Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Undecidability of the Spectral Gap in One Dimension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.01858 v2 pith:ZFZJR7CO submitted 2018-10-03 quant-ph cond-mat.otherhep-thmath-phmath.MP

Undecidability of the Spectral Gap in One Dimension

classification quant-ph cond-mat.otherhep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords systemsspectraltherespinphysicsproblemalgorithmchains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The spectral gap problem - determining whether the energy spectrum of a system has an energy gap above ground state, or if there is a continuous range of low-energy excitations - pervades quantum many-body physics. Recently, this important problem was shown to be undecidable for quantum spin systems in two (or more) spatial dimensions: there exists no algorithm that determines in general whether a system is gapped or gapless, a result which has many unexpected consequences for the physics of such systems. However, there are many indications that one dimensional spin systems are simpler than their higher-dimensional counterparts: for example, they cannot have thermal phase transitions or topological order, and there exist highly-effective numerical algorithms such as DMRG - and even provably polynomial-time ones - for gapped 1D systems, exploiting the fact that such systems obey an entropy area-law. Furthermore, the spectral gap undecidability construction crucially relied on aperiodic tilings, which are not possible in 1D. So does the spectral gap problem become decidable in 1D? In this paper we prove this is not the case, by constructing a family of 1D spin chains with translationally-invariant nearest neighbour interactions for which no algorithm can determine the presence of a spectral gap. This not only proves that the spectral gap of 1D systems is just as intractable as in higher dimensions, but also predicts the existence of qualitatively new types of complex physics in 1D spin chains. In particular, it implies there are 1D systems with constant spectral gap and non-degenerate classical ground state for all systems sizes up to an uncomputably large size, whereupon they switch to a gapless behaviour with dense spectrum.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Undecidability of Hitting Times in Computably Described Quantum Dynamics: A No-Go Theorem for Universal Time Selection

    quant-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The Unitary Hitting Time Problem is undecidable by reduction from the halting problem, with an operational no-go for any universal finite-time protocol.

  2. Undecidability of Hitting Times in Computably Described Quantum Dynamics: A No-Go Theorem for Universal Time Selection

    quant-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    There is no total algorithm that computes the first hitting time for computably described quantum dynamics; the problem is undecidable.