REVIEW 3 cited by
FMix: Enhancing Mixed Sample Data Augmentation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Mixed Sample Data Augmentation (MSDA) has received increasing attention in recent years, with many successful variants such as MixUp and CutMix. By studying the mutual information between the function learned by a VAE on the original data and on the augmented data we show that MixUp distorts learned functions in a way that CutMix does not. We further demonstrate this by showing that MixUp acts as a form of adversarial training, increasing robustness to attacks such as Deep Fool and Uniform Noise which produce examples similar to those generated by MixUp. We argue that this distortion prevents models from learning about sample specific features in the data, aiding generalisation performance. In contrast, we suggest that CutMix works more like a traditional augmentation, improving performance by preventing memorisation without distorting the data distribution. However, we argue that an MSDA which builds on CutMix to include masks of arbitrary shape, rather than just square, could further prevent memorisation whilst preserving the data distribution in the same way. To this end, we propose FMix, an MSDA that uses random binary masks obtained by applying a threshold to low frequency images sampled from Fourier space. These random masks can take on a wide range of shapes and can be generated for use with one, two, and three dimensional data. FMix improves performance over MixUp and CutMix, without an increase in training time, for a number of models across a range of data sets and problem settings, obtaining a new single model state-of-the-art result on CIFAR-10 without external data. Finally, we show that a consequence of the difference between interpolating MSDA such as MixUp and masking MSDA such as FMix is that the two can be combined to improve performance even further. Code for all experiments is provided at https://github.com/ecs-vlc/FMix .
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
AGVBench: A Reliability-Oriented Benchmark of Data Augmentation for Vein Recognition
On vein-recognition benchmarks, mixup-style augmentations win on clean accuracy but hurt calibration and adversarial robustness, while simple geometric transforms usually hurt performance.
-
MoEcho: Exploiting Side-Channel Attacks to Compromise User Privacy in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
MoEcho claims to compromise user privacy in MoE LLMs and VLMs via four CPU and GPU side channels, but the provided manuscript body contains no supporting content.
-
InstructMixup: Instruction-Guided Salient Patch Editing for Robust Data Augmentation
InstructMixup augments images by using a saliency map to select patches, editing them with an offline instruction-guided generative model, adding fractal texture, and blending the result back into the same image, impr...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.