RECORD
nu_e Disappearance in MiniBooNE
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 31 Jul 2007
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The anomalous excess of low-energy nu_e events measured in the MiniBooNE experiment is explained through a renormalization of the absolute neutrino flux and a simultaneous disappearance of the nu_e's in the beam, which is compatible with that indicated by the results of Gallium radioactive source experiments.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The anomalous excess of low-energy nu_e events measured in the MiniBooNE experiment is explained through a renormalization of the absolute neutrino flux and a simultaneous disappearance of the nu_e's in the beam, which is compatible with that indicated by the results of Gallium radioactive source experiments. We present the results of the fit of MiniBooNE data (P(nu_e->nu_e) = 0.64 +0.08 -0.07) and the combined fit of MiniBooNE data and the nu_e disappearance measured in the Gallium radioactive source experiments, which gives P(nu_e->nu_e) = 0.82 +- 0.04. We show that our interpretation of the data is also compatible with an old indication in favor of nu_e disappearance found from the analysis of the results of beam-dump experiments, leading to P(nu_e->nu_e) = 0.80 +0.03 -0.04.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The anomalous excess of low-energy nu_e events measured in the MiniBooNE experiment is explained through a renormalization of the absolute neutrino flux and a simultaneous disappearance of the nu_e's in the beam, which is compatible with that indicated by the results of Gallium radioactive source experiments. | interpretation 0.84 | 0.53 | 0.84 | asserted 0.93 |
| s1 | We present the results of the fit of MiniBooNE data (P(nu_e->nu_e) = 0.64 +0.08 -0.07) and the combined fit of MiniBooNE data and the nu_e disappearance measured in the Gallium radioactive source experiments, which gives P(nu_e->nu_e) = 0.82 +- 0.04. | result 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.30 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | We show that our interpretation of the data is also compatible with an old indication in favor of nu_e disappearance found from the analysis of the results of beam-dump experiments, leading to P(nu_e->nu_e) = 0.80 +0.03 -0.04. | result 0.73 | 0.55 | 0.11 | asserted 0.85 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The anomalous excess of low-energy nu_e events measured in the MiniBooNE experiment is explained through a renormalization of the absolute neutrino flux and a simultaneous disappearance of the nu_e's in the beam, which is compatible with that indicated by the results of Gallium radioactive source experiments. We present the results of the fit of MiniBooNE data (P(nu_e->nu_e) = 0.64 +0.08 -0.07) and the combined fit of MiniBooNE data and the nu_e disappearance measured in the Gallium radioactive source experiments, which gives P(nu_e->nu_e) = 0.82 +- 0.04. We show that our interpretation of the data is also compatible with an old indication in favor of nu_e disappearance found from the analysis of the results of beam-dump experiments, leading to P(nu_e->nu_e) = 0.80 +0.03 -0.04.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
23 arXiv papers cite this in 41 sentences
Papers citing it · 28 sentences without a confident label
Builds on it 1 paper
-
In this paper we update the analysis presented in Ref. [ref] of MiniBooNE neutrino events by considering the new data in Ref. [ref] (Section [ref]).
VSBL Electron Neutrino Disappearance · Introduction · 0.80
Uses its data or values 3 papers
-
Since the weighted average, [ref] [equation] is smaller than unity by more than $2σ$, it can be interpreted as an indication of the disappearance of electron neutrinos due to neutrino oscillations [ref] .
Limits on nu_e and anti-nu_e disappearance from Gallium and reactor experiments · Gallium · 0.81
-
* The data of Gallium radioactive source experiments (GALLEX [ref] and SAGE [ref] ) which indicate a $ν_e$ disappearance (the Gallium neutrino anomaly [ref] ).
Implications of 3+1 Short-Baseline Neutrino Oscillations · Introduction · 0.93
-
We present global analyses of all these data without and with the data of Gallium radioactive source experiments (GALLEX [ref] and SAGE [ref] ) which indicate a $ν_e$ disappearance (the Gallium neutrino anomaly [ref] ).
Status of 3+1 Neutrino Mixing · Global 3+1 Fits · 0.96
Compares with it 1 paper
-
The recent affirmative result of the BEST experiment [ref] is consistent with the region in ($sin^22θ_14$, $Δm^2_41$) which was suggested by Ref. [ref] , although most of the BEST region is disfavored by the reactor experiments except Neutrino-4.
Neutrino oscillation phenomenology and impact of Professor Masatoshi Koshiba · $ν_e→ν_e$ channel · 0.88
Cites it as support 2 papers
-
The explanation of the Gallium radioactive source experiments anomaly and the MiniBooNE low-energy anomaly through active-sterile neutrino oscillations requires the disappearance of electron neutrinos into sterile states [ref] .
Matter Effects in Active-Sterile Solar Neutrino Oscillations · Introduction · 0.96
-
This feature makes it difficult to explain the excess by a mis-modelling of the beam without exotic effects [ref] .
MiniBooNE Neutrino Oscillation Search Results and Predicted Background Events · MiniBooNE 2020 Oscillation results · 0.96
Cites it as background 4 papers
-
The GALLEX and SAGE radioactive source experiments revealed a disappearance of electron neutrinos with energy $E$ of the order of 1 MeV at a distance $L$ of the order of 1 m which could be due to short-baseline oscillations [ref] .
Short-BaseLine Electron Neutrino Disappearance · Introduction · 0.82
-
Here we consider the electron neutrino disappearance explanation of the Gallium radioactive source experiments anomaly [ref] (another interesting explanation through quantum decoherence in neutrino oscillations has been proposed in Ref. [ref] ).
Short-Baseline Electron Neutrino Disappearance, Tritium Beta Decay and Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay · Gallium Radioactive Source Experiments · 0.84
-
In the following, we consider the possibility of electron neutrino disappearance due to short-baseline oscillations [ref] (another explanation based on quantum decoherence in neutrino oscillations has been proposed in Ref. [ref] ).
Statistical Significance of the Gallium Anomaly · Introduction · 0.82
What it cites · 32 sentences without a confident label
Uses data or values from 6 papers
-
In order to obtain a robust upper bound we calculated the Bayesian $3σ$ upper limit on $m_β$ from $(m_β^(exp))^2 = -0.6 ±2.2 ±2.1$ measured in the Mainz experiment [ref] : [equation] From Eqs. ([ref]), ([ref]) and ([ref]) we finally obtain $m_4 ≲18 eV$.
Final Results from phase II of the Mainz Neutrino Mass Search in Tritium $\beta$ Decay · Introduction · 1.00
-
This is compatible with the observation of solar and reactor neutrino oscillations due to the squared-mass difference $Δm^2_SOL = ( 7.59 ±0.21 ) ×10^-5 eV^2$ [ref] and the observation of atmospheric and accelerator neutrino oscillations due to the squared-mass difference $Δm^2_ATM = ( 2.74 ^+0.44_-0.26 ×10^-3 ) ×10^-3 eV^2$ [ref] if there are at least four massive neutrinos (see Refs. [ref] ).
Neutrino masses and mixings and... · Introduction · 0.86
-
This is compatible with the observation of solar and reactor neutrino oscillations due to the squared-mass difference $Δm^2_SOL = ( 7.59 ±0.21 ) ×10^-5 eV^2$ [ref] and the observation of atmospheric and accelerator neutrino oscillations due to the squared-mass difference $Δm^2_ATM = ( 2.74 ^+0.44_-0.26 ×10^-3 ) ×10^-3 eV^2$ [ref] if there are at least four massive neutrinos (see Refs. [ref] ).
Neutrino Masses and Mixing: Evidence and Implications · Introduction · 0.86
Compares with 5 papers
-
If massive neutrinos are Majorana particles the amplitude of neutrinoless double-$β$ decay is proportional to the effective Majorana mass [equation] From Eqs. ([ref]) and ([ref]) we obtain [equation] If the contributions to $m_2β$ of the other neutrino masses is much smaller, $m_2β ≃|U_e4|^2 m_4$ is constrained in the range ([ref]), which is compatible with the most stringent bounds obtained in the Heidelberg-Moscow [ref] and IGEX [ref] experiments ($m_2β ≲0.3 - 1.0 eV$; see Ref. [ref] ), with the recent CUORICINO measurement [ref] ($m_2β ≲0.19 - 0.68 eV$) and with the alleged[ This measurement is controversial [ref] .
Results from a search for the $0\nu\beta\beta$-decay of $^{130}Te$ · Introduction · 0.84
-
If massive neutrinos are Majorana particles the amplitude of neutrinoless double-$β$ decay is proportional to the effective Majorana mass [equation] From Eqs. ([ref]) and ([ref]) we obtain [equation] If the contributions to $m_2β$ of the other neutrino masses is much smaller, $m_2β ≃|U_e4|^2 m_4$ is constrained in the range ([ref]), which is compatible with the most stringent bounds obtained in the Heidelberg-Moscow [ref] and IGEX [ref] experiments ($m_2β ≲0.3 - 1.0 eV$; see Ref. [ref] ), with the recent CUORICINO measurement [ref] ($m_2β ≲0.19 - 0.68 eV$) and with the alleged[ This measurement is controversial [ref] .
Comment on "Evidence for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay" · Introduction · 0.84
-
If massive neutrinos are Majorana particles the amplitude of neutrinoless double-$β$ decay is proportional to the effective Majorana mass [equation] From Eqs. ([ref]) and ([ref]) we obtain [equation] If the contributions to $m_2β$ of the other neutrino masses is much smaller, $m_2β ≃|U_e4|^2 m_4$ is constrained in the range ([ref]), which is compatible with the most stringent bounds obtained in the Heidelberg-Moscow [ref] and IGEX [ref] experiments ($m_2β ≲0.3 - 1.0 eV$; see Ref. [ref] ), with the recent CUORICINO measurement [ref] ($m_2β ≲0.19 - 0.68 eV$) and with the alleged[ This measurement is controversial [ref] .
The Igex 76ge Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Experiment: Prospects for Next Generation Experiments · Introduction · 0.84
Cites as background 21 papers
-
Possibilities to reconcile the LSND and MiniBooNE data through 3+1 four-neutrino mixing [ref] , 3+2 four-neutrino mixing [ref] , neutrino decay [ref] , extra-dimensions [ref] , mass-varying neutrinos [ref] , a new light gauge boson [ref] , and Lorentz-violation [ref] have been discussed in the literature.
Sterile neutrino oscillations after first MiniBooNE results · Introduction · 0.98
-
Possibilities to reconcile the LSND and MiniBooNE data through 3+1 four-neutrino mixing [ref] , 3+2 four-neutrino mixing [ref] , neutrino decay [ref] , extra-dimensions [ref] , mass-varying neutrinos [ref] , a new light gauge boson [ref] , and Lorentz-violation [ref] have been discussed in the literature.
MiniBooNE Results and Neutrino Schemes with 2 sterile Neutrinos: Possible Mass Orderings and Observables related to Neutrino Masses · Introduction · 0.98
-
Possibilities to reconcile the LSND and MiniBooNE data through 3+1 four-neutrino mixing [ref] , 3+2 four-neutrino mixing [ref] , neutrino decay [ref] , extra-dimensions [ref] , mass-varying neutrinos [ref] , a new light gauge boson [ref] , and Lorentz-violation [ref] have been discussed in the literature.
Neutrino decay as a possible interpretation to the MiniBooNE observation with unparticle scenario · Introduction · 0.98
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.