High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:1910.09569 v2 · submitted 21 Oct 2019
Inverse see-saw neutrino masses in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity
The paper says
“We show that the inverse see-saw is the most natural way of implementing neutrino masses in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity.”
from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier
Reviews
Reviews by people
No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.
The paper
Abstract
We show that the inverse see-saw is the most natural way of implementing neutrino masses in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity. The three extra quasi-Dirac neutrinos are needed to cancel the quadratically divergent contributions of the mirror leptons to the Higgs mass. If the T-parity of the heavy neutrino singlets is chosen to be even, their contributions to lepton flavor violating transitions are one-loop finite. The most stringent limits on this scenario result from the non-observation of these transitions. Constraints on neutrino mixing imply an upper bound on the mass of the T-odd mirror leptons at the reach of the LHC and/or future colliders.
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00
What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.69 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.25 · compares with prior results 0.34 · mentions code or data availability 0.01
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.
| Sentence | Role | The authors' own work | States the main conclusion | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We show that the inverse see-saw is the most natural way of implementing neutrino masses in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity. | result 0.62 | 0.86 | 0.87 | asserted 1.00 |
| The three extra quasi-Dirac neutrinos are needed to cancel the quadratically divergent contributions of the mirror leptons to the Higgs mass. | result 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| If the T-parity of the heavy neutrino singlets is chosen to be even, their contributions to lepton flavor violating transitions are one-loop finite. | result 0.97 | 0.70 | 0.08 | asserted 0.91 |
| The most stringent limits on this scenario result from the non-observation of these transitions. | result 0.72 | 0.32 | 0.09 | asserted 1.00 |
| Constraints on neutrino mixing imply an upper bound on the mass of the T-odd mirror leptons at the reach of the LHC and/or future colliders. | result 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.18 | asserted 0.96 |
What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.62
What was examined, and what was not
Sources read
- arXiv listing abstract v2
Not examined
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
Levels run
- P abstract
Not run
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
How the labels were made
Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,262 input tokens.
Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON
How the literature uses it
10 arXiv papers cite this in 20 sentences
Papers citing it · 10 sentences without a confident label
Builds on it 1 paper
-
A mechanism to accommodate neutrino masses in the new LHT model, completing the work in [ref] , will also be presented elsewhere.
A new and gauge-invariant Littlest Higgs model with T-parity · Conclusions and outlook · 0.80
Compares with it 1 paper
-
On the other hand, the matrices $W≡V^ℓ^c_-†_L V_L^H$ and $Z≡(V^χ_R)^†V^H_R$ introduced in [ref] are both the identity in our model, since now the T-odd combination of the mirror-partner leptons and the T-even combination of the $χ$ receive their masses from the same Yukawa Lagrangian $_Y_H$.
A new and gauge-invariant Littlest Higgs model with T-parity · Fermion masses and mixings · 0.95
Cites it as support 1 paper
-
However, we prefer to keep the structure of the original Yukawa Lagrangian to give masses of order $κf$ to mirror fermions, compatible with gauge invariance [ref] .
Phenomenological implications of the new Littlest Higgs model with T-parity · Fermion sector · 0.96
Cites it as background 7 papers
-
For a T-parity transformation it is common to contemplate two options [ref] : a) Ψ_1ΩΣ_0Ψ_2, b) Ψ_1-Σ_0Ψ_2.
A new and gauge-invariant Littlest Higgs model with T-parity · Fermion sector · 0.84
-
LFV has been extensively studied within this model [ref] .
Lepton flavor violation within the Simplest Little Higgs model · Introduction · 0.94
-
Among the various seesaw mechanism models, the inverse seesaw extended Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric SM (ISS-NMSSM) [ref] has generated particular interest.
Anomalous Muon Magnetic Moment in the Inverse Seesaw Extended Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model · Introduction · 0.89
What it cites · 44 sentences without a confident label
Uses data or values from 6 papers
-
Quasi–Dirac neutrino masses and mixings are only bounded on the other hand by their direct production limit, which for $M$ is currently of the order of $M_W$ [ref] , [Quasi–Dirac neutrinos are mainly produced by the exchange of $W^±$, $Z$ and $h$ at the LHC (see Eqs. ([ref]) and ([ref])) [ref] .
Search for heavy neutral leptons in events with three charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV · Conclusions · 0.93
-
In the top part of Table [ref] we collect the limits from EWPD obtained assuming that each heavy neutrino only mixes with one light neutrino of definite flavor and that only one mixing is non–vanishing at a time [ref] .
Effects of new leptons in Electroweak Precision Data · LFV limits · 0.93
-
In the top part of Table [ref] we collect the limits from EWPD obtained assuming that each heavy neutrino only mixes with one light neutrino of definite flavor and that only one mixing is non–vanishing at a time [ref] .
Electroweak limits on physics beyond the Standard Model · LFV limits · 0.93
Cites as support 1 paper
-
As they must do the extra leptons (partner doublets) in $SO(5)$ multiplets, $ψ'_R$ in Eq. ([ref]), for they must be also included in order to keep the LFV Higgs decay amplitudes into charged leptons one–loop finite [ref] .
Lepton Flavor Changing Higgs decays in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity · Neutrino masses in the LHT · 0.96
Cites as background 26 papers
-
Let us introduce the LHT to fix our notation and assumptions [ref] .
Precise limits from lepton flavour violating processes on the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity · Neutrino masses in the LHT · 0.98
-
Let us introduce the LHT to fix our notation and assumptions [ref] .
Lepton Flavor Changing Higgs decays in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity · Neutrino masses in the LHT · 0.98
-
The LHT has the matter content to account for see–saw mechanisms of type I and II [ref] .
Complex Spinors and Unified Theories · Introduction · 0.91
Challenges and discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.
Come back by email
A short list of the week's newly reviewed papers. Nothing is sent until you confirm from your inbox, and every email has a link that stops it. No account.
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment