pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.23672 · v2 · pith:PDAD2UIOnew · submitted 2025-07-31 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· math-ph· math.MP

Teleparallel gravity from the principal bundle viewpoint

Sebastian Brezina , Eugenia Boffo , Martin Kr\v{s}\v{s}\'ak This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 02:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords teleparallel gravityTEGRprincipal bundlesgauge theoryPoincaré groupLorentz groupabsolute elementsdiffeomorphism group
0
0 comments X

The pith

Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity admits a gauge theory formulation on principal bundles with the Poincaré or Lorentz group.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that TEGR can be cast as a gauge theory in the language of connections on principal bundles. It argues for choosing the affine bundle with the Poincaré group or the orthonormal frame bundle with the Lorentz group as the structure group. This matters to a sympathetic reader because it provides a way to determine the gauge symmetries of TEGR by identifying its absolute elements using Trautman's framework. The status of the non-dynamical teleparallel connection as an absolute element or not then decides whether the gauge group is a subgroup of diffeomorphisms or the entire group.

Core claim

We argue in favor of using either the affine bundle with the Poincaré group or, equivalently, the orthonormal frame bundle with the Lorentz group as the structure group. Following the framework of Trautman where gauge symmetries are determined using the absolute elements, we identify the absolute elements and gauge symmetries of TEGR. The problem of a non-dynamical teleparallel connection raises the question of whether it should be treated as an absolute element. If so, the gauge group of TEGR is potentially some undetermined subgroup of the diffeomorphism group. On the other hand, if the connection is allowed to be non-dynamical but the only absolute element is taken to be the canonical 1-1

What carries the argument

Principal bundle with Poincaré or Lorentz structure group, which carries the teleparallel connection and allows identification of absolute elements to fix the gauge symmetries.

If this is right

  • The gauge symmetries of TEGR are fixed once the absolute elements are chosen.
  • If the teleparallel connection is an absolute element, the gauge group is restricted to a subgroup of the diffeomorphism group.
  • If the only absolute element is the canonical 1-form, the gauge group is the full diffeomorphism group.
  • This provides an equivalent formulation of TEGR in gauge theory terms on bundles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This formulation leaves open the physical interpretation of the teleparallel connection's non-dynamical nature in terms of symmetries.
  • Similar bundle approaches could be applied to other equivalent formulations of gravity to compare their gauge structures.
  • The choice between the two proposed bundles might lead to different technical advantages in calculations of conserved quantities.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that Trautman's framework for determining gauge symmetries from absolute elements applies directly to TEGR formulated on principal bundles.

What would settle it

Constructing the explicit gauge transformations from the proposed bundle and checking if they leave the TEGR action invariant would confirm or refute the claim; a mismatch in the derived symmetries would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.23672 by Eugenia Boffo, Martin Kr\v{s}\v{s}\'ak, Sebastian Brezina.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A geometrical comparison of gauge gravitational theories with vanishing non-metricity tensor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We examine whether the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity (TEGR) can be formulated as a gauge theory in the language of connections on principal bundles. We argue in favor of using either the affine bundle with the Poincar\'e group or, equivalently, the orthonormal frame bundle with the Lorentz group as the structure group. Following the framework of Trautman--where gauge symmetries are determined using the absolute elements--we set to identify the absolute elements and gauge symmetries of TEGR. The problem of a non-dynamical teleparallel connection raises the question of whether it should be treated as an absolute element. If so, the gauge group of TEGR is potentially some undetermined subgroup of the diffeomorphism group. On the other hand, if the connection is allowed to be non-dynamical but the only absolute element is taken to be the canonical 1-form of the frame bundle, we recover the whole diffeomorphism group as the gauge group of TEGR.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines whether the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity (TEGR) can be formulated as a gauge theory using connections on principal bundles. It argues in favor of the affine bundle with the Poincaré group or, equivalently, the orthonormal frame bundle with the Lorentz group as structure group. Following Trautman's framework, the authors attempt to identify absolute elements and gauge symmetries of TEGR, with the status of the non-dynamical teleparallel connection left as an open case distinction that determines whether the gauge group is a subgroup of Diff(M) or the full diffeomorphism group.

Significance. If the identification of absolute elements were carried through with explicit derivations, the work could help clarify the geometric and symmetry structure of TEGR, offering a principled way to select the appropriate principal bundle and facilitating comparisons with other gauge-theoretic formulations of gravity. The explicit branching on the role of the Weitzenböck connection usefully isolates a conceptual ambiguity that any complete bundle treatment must address.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that either the affine Poincaré bundle or the orthonormal Lorentz frame bundle is the appropriate setting rests on a case distinction for the teleparallel connection's status as an absolute element, yet no explicit Lie derivative computation, invariance condition, or reduction to the solder form is supplied to decide the case; without this step the preference remains conditional and the argument does not yet establish the claimed equivalence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional explicit derivations where this strengthens the presentation without altering the core conceptual approach.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that either the affine Poincaré bundle or the orthonormal Lorentz frame bundle is the appropriate setting rests on a case distinction for the teleparallel connection's status as an absolute element, yet no explicit Lie derivative computation, invariance condition, or reduction to the solder form is supplied to decide the case; without this step the preference remains conditional and the argument does not yet establish the claimed equivalence.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The manuscript deliberately frames the status of the non-dynamical teleparallel connection as an open case distinction, following Trautman's approach to absolute elements, because both interpretations appear in the literature and lead to consistent but distinct gauge groups. When the connection is treated as absolute, the gauge group is a subgroup of Diff(M); when only the solder form is absolute, the full diffeomorphism group is recovered. This underpins our claim that either the affine Poincaré bundle or the equivalent Lorentz frame bundle provides an appropriate setting. We acknowledge that the argument would be strengthened by explicit calculations. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the Lie derivative conditions for invariance of the solder form and teleparallel connection, together with the reduction to the Lorentz structure group in the absolute-connection case. These derivations will clarify how the case distinction operates and make the equivalence between the two bundle formulations more rigorous. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; relies on external Trautman framework and standard bundle geometry.

full rationale

The paper's central discussion follows the Trautman framework to identify absolute elements and gauge symmetries for TEGR, explicitly considering the status of the non-dynamical teleparallel connection as a potential absolute element versus the canonical solder form. This leads to conditional statements about the gauge group being a subgroup of Diff(M) or the full diffeomorphism group. No derivation reduces by construction to self-defined quantities, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The argument for preferring the affine Poincaré bundle or orthonormal Lorentz frame bundle is presented as an interpretive choice grounded in external references and standard principal bundle theory, remaining self-contained without internal circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central discussion rests on the Trautman framework for determining gauge symmetries via absolute elements and standard definitions of principal bundles and connections in differential geometry.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Gauge symmetries of a theory are determined by identifying its absolute elements, following Trautman.
    Invoked in the abstract to set up the identification of absolute elements and gauge group for TEGR.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5709 in / 1233 out tokens · 45498 ms · 2026-05-19T02:11:54.897997+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quigg, Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak, and Electromagnetic Interactions: Second Edition

    C. Quigg, Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak, and Electromagnetic Interactions: Second Edition . Princeton University Press, USA, 9, 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Eguchi, P

    T. Eguchi, P. B. Gilkey, and A. J. Hanson, Gravitation, Gauge Theories and Differential Geometry , Phys. Rept. 66 (1980) 213

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    Trautman, Fiber bundles associated with space-time , Rept

    A. Trautman, Fiber bundles associated with space-time , Rept. Math. Phys. 1 (1970)

    work page 1970

  4. [4]

    Lubkin, Geometric definition of gauge invariance , Annals Phys

    E. Lubkin, Geometric definition of gauge invariance , Annals Phys. 23 (1963) 233

    work page 1963

  5. [5]

    Hermann, Vector Bundles in Mathematical Physics, vol

    R. Hermann, Vector Bundles in Mathematical Physics, vol. I and II . W. A. Benjamin, 1970

    work page 1970

  6. [6]

    Kobayashi, K

    S. Kobayashi, K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Volume 1 . Interscience Publishers, 1963

    work page 1963

  7. [7]

    Invariant Variation Problems

    E. Noether, Invariante Variationsprobleme, Gott. Nachr. 1918 (1918) 235–257, [physics/0503066]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1918

  8. [8]

    R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, Dynamical Structure and Definition of Energy in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. 116 (1959) 1322–1330

    work page 1959

  9. [9]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity. Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984

    work page 1984

  10. [10]

    Utiyama, Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction , Phys

    R. Utiyama, Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction , Phys. Rev. 101 (1956) 1597–1607

    work page 1956

  11. [11]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Lorentz invariance and the gravitational field , J. Math. Phys. 2 (1961) 212–221

    work page 1961

  12. [12]

    F. W. Hehl, P. Von Der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick, and J. M. Nester, General Relativity with Spin and Torsion: Foundations and Prospects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 48 (1976) 393–416. 13

    work page 1976

  13. [13]

    F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, and Y. Ne’eman, Metric affine gauge theory of gravity: Field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance , Phys. Rept. 258 (1995) 1–171, [ gr-qc/9402012]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  14. [14]

    Blagojevic, Gravitation and gauge symmetries

    M. Blagojevic, Gravitation and gauge symmetries . CRC Press, 2002

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    Ponomarev, A.O

    V.N. Ponomarev, A.O. Barvinsky, Y.N. Obukhov, Gauge Approach and Quantization Methods in Gravity Theory. Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 2017

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Hayashi and T

    K. Hayashi and T. Nakano, Extended translation invariance and associated gauge fields , Prog. Theor. Phys. 38 (1967) 491–507

    work page 1967

  17. [17]

    Y. M. Cho, Einstein Lagrangian as the Translational Yang-Mills Lagrangian , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2521

    work page 1976

  18. [18]

    Hayashi, The Gauge Theory of the Translation Group and Underlying Geometry , Phys

    K. Hayashi, The Gauge Theory of the Translation Group and Underlying Geometry , Phys. Lett. B69 (1977) 441

    work page 1977

  19. [19]

    Einstein, Einheitliche Feldtheorie und Hamiltonsches Prinzip , Sitzber

    A. Einstein, Einheitliche Feldtheorie und Hamiltonsches Prinzip , Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 18 (1929) 156–159

    work page 1929

  20. [20]

    Møller, Conservation Laws and Absolute Parallelism in General Relativity , K

    C. Møller, Conservation Laws and Absolute Parallelism in General Relativity , K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Skr. 1 (1961), no. 10 1–50

    work page 1961

  21. [21]

    Krˇ sˇ s´ ak,Teleparallel Gravity, Covariance and Their Geometrical Meaning , in Tribute to Ruben Aldrovandi (F

    M. Krˇ sˇ s´ ak,Teleparallel Gravity, Covariance and Their Geometrical Meaning , in Tribute to Ruben Aldrovandi (F. Caruso, J.G. Pereira and A. Santoro, ed.). Editora Livraria da F´ ısica, S˜ ao Paulo,

    work page

  22. [22]

    Aldrovandi and J

    R. Aldrovandi and J. G. Pereira, Teleparallel Gravity: An Introduction. Springer, 2013

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    J. W. Maluf, The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity , Annalen Phys. 525 (2013) 339–357, [arXiv:1303.3897]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    Krssak, R

    M. Krˇ sˇ s´ ak, R. van den Hoogen, J. Pereira, C. B¨ ohmer, and A. Coley,Teleparallel theories of gravity: illuminating a fully invariant approach , Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019), no. 18 183001, [arXiv:1810.12932]

    work page arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Modified teleparallel gravity: inflation without inflaton

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini, Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without inflaton , Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 084031, [ gr-qc/0610067]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  26. [26]

    Teleparallel gravity: from theory to cosmology,

    S. Bahamonde, K. F. Dialektopoulos, C. Escamilla-Rivera, G. Farrugia, V. Gakis, M. Hendry, M. Hohmann, J. Levi Said, J. Mifsud, and E. Di Valentino, Teleparallel gravity: from theory to cosmology, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 (2023), no. 2 026901, [ arXiv:2106.13793]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    J. G. Pereira and Y. N. Obukhov, Gauge Structure of Teleparallel Gravity , Universe 5 (2019), no. 6 139, [arXiv:1906.06287]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Teleparallel gravity (TEGR) as a gauge theory: Translation or Cartan connection?

    M. Fontanini, E. Huguet, and M. Le Delliou, Teleparallel gravity equivalent of general relativity as a gauge theory: Translation or Cartan connection? , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019), no. 6 064006, [arXiv:1811.03810]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Le Delliou, E

    M. Le Delliou, E. Huguet, and M. Fontanini, Teleparallel theory as a gauge theory of translations: Remarks and issues , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 2 024059, [ arXiv:1910.08471]

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Huguet, M

    E. Huguet, M. Le Delliou, and M. Fontanini, Cartan approach to Teleparallel Equivalent to General Relativity: A review , Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 18 (2021), no. supp01 2140004, [arXiv:2101.07064]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Dass, Gauge fields, space-time geometry and gravity , Pramana 23 (1984) 433

    T. Dass, Gauge fields, space-time geometry and gravity , Pramana 23 (1984) 433

    work page 1984

  32. [32]

    Sardanashvily, What are the Poincare gauge fields? , Czech

    G. Sardanashvily, What are the Poincare gauge fields? , Czech. J. Phys. B 33 (1983) 610–615

    work page 1983

  33. [33]

    G. A. Sardanashvily, On the definition of gauge transformations in gauge theory , Annalen Phys. 41 (1984) 23–28

    work page 1984

  34. [34]

    Ivanenko and G

    D. Ivanenko and G. Sardanashvily, On the Goldstonic Gravitation theory , Pramana 29 (1987) 21. 14

    work page 1987

  35. [35]

    On the geometric foundation of classical gauge gravitation theory

    G. Sardanashvily, On the geometric foundation of classical gauge gravitation theory , gr-qc/0201074

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Trautman, On Gauge Transformations and Symmetries , Bull

    A. Trautman, On Gauge Transformations and Symmetries , Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. (Phys. Astron. ) 27 (1979) 7–13

    work page 1979

  37. [37]

    Trautman, On groups of gauge transformations , Lecture Notes in Phys

    A. Trautman, On groups of gauge transformations , Lecture Notes in Phys. Springer 129 (1980) 114–120

    work page 1980

  38. [38]

    Classical gauge gravitation theory

    G. Sardanashvily, Classical gauge gravitation theory , Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 8 (2011) 1869–1895, [arXiv:1110.1176]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Percacci, Role of Soldering in Gravity Theory , in International Summer School on Elementary Particles and High Energy Physics: Differential Geometric Methods , 8, 1984

    R. Percacci, Role of Soldering in Gravity Theory , in International Summer School on Elementary Particles and High Energy Physics: Differential Geometric Methods , 8, 1984

    work page 1984

  40. [40]

    Gravity from a Particle Physicists' perspective

    R. Percacci, Gravity from a Particle Physicists’ perspective , PoS ISFTG (2009) 011, [arXiv:0910.5167]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  41. [41]

    Y. N. Obukhov and J. G. Pereira, Metric affine approach to teleparallel gravity , Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 044016, [ gr-qc/0212080]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  42. [42]

    Holographic Renormalization in Teleparallel Gravity

    M. Krˇ sˇ s´ ak,Holographic Renormalization in Teleparallel Gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017), no. 1 44, [arXiv:1510.06676]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    On the covariance of teleparallel gravity theories

    A. Golovnev, T. Koivisto, and M. Sandstad, On the covariance of teleparallel gravity theories , Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017), no. 14 145013, [ arXiv:1701.06271]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Fecko, Differential geometry and Lie groups for physicists

    M. Fecko, Differential geometry and Lie groups for physicists . Cambridge University Press, 2006

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    Trautman, Differential Geometry for Physicists

    A. Trautman, Differential Geometry for Physicists . Bibliopolis., Napoli, 1985

    work page 1985

  46. [46]

    Trautman, Yang-Mills Theory and Gravitation: a Comparison

    A. Trautman, Yang-Mills Theory and Gravitation: a Comparison. , Lect. Notes Math. Springer. 926 (1982) 179–189

    work page 1982

  47. [47]

    Trautman, Fiber Bundles, Gauge Fields, and Gravitation , General Relativity and Gravitation, Vol.1 (1981)

    A. Trautman, Fiber Bundles, Gauge Fields, and Gravitation , General Relativity and Gravitation, Vol.1 (1981)

    work page 1981

  48. [48]

    Trautman, Geometrical aspects of gauge configurations, Acta Phys

    A. Trautman, Geometrical aspects of gauge configurations, Acta Phys. Austriaca Suppl. 23 (1981) 401–432

    work page 1981

  49. [49]

    M. E. Mayer and A. Trautman, A brief introduction to the geometry of gauge fields , Acta Phys. Austriaca Suppl. 23 (1981) 433–476

    work page 1981

  50. [50]

    Krˇ sˇ s´ ak,Self-Excited Gravitational Instantons, Phys

    M. Krˇ sˇ s´ ak,Self-Excited Gravitational Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025), no. 20 201501, [arXiv:2408.01140]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Huguet, M

    E. Huguet, M. Le Delliou, M. Fontanini, and Z. C. Lin, Teleparallel gravity as a gauge theory: Coupling to matter using the Cartan connection , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 4 044061, [arXiv:2008.13493]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    D. K. Wise, MacDowell-Mansouri gravity and Cartan geometry , Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 155010, [gr-qc/0611154]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    H. F. Westman and T. G. Zlosnik, An introduction to the physics of Cartan gravity , Annals Phys. 361 (2015) 330–376, [ arXiv:1411.1679]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    Geometrical Foundations of Cartan Gauge Gravity

    G. Catren, Geometric foundations of Cartan gauge gravity , Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 12 (2015), no. 04 1530002, [ arXiv:1407.7814]. 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015