REVIEW 1 cited by
How to Manipulate CNNs to Make Them Lie: the GradCAM Case
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
How to Manipulate CNNs to Make Them Lie: the GradCAM Case
read the original abstract
Recently many methods have been introduced to explain CNN decisions. However, it has been shown that some methods can be sensitive to manipulation of the input. We continue this line of work and investigate the explanation method GradCAM. Instead of manipulating the input, we consider an adversary that manipulates the model itself to attack the explanation. By changing weights and architecture, we demonstrate that it is possible to generate any desired explanation, while leaving the model's accuracy essentially unchanged. This illustrates that GradCAM cannot explain the decision of every CNN and provides a proof of concept showing that it is possible to obfuscate the inner workings of a CNN. Finally, we combine input and model manipulation. To this end we put a backdoor in the network: the explanation is correct unless there is a specific pattern present in the input, which triggers a malicious explanation. Our work raises new security concerns, especially in settings where explanations of models may be used to make decisions, such as in the medical domain.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Why Do You Say It Like That? A Phoneme-Level Framework for Explainable Speech Deepfake Detection
Phoneme-aligned Grad-CAM on a WavLM-CNN detector reveals significant attack- and speaker-dependent importance of vowels, fricatives and pauses for spoof vs bona-fide decisions on ASVspoof 5.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.