Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:1011.6167 v2 · submitted 29 Nov 2010

Vacuum misalignment corrections to tri-bimaximal mixing and form dominance

Stephen F. King

The paper says

“The analytic results show that the corrections to tri-bimaximal mixing and form dominance depend on the pattern of the vacuum misalignment, with the two effects being uncorrelated.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

Tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing may arise from see-saw models based on family symmetry which is spontaneously broken by flavons with particular vacuum alignments. However recent analyses hint that tri-bimaximal mixing may be insensitive to the precise form of vacuum alignment. In this paper we derive approximate analytic results which express the deviations from tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing due to vacuum misalignment. We also relate vacuum misalignment to departures from form dominance, corresponding to deviations from the real orthogonal R matrix, where such corrections are necessary to allow for successful leptogenesis. The analytic results show that the corrections to tri-bimaximal mixing and form dominance depend on the pattern of the vacuum misalignment, with the two effects being uncorrelated.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.26 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.15 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.51 · mentions code or data availability 0.01

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
Tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing may arise from see-saw models based on family symmetry which is spontaneously broken by flavons with particular vacuum alignments. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 hedged possibility 1.00
However recent analyses hint that tri-bimaximal mixing may be insensitive to the precise form of vacuum alignment. background 0.87 0.04 0.03 hedged possibility 1.00
In this paper we derive approximate analytic results which express the deviations from tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing due to vacuum misalignment. contribution 0.96 0.96 0.11 asserted 1.00
We also relate vacuum misalignment to departures from form dominance, corresponding to deviations from the real orthogonal $R$ matrix, where such corrections are necessary to allow for successful leptogenesis. contribution 0.96 0.72 0.11 asserted 0.99
The analytic results show that the corrections to tri-bimaximal mixing and form dominance depend on the pattern of the vacuum misalignment, with the two effects being uncorrelated. result 1.00 0.94 0.83 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,300 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 5 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

10 arXiv papers cite this in 16 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 13 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 86 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
  • To first order in $r,s,a$ the lepton mixing matrix $U$ (where as usual $U_MNS=U.P_Maj$) can be written as [ref] , [Other related proposals to parametrize the lepton mixing matrix have been considered in [ref] .] [equation] from which the deviations of the columns of $U= (Φ_1,Φ_2,Φ_3)$ in Eq.[ref], namely $ΔΦ_i$, may be read off as follows, [equation]

    Parametrizing the lepton mixing matrix in terms of deviations from tri-bimaximal mixing · Deviations from tri-bimaximal mixing · 0.91

  • To first order in $r,s,a$ the lepton mixing matrix $U$ (where as usual $U_MNS=U.P_Maj$) can be written as [ref] , [Other related proposals to parametrize the lepton mixing matrix have been considered in [ref] .] [equation] from which the deviations of the columns of $U= (Φ_1,Φ_2,Φ_3)$ in Eq.[ref], namely $ΔΦ_i$, may be read off as follows, [equation]

    Nearly Tri-Bimaximal Neutrino Mixing and CP Violation · Deviations from tri-bimaximal mixing · 0.91

Uses data or values from 1 paper
Compares with 2 papers
  • We also note that the results in this paper are complementary and more general than the analytic results in [ref] which were confined to sequential dominance (SD) [ref] , and were derived in a completely different way based on a perturbative diagonalization of the neutrino mass matrix in powers of small neutrino mass ratios assuming a hierarchical mass spectrum.

    Neutrino Mixing Angles in Sequential Dominance to NLO and NNLO · Introduction · 0.97

  • We also note that the results in this paper are complementary and more general than the analytic results in [ref] which were confined to sequential dominance (SD) [ref] , and were derived in a completely different way based on a perturbative diagonalization of the neutrino mass matrix in powers of small neutrino mass ratios assuming a hierarchical mass spectrum.

    Atmospheric and Solar Neutrinos with a Heavy Singlet · Introduction · 0.97

Cites as support 2 papers
  • On the contrary, the analyses [ref] seem to motivate indirect family symmetry models with the accidental emergence of the Klein symmetry, and indicate that tri-bimaximal mixing may be insensitive to relatively large vacuum misalignment.

    Tri-bimaximal Neutrino Mixing and $\theta_{13}$ · Example: deviations due to the reactor angle · 0.99

  • On the contrary, the analyses [ref] seem to motivate indirect family symmetry models with the accidental emergence of the Klein symmetry, and indicate that tri-bimaximal mixing may be insensitive to relatively large vacuum misalignment.

    Is the tri-bimaximal mixing accidental? · Example: deviations due to the reactor angle · 0.99

Cites as background 21 papers
  • To set the notation, recall that, in the type I see-saw mechanism [ref] , the starting point is a heavy right-handed Majorana neutrino mass matrix $M_RR$ and a Dirac neutrino mass matrix (in the left-right convention) $M_D$, with the light effective left-handed Majorana neutrino mass matrix $M^ν$ given by the type I see-saw formula [ref] , [equation] In a basis in which $M_RR$ is diagonal with real and positive eigenvalues $M_i$, we may write, [equation] and $M_D$ may be written in terms of three general column vectors $m_D1,m_D2,m_D3$, [equation] The see-saw formula then gives, [equation] As first observed in [ref] $M^ν_TB$ may be achieved if the columns of the Dirac mass matrix are aligned along the columns of the TB mixing matrix, $U^TB=(Φ_1^TB, Φ_2^TB, Φ_3^TB)$, [equation] where $a_i$ are three complex constants.

    A4 See-Saw Models and Form Dominance · Form Dominance · 0.94

  • To set the notation, recall that, in the type I see-saw mechanism [ref] , the starting point is a heavy right-handed Majorana neutrino mass matrix $M_RR$ and a Dirac neutrino mass matrix (in the left-right convention) $M_D$, with the light effective left-handed Majorana neutrino mass matrix $M^ν$ given by the type I see-saw formula [ref] , [equation] In a basis in which $M_RR$ is diagonal with real and positive eigenvalues $M_i$, we may write, [equation] and $M_D$ may be written in terms of three general column vectors $m_D1,m_D2,m_D3$, [equation] The see-saw formula then gives, [equation] As first observed in [ref] $M^ν_TB$ may be achieved if the columns of the Dirac mass matrix are aligned along the columns of the TB mixing matrix, $U^TB=(Φ_1^TB, Φ_2^TB, Φ_3^TB)$, [equation] where $a_i$ are three complex constants.

    Predicting neutrino parameters from SO(3) family symmetry and quark-lepton unification · Form Dominance · 0.94

  • In the indirect models the underlying family symmetry of the Lagrangian $G_f$ is completely broken, and the flavour symmetry of the neutrino mass matrix $Z_2^S ×Z_2^U$ emerges entirely as an accidental symmetry, due to the quadratic appearance of such flavons in effective Majorana Lagrangian which results in a neutrino mass matrix of the desired form in Eq.[ref] [ref] .

    On the origin of neutrino flavour symmetry · Direct vs Indirect Models · 0.90

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment