lyubovitskij,X(3872) as a hadronic molecule and its decays to charmonium states and pions, Phys. Rev. D 79, 094013 (2009), arXiv:0903.5416 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  14. [22]

    I. W. Lee, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovit- skij,X(3872) as a molecularDD ∗ state in a potential model, Phys. Rev. D80, 094005 (2009), arXiv:0910.1009 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Lee, Z.-G

    N. Lee, Z.-G. Luo, X.-L. Chen, and S.-L. Zhu, Possible Deuteron-like Molecular States Composed of Heavy Baryons, Phys. Rev. D84, 014031 (2011), arXiv:1104.4257 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Liu, Z.-G

    X. Liu, Z.-G. Luo, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu,X(3872) and Other Possible Heavy Molecular States, Eur. Phys. J. C61, 411 (2009), arXiv:0808.0073 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Zhang and M.-Q

    J.-R. Zhang and M.-Q. Huang,{Q¯q}{ ¯Q ′ q}molecular states, Phys. Rev. D80, 056004 (2009), arXiv:0906.0090 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Gamermann, J

    D. Gamermann, J. Nieves, E. Oset, and E. Ruiz Arriola, Couplings in coupled channels versus wave functions: ap- plication to theX(3872) resonance, Phys. Rev. D81, 014029 (2010), arXiv:0911.4407 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Mehen and R

    T. Mehen and R. Springer, Radiative DecaysX(3872)→ ψ(2S)γandψ(4040)→X(3872)γin Effective Field The- ory, Phys. Rev. D83, 094009 (2011), arXiv:1101.5175 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Nieves and M

    J. Nieves and M. P. Valderrama, Deriving the exis- tence ofB ¯B∗ bound states from theX(3872) and Heavy Quark Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D84, 056015 (2011), arXiv:1106.0600 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Nieves and M

    J. Nieves and M. P. Valderrama, The Heavy Quark Spin Symmetry Partners of theX(3872), Phys. Rev. D86, 056004 (2012), arXiv:1204.2790 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Li and S.-L

    N. Li and S.-L. Zhu, Isospin breaking, Coupled-channel effects and Diagnosis ofX(3872), Phys. Rev. D86, 074022 (2012), arXiv:1207.3954 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu, M. Nielsen, and S.-L. Zhu, Hadronic molecules with both open charm and bottom, Phys. Rev. D85, 094008 (2012), arXiv:1203.1090 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  24. [32]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves, and M. P. Valderrama, Consequences of Heavy Quark Symmetries for Hadronic Molecules, Phys. Rev. D88, 054007 (2013), arXiv:1303.6608 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [33]

    He, Study of theB ¯B∗/D ¯D∗ bound states in a Bethe- Salpeter approach, Phys

    J. He, Study of theB ¯B∗/D ¯D∗ bound states in a Bethe- Salpeter approach, Phys. Rev. D90, 076008 (2014), arXiv:1409.8506 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [34]

    L. Zhao, L. Ma, and S.-L. Zhu, Spin-orbit force, recoil corrections, and possibleB ¯B∗ andD ¯D∗ molecular states, Phys. Rev. D89, 094026 (2014), arXiv:1403.4043 [hep- ph]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, Y. S. Kalashnikova, U.-G. Meißner, and A. V. Nefediev, What can radiative decays of theX(3872) teach us about its nature?, Phys. Lett. B 742, 394 (2015), arXiv:1410.6712 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [36]

    F. K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves, A. Ozpineci, and M. P. Valderrama, Detecting the long-distance struc- ture of theX(3872), Eur. Phys. J. C74, 2885 (2014), arXiv:1404.1776 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Braaten and M

    E. Braaten and M. Kusunoki, Low-energy universality and the new charmonium resonance at 3870 MeV, Phys. Rev. D69, 074005 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0311147

    2004 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Wu, D.-Y

    Q. Wu, D.-Y. Chen, and T. Matsuki, A phenomenolog- ical analysis on isospin-violating decay ofX(3872), Eur. Phys. J. C81, 193 (2021), arXiv:2102.08637 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Yamaguchi, A

    Y. Yamaguchi, A. Hosaka, S. Takeuchi, and M. Takizawa, Heavy hadronic molecules with pion exchange and quark core couplings: a guide for practitioners, J. Phys. G47, 053001 (2020), arXiv:1908.08790 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    F. Wang, G. Li, S.-D. Liu, and Q. Wu, Radiative decays ofX(3872) inD ¯D∗ molecule scenario, Phys. Rev. D111, 094001 (2025), arXiv:2502.19887 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Cai, Z.-S

    H.-D. Cai, Z.-S. Jia, G. Li, and S.-D. Liu, Hidden charmed decays ofX(3872) within theD ¯D∗ molec- ular framework, Phys. Rev. D111, 114024 (2025), arXiv:2503.20183 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Wu, Z.-Q

    Q. Wu, Z.-Q. Sun, D.-Y. Chen, S.-D. Liu, and G. Li, Dipion transitions fromX(3872) toχ cJ (J= 0,1,2), Phys. Rev. D113, 014015 (2026), arXiv:2512.21161 [hep- ph]

    2026

  35. [43]

    Z.-S. Jia, G. Li, and Z.-H. Zhang, Constrain the χcJ →D (∗) ¯D(∗) effective couplings via theX(3872)→ π0χcJ decays, Phys. Rev. D112, 074035 (2025), arXiv:2507.16618 [hep-ph]

    2025

  36. [44]

    Y. S. Kalashnikova and A. V. Nefediev,X(3872) in the molecular model, Phys. Usp.62, 568 (2019), arXiv:1811.01324 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Maiani, F

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Diquark-antidiquarks with hidden or open charm and the nature ofX(3872), Phys. Rev. D71, 014028 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0412098

    2005 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Maiani, V

    L. Maiani, V. Riquer, F. Piccinini, and A. D. Polosa, Four quark interpretation ofY(4260), Phys. Rev. D72, 031502 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0507062

    2005 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Maiani, A

    L. Maiani, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Indications of a Four-Quark Structure for theX(3872) andX(3876) Par- ticles from Recent Belle and BABAR Data, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 182003 (2007), arXiv:0707.3354 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Terasaki, A New tetra-quark interpretation of X(3872), Prog

    K. Terasaki, A New tetra-quark interpretation of X(3872), Prog. Theor. Phys.118, 821 (2007), arXiv:0706.3944 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Dubniˇ cka, A

    S. Dubniˇ cka, A. Z. Dubniˇ ckov´ a, M. A. Ivanov, and A. Liptaj, Dynamical Approach to Decays ofXY Z States, Symmetry12, 884 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Wang, Decipher the width of theX(3872) via the QCD sum rules, Phys

    Z.-G. Wang, Decipher the width of theX(3872) via the QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D109, 014017 (2024), arXiv:2310.02030 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Wang, Analysis of the hidden-charm tetraquark mass spectrum with the QCD sum rules, Phys

    Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the hidden-charm tetraquark mass spectrum with the QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014018 (2020), arXiv:1908.07914 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Barnes and S

    T. Barnes and S. Godfrey, Charmonium options for the X(3872), Phys. Rev. D69, 054008 (2004), arXiv:hep- ph/0311162

    2004

  45. [53]

    Suzuki, TheX(3872) boson: Molecule or char- monium, Phys

    M. Suzuki, TheX(3872) boson: Molecule or char- monium, Phys. Rev. D72, 114013 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0508258. 8

    2005

  46. [54]

    Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, J/ψγandψ(2S)γdecay modes of theX(3872), J. Phys. G38, 015001 (2011), arXiv:0909.0380 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Braaten, H

    E. Braaten, H. W. Hammer, and T. Mehen, Scattering of an Ultrasoft Pion and theX(3872), Phys. Rev. D82, 034018 (2010), arXiv:1005.1688 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Fleming and T

    S. Fleming and T. Mehen, The decay of theX(3872) intoχ cJ and the Operator Product Expansion in XEFT, Phys. Rev. D85, 014016 (2012), arXiv:1110.0265 [hep- ph]

    2012 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Mehen, Hadronic loops versus factorization in effective field theory calculations ofX(3872)→χ cJ π0, Phys

    T. Mehen, Hadronic loops versus factorization in effective field theory calculations ofX(3872)→χ cJ π0, Phys. Rev. D92, 034019 (2015), arXiv:1503.02719 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Braaten, Galilean-invariant effective field theory for theX(3872), Phys

    E. Braaten, Galilean-invariant effective field theory for theX(3872), Phys. Rev. D91, 114007 (2015), arXiv:1503.04791 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Dai, F.-K

    L. Dai, F.-K. Guo, and T. Mehen, RevisitingX(3872)→ D0 ¯D0π0 in an effective field theory for theX(3872), Phys. Rev. D101, 054024 (2020), arXiv:1912.04317 [hep- ph]

    2020 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Ablikim et al

    M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII), Study of Open-Charm De- cays and Radiative Transitions of theX(3872), Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 242001 (2020), arXiv:2001.01156 [hep- ex]

    2020

  53. [61]

    Y. Wang, Q. Wu, G. Li, W.-H. Qin, X.-H. Liu, C.-S. An, and J.-J. Xie, Investigations of charmless decays of X(3872) via intermediate meson loops, Phys. Rev. D 106, 074015 (2022), arXiv:2209.12206 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Albaladejo, F

    M. Albaladejo, F. K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves, and M. P. Valderrama, Decay widths of the spin-2 part- ners of theX(3872), Eur. Phys. J. C75, 547 (2015), arXiv:1504.00861 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Jia, Z.-H

    Z.-S. Jia, Z.-H. Zhang, G. Li, and F.-K. Guo, Radiative decays of the heavy-quark-spin molecular partner ofT + cc, Phys. Rev. D108, 094038 (2023), arXiv:2307.11047 [hep- ph]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Fleming, R

    S. Fleming, R. Hodges, and T. Mehen,T + cc decays: Dif- ferential spectra and two-body final states, Phys. Rev. D 104, 116010 (2021), arXiv:2109.02188 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    J. F. Amundson, C. G. Boyd, E. E. Jenkins, M. E. Luke, A. V. Manohar, J. L. Rosner, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, RadiativeD ∗ decay using heavy quark and chi- ral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B296, 415 (1992), arXiv:hep- ph/9209241

    1992

  58. [66]

    I. W. Stewart, Extraction of theD ∗Dπcoupling from D∗ decays, Nucl. Phys. B529, 62 (1998), arXiv:hep- ph/9803227

    1998

  59. [67]

    Guo, Novel Method for Precisely Measuring the X(3872) Mass, Phys

    F.-K. Guo, Novel Method for Precisely Measuring the X(3872) Mass, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 202002 (2019), arXiv:1902.11221 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  60. [68]

    D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Two nucleon systems from effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B534, 329 (1998), arXiv:nucl-th/9802075

    1998 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Shi, Z.-H

    P.-P. Shi, Z.-H. Zhang, F.-K. Guo, and Z. Yang,D +D− hadronic atom and its production inppandp¯pcollisions, Phys. Rev. D105, 034024 (2022), arXiv:2111.13496 [hep- ph]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, G. Li, U.-G. Meißner, and Q. Zhao, Effect of charmed meson loops on charmo- nium transitions, Phys. Rev. D83, 034013 (2011), arXiv:1008.3632 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-antiheavy hadronic molecules, Progr. Phys.41, 65 (2021), arXiv:2101.01021 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.