Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:1704.04424 v1 · submitted 14 Apr 2017

Effective Sextic Superpotential and B−L violation in NMSGUT

Charanjit S. Aulakh, Ram Lal Awasthi, S. Krishna (IISER Mohali)

The paper says

“We find a novel B,B−L violating quintic operator that leads to the decay mode n → e−K+.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We list operators of the superpotential of the effective MSSM that emerges from the NMSGUT up to sextic degree. We give illustrative expressions for the coefficients in terms of NMSGUT parameters. We also estimate the impact of GUT scale threshold corrections on these effective operators in view of the demonstration that B violation via quartic superpotential terms can be suppressed to acceptable levels after including such corrections in the NMSGUT. We find a novel B,B−L violating quintic operator that leads to the decay mode n → e−K+. We also remark that the threshold corrections to the Type I seesaw mechanism make the deviation of right handed neutrino masses from the GUT scale more natural while Type II seesaw neutrino masses, which earlier tended to utterly negligible receive threshold enhancement. Our results are of relevance for analyzing B−L violating operator based, sphaleron safe, Baryogenesis.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.16 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.46 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We list operators of the superpotential of the effective MSSM that emerges from the NMSGUT up to sextic degree. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.07 asserted 0.99
We give illustrative expressions for the coefficients in terms of NMSGUT parameters. contribution 0.94 0.93 0.04 asserted 0.98
We also estimate the impact of GUT scale threshold corrections on these effective operators in view of the demonstration that $B$ violation via quartic superpotential terms can be suppressed to acceptable levels after including such corrections in the NMSGUT. contribution 0.79 0.62 0.10 asserted 0.89
We find a novel $B, B-L$ violating quintic operator that leads to the decay mode $n\to e^- K^+$. result 0.98 0.95 0.41 asserted 1.00
We also remark that the threshold corrections to the Type I seesaw mechanism make the deviation of right handed neutrino masses from the GUT scale more natural while Type II seesaw neutrino masses, which earlier tended to utterly negligible receive threshold enhancement. result 0.91 0.73 0.07 asserted 0.90
Our results are of relevance for analyzing $B-L$ violating operator based, sphaleron safe, Baryogenesis. interpretation 0.93 0.33 0.14 asserted 0.81

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,986 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 42 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
  • Techniques for computing the decomposition of SO(10) invariants in terms of PS along with coefficients of dimension 5 operators for $B$, $L$ violation were presented in [ref] .

    SO(10) a la Pati-Salam · Introduction · 0.89

  • Techniques for computing the decomposition of SO(10) invariants in terms of PS along with coefficients of dimension 5 operators for $B$, $L$ violation were presented in [ref] .

    The New Minimal Supersymmetric GUT : Spectra, RG analysis and fitting formulae · Introduction · 0.89

Cites as background 3 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment