REVIEW
On sgoldstino interpretation of the diphoton excess
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 17 Dec 2015 · 28 references
Pith's verdict: A competent follow-up that maps diboson correlations for the sgoldstino explanation, but the viability check on the 8 TeV bound is asserted rather than demonstrated.
T0 · AI review
Why Pith says this
Highlight any text to comment on it.
Referee report
The paper
The paper claims
The 750 GeV diphoton bump could be the sgoldstino, the scalar partner of the goldstino in low-scale broken supersymmetry, and its couplings would force correlated WW, ZZ and Z-photon peaks at the same mass.
The reading
What carries the argument
The sgoldstino is the scalar superpartner of the goldstino, the Goldstone fermion of spontaneously broken supersymmetry. Its interactions with gauge bosons are fixed by the soft gaugino masses and the supersymmetry-breaking scale: the effective Lagrangian couples $S$ to $G^a_{munu}G^{a munu}$ with strength $M_3/(sqrt{2}F)$ and to $F_{munu}F^{munu}$ with strength $M_{gammagamma}/(sqrt{2}F)$, where $M_{gammagamma} = M_1 cos^2 theta_W + M_2 sin^2 theta_W$ and $F$ is the supersymmetry-breaking order parameter. Similar terms with $M_{ZZ} = M_1 sin^2 theta_W + M_2 cos^2 theta_W$ and $M_{Zgamma} = (M_2 - M_1) sin theta_W cos theta_W$ generate the $ZZ$ and $Zgamma$ channels. That shared structure is what carries the argument: a single set of three gaugino masses and one scale $F$ fixes production, the diphoton branching ratio, and every diboson rate at once, so the model makes a joint prediction rather than a single-point fit.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The paper's claim is that a scalar sgoldstino of mass 750 GeV, in a supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model with low-scale breaking, reproduces the observed diphoton excess while surviving existing collider bounds. The production is gluon-gluon fusion, dominant because the gluino is taken to be the heaviest gaugino, and the diphoton branching ratio reduces to the ratio of effective couplings, $Br(S to gammagamma) = (M_{gammagamma}/M_3)^2$ up to the appropriate phase-space factor. The authors scan $M_1$ and $M_2$ between 0.2 TeV and $M_{SUSY}$, and $M_3$ between 1.7 TeV and $M_{SUSY}$, for $M_{SUSY} = 5$ and 7 TeV, keeping only models with $3 fb < sigma_{gammagamma} < 13 fb$ at 13 TeV that also pass the 8 TeV diphoton, dijet and diboson limits. They find that the surviving models predict $ZZ$ cross sections up to about 17 fb ($M_{SUSY} = 5$ TeV) and 26 fb ($M_{SUSY} = 7$ TeV), with $WW$ and $Zgamma$ rates of comparable or larger size, all correlated because the couplings share the same gaugino masses and the same $1/F$ suppression. They also note that the resonance width in this minimal setup stays below the GeV scale, so the large width ATLAS somewhat prefers would require an extension with a light singlet scalar, such as in NMSSM-type models, where the sgoldstino can also decay into scalar pairs without disturbing the diboson branching pattern.
Load-bearing premise
The scenario survives only if the 8 TeV diphoton bound does not already exclude the 13 TeV window it needs; the paper addresses this qualitatively, noting the required rate of 0.6 to 2.6 fb at 13 TeV is 'still allowed partly' and asserting the 13-to-8 TeV cross-section ratio is about 5 and nearly parameter-independent, without a full recast or an uncertainty on that ratio.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Run-II should show resonances at 750 GeV in $ZZ$, $WW$ and $Zgamma$ with rates up to tens of fb, and the pattern among the three channels is fixed by the same two gaugino masses that set the diphoton rate.
- The dominant decay into gluon pairs produces a dijet resonance at 750 GeV, already constrained below about 30 pb by 8 TeV searches.
- Small predicted diboson cross sections correspond to small gaugino masses, so the low-rate corner of parameter space is reachable by direct searches for light gauginos rather than by resonance searches.
- If a pseudoscalar sgoldstino partner exists with a different mass, a second diphoton peak should appear at that mass, with matching diboson peaks, and any scalar-pseudoscalar mixing would alter the angular distributions of the decay products.
- Soft trilinear couplings can carry flavour structure, so virtual sgoldstino exchange gives flavour-changing top and heavy-meson decays and possibly fermion-antifermion resonances at 750 GeV, including pairs of different flavour.
- The gravitino mass in this window is $10^{-3}$ to $10^{-2}$ eV, consistent with supernova and Big Bang nucleosynthesis bounds.
Reading between the lines
- The real fingerprint is the correlation among $sigma_{ZZ}$, $sigma_{WW}$ and $sigma_{Zgamma}$: measuring any two of them at 750 GeV would over-determine $M_1$, $M_2$ and $sqrt{F}$, making the hypothesis far easier to confirm or kill than the diphoton rate alone.
- Because the same $1/F$ suppression controls production, decay and the gravitino mass, any tightening of cosmological or astrophysical bounds on light gravitinos feeds back directly on the collider window this paper carves out.
- A confirmed width near 46 GeV would push the minimal sgoldstino out and point to an extended breaking sector with a light singlet, so the width measurement is a discriminator between the minimal and non-minimal versions of this explanation.
- If Run-II accumulates enough data to see the diphoton line but finds no accompanying $ZZ$ or $WW$ structure at 750 GeV at the tens-of-fb level, the sgoldstino reading loses its main advantage over generic spin-0 interpretations.
Original abstract
We point out that the diphoton excess at about 750 GeV recently discovered by the LHC experiments can be explained within supersymmetric models with low scale supersymmetry breaking with sgoldstino as a natural candidate. We discuss phenomenological consequences of this scenario describing possible signatures to test this hypothesis.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We point out that the diphoton excess at about 750 GeV recently discovered by the LHC experiments can be explained within supersymmetric models with low scale supersymmetry breaking with sgoldstino as a natural candidate. We discuss phenomenological consequences of this scenario describing possible signatures to test this hypothesis.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We point out that the diphoton excess at about 750 GeV recently discovered by the LHC experiments can be explained within supersymmetric models with low scale supersymmetry breaking with sgoldstino as a natural candidate. | contribution 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.90 | hedged possibility 0.57 |
| s1 | We discuss phenomenological consequences of this scenario describing possible signatures to test this hypothesis. | contribution 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.08 | asserted 0.50 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
Figures
Figures reproduced from arXiv:1512.05723 by the authors.
References
How the literature uses it
59 arXiv papers cite this in 63 sentences
Papers whose main result relates to this one's
States the same result 1 paper
-
We interpret the di-photon excess recently reported by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations as a new resonance arising from the sgoldstino scalar, which is the superpartner of the Goldstone mode of spontaneous supersymmetry breaking, the goldstino.
The 750 GeV diphoton excess from the goldstino superpartner · 0.98
Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label
Builds on it 1 paper
-
In the previous papers [ref] , only the second scenario has been considered.
Systematic Study of Diphoton Resonance at 750 GeV from Sgoldstino · Productions and Decays of Sgolstino and the LHC Constrains · 0.87
Cites it as background 47 papers
-
A lot of studies have been done here [ref] .
The Fourth Generation Quark and the 750 GeV Diphoton Excess · Introduction · 0.97
-
This possibility has been discussed by [ref] using an effective description of how the SUSY breaking is mediated to the MSSM sector.
The 750 GeV diphoton resonance as an sgoldstino: a reappraisal · Introduction · 0.81
-
The interpretation in terms of the production and decay of a sgoldstino [ref] places the underlying new physics into the wider context of supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model (SM), thus going beyond the mere parameterisation of the effect in terms of ad hoc dynamics.
A closer look to the sgoldstino interpretation of the diphoton excess · Introduction · 0.80
What it cites · 8 sentences without a confident label
Uses data or values from 5 papers
-
The strongest present bound from the searches for dijet resonances is $σ_S×Br(S→gg) 30$ pb [ref] .
Search for new phenomena in the dijet mass distribution using $p-p$ collision data at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS detector · Exploring the model · 0.99
-
The strongest bound $σ_γγ 1.5$ fb at this collision energy was obtained by the CMS [ref] while somewhat weaker constraints come from ATLAS data [ref] .
Search for high-mass diphoton resonances in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS detector · Exploring the model · 0.95
-
The strongest bound $σ_γγ 1.5$ fb at this collision energy was obtained by the CMS [ref] while somewhat weaker constraints come from ATLAS data [ref] .
Search for diphoton resonances in the mass range from 150 to 850 GeV in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV · Exploring the model · 0.95
Cites as background 7 papers
-
In this class of models (see, e.g. [ref] ) apart from usual superpartners of the Standard Model particles, the low energy theory contains also a part of the sector responsible for supersymmetry breaking.
Low Scale Supersymmetry Breaking and its LHC Signatures · Introduction · 0.99
-
In this class of models (see, e.g. [ref] ) apart from usual superpartners of the Standard Model particles, the low energy theory contains also a part of the sector responsible for supersymmetry breaking.
Low-scale SUSY breaking and the (s)goldstino physics · Introduction · 0.99
-
In this class of models (see, e.g. [ref] ) apart from usual superpartners of the Standard Model particles, the low energy theory contains also a part of the sector responsible for supersymmetry breaking.
The MSSM Higgs Sector with a Dynamical Goldstino Supermultiplet · Introduction · 0.99
Discussion
Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.