Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Distinguishing Dark Matter Stabilization Symmetries Using Multiple Kinematic Edges and Cusps

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 4 Mar 2010

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this case, we note that certain decay chain "topologies" of the mother particle which are present for the Z_3 case (but absent for the Z_2 case) generate a "cusp" in the invariant mass distribution of the SM particles.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1003.0899 (version 2)
Pith IDP2JI4H2J, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDevin G. E. Walker, Doojin Kim, Kaustubh Agashe, Manuel Toharia. "Distinguishing Dark Matter Stabilization Symmetries Using Multiple Kinematic Edges and Cusps." arXiv:1003.0899 (2010). https://pith.science/paper/P2JI4H2J
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,176 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.56 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.44 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.21 · compares with prior results 0.48 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We emphasize that the stabilizing symmetry for dark matter (DM) particles does not have to be the commonly used parity (Z_2) symmetry. We therefore examine the potential of the colliders to distinguish models with parity stabilized DM from models in which the DM is stabilized by other symmetries. We often take the latter to be a Z_3 symmetry for illustration. We focus on signatures where a single particle, charged under the DM stabilization symmetry decays into the DM and Standard Model (SM) particles. Such a Z_3-charged "mother" particle can decay into one or two DM particles along with the same SM particles. This can be contrasted with the decay of a Z_2-charged mother particle, where only one DM particle appears. Thus, if the intermediate particles in these decay chains are off-shell, then the reconstructed invariant mass of the SM particles exhibits two kinematic edges for the Z_3 case but only one for the Z_2 case. For the case of on-shell intermediate particles, distinguishing the two symmetries requires more than the kinematic edges. In this case, we note that certain decay chain "topologies" of the mother particle which are present for the Z_3 case (but absent for the Z_2 case) generate a "cusp" in the invariant mass distribution of the SM particles. We demonstrate that this cusp is generally invariant of the various spin configurations. We further apply these techniques within the context of explicit models.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We emphasize that the stabilizing symmetry for dark matter (DM) particles does not have to be the commonly used parity (Z_2) symmetry. background 0.92 0.14 0.14 asserted 0.73
s1 We therefore examine the potential of the colliders to distinguish models with parity stabilized DM from models in which the DM is stabilized by other symmetries. contribution 0.98 0.59 0.10 hedged possibility 0.64
s2 We often take the latter to be a Z_3 symmetry for illustration. method 0.72 0.55 0.04 asserted 0.83
s3 We focus on signatures where a single particle, charged under the DM stabilization symmetry decays into the DM and Standard Model (SM) particles. method 0.56 0.44 0.04 asserted 0.97
s4 Such a Z_3-charged "mother" particle can decay into one or two DM particles along with the same SM particles. method 0.52 0.32 0.05 asserted 0.75
s5 This can be contrasted with the decay of a Z_2-charged mother particle, where only one DM particle appears. background 0.60 0.16 0.05 asserted 1.00
s6 Thus, if the intermediate particles in these decay chains are off-shell, then the reconstructed invariant mass of the SM particles exhibits two kinematic edges for the Z_3 case but only one for the Z_2 case. result 0.90 0.65 0.29 asserted 0.95
s7 For the case of on-shell intermediate particles, distinguishing the two symmetries requires more than the kinematic edges. limitation 0.63 0.43 0.07 asserted 0.99
s8 In this case, we note that certain decay chain "topologies" of the mother particle which are present for the Z_3 case (but absent for the Z_2 case) generate a "cusp" in the invariant mass distribution of the SM particles. result 0.51 0.74 0.25 asserted 0.98
s9 We demonstrate that this cusp is generally invariant of the various spin configurations. result 0.96 0.88 0.13 asserted 1.00
s10 We further apply these techniques within the context of explicit models. contribution 0.81 0.88 0.05 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.64 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.66.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We emphasize that the stabilizing symmetry for dark matter (DM) particles does not have to be the commonly used parity (Z_2) symmetry. We therefore examine the potential of the colliders to distinguish models with parity stabilized DM from models in which the DM is stabilized by other symmetries. We often take the latter to be a Z_3 symmetry for illustration. We focus on signatures where a single particle, charged under the DM stabilization symmetry decays into the DM and Standard Model (SM) particles. Such a Z_3-charged "mother" particle can decay into one or two DM particles along with the same SM particles. This can be contrasted with the decay of a Z_2-charged mother particle, where only one DM particle appears. Thus, if the intermediate particles in these decay chains are off-shell, then the reconstructed invariant mass of the SM particles exhibits two kinematic edges for the Z_3 case but only one for the Z_2 case. For the case of on-shell intermediate particles, distinguishing the two symmetries requires more than the kinematic edges. In this case, we note that certain decay chain "topologies" of the mother particle which are present for the Z_3 case (but absent for the Z_2 case) generate a "cusp" in the invariant mass distribution of the SM particles. We demonstrate that this cusp is generally invariant of the various spin configurations. We further apply these techniques within the context of explicit models.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

32 arXiv papers cite this in 59 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 48 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • Since earlier work [ref] only studied measurements of the visible part of a single mother decay, here we focussed on using the information from both mother decays, including the missing energy in the event which is shared between the two decay chains (or sides).

    Using M_T2 to Distinguish Dark Matter Stabilization Symmetries · Conclusions and Outlook · 0.80

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Compares with it 2 papers
  • Solving the above-given two equations, we obtain both mother and DM masses [The upper edge from SM$_ 2 2$ provides redundant information, but of course can be a cross-check.]: M = 2/3√( C_ E2 )(4C_ E2 -C_ E3 ) m_DM = 2/3√(C_E2)√((4C_ E2 -C_ E3 )(C_ E2 -C_ E3 )) This situation is somewhat like the double-edge signal for single mother decay studied in reference [ref] , where it was again possible to obtain mother and DM masses from the two edges in invariant mass distribution of visible/SM final state.

    Using M_T2 to Distinguish Dark Matter Stabilization Symmetries · One Visible/SM Particle in Each Decay Chain · 0.93

  • In particular, Refs. [ref] used the endpoints of kinematic distributions to probe the stabilization symmetry of the DM, whereas our method relies quite directly on peak measurements and only marginally on endpoint measurements.

    Using Energy Peaks to Count Dark Matter Particles in Decays · Introduction · 0.99

Cites it as background 7 papers

What it cites · 39 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
  • The differential distribution $1/Γ ∂Γ/∂m_ac^2$ that we want to study can be obtained for this “new” topology easily by noting that the differential distribution $1/Γ ∂^2 Γ/∂u∂v$ must be flat, where the variables are defined as follows u=1-cosθ_c DM^(C)/2 and v=1-cosθ_ca^(B)/2, with $θ_ca^(B)$ being the angle between $c$ and $a$ in the rest frame of $B$, and $θ_c DM^(C)$ being the angle between $c$ and DM in the rest frame of $C$ [ref] .

    Invariant mass distributions in cascade decays · Cusp Topology · 0.80

  • In figure [ref] we show the distribution (again obtained with Madgraph [ref] ) for the same decay chain as in Figure [ref], but where the chiral structure of some couplings has been modified from before.

    MadGraph/MadEvent v4: The New Web Generation · $Z_3$ case: 2 DM + 2 Visible · 1.00

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as support 2 papers
Cites as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.