Teleparallel gravity (TEGR) as a gauge theory: Translation or Cartan connection?
read the original abstract
In this paper we question the status of TEGR, the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity,as a gauge theory of translations. We observe that TEGR (in its usual translation-gauge view) does not seem to realize the generally admitted requirements for a gauge theory for some symmetry group $G$: namely it does not present a mathematical structure underlying the theory which relates to a principal $G$-bundle and the choice of a connection on it (the gauge field). We point out that, while it is usually presented as absent, the gauging of the Lorentz symmetry is actually present in the theory, and that the choice of an Erhesmann connection to describe the gauge field makes the translations difficult to implement (mainly because there is in general no principal translation-bundle). We finally propose to use the Cartan Geometry and the Cartan connection as an alternative approach, naturally arising from the solution of the issues just mentioned, to obtain a more mathematically sound framework for TEGR.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Teleparallel gravity from the principal bundle viewpoint
TEGR is argued to admit a gauge theory formulation on principal bundles with Poincaré or Lorentz structure groups, where the gauge group is the diffeomorphism group if the teleparallel connection is not treated as an ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.