Pith. sign in

REVIEW

IITK-RSA at SemEval-2020 Task 5: Detecting Counterfactuals

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.10866 v1 pith:3RQ3IK46 submitted 2020-07-21 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

IITK-RSA at SemEval-2020 Task 5: Detecting Counterfactuals

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords taskapproachescounterfactualcounterfactualsdetectingeventsexpressionsinvolved
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper describes our efforts in tackling Task 5 of SemEval-2020. The task involved detecting a class of textual expressions known as counterfactuals and separating them into their constituent elements. Counterfactual statements describe events that have not or could not have occurred and the possible implications of such events. While counterfactual reasoning is natural for humans, understanding these expressions is difficult for artificial agents due to a variety of linguistic subtleties. Our final submitted approaches were an ensemble of various fine-tuned transformer-based and CNN-based models for the first subtask and a transformer model with dependency tree information for the second subtask. We ranked 4-th and 9-th in the overall leaderboard. We also explored various other approaches that involved the use of classical methods, other neural architectures and the incorporation of different linguistic features.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.