Pith. Sign in

REVIEW

On sgoldstino interpretation of the diphoton excess

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 17 Dec 2015 · 28 references

Pith's verdict: A competent follow-up that maps diboson correlations for the sgoldstino explanation, but the viability check on the 8 TeV bound is asserted rather than demonstrated.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 9, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

  1. T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
  2. T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
  3. T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
  4. T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
  5. T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 9 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →
Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1512.05723 (version 2)
Pith IDP5BUBXS7, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD.S.Gorbunov, S.V.Demidov. "On sgoldstino interpretation of the diphoton excess." arXiv:1512.05723 (2015). https://pith.science/paper/P5BUBXS7
Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper
Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Referee report
The paper

The paper claims

The 750 GeV diphoton bump could be the sgoldstino, the scalar partner of the goldstino in low-scale broken supersymmetry, and its couplings would force correlated WW, ZZ and Z-photon peaks at the same mass.

The reading

Two LHC experiments reported a small excess of photon pairs around 750 GeV of invariant mass. This paper argues that the excess is naturally explained by a sgoldstino: the scalar partner of the goldstino, the Goldstone fermion of spontaneously broken supersymmetry, in models where supersymmetry breaks at a low scale $M_{SUSY} = 4.7$ TeV, so that the breaking sector is accessible to the LHC. The appeal of the idea is that the sgoldstino's couplings are not free parameters: they are fixed by the soft gaugino masses $M_1, M_2, M_3$ and suppressed by the supersymmetry-breaking scale $M_{SUSY}$. The same couplings that generate the diphoton rate through gluon fusion also generate decays into $WW$, $ZZ$ and $Zgamma$, so the hypothesis is not a one-number fit but a set of linked predictions. If the authors are right, the 750 GeV bump is the first collider handle on the sector that breaks supersymmetry, and Run-II should see companion resonances in diboson channels at the same mass.

What carries the argument

The sgoldstino is the scalar superpartner of the goldstino, the Goldstone fermion of spontaneously broken supersymmetry. Its interactions with gauge bosons are fixed by the soft gaugino masses and the supersymmetry-breaking scale: the effective Lagrangian couples $S$ to $G^a_{munu}G^{a munu}$ with strength $M_3/(sqrt{2}F)$ and to $F_{munu}F^{munu}$ with strength $M_{gammagamma}/(sqrt{2}F)$, where $M_{gammagamma} = M_1 cos^2 theta_W + M_2 sin^2 theta_W$ and $F$ is the supersymmetry-breaking order parameter. Similar terms with $M_{ZZ} = M_1 sin^2 theta_W + M_2 cos^2 theta_W$ and $M_{Zgamma} = (M_2 - M_1) sin theta_W cos theta_W$ generate the $ZZ$ and $Zgamma$ channels. That shared structure is what carries the argument: a single set of three gaugino masses and one scale $F$ fixes production, the diphoton branching ratio, and every diboson rate at once, so the model makes a joint prediction rather than a single-point fit.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that a scalar sgoldstino of mass 750 GeV, in a supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model with low-scale breaking, reproduces the observed diphoton excess while surviving existing collider bounds. The production is gluon-gluon fusion, dominant because the gluino is taken to be the heaviest gaugino, and the diphoton branching ratio reduces to the ratio of effective couplings, $Br(S to gammagamma) = (M_{gammagamma}/M_3)^2$ up to the appropriate phase-space factor. The authors scan $M_1$ and $M_2$ between 0.2 TeV and $M_{SUSY}$, and $M_3$ between 1.7 TeV and $M_{SUSY}$, for $M_{SUSY} = 5$ and 7 TeV, keeping only models with $3 fb < sigma_{gammagamma} < 13 fb$ at 13 TeV that also pass the 8 TeV diphoton, dijet and diboson limits. They find that the surviving models predict $ZZ$ cross sections up to about 17 fb ($M_{SUSY} = 5$ TeV) and 26 fb ($M_{SUSY} = 7$ TeV), with $WW$ and $Zgamma$ rates of comparable or larger size, all correlated because the couplings share the same gaugino masses and the same $1/F$ suppression. They also note that the resonance width in this minimal setup stays below the GeV scale, so the large width ATLAS somewhat prefers would require an extension with a light singlet scalar, such as in NMSSM-type models, where the sgoldstino can also decay into scalar pairs without disturbing the diboson branching pattern.

Load-bearing premise

The scenario survives only if the 8 TeV diphoton bound does not already exclude the 13 TeV window it needs; the paper addresses this qualitatively, noting the required rate of 0.6 to 2.6 fb at 13 TeV is 'still allowed partly' and asserting the 13-to-8 TeV cross-section ratio is about 5 and nearly parameter-independent, without a full recast or an uncertainty on that ratio.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Run-II should show resonances at 750 GeV in $ZZ$, $WW$ and $Zgamma$ with rates up to tens of fb, and the pattern among the three channels is fixed by the same two gaugino masses that set the diphoton rate.
  • The dominant decay into gluon pairs produces a dijet resonance at 750 GeV, already constrained below about 30 pb by 8 TeV searches.
  • Small predicted diboson cross sections correspond to small gaugino masses, so the low-rate corner of parameter space is reachable by direct searches for light gauginos rather than by resonance searches.
  • If a pseudoscalar sgoldstino partner exists with a different mass, a second diphoton peak should appear at that mass, with matching diboson peaks, and any scalar-pseudoscalar mixing would alter the angular distributions of the decay products.
  • Soft trilinear couplings can carry flavour structure, so virtual sgoldstino exchange gives flavour-changing top and heavy-meson decays and possibly fermion-antifermion resonances at 750 GeV, including pairs of different flavour.
  • The gravitino mass in this window is $10^{-3}$ to $10^{-2}$ eV, consistent with supernova and Big Bang nucleosynthesis bounds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The real fingerprint is the correlation among $sigma_{ZZ}$, $sigma_{WW}$ and $sigma_{Zgamma}$: measuring any two of them at 750 GeV would over-determine $M_1$, $M_2$ and $sqrt{F}$, making the hypothesis far easier to confirm or kill than the diphoton rate alone.
  • Because the same $1/F$ suppression controls production, decay and the gravitino mass, any tightening of cosmological or astrophysical bounds on light gravitinos feeds back directly on the collider window this paper carves out.
  • A confirmed width near 46 GeV would push the minimal sgoldstino out and point to an extended breaking sector with a light singlet, so the width measurement is a discriminator between the minimal and non-minimal versions of this explanation.
  • If Run-II accumulates enough data to see the diphoton line but finds no accompanying $ZZ$ or $WW$ structure at 750 GeV at the tens-of-fb level, the sgoldstino reading loses its main advantage over generic spin-0 interpretations.
Original abstract

We point out that the diphoton excess at about 750 GeV recently discovered by the LHC experiments can be explained within supersymmetric models with low scale supersymmetry breaking with sgoldstino as a natural candidate. We discuss phenomenological consequences of this scenario describing possible signatures to test this hypothesis.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,295 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.50 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We point out that the diphoton excess at about 750 GeV recently discovered by the LHC experiments can be explained within supersymmetric models with low scale supersymmetry breaking with sgoldstino as a natural candidate. We discuss phenomenological consequences of this scenario describing possible signatures to test this hypothesis.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We point out that the diphoton excess at about 750 GeV recently discovered by the LHC experiments can be explained within supersymmetric models with low scale supersymmetry breaking with sgoldstino as a natural candidate. contribution 0.63 0.63 0.90 hedged possibility 0.57
s1 We discuss phenomenological consequences of this scenario describing possible signatures to test this hypothesis. contribution 0.94 0.79 0.08 asserted 0.50

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.65 · evidence from argument 0.78.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures
Figure 1. Scatter plot in (M1, M2) plane for √ F = 5 TeV (green/light gray) and √ F = 7 TeV (red / dark gray). M1,2 of the selected models for different values of supersymmetry breaking scale √ F. As expected, larger √ F require an increase of gaugino masses M1,2 because sgoldstino couplings behave as Mi/F. Similar correlation is found for M3. Diphoton and pp → S → ZZ cross sections calculated at different √ F are shown in
Figure 2. Diphoton cross section versus ZZ cross section for √ F = 5 TeV (green) and √ F = 7 TeV (red); we set √ s = 13 TeV. 4
Figure 3. ZZ and WW cross sections for √ F = 5 TeV (green) and √ F = 7 TeV (red); we set √ s = 13 TeV. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 σZZ, fb σZγ , fb
Figure 4. ZZ and Zγ cross sections for √ F = 5 TeV (green) and √ F = 7 TeV (red); we set √ s = 13 TeV. at the LHC, Run-II with larger statistics. Moreover there are correlations between values of these cross sections which appear because of relations between corresponding sgoldstino 5

Figures reproduced from arXiv:1512.05723 by the authors.

References
How the literature uses it

59 arXiv papers cite this in 63 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper
  • We interpret the di-photon excess recently reported by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations as a new resonance arising from the sgoldstino scalar, which is the superpartner of the Goldstone mode of spontaneous supersymmetry breaking, the goldstino.

    The 750 GeV diphoton excess from the goldstino superpartner · 0.98

Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Cites it as background 47 papers

What it cites · 8 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 5 papers
Cites as background 7 papers
  • In this class of models (see, e.g. [ref] ) apart from usual superpartners of the Standard Model particles, the low energy theory contains also a part of the sector responsible for supersymmetry breaking.

    Low Scale Supersymmetry Breaking and its LHC Signatures · Introduction · 0.99

  • In this class of models (see, e.g. [ref] ) apart from usual superpartners of the Standard Model particles, the low energy theory contains also a part of the sector responsible for supersymmetry breaking.

    Low-scale SUSY breaking and the (s)goldstino physics · Introduction · 0.99

  • In this class of models (see, e.g. [ref] ) apart from usual superpartners of the Standard Model particles, the low energy theory contains also a part of the sector responsible for supersymmetry breaking.

    The MSSM Higgs Sector with a Dynamical Goldstino Supermultiplet · Introduction · 0.99

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.