Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Attributing Fake Images to GANs: Learning and Analyzing GAN Fingerprints

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.08180 v3 pith:EF4RULQW submitted 2018-11-20 cs.CV cs.CRcs.CYcs.GRcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CRcs.CYcs.GRcs.LG
keywords fingerprintsimageimagesattributiongansmodeladversarialdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown increasing success in generating photorealistic images. But they also raise challenges to visual forensics and model attribution. We present the first study of learning GAN fingerprints towards image attribution and using them to classify an image as real or GAN-generated. For GAN-generated images, we further identify their sources. Our experiments show that (1) GANs carry distinct model fingerprints and leave stable fingerprints in their generated images, which support image attribution; (2) even minor differences in GAN training can result in different fingerprints, which enables fine-grained model authentication; (3) fingerprints persist across different image frequencies and patches and are not biased by GAN artifacts; (4) fingerprint finetuning is effective in immunizing against five types of adversarial image perturbations; and (5) comparisons also show our learned fingerprints consistently outperform several baselines in a variety of setups.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Lightweight and Interpretable Deepfakes Detection Framework

    cs.CV 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A lightweight XGBoost detector that fuses facial landmarks with color-statistic 'heart rate' features reaches AUC 0.95 on the WLDR deepfake dataset, but the heart-rate claim is unsupported.

Pith tools