Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:2003.01788 v2 · submitted 3 Mar 2020

Higgs portal to dark matter and B → K(*) decays

Aliaksei Kachanovich, Ulrich Nierste, Ivan Nišandžić

The paper says

“Then we revisit the b → sh2 phenomenology and point out that a simultaneous study of B → K*h2 and B → Kh2 helps to discriminate between the Higgs portal and alternative models of the Dark Sector.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We consider a Higgs portal model in which the 125-GeV Higgs boson mixes with a light singlet mediator h2 coupling to particles of a Dark Sector and study potential b → sh2 decays in the Belle II experiment. Multiplying the gauge-dependent off-shell Standard-Model b-s-Higgs vertex with the sine of the Higgs mixing angle does not give the correct b-s-h2 vertex. We clarify this issue by calculating the b-s-h2 vertex in an arbitrary Rξ gauge and demonstrate how the ξ dependence cancels from physical decay rates involving an on-shell or off-shell h2. Then we revisit the b → sh2 phenomenology and point out that a simultaneous study of B → K*h2 and B → Kh2 helps to discriminate between the Higgs portal and alternative models of the Dark Sector. We further advocate for the use of the h2 lifetime information contained in displaced-vertex data with h2 decaying back to Standard-Model particles to better constrain the h2 mass or to reveal additional h2 decay modes into long-lived particles.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.62

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.26 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.56 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v2). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We consider a Higgs portal model in which the 125-GeV Higgs boson mixes with a light singlet mediator $h_2$ coupling to particles of a Dark Sector and study potential $b\to s h_2$ decays in the Belle II experiment. contribution 0.95 0.71 0.09 asserted 0.53
Multiplying the gauge-dependent off-shell Standard-Model $b$-$s$-Higgs vertex with the sine of the Higgs mixing angle does not give the correct $b$-$s$-$h_2$ vertex. gap 0.58 0.25 0.19 asserted 1.00
We clarify this issue by calculating the $b$-$s$-$h_2$ vertex in an arbitrary $R_\xi$ gauge and demonstrate how the $\xi$ dependence cancels from physical decay rates involving an on-shell or off-shell $h_2$. contribution 0.60 0.95 0.22 asserted 1.00
Then we revisit the $b\to s h_2$ phenomenology and point out that a simultaneous study of $B\to K^* h_2$ and $B\to K h_2$ helps to discriminate between the Higgs portal and alternative models of the Dark Sector. contribution 0.63 0.69 0.28 asserted 0.62
We further advocate for the use of the $h_2$ lifetime information contained in displaced-vertex data with $h_2$ decaying back to Standard-Model particles to better constrain the $h_2$ mass or to reveal additional $h_2$ decay modes into long-lived particles. future work 0.89 0.30 0.16 hedged possibility 0.59

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v2

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,664 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 8 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

18 arXiv papers cite this in 20 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 17 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 3 papers

What it cites · 16 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 2 papers
Uses the method or tool of 4 papers
  • We further use the FeynArts package [ref] for generating the amplitudes and the FeynCalc [ref] , Package-X [ref] , and FeynHelpers [ref] packages to evaluate the analytic expressions for the Feynman diagrams.

    FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements · The $s̅ bh_2$ vertex in the $R_ξ$ gauge · 1.00

  • We further use the FeynArts package [ref] for generating the amplitudes and the FeynCalc [ref] , Package-X [ref] , and FeynHelpers [ref] packages to evaluate the analytic expressions for the Feynman diagrams.

    Package-X: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals · The $s̅ bh_2$ vertex in the $R_ξ$ gauge · 1.00

  • We further use the FeynArts package [ref] for generating the amplitudes and the FeynCalc [ref] , Package-X [ref] , and FeynHelpers [ref] packages to evaluate the analytic expressions for the Feynman diagrams.

    New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0 · The $s̅ bh_2$ vertex in the $R_ξ$ gauge · 1.00

Uses data or values from 7 papers
Compares with 9 papers
  • In Fig:combination we compare the reach of the Belle II experiment to displaced vertices of $h_2$ including both $B→K h_2$ and $B→K^∗h_2$ processes and decays of $h_2$ to $(ππ+ K K), μ^+μ^-, τ^+τ^-$ with the existing search limit of the LHCb experiment [ref] .[We use the result of Ref. [ref] for the LHCb search limit on $B(B→K h_2[→μ^+μ^-])$.] We also compare to projected sensitivities of other proposed experiments, Mathusla [ref] , SHiP [ref] , CODEX b [ref] and FASER 2 [ref] .

    Decay and Detection of a Light Scalar Boson Mixing with the Higgs · $B →K^∗ h_2$ · 0.82

  • In Fig:combination we compare the reach of the Belle II experiment to displaced vertices of $h_2$ including both $B→K h_2$ and $B→K^∗h_2$ processes and decays of $h_2$ to $(ππ+ K K), μ^+μ^-, τ^+τ^-$ with the existing search limit of the LHCb experiment [ref] .[We use the result of Ref. [ref] for the LHCb search limit on $B(B→K h_2[→μ^+μ^-])$.] We also compare to projected sensitivities of other proposed experiments, Mathusla [ref] , SHiP [ref] , CODEX b [ref] and FASER 2 [ref] .

    A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case · $B →K^∗ h_2$ · 0.82

  • In Fig:combination we compare the reach of the Belle II experiment to displaced vertices of $h_2$ including both $B→K h_2$ and $B→K^∗h_2$ processes and decays of $h_2$ to $(ππ+ K K), μ^+μ^-, τ^+τ^-$ with the existing search limit of the LHCb experiment [ref] .[We use the result of Ref. [ref] for the LHCb search limit on $B(B→K h_2[→μ^+μ^-])$.] We also compare to projected sensitivities of other proposed experiments, Mathusla [ref] , SHiP [ref] , CODEX b [ref] and FASER 2 [ref] .

    Search for long-lived scalar particles in $B^+ \to K^+ \chi (\mu^+\mu^-)$ decays · $B →K^∗ h_2$ · 0.82

Cites as background 10 papers
  • A viable scenario involves a gauge singlet Higgs field which mixes with the SM Higgs field through appropriate terms in the Higgs potential, resulting in a dominantly SU(2)-doublet Higgs boson $h_1$ with mass 125 GeV and an additional Higgs boson $h_2$ with a priori arbitrary mass [ref] .

    Probing Light Thermal Dark-Matter With a Higgs Portal Mediator · Introduction · 0.93

  • A viable scenario involves a gauge singlet Higgs field which mixes with the SM Higgs field through appropriate terms in the Higgs potential, resulting in a dominantly SU(2)-doublet Higgs boson $h_1$ with mass 125 GeV and an additional Higgs boson $h_2$ with a priori arbitrary mass [ref] .

    Constraining Higgs mediated dark matter interactions · Introduction · 0.93

  • Phenomenological studies of the scenario were recently performed in Refs. [ref] .

    Probing dark sectors with long-lived particles at BELLE II · Introduction · 0.97

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment