Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Reachability Deficits in Quantum Approximate Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.11259 v2 pith:KNGXKMQL submitted 2019-06-26 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechcs.AIcs.LG

classification quant-phcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mechcs.AIcs.LG
keywords optimizationquantumapproximatelimitationsproblemqaoaalgorithmalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) has rapidly become a cornerstone of contemporary quantum algorithm development. Despite a growing range of applications, only a few results have been developed towards understanding the algorithms ultimate limitations. Here we report that QAOA exhibits a strong dependence on a problem instances constraint to variable ratio$-$this problem density places a limiting restriction on the algorithms capacity to minimize a corresponding objective function (and hence solve optimization problem instances). Such $reachability~deficits$ persist even in the absence of barren plateaus [McClean et al., 2018] and are outside of the recently reported level-1 QAOA limitations [Hastings 2019]. These findings are among the first to determine strong limitations on variational quantum approximate optimization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A quantum algorithm to count weighted ground states of classical spin Hamiltonians

    quant-ph 2019-08 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    A modified AQO and QAOA for weighted ground-state counting is proposed, but factor errors in the estimator and inverted complexity scaling invalidate the claimed speedup.

Pith tools