Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0401213 v2 · submitted 27 Jan 2004

General Formulation for Proton Decay Rate in Minimal Supersymmetric SO(10) GUT

Takeshi Fukuyama, Amon Ilakovac, Tatsuru Kikuchi, Stjepan Meljanac, Nobuchika Okada

The paper says

“We make an explicit formulation for the proton decay rate in the minimal renormalizable supersymmetric (SUSY) SO(10) model.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We make an explicit formulation for the proton decay rate in the minimal renormalizable supersymmetric (SUSY) SO(10) model. In this model, the Higgs fields consist of ${\bf 10}$ and ${\bf \bar{126}}$ SO(10) representations in the Yukawa interactions with matter and of ${\bf 10}$, ${\bf \bar{126}}$, ${\bf 126}$, and ${\bf 210}$ representations in the Higgs potential. We present all the mass matrices for the Higgs fields contained in this minimal SUSY SO(10) model. Finally, we discuss the threshold effects of these Higgs fields on the gauge coupling unification.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.04 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We make an explicit formulation for the proton decay rate in the minimal renormalizable supersymmetric (SUSY) SO(10) model. contribution 1.00 0.96 0.22 asserted 1.00
In this model, the Higgs fields consist of ${\bf 10}$ and ${\bf \bar{126}}$ SO(10) representations in the Yukawa interactions with matter and of ${\bf 10}$, ${\bf \bar{126}}$, ${\bf 126}$, and ${\bf 210}$ representations in the Higgs potential. method 0.52 0.20 0.04 asserted 1.00
We present all the mass matrices for the Higgs fields contained in this minimal SUSY SO(10) model. contribution 0.96 0.95 0.09 asserted 1.00
Finally, we discuss the threshold effects of these Higgs fields on the gauge coupling unification. contribution 0.97 0.86 0.10 asserted 0.62

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,741 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 7 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

17 arXiv papers cite this in 31 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 23 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • The complete spectrum of the 26 different MSSM irrep types and tree level effective Superpotential is available [ref] and extends the MSGUT result [ref] .

    MSSM Higgs : Window into Susy GUTs · Minimal Susy SO(10) Grand Unified Model · 0.87

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • $H,H̅$ are constrained to be very light compared to the GUt scale by imposing $det H=0$ on their mass matrix ($H$) which is calculated using the MSGUT vevs [ref] .

    NMSGUT emergence and Trans-Unification RG flows · NMSGUT Running down · 0.84

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as support 2 papers
Cites it as background 3 papers
  • For the first one of these two topics, i.e., the mass spectrum, we refer the reader to the existent literature [ref] (for very recent reanalysis see [ref] ).

    Minimal SO(10) splits supersymmetry · The minimal SO(10) · 1.00

  • Among these are third generation Yukawa unification [ref] , automatic embedding of minimal supersymmetric Left-Right models, natural R-parity preservation [ref] down to the weak scale and consequently natural LSP WIMP dark matter, economic and explicitly soluble symmetry breaking at the GUT scale [ref] , explicitly calculable superheavy spectra [ref] , interesting gauge unification threshold effects [ref] which can lead to a natural elevation of the unification scale to near the Planck scale [ref] , GUT scale threshold corrections to the QCD coupling $α_3(M_Z)$ of the required [ref] sign and size [ref] and a deep interplay between the scales of Baryon and Lepton number violation as suggested by the neutrino oscillation measurements and the seesaw formulae connecting neutrino masses to the B-L breaking scale.

    Baryon Stability on the Higgs Dissolution Edge : Threshold corrections and suppression of Baryon violation in the NMSGUT · Introduction · 0.90

  • See [ref] for related spectrum calculations.

    Effective Sextic Superpotential and $B-L$ violation in NMSGUT · Introduction · 0.86

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment