Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Emergent Complexity and Zero-shot Transfer via Unsupervised Environment Design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.02096 v2 pith:POQBUU4J submitted 2020-12-03 cs.LG cs.AIcs.MA

Emergent Complexity and Zero-shot Transfer via Unsupervised Environment Design

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.MA
keywords environmentsagentenvironmentantagonistdesigndistributiongeneratelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

A wide range of reinforcement learning (RL) problems - including robustness, transfer learning, unsupervised RL, and emergent complexity - require specifying a distribution of tasks or environments in which a policy will be trained. However, creating a useful distribution of environments is error prone, and takes a significant amount of developer time and effort. We propose Unsupervised Environment Design (UED) as an alternative paradigm, where developers provide environments with unknown parameters, and these parameters are used to automatically produce a distribution over valid, solvable environments. Existing approaches to automatically generating environments suffer from common failure modes: domain randomization cannot generate structure or adapt the difficulty of the environment to the agent's learning progress, and minimax adversarial training leads to worst-case environments that are often unsolvable. To generate structured, solvable environments for our protagonist agent, we introduce a second, antagonist agent that is allied with the environment-generating adversary. The adversary is motivated to generate environments which maximize regret, defined as the difference between the protagonist and antagonist agent's return. We call our technique Protagonist Antagonist Induced Regret Environment Design (PAIRED). Our experiments demonstrate that PAIRED produces a natural curriculum of increasingly complex environments, and PAIRED agents achieve higher zero-shot transfer performance when tested in highly novel environments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolution

    cs.CL 2023-09 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Promptbreeder evolves both task prompts and the mutation prompts that improve them using LLMs, outperforming Chain-of-Thought and Plan-and-Solve on arithmetic and commonsense reasoning benchmarks.

  2. Self-Modifying Lean Proof Agents with Verifier-Grounded Benchmark Coevolution

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A verifier-grounded self-evolving Lean proof agent with a champion-driven, self-hardening benchmark reached 45.1% held-out miniF2F solve rate versus 32.0% for a fixed-benchmark baseline.

  3. LEMUR: Learning to Align with Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning from Preference Feedback

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    LEMUR jointly learns a separate reward model for each teacher's preferences and uses them to train a population of multi-objective policies, beating baselines that merge feedback into one reward.

  4. Bridging Performance and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning for Agile Flight

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RL framework for agile drone racing combines task-aware switching and physically informed procedural track generation to achieve 7.4x better zero-shot generalization to unseen tracks while maintaining competitive speeds.

  5. Trading Human Curation for Synthetic Augmentation in RLVR

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    Gated synthetic augmentations of a 10-task human base substitute for ~87 extra human RLVR tasks on aggregate held-out pass@1, with cost-adjusted trade rate ρ_cost in [1.4×, 11.6×].

  6. Trading Human Curation for Synthetic Augmentation in RLVR

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Gated synthetic augmentations can substitute for additional human-authored RLVR tasks at a cost-adjusted trade rate of 1.4x-11.6x while retaining held-out generalization on ten benchmarks spanning code, instruction fo...

  7. Learning to Reason at the Frontier of Learnability

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A curriculum sampling questions with high variance in success rate improves reinforcement learning performance for LLM reasoning tasks.