REVIEW 1 cited by
Proton-lambda correlation functions at the LHC with account for residual correlations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The theoretical analysis of $\bar{p}-\Lambda \oplus p-\bar{\Lambda}$ correlation function in 10% most central Au+Au collisions at RHIC energy $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV shows that the contribution of residual correlations is the necessary factor to obtain a satisfactory description of the experimental data. A neglecting of the residual correlation effect, leads to unrealistically low source radius, about 2 times smaller than the corresponding value for $p-\Lambda \oplus \bar{p}-\bar{\Lambda}$ case, when one fits the experimental correlation function within Lednicky-Lyuboshitz analytical model. Recently an approach accounting effectively for residual correlations for the baryon-antibaryon correlation function was proposed, and a good RHIC data description was reached with the source radius extracted from the hydrokinetic model (HKM). The $\bar{p}-\Lambda$ scattering length, as well as the parameters characterizing the residual correlation effect --- annihilation dip amplitude and its inverse width --- were extracted from the corresponding fit. In this paper we use these extracted values and simulated in HKM source functions for Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC energy $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76$ TeV to predict the corresponding $p\Lambda$ and $p\bar{\Lambda}$ correlation functions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Interferometry Radii at RHIC BES Energies within the integrated HydroKinetic Model
The iHKMe model reproduces pion HBT radii at RHIC BES energies with a crossover equation of state, while a first-order phase transition predicts too-large R_long at higher energies.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.