RECORD
Extracting $B \to K^*$ Form Factors from Data
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 19 Apr 2012
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We extract ratios of $B \to K^*$ form factors at low hadronic recoil from recent data on $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decays in a model-independent way.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We extract ratios of $B \to K^*$ form factors at low hadronic recoil from recent data on $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decays in a model-independent way. The presented method will improve in the future with further (angular) studies in semileptonic rare B-decays and advance our understanding of form factors, which are important inputs in precision tests of the Standard Model.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We extract ratios of $B \to K^*$ form factors at low hadronic recoil from recent data on $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decays in a model-independent way. | contribution 0.88 | 0.95 | 0.83 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | The presented method will improve in the future with further (angular) studies in semileptonic rare B-decays and advance our understanding of form factors, which are important inputs in precision tests of the Standard Model. | future work 0.99 | 0.10 | 0.11 | hedged possibility 0.55 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We extract ratios of $B \to K^*$ form factors at low hadronic recoil from recent data on $B \to K^* \mu^+ \mu^-$ decays in a model-independent way. The presented method will improve in the future with further (angular) studies in semileptonic rare B-decays and advance our understanding of form factors, which are important inputs in precision tests of the Standard Model.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
22 arXiv papers cite this in 37 sentences
Papers citing it · 30 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 2 papers
-
Following Ref. [ref] , we parametrize the transversity form factors $f_i$, $i=⊥,0,∥$ in $B →K^* ℓ^+ ℓ^-$ decays through a Series Expansion (SE) [ref] [equation] in the variable $z$ defined as [equation] Here, $t$ denotes the analytic continuation of $q^2$ to the complex plane, $t_±=(m_B ±m_K^*)^2$ and $t_0$ is a free parameter in the range $0 ≤t_0<t_+$ for which a common choice is $t_0 = t_opt$ with $t_opt=t_+ (1 - √(1 - t_-/t_+))$ [ref] .
B -> K^* Form Factors from Flavor Data to QCD and Back · Form factor series expansion · 0.98
-
Anticipating this, and following similar procedures adopted in the analysis of the data in the $B →(K, K^*) ℓ^+ ℓ^-$ decays [ref] we present here results for the partial branching ratios $dB (B^+ →π^+ μ^+ μ^-)/dq^2$, binned over specified ranges $[q^2_min, q^2_max]$ in eight $q^2$-intervals.
Precise Calculation of the Dilepton Invariant-Mass Spectrum and the Decay Rate in $B^\pm \to \pi^\pm \mu^+ \mu^-$ in the SM · Introduction · 0.85
Uses its data or values 1 paper
-
The best-fit result in the lowest order series expansion (SE) is obtained as $α_∥/α_⊥=0.43^+0.11_-0.08, α_0/α_⊥=0.15^+0.03_-0.02$ [ref] .
B -> K(*) l+ l- @ Low Recoil and Physics Implications · $B →K^*$ form factors data versus theory · 0.87
Compares with it 1 paper
-
* The results in plain SE1 are consistent with the previous findings of Ref. [ref] , but not equal due to the different $B →K^* ℓ^+ ℓ^-$data.
B -> K^* Form Factors from Flavor Data to QCD and Back · Results · 1.00
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
In particular, the $B →K^*(→Kπ) μ^+ μ^-$ decay offers a large number of observables to test the SM, ranging from the differential decay widths, polarizations, to a full analysis of angular distributions of the final state particles, for an incomplete list one can refer to Refs. [ref] and many references therein.
Implications of the $R_K$ and $R_{K^*}$ anomalies · Introduction · 1.00
-
The data are presently being combined with theoretical and phenomenological calculations in order to test the Standard Model and to constrain classes of BSM models [ref] .
Lattice QCD calculation of form factors describing the rare decays $B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-$ and $B_s \to \phi \ell^+ \ell^-$ · Introduction · 0.80
What it cites · 26 sentences without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 8 papers
-
Using the parametrization of the Simplified Series Expansion (SSE) [ref] , corresponding to the changes $B(t) →1-t/m_R^2$, $ϕ_f(t) →1$, $√(-z(t,0)) →√(t)/m_B$, $√(z(t,t_-)) →√(λ̂)$ in Eq. ([ref]), a similarly good fit ist obtained with $χ_min^2=3.4$ and the best-fit results [equation]
Model-independent description of $B\to \pi l\nu$ decays and a determination of $|V_{ub}|$ · Introduction · 0.98
-
For an analytic ansatz for the $q^2$-shape of the form factors we employ the Series Expansion (SE) [ref] .
A Precision Model Independent Determination of |Vub| from B -> pi e nu · Introduction · 1.00
-
For an analytic ansatz for the $q^2$-shape of the form factors we employ the Series Expansion (SE) [ref] .
Comment on form factor shape and extraction of |V_ub| from B --> pi l nu · Introduction · 1.00
Uses data or values from 1 paper
-
Two of these short-distance free observables, the fraction of longitudinally polarized vector mesons $F_L$ and the transverse asymmetry $A_T^(2)$ [ref] , have recently been measured by CDF [ref] , BaBar [ref] ($F_L$ only) and LHCb [ref] in the decay $B →K^* μ^+ μ^-$.
Measurements of the Angular Distributions in the Decays B -> K(*) mu+ mu- at CDF · Introduction · 0.81
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.