Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Analyzing the Behavior of Visual Question Answering Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1606.07356 v2 pith:NZOVURNE submitted 2016-06-23 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords modelsbehavioranalyzequestionansweringprogressvisualacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, a number of deep-learning based models have been proposed for the task of Visual Question Answering (VQA). The performance of most models is clustered around 60-70%. In this paper we propose systematic methods to analyze the behavior of these models as a first step towards recognizing their strengths and weaknesses, and identifying the most fruitful directions for progress. We analyze two models, one each from two major classes of VQA models -- with-attention and without-attention and show the similarities and differences in the behavior of these models. We also analyze the winning entry of the VQA Challenge 2016. Our behavior analysis reveals that despite recent progress, today's VQA models are "myopic" (tend to fail on sufficiently novel instances), often "jump to conclusions" (converge on a predicted answer after 'listening' to just half the question), and are "stubborn" (do not change their answers across images).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SemIRNet: A Semantic Irony Recognition Network for Multimodal Sarcasm Detection

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    SemIRNet combines ConceptNet, word-level and sample-level semantic similarity scoring, and contrastive learning to reach 88.87% accuracy on a multimodal irony benchmark.

Pith tools