REVIEW 2 cited by
Neural Empirical Bayes: Source Distribution Estimation and its Applications to Simulation-Based Inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We revisit empirical Bayes in the absence of a tractable likelihood function, as is typical in scientific domains relying on computer simulations. We investigate how the empirical Bayesian can make use of neural density estimators first to use all noise-corrupted observations to estimate a prior or source distribution over uncorrupted samples, and then to perform single-observation posterior inference using the fitted source distribution. We propose an approach based on the direct maximization of the log-marginal likelihood of the observations, examining both biased and de-biased estimators, and comparing to variational approaches. We find that, up to symmetries, a neural empirical Bayes approach recovers ground truth source distributions. With the learned source distribution in hand, we show the applicability to likelihood-free inference and examine the quality of the resulting posterior estimates. Finally, we demonstrate the applicability of Neural Empirical Bayes on an inverse problem from collider physics.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Simulation-Prior Independent Neural Unfolding Procedure
SPINUP is a neural-unfolding method that fits a parton-level generative model directly to detector-level data through a learned forward simulator, aiming to remove the simulation-prior bias.
-
Toward an event-level analysis of hadron structure using differential programming
LOITS is a differentiable sampling method, demonstrated in a GAN closure test, that maps sampled events back to the parameters of a target density for event-level inference.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.