pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02020 · v1 · pith:H466MBZInew · submitted 2019-07-03 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc· hep-ph

Orbital Inflation: inflating along an angular isometry of field space

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 09:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords multi-field inflationorbital inflationangular isometryentropy massconsistency relationsnon-Gaussianityquasi-single fieldfield space geometry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Orbital Inflation reconstructs two-field models along angular isometries to produce single-field-like predictions with violated consistency relations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a reconstruction method for two-field inflationary actions whose trajectory follows an angular isometry at constant radius in field space. This method maintains controlled mass for the radial isocurvature mode and yields exact analytic expressions for both background evolution and perturbations. When the entropy mass and radius of curvature remain small the resulting observables closely resemble single-field inflation. The entropy mass value controls the spread of predictions across the spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio plane. Self-interactions of the isocurvature mode set the size of non-Gaussianity from slow-roll suppressed levels up to order a few.

Core claim

Orbital Inflation reconstructs simultaneously a two-field action and an inflationary trajectory that proceeds along an angular direction of field space at constant radius of curvature with controlled entropy mass. The Hubble parameter governs both the background and the perturbations. This construction supplies exact analytic control that solves the phenomenology for small entropy mass and small radius of curvature, producing single-field-like predictions although the consistency relations are violated and the entropy mass dictates how the predictions fan out in the (n_s, r) plane, with the non-Gaussianity parameter f_NL ranging from slow-roll suppressed to order a few depending on isocurv

What carries the argument

An approximate angular shift symmetry (isometry) in field space at constant radius that protects perturbation dynamics independently of the potential shape.

If this is right

  • The Hubble parameter alone determines both background evolution and perturbation spectra.
  • The construction supplies a controlled playground for quasi-single-field inflation.
  • Exact analytic solutions exist throughout the regime of small entropy mass and small radius of curvature.
  • Predictions remain single-field-like while the consistency relations are violated.
  • The non-Gaussianity parameter f_NL ranges from slow-roll suppressed values to order a few according to the strength of isocurvature self-interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be extended to other unbroken isometries to generate additional families of analytically tractable multi-field models.
  • Observers could test for the specific pattern of consistency-relation violations that scale with the entropy mass.
  • Apparently single-field data sets might still contain hidden multi-field signatures detectable only through precision consistency tests.
  • Time-dependent radius or different field-space curvatures could be added to enlarge the space of predictions while retaining analytic control.

Load-bearing premise

An approximate angular shift symmetry exists in field space and remains unbroken along the entire inflationary trajectory.

What would settle it

CMB measurements of the spectral index, tensor-to-scalar ratio, and squeezed-limit bispectrum that fail to exhibit the entropy-mass-controlled fanning pattern or that show exact adherence to single-field consistency relations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.02020 by Ana Achucarro, Yvette Welling.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. This figure shows the predictions of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The simplicity of the CMB data, so well described by single-field inflation, raises the question whether there might be an equally simple multi-field realization consistent with the observations. We explore the idea that an approximate 'angular' shift symmetry in field space (an isometry) protects the dynamics of coupled inflationary perturbations. This idea relates to the recent observation that multi-field inflation mimics the predictions of single-field inflation, if the inflaton is efficiently and constantly coupled to a second massless degree of freedom (the isocurvature perturbation). In multi-field inflation, the inflationary trajectory is in general not aligned with the gradient of the potential. As a corollary the potential does not reflect the symmetries of perturbations. We propose a new method to reconstruct simultaneously a two-field action and an inflationary trajectory which proceeds along an `angular' direction of field space, with a constant radius of curvature, and that has a controlled mass of `radial' isocurvature perturbations (entropy mass). We dub this `Orbital Inflation'. In this set-up the Hubble parameter determines the behavior of both the background and the perturbations. First, Orbital Inflation provides a playground for quasi-single field inflation. Second, the exquisite analytical control of these models allows us to exactly solve the phenomenology of Orbital Inflation with a small entropy mass and a small radius of curvature, a regime not previously explored. The predictions are single-field-like, although the consistency relations are violated. Moreover, the value of the entropy mass dictates how the inflationary predictions fan out in the ($n_s$, $r$) plane. Depending on the size of the self interactions of the isocurvature perturbations, the non-Gaussianity parameter $f_{NL}$ can range from slow-roll suppressed to $\mathcal{O}(\text{a few})$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes 'Orbital Inflation', a reconstruction method for two-field inflationary models in which the trajectory follows an angular isometry at constant radius in field space, with a controlled entropy mass for the radial isocurvature perturbations. The Hubble parameter is stated to determine both background evolution and perturbations, yielding single-field-like predictions (n_s, r) that violate consistency relations when the entropy mass and curvature radius are small, while f_NL ranges from slow-roll suppressed to O(few) depending on isocurvature self-interactions. The setup is presented as a controlled playground for quasi-single field inflation.

Significance. If the reconstruction and constant-radius condition hold with the claimed analytic control, the work supplies an explicit class of multi-field models that match CMB data while violating single-field consistency relations, with the entropy mass directly controlling the spread in the (n_s, r) plane. The exact solvability in the small-mass, small-radius regime is a concrete strength for exploring quasi-single field phenomenology beyond previous approximations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, paragraph 3] Abstract, paragraph 3: the central claim that an approximate angular shift symmetry 'protects the dynamics of coupled inflationary perturbations' and 'remains unbroken along the entire inflationary trajectory' is load-bearing for the constant-radius condition and the assertion that the Hubble parameter alone determines perturbations independently of potential shape. The reconstruction introduces small explicit breaking terms to realize an approximate isometry; it is not shown that the resulting radial force remains small enough to prevent slow drift away from constant radius over 50–60 e-folds while preserving the claimed analytic control.
  2. [Reconstruction method] Reconstruction method (section describing the two-field action and trajectory): the entropy mass and radius of curvature are introduced as free parameters that directly set the phenomenology. The paper must demonstrate that these parameters can be chosen consistently with the slow-roll conditions and the unbroken isometry without additional tuning that would undermine the 'parameter-free' character of the Hubble-driven predictions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the field-space metric and the angular coordinate should be introduced with an explicit diagram or equation reference in the first section to aid readability for readers unfamiliar with curved field space.
  2. [Phenomenology] The range of f_NL values is stated qualitatively; a brief table or plot showing the dependence on the self-interaction strength would strengthen the phenomenology section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive major comments. We address each point below and will incorporate clarifications and additional analysis in a revised version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract, paragraph 3] Abstract, paragraph 3: the central claim that an approximate angular shift symmetry 'protects the dynamics of coupled inflationary perturbations' and 'remains unbroken along the entire inflationary trajectory' is load-bearing for the constant-radius condition and the assertion that the Hubble parameter alone determines perturbations independently of potential shape. The reconstruction introduces small explicit breaking terms to realize an approximate isometry; it is not shown that the resulting radial force remains small enough to prevent slow drift away from constant radius over 50–60 e-folds while preserving the claimed analytic control.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain an explicit estimate of the radial drift induced by the small explicit breaking terms over 50-60 e-folds. In the revised version we will add a short calculation in the reconstruction section showing that the radial displacement remains perturbatively small (of order the breaking parameter times the number of e-folds) provided the breaking is chosen sufficiently small while still satisfying the slow-roll conditions. This addition will make the control over the constant-radius trajectory explicit without altering the main results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Reconstruction method] Reconstruction method (section describing the two-field action and trajectory): the entropy mass and radius of curvature are introduced as free parameters that directly set the phenomenology. The paper must demonstrate that these parameters can be chosen consistently with the slow-roll conditions and the unbroken isometry without additional tuning that would undermine the 'parameter-free' character of the Hubble-driven predictions.

    Authors: The entropy mass and curvature radius are indeed additional parameters of the reconstruction; once fixed, however, the background and perturbation equations are completely determined by the Hubble parameter alone, with no further dependence on the detailed shape of the potential. We will add a brief paragraph clarifying that the choice of these parameters is constrained only by the requirements of slow-roll and a sufficiently small breaking of the isometry, and that no extra tuning of the potential is required beyond this choice. This preserves the sense in which the predictions are 'Hubble-driven' while acknowledging the role of the two extra parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper defines Orbital Inflation via an explicit reconstruction that builds an angular isometry, constant radius, and controlled entropy mass directly into the two-field action and trajectory. Observable predictions (n_s, r, f_NL) are then computed from these model parameters, which is standard parameter-dependent model building rather than any reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption of an approximate isometry that is maintained along the trajectory and on the validity of the slow-roll and quasi-single-field approximations; no new particles are postulated beyond the two scalar fields already standard in multi-field inflation.

free parameters (2)
  • radius of curvature
    Introduced as a constant parameter controlling the angular trajectory; its small value is required for the analytic control claimed.
  • entropy mass
    Tunable mass of the radial isocurvature mode; directly sets the spread in the n_s-r plane and the range of f_NL.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Approximate angular shift symmetry (isometry) in field space protects perturbation dynamics independently of potential shape.
    Invoked in abstract paragraph 3 as the protecting mechanism for the coupled perturbations.
  • domain assumption Slow-roll and quasi-single-field approximations remain valid throughout inflation.
    Required for the single-field-like predictions and analytic solvability.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5857 in / 1612 out tokens · 28075 ms · 2026-05-25T09:57:00.290788+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 46 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Furthermore, we plotted the 1 σ and 2σ confidence contours from Planck [5] on the background

    between 1 and 10 5. Furthermore, we plotted the 1 σ and 2σ confidence contours from Planck [5] on the background. We compare our results with an analytical estimate of ns andr by combining the Hubble gradient flow approxi- mation with theδN formalism, please see§ VIII for more details. The power spectrum is given by PR = H2 8π2ϵ (1 +D), (12) whereD denotes ...

  2. [2]

    Shift-Symmetric Orbital Inflation: single field or multi-field?,

    A. Ach´ ucarro, E. J. Copeland, O. Iarygina, G. A. Palma, D.-G. Wang, and Y. Welling, “Shift-Symmetric Orbital Inflation: single field or multi-field?,” 2019, 1901.03657

  3. [3]

    Cumulative effects in inflation with ultra-light entropy modes

    A. Ach´ ucarro, V. Atal, C. Germani, and G. A. Palma, “Cumulative effects in inflation with ultra-light en- tropy modes,” JCAP, vol. 1702, no. 02, p. 013, 2017, 1607.08609

  4. [4]

    Quasi-Single Field Inflation and Non-Gaussianities

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Quasi-Single Field Inflation and Non-Gaussianities,” JCAP, vol. 1004, p. 027, 2010, 0911.3380

  5. [5]

    Large non-Gaussianities with Intermediate Shapes from Quasi-Single Field Inflation

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Large non-Gaussianities with Intermediate Shapes from Quasi-Single Field Inflation,” Phys. Rev., vol. D81, p. 063511, 2010, 0909.0496

  6. [6]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akrami et al., “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” 2018, 1807.06211

  7. [7]

    Inflation and String Theory

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister, Inflation and String The- ory. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2015, 1404.2601

  8. [8]

    Spinflation

    D. A. Easson, R. Gregory, D. F. Mota, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, “Spinflation,” JCAP, vol. 0802, p. 010, 2008, 0709.2666

  9. [9]

    The Strong Multifield Slowroll Condition and Spiral Inflation

    I.-S. Yang, “The Strong Multifield Slowroll Condition and Spiral Inflation,” Phys. Rev. , vol. D85, p. 123532, 2012, 1202.3388

  10. [10]

    Heavy fields, reduced speeds of sound and decoupling during inflation

    A. Achucarro, V. Atal, S. Cespedes, J.-O. Gong, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, “Heavy fields, reduced speeds of sound and decoupling during inflation,” Phys. Rev. , 6 vol. D86, p. 121301, 2012, 1205.0710

  11. [11]

    Hyperinflation

    A. R. Brown, “Hyperinflation,” 2017, 1705.03023

  12. [12]

    Universality of multi-field $\alpha$-attractors

    A. Ach´ ucarro, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, D.-G. Wang, and Y. Welling, “Universality of multi-field α-attractors,” JCAP, vol. 1804, no. 04, p. 028, 2018, 1711.09478

  13. [13]

    Angular inflation in multi-field α-attractors,

    P. Christodoulidis, D. Roest, and E. I. Sfakianakis, “Angular inflation in multi-field α-attractors,” 2018, 1803.09841

  14. [14]

    Primordial fluctuations and non-Gaussianities in sidetracked inflation

    S. Garcia-Saenz, S. Renaux-Petel, and J. Ronayne, “Primordial fluctuations and non-Gaussianities in side- tracked inflation,” JCAP, vol. 1807, no. 07, p. 057, 2018, 1804.11279

  15. [15]

    The string swampland constraints require multi-field inflation

    A. Achcarro and G. A. Palma, “The string swamp- land constraints require multi-field inflation,” JCAP, vol. 1902, p. 041, 2019, 1807.04390

  16. [16]

    Hyperinflation generalised: from its attractor mechanism to its tension with the `swampland conjectures'

    T. Bjorkmo and M. C. D. Marsh, “Hyperinflation gener- alised: from its attractor mechanism to its tension with the ‘swampland conjectures’,” 2019, 1901.08603

  17. [17]

    Hyper non-Gaussianities in inflation with strongly non-geodesic motion,

    J. Fumagalli, S. Garcia-Saenz, L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel, and J. Ronayne, “Hyper non-Gaussianities in inflation with strongly non-geodesic motion,” 2019, 1902.03221

  18. [18]

    The rapid-turn inflationary attractor

    T. Bjorkmo, “The rapid-turn inflationary attractor,” 2019, 1902.10529

  19. [19]

    At- tractors, Bifurcations and Curvature in Multi-field Infla- tion,

    P. Christodoulidis, D. Roest, and E. Sfakianakis, “At- tractors, Bifurcations and Curvature in Multi-field Infla- tion,” 2019, 1903.03513

  20. [20]

    Scal- ing attractors in multi-field inflation,

    P. Christodoulidis, D. Roest, and E. I. Sfakianakis, “Scal- ing attractors in multi-field inflation,” 2019, 1903.06116

  21. [21]

    Multi-field Infla- tion in High-Slope Potentials,

    V. Aragam, S. Paban, and R. Rosati, “Multi-field Infla- tion in High-Slope Potentials,” 2019, 1905.07495

  22. [22]

    The Effective Field Theory of Inflation

    C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and L. Senatore, “The Effective Field Theory of Infla- tion,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 014, 2008, 0709.0293

  23. [23]

    Signatures of Supersymmetry from the Early Universe

    D. Baumann and D. Green, “Signatures of Supersym- metry from the Early Universe,” Phys. Rev. , vol. D85, p. 103520, 2012, 1109.0292

  24. [24]

    Effective field theory approach to quasi-single field inflation and effects of heavy fields

    T. Noumi, M. Yamaguchi, and D. Yokoyama, “Effec- tive field theory approach to quasi-single field inflation and effects of heavy fields,” JHEP, vol. 06, p. 051, 2013, 1211.1624

  25. [25]

    Effective field theory of weakly coupled inflationary models

    R. Gwyn, G. A. Palma, M. Sakellariadou, and S. Syp- sas, “Effective field theory of weakly coupled inflationary models,” JCAP, vol. 1304, p. 004, 2013, 1210.3020

  26. [26]

    Non-Gaussianity as a Particle Detector

    H. Lee, D. Baumann, and G. L. Pimentel, “Non- Gaussianity as a Particle Detector,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 040, 2016, 1607.03735

  27. [27]

    The Effective Theory of Shift-Symmetric Cosmologies

    B. Finelli, G. Goon, E. Pajer, and L. Santoni, “The Ef- fective Theory of Shift-Symmetric Cosmologies,” JCAP, vol. 1805, no. 05, p. 060, 2018, 1802.01580

  28. [28]

    The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,” 2018, 1811.00024

  29. [29]

    On the Scalar Field Dynamics in a Spatially Flat Friedman Universe,

    A. G. Muslimov, “On the Scalar Field Dynamics in a Spatially Flat Friedman Universe,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 7, pp. 231–237, 1990

  30. [30]

    Nonlinear evolution of long wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary mod- els,

    D. S. Salopek and J. R. Bond, “Nonlinear evolution of long wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary mod- els,” Phys. Rev., vol. D42, pp. 3936–3962, 1990

  31. [31]

    The Scalar field as dynamical variable in inflation,

    J. E. Lidsey, “The Scalar field as dynamical variable in inflation,” Phys. Lett., vol. B273, pp. 42–46, 1991

  32. [32]

    Reconstructing the Inflaton Potential---in Principle and in Practice

    E. J. Copeland, E. W. Kolb, A. R. Liddle, and J. E. Lid- sey, “Reconstructing the inflation potential, in principle and in practice,” Phys. Rev. , vol. D48, pp. 2529–2547, 1993, hep-ph/9303288

  33. [33]

    Hidden supersymmetry of domain walls and cosmologies

    K. Skenderis and P. K. Townsend, “Hidden supersymme- try of domain walls and cosmologies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 96, p. 191301, 2006, hep-th/0602260

  34. [34]

    Hamilton-Jacobi method for Domain Walls and Cosmologies

    K. Skenderis and P. K. Townsend, “Hamilton-Jacobi method for curved domain walls and cosmologies,” Phys. Rev., vol. D74, p. 125008, 2006, hep-th/0609056

  35. [35]

    Non-Gaussianity beyond slow roll in multi-field inflation

    C. T. Byrnes and G. Tasinato, “Non-Gaussianity beyond slow roll in multi-field inflation,”JCAP, vol. 0908, p. 016, 2009, 0906.0767

  36. [36]

    The covariance of multi-field perturbations, pseudo-susy and f_NL

    P. M. Saffin, “The covariance of multi-field perturbations, pseudo-susy and fNL,” JCAP, vol. 1209, p. 002, 2012, 1203.0397

  37. [37]

    Multi-field inflation from holography

    J. Garriga, K. Skenderis, and Y. Urakawa, “Multi-field inflation from holography,” JCAP, vol. 1501, no. 01, p. 028, 2015, 1410.3290

  38. [38]

    $\delta N$ formalism from superpotential and holography

    J. Garriga, Y. Urakawa, and F. Vernizzi, “δN formalism from superpotential and holography,” JCAP, vol. 1602, no. 02, p. 036, 2016, 1509.07339

  39. [39]

    Constraints on holographic multi-field inflation and models based on the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism

    A. Ach´ ucarro, S. Cespedes, A.-C. Davis, and G. A. Palma, “Constraints on holographic multi-field infla- tion,” 2018, 1809.05341

  40. [40]

    A simple exact model of quasi-single-field inflation,

    Y. Welling, “A simple exact model of quasi-single-field inflation,” In Preparation

  41. [41]

    Multicomponent de Sitter (Inflation- ary) Stages and the Generation of Perturbations,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “Multicomponent de Sitter (Inflation- ary) Stages and the Generation of Perturbations,” JETP Lett., vol. 42, pp. 152–155, 1985. [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.42,124(1985)]

  42. [42]

    A General Analytic Formula for the Spectral Index of the Density Perturbations produced during Inflation

    M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart, “A General analytic for- mula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation,” Prog. Theor. Phys. , vol. 95, pp. 71–78, 1996, astro-ph/9507001

  43. [43]

    Super-Horizon Scale Dynamics of Multi-Scalar Inflation

    M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, “Superhorizon scale dynam- ics of multiscalar inflation,” Prog. Theor. Phys., vol. 99, pp. 763–782, 1998, gr-qc/9801017

  44. [44]

    A New delta N Formalism for Multi-Component Inflation

    H.-C. Lee, M. Sasaki, E. D. Stewart, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, “A New delta N formalism for multi- component inflation,” JCAP, vol. 0510, p. 004, 2005, astro-ph/0506262

  45. [45]

    A. A. Abolhasani, H. Firouzjahi, A. Naruko, and M. Sasaki, Delta N Formalism in Cosmological Perturba- tion Theory. WSP, 2019

  46. [46]

    Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models

    J. M. Maldacena, “Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 013, 2003, astro-ph/0210603

  47. [47]

    Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function

    P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga, “Single field consis- tency relation for the 3-point function,” JCAP, vol. 0410, p. 006, 2004, astro-ph/0407059

  48. [48]

    PyTransport: A Python package for the calculation of inflationary correlation functions

    D. J. Mulryne and J. W. Ronayne, “PyTransport: A Python package for the calculation of inflationary corre- lation functions,” 2016, 1609.00381

  49. [49]

    Numerically evaluating the bispectrum in curved field-space - with PyTransport 2.0

    J. W. Ronayne and D. J. Mulryne, “Numerically eval- uating the bispectrum in curved field-space with Py- Transport 2.0,” JCAP, vol. 1801, no. 01, p. 023, 2018, 1708.07130

  50. [50]

    Numerical evaluation of the bispectrum in multiple field inflation

    M. Dias, J. Frazer, D. J. Mulryne, and D. Seery, “Numer- ical evaluation of the bispectrum in multiple field infla- tionthe transport approach with code,” JCAP, vol. 1612, no. 12, p. 033, 2016, 1609.00379

  51. [51]

    CppTransport: a platform to automate calculation of inflationary correlation functions

    D. Seery, “CppTransport: a platform to automate cal- culation of inflationary correlation functions,” 2016, 1609.00380

  52. [52]

    On the origin of ultra-light fields during inflation and 7 their primordial non-Gaussianity,

    A. Ach´ ucarro, G. A. Palma, D.-G. Wang, and Y. Welling, “On the origin of ultra-light fields during inflation and 7 their primordial non-Gaussianity,” In Preparation

  53. [53]

    Density perturbations arising from multiple field slow-roll inflation

    S. Groot Nibbelink and B. J. W. van Tent, “Density per- turbations arising from multiple field slow roll inflation,” 2000, hep-ph/0011325

  54. [54]

    Scalar perturbations during multiple field slow-roll inflation,

    S. Groot Nibbelink and B. J. W. van Tent, “Scalar perturbations during multiple field slow-roll inflation,” Class. Quant. Grav. , vol. 19, pp. 613–640, 2002, hep- ph/0107272

  55. [55]

    Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum

    A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, “Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum,” JCAP, vol. 1101, p. 030, 2011, 1010.3693

  56. [56]

    Cosmic inflation in a landscape of heavy-fields

    S. Cespedes and G. A. Palma, “Cosmic inflation in a landscape of heavy-fields,” JCAP, vol. 1310, p. 051, 2013, 1303.4703

  57. [57]

    The inflationary prediction for primordial non-gaussianity

    D. H. Lyth and Y. Rodriguez, “The Inflationary predic- tion for primordial non-Gaussianity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 95, p. 121302, 2005, astro-ph/0504045

  58. [58]

    Primordial non-gaussianities from multiple-field inflation

    D. Seery and J. E. Lidsey, “Primordial non-Gaussianities from multiple-field inflation,” JCAP, vol. 0509, p. 011, 2005, astro-ph/0506056

  59. [59]

    A geometrical approach to nonlinear perturbations in relativistic cosmology

    D. Langlois and F. Vernizzi, “A geometrical approach to nonlinear perturbations in relativistic cosmology,” Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 27, p. 124007, 2010, 1003.3270

  60. [60]

    A covariant approach to general field space metric in multi-field inflation

    J.-O. Gong and T. Tanaka, “A covariant approach to general field space metric in multi-field inflation,” JCAP, vol. 1103, p. 015, 2011, 1101.4809. [Erratum: JCAP1202,E01(2012)]

  61. [61]

    The inflationary bispectrum with curved field-space

    J. Elliston, D. Seery, and R. Tavakol, “The inflationary bispectrum with curved field-space,” JCAP, vol. 1211, p. 060, 2012, 1208.6011

  62. [62]

    Adiabatic and entropy perturbations from inflation

    C. Gordon, D. Wands, B. A. Bassett, and R. Maartens, “Adiabatic and entropy perturbations from inflation,” Phys. Rev., vol. D63, p. 023506, 2001, astro-ph/0009131. VI. KINEMATICAL TWO-FIELD ANALYSIS In this appendix we recap the main elements of the kinematical analysis of two-field inflationary models of the form S = 1 2 ∫ d4x√−g [ M2 pR−Gab∂µφa∂µφb− 2V (φa...

  63. [63]

    of the coupled system of perturbations (described in Eq. 45). The time-dependence of the inflationary back- ground induces the geometrical and centrifugal contribu- tions to the entropy mass. VII. HAMILTON-JACOBI FORMALISM A. Hamilton-Jacobi for two fields To reconstruct the potential in the neighbourhood of a given background trajectory we use a generaliza...

  64. [64]

    The first contribution is sourced by initial curvature perturba- tions whereσ0 = 0

    there are two uncorrelated contributions to ˆR. The first contribution is sourced by initial curvature perturba- tions whereσ0 = 0. This corresponds to a constant mode R0 that freezes out on super-Hubble scales. The second contribution is sourced by initial isocurvature perturba- tions where R0 = 0 and grows on superhorizon scales. Using the typical amplit...